3-3-Score Sheet -Architectural RFQ.pdf

PDF 125 KB Posted

Attached to
ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES RFQ
Solicitation number
SLCAIR26001
Issued by
Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah

About this file

This is an evaluation scoresheet for an on-call architectural services RFQ issued by the Salt Lake City Department of Airports (SLCDA) in Utah, designated as SLCAIR26001. The RFQ seeks qualified architectural firms to provide on-call services across three facilities: Salt Lake City International Airport, South Valley Regional Airport, and Tooele Valley Airport. The evaluation scoresheet establishes a 500-point maximum scoring structure for technical proposals, with evaluation criteria weighted as follows: Demonstrated Project Experience (35%), Organization, Resources, and Personnel (35%), Experience Blending Aesthetic & Architectural Concepts (20%), and Distinctive Quality (10%). Each criterion is scored on a scale of 0 to 5, with 0 representing failure to address requirements and 5 representing excellence in exceeding RFP requirements.

Respondents must meet mandatory minimum requirements to be considered, including maintenance of permanent local resources in the form of a physical office and full-time professional and support staff located in the Salt Lake City area and/or greater Wasatch Front region. Additionally, firms must be in good standing regarding any prior agreements or indebtedness with the City, as existing past due debt or failure to fulfill previous City agreements may result in rejection and disqualification. The scoresheet does not specify pricing terms, contract duration, renewal options, or award dates within this evaluation document.

View the file

Other files

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

Score will be assigned as follows:

0 = Fail, the proposal fails to address the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed du to missing information.

1 = Poor, the proposal inadequately addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP or cannot be assessed due to incomplete information.

2 = Unsatisfactory, the proposal addresses the requirements or criteria described in the RFP in an unsatisfactory manner.

3 = Satisfactory, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP in a minimum satisfactory manner.

4 = Good, the proposal addresses all requirements or criteria described in the RFP and in some respects exceeds them.

5 = Excellent, the proposal addresses and exceeds all of the requirements or criteria described in the RFP.

RFP Section Evaluation (Pass/Fail)

1 3.B

2 3.B

RFP Section Evaluator

Score (0-5) Criteria Weight

% of Tech Criteria

Points Possible Points Earned

1 6.A 35 35.0% 175.0 0.0 2 6.A 35 35.0% 175.0 0.0 3 6.A 20 20.0% 100.0 0.0 4 6.A 10 10.0% 50.0 0.0

100.0% 500.0 0.0

Possible Points Points Earned

100.00% 500.00 0.00

Demonstrated Project Experience

Total Technical Points

Organization, Resources, and Personnel

Experience Blending Aesthetic & Architectural Concepts Distinctive Quality

Scoreable Technical Criteria

ON-CALL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES RFQ

RFQ EVALUATION SCORESHEET

Firm Name:

Evaluator:

Date:

Minimum Mandatory Requirements

SOLICITATION # SLCAIR26001

Consideration will only be given to Respondents with permanent local resources, in the form of an office and full-time professional and support staff in the Salt Lake City area and/or along the greater Wasatch Front.

Respondent shall be in good standing with regard to prior agreements or indebtedness with the City. Any existing past due debt or any failure to fulfill the provisions of any previous Agreement with City may be cause for rejection of the Statement and disqualification of the Respondent.

Scorable Technical Criteria Total

Submittal 7

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .