3-2025.12.30-NWP Verify Encl-202300569.pdf

PDF 14 MB Posted Jul 17, 2026

Attached to: IFB - GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD CONSTRUCTION - Virgin River Bridge to River Road
Solicitation number: 26-296
Issued by: Washington County, Utah

About this file

Written by GovTribe AI · Jul 20, 2026

This is a Notification of Enclosure verification document from the City of St. George, Utah, related to an Invitation for Bids for George Washington Boulevard construction from the Virgin River Bridge to River Road. The document serves as an enclosure notification confirming that all required bid documents and supporting materials have been included with the bid submission. The project involves construction services for a municipal roadway improvement project, with bidders required to submit sealed bids in accordance with the city's procurement procedures and specifications outlined in the invitation for bids.

The bid submission requirements include a bid bond equal to five percent of the total bid amount issued by a surety company licensed in Utah, along with 100% payment and performance bonds upon award. The City of St. George reserves the right to reject any or all proposals and waive any formality or technicality in proposals as deemed in the city's interest. This enclosure verification ensures that bidders have submitted complete and compliant bid packages meeting all administrative and bonding requirements established for the competitive bidding process.

View the file

Other files

File	Type	Posted
10-Retaining Wall Design Package.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
7-Construction Plans 7-15-26 - George Washington Blvd Virgin River Bridge to River Road.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
9-Proposed Pedestrian Bridge Over GWB Geotechnical Report - Final 07-08-2026 - Reduced.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
2-2025.12.30-NWP Verify-202300569.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
5-26-296 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
6-GENERAL CONDITIONS rev 09.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
11-sample - CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
4-26-296 - BID DOCUMENTS.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
1-George Washington Parkway - Geotechnical Report - 10-21-2025 - Reduced.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
8-MAJOR SUBCONTRACTOR LISTING.pdf	PDF	Jul 17, 2026
12-26-296 Bid Schedule Worksheet.xlsx	XLSX spreadsheet	Jul 17, 2026

Show all 11

On GovTribe

Work with this file

Download the original file
Contacts named in this file
Similar government files
Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Try for free Login

Text version

The file's text, extracted by GovTribe without its formatting.

M p w

/h o r r o c k s p w

.b e n tl e y .c o m

:h o r r o c k s p w

/D o c u m e n ts

/P r o je c ts

/2 /U

T T

G e o r g e W a s h in g to n P k w y P h a s e I

I /P r o je c t

D a ta

/S h e e t_

F il e s /C o v e r /U

T T

R T it le

.d g n

P e r s o n a l

INTERSTATE

N E

V A

D A

IDAHO

J U A N

NAS

W A S H I N G T O N

S A

N P

E T

C A

C H

SALT

LAKE

D A V I S

W E B E R

M O R G A N

S E V I E R

W A Y N E

D A G G E T T

I R O N

B E A V E R

M I L L A R D

J U A B

T O O E L E

B O X E L D E R

G A R F I E L D

K A N E

E M E R Y

G R A N D

C A R B O N

S U M M I T

E R

G R

E E

E R

G R

E E

VER

J U

A N

SAN

C O L O R

A D

P O

W E

L L

L A

K E

LAKE

SALT

GREAT

ARIZONA

WYOMING

C O

L O

R A

D O

WASHINGTON COUNTY

ST. GEORGE CITY

CITY OF ST. GEORGE

PHASE II

GEORGE WASHINGTON PKWY

ST. GEORGE, UT

NO.

SHEET

HORROCKS PROJECT MANAGER

CLIENT APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE

DATE

VICINITY MAP

PLANS OF PROPOSED

INQUIRY NO. XX-XXX

RIVERSIDE DR

DIXIE DR

900 S

ST JAMES LN

E A

V E

B L

U F F S

E R

PROJECT LOCATION

GEORGE W

ASHIN

GTON B

LVD

N l2rdicdj Text Box Enclosure 1

TOTAL IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S.

AREA (AC) LENGTH (LN FT) FILL (CU YDS)

3.4 2,333

7,4570.5 798

TEMPORARY

PERMANENT

1 PHOTO LOCATION

AND DIRECTION

TOTAL PERMANENT IMPACTS

ROCK RIP-RAP

699 LN FT

0.44 ACRES

5,375 CU YDS

CONCRETE:

98.0 LN FT

0.08 ACRES

2,082 CU YDS

TOTAL TEMPORARY IMPACTS

ROAD STABILIZATION ROCK

1,057 LN FT

0.6 ACRES

887 CU YDS

IMPACTS TO WATERS OF THE U.S. (WETLANDS)

AREA (AC) LENGTH (LN FT) FILL (CU YDS)

0.53 N/A

9640.05 N/A

TEMPORARY

PERMANENT

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

R S

O F

U .S

R G

E W

D B

G E

. G

G E

B D.4

A D.5

A D.6

AERIAL IMAGE TAKEN 2022

VIRGIN

RIVER

TRANSITION TO EXISTING

EROSION PROTECTION

F 954 BRIDGE

(SEE BRIDGE PLANS)

EXISTING NRCS

EROSION PROTECTION

FT. PIERCE WASH

D.4ST. JAMES PARK

C R

Y W

A Y

ST. JAMES LANE

EXISTING EROSION

PROTECTION

E2813 PEDESTRIAN

UNDERPASS

TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNEL 1

1,652 LN FT

TEMPORARY HAUL ROAD

9,546 LN FT

TEMPORARY STREAM

CROSSING

TRACKING PAD

STAGING AREA 1

STAGING AREA 2

OHWM

WILLOW CLUSTER POLE

PLANTINGS

3,237 LN FT (1,942 CLUSTERS)

EXISTING ASPHALT TRAIL

OHWM

EXISTING ASPHALT TRAIL

TRACKING PAD

SEE DEWATERING PLAN

VIEW SHEET (4)

OHWM R2UB2

WETLAND (PSS1)

WETLAND (PEM5)

SURVEY AREA

A D.4

TEMPORARY DIVERSION CHANNEL 2

681 LN FT

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

2,406 CU YDS (243 LF)

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

8.9 CU YDS PER LF

890 CU YDS (100 LF)

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

1,346 CU YDS (136 LF)

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

1,772 CU YDS (179 LF)

PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTARY ROCK

RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION

(D50 = 30") 3.1 CU YDS PER LF

1,705 CU YDS (550 LF)

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

8.9 CU YDS PER LF

890 CU YDS (100 LF)

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

782 CU YDS (79 LF)

EP-D.3

EP-D.4

EP-D.1

EP-D.2

EP-D.1

EP-D.2

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.4 CU YDS PER LF

3,768 CU YDS (400 LF)

EP-D.2

A D.2

A D.3

A D.2

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.4 CU YDS PER LF

10,660 CU YDS (1,134 LF)

A D.2

A D.3

SEE DEWATERING PLAN

VIEW SHEET (4)

SURVEY AREA FOR BRIDGE

SURVEY AREA FOR ROADWAY

SURVEY AREA FOR

ROADWAY

SURVEY AREA FOR

BRIDGE

PROPOSED ROADWAY

VIRGIN RIVER TRAIL

NORTH REALIGNMENT

VIRGIN RIVER TRAIL

SOUTH REALIGNMENT

AutoCAD SHX Text 05/19/2025

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-19-001

AutoCAD SHX Text

WJP

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

PERMIT

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text 200'

AutoCAD SHX Text 400'

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1"=200'

l2rdicdj

Enclosure 2

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

2,406 CU YDS (243 LF)

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

8.9 CU YDS PER LF

890 CU YDS (100 LF)

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

1,346 CU YDS (136 LF)

LEGEND

EROSION HAZARD BOUNDARY (2009 STUDY)

AERIAL IMAGE: 2022

VIRGIN

RIVER

FUTURE ROADWAY EROSION PROTECTION

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

EP 1

O N

P R

N P

R G

E W

D . E

O N

. G

G E

RIVERSIDE DR.

ST. JAMES PARK

EFFECTIVE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (2009 FIS)

TRANSITION TO EXISTING

EROSION PROTECTION

FUTURE GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD.A

D.2

A D.1

A D.2

TIE IN TO EXISTING

EROSION PROTECTION

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

1,772 CU YDS (179 LF)

PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTARY ROCK

RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

3.1 CU YDS PER LF

1,705 CU YDS (550 LF)

F 954 BRIDGE

D.3

IE D

EXISTING NRCS

EROSION PROTECTION

Jared W.

BatesP

R O

S I ONAL ENG

I N E

E R

S T

A T E O F U

T A

O . 78868

A D.4

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

8.9 CU YDS PER LF

890 CU YDS (100 LF)

A D.1

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

782 CU YDS (79 LF)

A D.4

E2813

PEDESTRIAN

UNDERPASS

FUTURE ROADWAY EROSION PROTECTION

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text 200'

AutoCAD SHX Text 400'

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1"=200'

AutoCAD SHX Text 6/15/2023

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-22-004

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

LEGEND

EROSION HAZARD BOUNDARY (2009 STUDY)

AERIAL IMAGE: 2022

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

EP 2

O N

P R

N P

R G

E W

D . E

O N

. G

G E

ST. JAMES PARK

EFFECTIVE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (2009 FIS)

EAST ABUTMENT

Jared W.

BatesP

R O

S I ONAL ENG

E R

S T

A T E O F U

O . 78868

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

8.9 CU YDS PER LF

890 CU YDS (100 LF)

A D.1

F 954 BRIDGE

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

2,406 CU YDS (243 LF)

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

1,346 CU YDS (136 LF)

A D.2

AutoCAD SHX Text 2542.30

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2541.80

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2541.69

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2541.51

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2541.36

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2538.47

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2539.30

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text 50'

AutoCAD SHX Text 100'

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1"=50'

AutoCAD SHX Text 6/15/2023

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-22-004

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

AERIAL IMAGE: 2022

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

EP 3

O N

P R

N P

T A

R G

E W

D . E

O N

. G

G E

ST. JAMES PARK

EFFECTIVE 100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (2009 FIS)

TIE IN TO EXISTING

EROSION PROTECTION

PROPOSED SUPPLEMENTARY ROCK

RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

3.1 CU YDS PER LF

1,705 CU YDS (550 LF)

A D.3

TRANSITION TO EXISTING

EROSION PROTECTION

EXISTING NRCS

EROSION PROTECTION

Jared W.

BatesP

R O

S I ONAL ENG

I N E

E R

S T

A T E O F U

. 78868

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

1,772 CU YDS (179 LF)

A D.4

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

9.9 CU YDS PER LF

782 CU YDS (79 LF)

A D.4

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

8.9 CU YDS PER LF

890 CU YDS (100 LF)

A D.1

F 954 BRIDGE

AutoCAD SHX Text

MATCH

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text

MATCH

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2539.44

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2538.08

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2541.07

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2541.07

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2541.07

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2541.00

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2540.78

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2540.78

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2540.78

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2540.73

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text 2540.67

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text

TRANSITION

AutoCAD SHX Text

RIP-RAP

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text 80'

AutoCAD SHX Text 160'

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1"=80'

AutoCAD SHX Text 6/15/2023

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-22-004

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

(3' DRAPE BOTH ENDS)

EXISTING GROUND

FILL VOIDS IN RIP-RAP

WITH SEDIMENT

(AVAILABLE ON-SITE)

100 YEAR WSEL

F 954 BRIDGE

ABUTMENT

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD.

RIVER FL

31'

11.3'

2:1 SLOPE

1:1

OPE

19.7'

ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

5' M

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

. G

R G

E G

G E

W A

N B

. E X

O N

P R

N D

EP-D.1SCALE: 1"=5'

A ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION - ABUTMENT FACE

RIP-RAP CONSTRUCTION NOTES

1. AVERAGE ROCK SIZE, D50=30". USE ANGULAR-SHAPED ROCK FREE FROM CRACKS, OVERBURDEN, SHALE; WITH A MINIMUM DENSITY OF 156 LB. PER CUBIC FT. (SPECIFIC GRAVITY = 2.50), WITH THE BREADTH OR THICKNESS OF A SINGLE STONE NOT LESS THAN ONE THIRD ITS LENGTH. FURNISH ROCK GRADED AS INDICATED IN THE TABLE. ALL ROCK RIP-RAP SHALL BE INSPECTED BY

THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL.

2. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE MIRIFI 180 N 8 OZ. NON WOVEN GEO-TEXTILE OR APPROVED EQUAL. FABRIC SHALL BE PLACED AS SHOWN HEREON AND INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURE'S INSTRUCTIONS. CARE SHALL BE TAKEN TO PREVENT FABRIC

FROM TEARING DURING ROCK PLACEMENT.

3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FILL VOIDS IN RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION WITH SEDIMENT USING WATER JETTING OR OTHER APPROVED METHODS. ALL ROCK RIP-RAP SHALL BE INSPECTED BY THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO SEDIMENT PLACEMENT.

4. ALL UNSUITABLE VEGETATION AND WOODY DEBRIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE WORK AREA AND DISPOSED OF

PROPERLY OFFSITE.

5. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND STATE OF UTAH PERMIT REQUIREMENT & CONDITIONS.

6. RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION REPAIR TERMINATION LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY ENGINEER BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.

ROCK GRADATION

D100 42" D75 36" D50 30" D25 18"

MIN SIZE 12"

QUANTITIES

ROCK RIP-RAP D50=30": 8.9 CU YDS PER LF

FILTER FABRIC: 5.2 SQ YDS PER LF

Jared W.

BatesP

R O

S I ONAL ENG

I N E

E R

S T

T E O F U T

. 78868

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-22-004

AutoCAD SHX Text 6/15/2023

5'26'

6' 9.

9.5'21.5'

2:1 SLOPE

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

(3' DRAPE BOTH ENDS)

FILL VOIDS IN RIP-RAP

WITH SEDIMENT

(AVAILABLE ON-SITE)

1:1

OPE

31'

100 YEAR WSEL 1'

ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

EXISTING GROUND

3:1 SLOPE, TYP.

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD.VARIES 10' TO 20'

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

. G

R G

E G

G E

W A

N B

. E X

O N

P R

N D

EP-D.2SCALE: 1"=5'

A ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION - EAST ABUTMENT APPROACH TYPICAL SECTION

RIP-RAP CONSTRUCTION NOTES

THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL.

FROM TEARING DURING ROCK PLACEMENT.

4. ALL UNSUITABLE VEGETATION AND WOODY DEBRIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE WORK AREA AND DISPOSED OF

PROPERLY OFFSITE.

5. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND STATE OF UTAH PERMIT REQUIREMENT & CONDITIONS.

6. RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION REPAIR TERMINATION LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY ENGINEER BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.

ROCK GRADATION

D100 42" D75 36" D50 30" D25 18"

MIN SIZE 12"

QUANTITIES

ROCK RIP-RAP D50=30": 9.9 CU YDS PER LF

FILTER FABRIC: 5.6 SQ YDS PER LF

Jared W.

BatesP

R O

S I ONAL ENG

I N E

E R

S T

A T E O F U

. 78868

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-22-004

AutoCAD SHX Text 6/15/2023

3:1 SLOPE, TYP.

2:1 SLOPE

ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

10'

5' 5'

15'

10'

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

(3' DRAPE BOTH ENDS)

EXISTING GROUND

FILL VOIDS IN RIP-RAP

WITH SEDIMENT

(AVAILABLE ON-SITE)

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD.VARIES 10' TO 20'

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

. G

R G

E G

G E

W A

N B

. E X

O N

P R

N D

EP-D.3SCALE: 1"=5'

A ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION - WEST ABUTMENT APPROACH TYPICAL SECTION

RIP-RAP CONSTRUCTION NOTES

THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL.

FROM TEARING DURING ROCK PLACEMENT.

4. ALL UNSUITABLE VEGETATION AND WOODY DEBRIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE WORK AREA AND DISPOSED OF

PROPERLY OFFSITE.

5. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND STATE OF UTAH PERMIT REQUIREMENT & CONDITIONS.

6. RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION REPAIR TERMINATION LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY ENGINEER BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.

ROCK GRADATION

D100 42" D75 36" D50 30" D25 18"

MIN SIZE 12"

QUANTITIES

ROCK RIP-RAP D50=30": 3.1 CU YDS PER LF

FILTER FABRIC: 3.8 SQ YDS PER LF

Jared W.

BatesP

R O

S I ONAL ENG

I N E

E R

S T

T E O F U T

. 78868

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-22-004

AutoCAD SHX Text 6/15/2023

EXISTING ROCK RIP-RAP

5'26'

6' 9.

9.5'21.5'

2:1 SLOPE

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

(3' DRAPE BOTH ENDS)

FILL VOIDS IN RIP-RAP

WITH SEDIMENT

(AVAILABLE ON-SITE)

1:1

OPE

31'

ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

RELOCATE ROCK AS FEASIBLE

BACKFILL BETWEEN EROSION PROTECTION AS REQIORED

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

. G

R G

E G

G E

W A

N B

. E X

O N

P R

N D

EP-D.4SCALE: 1"=5'

A ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION - EAST ABUTMENT APPROACH TYPICAL SECTION

RIP-RAP CONSTRUCTION NOTES

THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL.

FROM TEARING DURING ROCK PLACEMENT.

4. ALL UNSUITABLE VEGETATION AND WOODY DEBRIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE WORK AREA AND DISPOSED OF

PROPERLY OFFSITE.

5. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND STATE OF UTAH PERMIT REQUIREMENT & CONDITIONS.

6. RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION REPAIR TERMINATION LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY ENGINEER BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.

ROCK GRADATION

D100 42" D75 36" D50 30" D25 18"

MIN SIZE 12"

QUANTITIES

ROCK RIP-RAP D50=30": 9.9 CU YDS PER LF

FILTER FABRIC: 5.6 SQ YDS PER LF

Jared W.

BatesP

R O

S I ONAL ENG

I N E

E R

S T

A T E O F U

. 78868

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-22-004

AutoCAD SHX Text 6/15/2023

AERIAL IMAGE TAKEN

JUNE 2020

VIRGIN RIVER

EXISTING EROSION PROTECTION

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

N P

R O

R G

E W

D . E

O N

. G

G E

RIVERSIDE DR.

RIV

ER RD

ST. JAMES LN.

ST. JAMES PARK

FORT PIERCE WASH

100 YEAR FLOODPLAIN (2021 ANALYSIS)

EXISTING EROSION

PROTECTION TO BE REMOVED

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (30.5' SECTION)

3,768 CU YDS (400 LF)

D50 = 30"

PROPOSED GEORGE

WASHINGTON BLVD.

EXTENSION

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD.

EDGE OF 100' R.O.W.

PARCEL SG-5-2-32-32001

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (37' SECTION)

12,076 CU YDS (1,282 LF)

D50 = 30"

FUTURE BRIDGE

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (37' SECTION)

15,421 CU YDS (1,637 LF)

D50 = 30"

PROPOSED ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (25' SECTION)

20,916 CU YDS (2,204 LF)

D50 = 30"

A D.2

A D.3

A D.2

A D.1

A D.1A

D.2

A D.2

A D.3

AutoCAD SHX Text

AutoCAD SHX Text 400'

AutoCAD SHX Text 800'

AutoCAD SHX Text

SCALE: 1"=400'

AutoCAD SHX Text 2-24-23

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-19-001

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

17.5'7.5'

5' 7.

7.5'17.5'

5' 7.

95% COMPACTED SUBGRADE

ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

1:1

OPE

18' EROSION PROTECTION EASEMENT

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

(3' DRAPE BOTH ENDS)

EXISTING GROUND

FILL VOIDS IN RIP-RAP

WITH SEDIMENT

(AVAILABLE ON-SITE)

1:1

OPE

13'

25'

EDGE OF

ROAD R.O.W.

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD.5% (TYP.)

EDGE OF ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS

100 YEAR WSEL 1'

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

. G

R G

E G

G E

W A

N B

. E X

N P

R O

(2 5'

, T Y

D.1

SCALE: 1"=5'

A ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION - 25' SECTION, TYP.

RIP-RAP CONSTRUCTION NOTES

THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION AND BACKFILL.

FROM TEARING DURING ROCK PLACEMENT.

4. ALL UNSUITABLE VEGETATION AND WOODY DEBRIS MATERIAL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM THE WORK AREA AND DISPOSED OF

PROPERLY OFFSITE.

5. ALL WORK SHALL COMPLY WITH THE ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS AND STATE OF UTAH PERMIT REQUIREMENT & CONDITIONS.

6. RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION REPAIR TERMINATION LOCATIONS TO BE VERIFIED BY ENGINEER BASED ON FIELD CONDITIONS.

ROCK GRADATION

D100 42" D75 36" D50 30" D25 18"

MIN SIZE 12"

QUANTITIES

ROCK RIP-RAP D50=30": 9.49 CU YDS PER LF

FILTER FABRIC: 5.03 SQ YDS PER LF

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-19-001

AutoCAD SHX Text 5/24/2022

95% COMPACTED SUBGRADE

ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION

D50 = 24"

5'6' 10.5'

1:1 SLOPE

26'

3' 5'

5' 18' 10.5' 3.5'

5% (TYP.)

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

(3' DRAPE BOTH ENDS)

EXISTING GROUND

FILL VOIDS IN RIP-RAP

WITH SEDIMENT

(AVAILABLE ON-SITE)

1 12 H

: 1V SLO

37'

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD.

EDGE OF ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS

100 YEAR WSEL 1'

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

. G

R G

E, U

R G

E W

D . E

O N

N P

R O

(3 7'

, T Y

D.2

SCALE: 1"=5'

A ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION - 37' SECTION, TYP.

ROCK GRADATION

D100 42" D75 36" D50 30" D25 18"

MIN SIZE 12"

QUANTITIES

ROCK RIP-RAP D50=30": 9.42 CU YDS PER LF

FILTER FABRIC: 6.21 SQ YDS PER LF

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-19-001

AutoCAD SHX Text 5/24/2022

9.5'21'

5' 8'

8.0'22.5'

95% COMPACTED SUBGRADE

ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION

PROTECTION (D50 = 30")

2:1 SLOPE

GEORGE WASHINGTON BLVD.

GEOTEXTILE FABRIC

(3' DRAPE BOTH ENDS)

EXISTING GROUND

FILL VOIDS IN RIP-RAP

WITH SEDIMENT

(AVAILABLE ON-SITE)

1:1

OPE

EDGE OF ROADWAY

IMPROVEMENTS

30.5'

EDGE OF

ROAD R.O.W.

100 YEAR WSEL 1'

3:1 SLOPE

JOB NO.:

DATE:

D A

CHECKED BY:

N S

SHEET

DWG:

OF SHEETS

352 East Riverside Drive, Suite A-2 St. George, Utah 84790

Ph (435) 673-8586 Fx (435) 673-8397 www.racivil.com

. G

R G

E G

G E

W A

N B

. E X

N P

R O

(3 0.

N , T

Y P.

D.3

SCALE: 1"=5'

A ROCK RIP-RAP EROSION PROTECTION - 30.5' SECTION, TYP.

ROCK GRADATION

D100 42" D75 36" D50 30" D25 18"

MIN SIZE 12"

QUANTITIES

ROCK RIP-RAP D50=30": 9.42 CU YDS PER LF

FILTER FABRIC: 5.36 SQ YDS PER LF

AutoCAD SHX Text

EHZ

AutoCAD SHX Text

JWB

AutoCAD SHX Text

GRF

AutoCAD SHX Text 11138-19-001

AutoCAD SHX Text 5/24/2022

BUILDING STRONG®

U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS – SACRAMENTO DISTRICT

1325 J ST. – SACRAMENTO, CA 95814

www.spk.usace.army.mil www.facebook.com/sacramentodistrict www.youtube.com/sacramentodistrict www.twitter.com/USACESacramento www.f lickr.com/photos/sacramentodistrict

2021 Nationwide Permit Summary 33 CFR Part 330; Issuance of Nationwide Permits – February 25, 2022

14. Linear Transportation Projects. Activities required for crossings of waters of the United States associated with the construction, expansion, modification, or improvement of linear transportation projects (e.g., roads, highways, railways, trails, driveways, airport runways, and taxiways) in waters of the

United States. For linear transportation projects in non-tidal waters, the discharge of dredged or fill material cannot cause the loss of greater than 1⁄2-acre of waters of the United States. For linear transportation projects in tidal wa ters, the discharge of dredged or fill material cannot cause the loss of greater than 1⁄3-acre of waters of the United States. Any stream channel modification, including bank stabilization, is limited to the minimum necessary to construct or protect the linear transportation project; such modifications must be in the immediate vicinity of the project.

This NWP also authorizes temporary structures, fills, and work, including the use of temporary mats, necessary to construct the linear transportation project. Appropriate measures must be taken to maintain normal downstream flows and minimize flooding to the maximum extent practicable, when temporary structures, work, and discharges of dredged or fill material, including cofferdams, are necessary for construction activities, access fills, or dewatering of construction sites. Temporary fills must consist of materials, and be placed in a manner, that will not be eroded by expected high flows. Temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to pre-construction elevations. The areas affected by temporary fills must be revegetated, as appropriate.

This NWP cannot be used to authorize non-linear features commonly associated with transportation projects, such as vehicle maintenance or storage buildings, parking lots, train stations, or aircraft hangars.

Notification: The permittee must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer prior to commencing the activity if: (1) The loss of waters of the United States exceeds 1⁄10 acre; or (2) there is a discharge of dredged or fill material in a special aquatic site, including wetlands. (See general condition

32.) (Authorities: Sections 10 and 404).

Note 1: For linear transportation projects crossing a single waterbody more than one time at separate and distant locations, or multiple waterbodies at separate and distant locations, each crossing is considered a single and complete project for purposes of NWP authorization. Linear transportation projects must comply with 33 CFR 330.6(d).

Note 2: Some discharges of dredged or fill material for the construction of farm roads or forest roads, or temporary roads for moving mining equipment, may qualify for an exemption under Section 404(f) of the Clean Water Act (see 33 CFR

323.4).

Note 3: For NWP 14 activities that require pre-construction notification, the PCN must include any other NWP(s), regional general permit(s), or individual permit(s) used or intended to be used to authorize any part of the proposed project or any related activity, including other separate and distant crossings that require Department of the Army authorization but do not require pre-construction notification (see paragraph (b)(4) of general condition 32). The district engineer will evaluate the PCN in accordance with Section D, ‘‘District Engineer’s Decision.’’ The district engineer may require mitigation to ensure that the authorized activity results in no more than minimal individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects (see general condition 23).

A. Regional Conditions

1. Regional Conditions for California

2. Regional Conditions for Nevada and Utah

B. Nationwide Permit General Conditions

Note: To qualify for NWP authorization, the prospective permittee must comply with the following general conditions, as applicable, in addition to any regional or case-specific conditions imposed by the division engineer or district engineer.

Prospective permittees should contact the appropriate Corps district office to determine if regional conditions have been imposed on an NWP. Prospective permittees should also contact the appropriate Corps district office to determine the status of Clean Water Act Section 401 water quality certification and/or

Coastal Zone Management Act consistency for an NWP. Every person who may wish to obtain permit authorization under one or more NWPs, or who is currently relying on an existing or prior permit authorization under one or more NWPs, has been and is on notice that all of the provisions of 33 CFR 330.1 through 330.6 apply to every NWP authorization. Note especially 33 CFR 330.5 relating to the modification, suspension, or revocation of any NWP authorization.

1. Navigation.

(a) No activity may cause more than a minimal adverse effect on navigation.

(b) Any safety lights and signals prescribed by the

U.S. Coast Guard, through regulations or otherwise, must be installed and maintained at the permittee's expense on l2rdicdj

Enclosure 3 authorized facilities in navigable waters of the United

States.

(c) The permittee understands and agrees that, if future operations by the United States require the removal, relocation, or other alteration, of the structure or work herein authorized, or if, in the opinion of the

Secretary of the Army or his or her authorized representative, said structure or work shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of the navigable waters, the permittee will be required, upon due notice from the Corps of Engineers, to remove, relocate, or alter the structural work or obstructions caused thereby, without expense to the United States. No claim shall be made against the United States on account of any such removal or alteration.

2. Aquatic Life Movements. No activity may substantially disrupt the necessary life cycle movements of those species of aquatic life indigenous to the waterbody, including those species that normally migrate through the area, unless the activity's primary purpose is to impound water. All permanent and temporary crossings of waterbodies shall be suitably culverted, bridged, or otherwise designed and constructed to maintain low flows to sustain the movement of those aquatic species. If a bottomless culvert cannot be used, then the crossing should be designed and constructed to minimize adverse effects to aquatic life movements.

3. Spawning Areas. Activities in spawning areas during spawning seasons must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable. Activities that result in the physical destruction (e.g., through excavation, fill, or downstream smothering by substantial turbidity) of an important spawning area are not authorized.

4. Migratory Bird Breeding Areas. Activities in waters of the United States that serve as breeding areas for migratory birds must be avoided to the maximum extent practicable.

5. Shellfish Beds. No activity may occur in areas of concentrated shellfish populations, unless the activity is directly related to a shellfish harvesting activity authorized by NWPs 4 and 48, or is a shellfish seeding or habitat restoration activity authorized by NWP 27.

6. Suitable Material. No activity may use unsuitable material (e.g., trash, debris, car bodies, asphalt, etc.). Material used for construction or discharged must be free from toxic pollutants in toxic amounts (see section 307 of the Clean Water

Act).

7. Water Supply Intakes. No activity may occur in the proximity of a public water supply intake, except where the activity is for the repair or improvement of public water supply intake structures or adjacent bank stabilization.

8. Adverse Effects From Impoundments. If the activity creates an impoundment of water, adverse effects to the aquatic system due to accelerating the passage of water, and/or restricting its flow must be minimized to the maximum extent practicable.

9. Management of Water Flows. To the maximum extent practicable, the pre-construction course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters must be maintained for each activity, including stream channelization, storm water management activities, and temporary and permanent road crossings, except as provided below. The activity must be constructed to withstand expected high flows. The activity must not restrict or impede the passage of normal or high flows, unless the primary purpose of the activity is to impound water or manage high flows. The activity may alter the pre-construction course, condition, capacity, and location of open waters if it benefits the aquatic environment (e.g., stream restoration or relocation activities).

10. Fills Within 100-Year Floodplains. The activity must comply with applicable FEMA-approved state or local floodplain management requirements.

11. Equipment. Heavy equipment working in wetlands or mudflats must be placed on mats, or other measures must be taken to minimize soil disturbance.

12. Soil Erosion and Sediment Controls. Appropriate soil erosion and sediment controls must be used and maintained in effective operating condition during construction, and all exposed soil and other fills, as well as any work below the ordinary high water mark or high tide line, must be permanently stabilized at the earliest practicable date. Permittees are encouraged to perform work within waters of the United States during periods of low-flow or no-flow, or during low tides.

13. Removal of Temporary Fills. Temporary structures must be removed, to the maximum extent practicable, after their use has been discontinued. Temporary fills must be removed in their entirety and the affected areas returned to pre-construction elevations. The affected areas must be revegetated, as appropriate.

14. Proper Maintenance. Any authorized structure or fill shall be properly maintained, including maintenance to ensure public safety and compliance with applicable NWP general conditions, as well as any activity-specific conditions added by the district engineer to an NWP authorization.

15. Single and Complete Project. The activity must be a single and complete project. The same NWP cannot be used more than once for the same single and complete project.

16. Wild and Scenic Rivers.

(a) No NWP activity may occur in a component of the

National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a “study river” for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, unless the appropriate Federal agency with direct management responsibility for such river, has determined in writing that the proposed activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation or study status.

(b) If a proposed NWP activity will occur in a component of the National Wild and Scenic River System, or in a river officially designated by Congress as a “study river” for possible inclusion in the system while the river is in an official study status, the permittee must submit a pre-construction notification (see general condition 32). The district engineer will coordinate the PCN with the Federal agency with direct management responsibility for that river.

Permittees shall not begin the NWP activity until notified by the district engineer that the Federal agency with direct management responsibility for that river has determined in writing that the proposed NWP activity will not adversely affect the Wild and Scenic River designation or study status.

(c) Information on Wild and Scenic Rivers may be obtained from the appropriate Federal land management agency responsible for the designated Wild and Scenic River or study river (e.g., National Park Service, U.S. Forest

Service, Bureau of Land Management, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). Information on these rivers is also available at: https://www.rivers.gov/.

17. Tribal Rights. No activity or its operation may impair reserved tribal rights, including, but not limited to, reserved water rights and treaty fishing and hunting rights.

18. Endangered Species.

(a) No activity is authorized under any NWP which is likely to directly or indirectly jeopardize the continued existence of a threatened or endangered species or a species proposed for such designation, as identified under the Federal Endangered Species Act (ESA), or which will directly or indirectly destroy or adversely modify designated critical habitat or critical habitat proposed for such designation. No activity is authorized under any

NWP which “may affect” a listed species or critical habitat, unless ESA section 7 consultation addressing the consequences of the proposed activity on listed species or critical habitat has been completed. See 50 CFR 402.02 for the definition of “effects of the action” for the purposes of ESA section 7 consultation, as well as 50 CFR 402.17, which provides further explanation under ESA section 7 regarding “activities that are reasonably certain to occur” and “consequences caused by the proposed action.”

(b) Federal agencies should follow their own procedures for complying with the requirements of the

ESA (see 33 CFR 330.4(f)(1)). If pre-construction notification is required for the proposed activity, the Federal permittee must provide the district engineer with the appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The district engineer will verify that the appropriate documentation has been submitted. If the appropriate documentation has not been submitted, additional ESA section 7 consultation may be necessary for the activity and the respective federal agency would be responsible for fulfilling its obligation under section 7 of the ESA.

(c) Non-federal permittees must submit a pre-construction notification to the district engineer if any listed species (or species proposed for listing) or designated critical habitat (or critical habitat proposed such designation) might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, or if the activity is located in designated critical habitat or critical habitat proposed for such designation, and shall not begin work on the activity until notified by the district engineer that the requirements of the ESA have been satisfied and that the activity is authorized. For activities that might affect Federally-listed endangered or threatened species (or species proposed for listing) or designated critical habitat (or critical habitat proposed for such designation), the pre-construction notification must include the name(s) of the endangered or threatened species (or species proposed for listing) that might be affected by the proposed activity or that utilize the designated critical habitat (or critical habitat proposed for such designation) that might be affected by the proposed activity. The district engineer will determine whether the proposed activity “may affect” or will have “no effect” to listed species and designated critical habitat and will notify the non-Federal applicant of the Corps’ determination within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification. For activities where the non- Federal applicant has identified listed species (or species proposed for listing) or designated critical habitat (or critical habitat proposed for such designation) that might be affected or is in the vicinity of the activity, and has so notified the Corps, the applicant shall not begin work until the Corps has provided notification that the proposed activity will have “no effect” on listed species (or species proposed for listing or designated critical habitat (or critical habitat proposed for such designation), or until ESA section 7 consultation or conference has been completed. If the non-Federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps.

(d) As a result of formal or informal consultation or conference with the FWS or NMFS the district engineer may add species-specific permit conditions to the NWPs.

(e) Authorization of an activity by an NWP does not authorize the “take” of a threatened or endangered species as defined under the ESA. In the absence of separate authorization (e.g., an ESA Section 10 Permit, a Biological Opinion with “incidental take” provisions, etc.)

from the FWS or the NMFS, the Endangered Species Act prohibits any person subject to the jurisdiction of the

United States to take a listed species, where "take" means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct. The word “harm” in the definition of “take'' means an act which actually kills or injures wildlife. Such an act may include significant habitat modification or degradation where it actually kills or injures wildlife by significantly impairing essential behavioral patterns, including breeding, feeding or sheltering.

(f) If the non-federal permittee has a valid ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) incidental take permit with an approved Habitat Conservation Plan for a project or a group of projects that includes the proposed NWP activity, the non-federal applicant should provide a copy of that ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit with the PCN required by paragraph (c) of this general condition. The district engineer will coordinate with the agency that issued the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit to determine whether the proposed NWP activity and the associated incidental take were considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation conducted for the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit. If that coordination results in concurrence from the agency that the proposed NWP activity and the associated incidental take were considered in the internal ESA section 7 consultation for the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit, the district engineer does not need to conduct a separate ESA section 7 consultation for the proposed NWP activity. The district engineer will notify the non-federal applicant within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification whether the ESA section 10(a)(1)(B) permit covers the proposed NWP activity or whether additional ESA section 7 consultation is required.

(g) Information on the location of threatened and endangered species and their critical habitat can be obtained directly from the offices of the FWS and NMFS or their world wide web pages at https://www.fws.gov/ or https://www.fws.gov/ipac/ and https://www.fisheries.noaa.gov/topic/endangered-species-conservation respectively.

19. Migratory Birds and Bald and Golden Eagles. The permittee is responsible for ensuring that an action authorized by an NWP complies with the Migratory Bird Treaty Act and the

Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act. The permittee is responsible for contacting the appropriate local office of the U.S.

Fish and Wildlife Service to determine what measures, if any, are necessary or appropriate to reduce adverse effects to migratory birds or eagles, including whether "incidental take" permits are necessary and available under the Migratory Bird

Treaty Act or Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act for a particular activity.

20. Historic Properties.

(a) No activity is authorized under any NWP which may have the potential to cause effects to properties listed, or eligible for listing, in the National Register of Historic Places until the requirements of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) have been satisfied.

(b) Federal permittees should follow their own procedures for complying with the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (see

33 CFR 330.4(g)(1)). If pre-construction notification is required for the proposed NWP activity, the Federal permittee must provide the district engineer with the appropriate documentation to demonstrate compliance with those requirements. The district engineer will verify that the appropriate documentation has been submitted. If the appropriate documentation is not submitted, then additional consultation under section 106 may be necessary. The respective federal agency is responsible for fulfilling its obligation to comply with section 106.

NWP activity might have the potential to cause effects to any historic properties listed on, determined to be eligible for listing on, or potentially eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places, including previously unidentified properties. For such activities, the pre-construction notification must state which historic properties might have the potential to be affected by the proposed NWP activity or include a vicinity map indicating the location of the historic properties or the potential for the presence of historic properties.

Assistance regarding information on the location of, or potential for, the presence of historic properties can be sought from the State Historic Preservation Officer, Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, or designated tribal representative, as appropriate, and the National Register of Historic Places (see 33 CFR 330.4(g)). When reviewing pre-construction notifications, district engineers will comply with the current procedures for addressing the requirements of section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act. The district engineer shall make a reasonable and good faith effort to carry out appropriate identification efforts commensurate with potential impacts, which may include background research, consultation, oral history interviews, sample field investigation, and/or field survey. Based on the information submitted in the PCN and these identification efforts, the district engineer shall determine whether the proposed NWP activity has the potential to cause effects on the historic properties. Section 106 consultation is not required when the district engineer determines that the activity does not have the potential to cause effects on historic properties (see 36 CFR 800.3(a)). Section 106 consultation is required when the district engineer determines that the activity has the potential to cause effects on historic properties. The district engineer will conduct consultation with consulting parties identified under 36 CFR 800.2(c) when he or she makes any of the following effect determinations for the purposes of section 106 of the NHPA: no historic properties affected, no adverse effect, or adverse effect.

(d) Where the non-Federal applicant has identified historic properties on which the proposed NWP activity might have the potential to cause effects and has so notified the Corps, the non-Federal applicant shall not begin the activity until notified by the district engineer either that the activity has no potential to cause effects to historic properties or that NHPA section 106 consultation has been completed. For non-federal permittees, the district engineer will notify the prospective permittee within 45 days of receipt of a complete pre-construction notification whether NHPA section 106 consultation is required. If NHPA section 106 consultation is required, the district engineer will notify the non-Federal applicant that he or she cannot begin the activity until section 106 consultation is completed. If the non-Federal applicant has not heard back from the Corps within 45 days, the applicant must still wait for notification from the Corps.

(e) Prospective permittees should be aware that section 110(k) of the NHPA (54 U.S.C. 306113) prevents the Corps from granting a permit or other assistance to an applicant who, with intent to avoid the requirements of section 106 of the NHPA, has intentionally significantly adversely affected a historic property to which the permit would relate, or having legal power to prevent it, allowed such significant adverse effect to occur, unless the Corps, after consultation with the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP), determines that circumstances justify granting such assistance despite the adverse effect created or permitted by the applicant. If circumstances justify granting the assistance, the Corps is required to notify the ACHP and provide documentation specifying the circumstances, the degree of damage to the integrity of any historic properties affected, and proposed mitigation. This documentation must include any views obtained from the applicant, SHPO/THPO, appropriate

Indian tribes if the undertaking occurs on or affects historic properties on tribal lands or affects properties of interest to those tribes, and other parties known to have a legitimate interest in the impacts to the permitted activity on historic properties.

21. Discovery of Previously Unknown Remains and Artifacts. Permittees that discover any previously unknown historic, cultural or archeological remains and artifacts while accomplishing the activity authorized by an NWP, they must immediately notify the district engineer of what they have found, and to the maximum extent practicable, avoid construction activities that may affect the remains and artifacts until the required coordination has been completed. The district engineer will initiate the Federal, Tribal, and state coordination required to determine if the items or remains warrant a recovery effort or if the site is eligible for listing in the National Register of

Historic Places.

22. Designated Critical Resource Waters. Critical resource waters include, NOAA-managed marine sanctuaries and marine monuments, and National Estuarine Research Reserves. The district engineer may designate, after notice and opportunity for public comment, additional waters officially designated by a state as having particular environmental or ecological significance, such as outstanding national resource waters or state natural heritage sites. The district engineer may also designate additional critical resource waters after notice and opportunity for public comment.

(a) Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States are not authorized by NWPs 7, 12, 14, 16, 17, 21, 29, 31, 35, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 49, 50, 51, 52, 57 and 58 for any activity within, or directly affecting, critical resource waters, including wetlands adjacent to such waters.

(b) For NWPs 3, 8, 10, 13, 15, 18, 19, 22, 23, 25, 27, 28, 30, 33, 34, 36, 37, 38, and 54, notification is required in accordance with general condition 32, for any activity proposed by permittees in the designated critical resource waters including wetlands adjacent to those waters. The district engineer may authorize activities under these NWPs only after she or he determines that the impacts to the critical resource waters will be no more than minimal.

23. Mitigation. The district engineer will consider the following factors when determining appropriate and practicable mitigation necessary to ensure that the individual and cumulative adverse environmental effects are no more than minimal:

(a) The activity must be designed and constructed to avoid and minimize adverse effects, both temporary and permanent, to waters of the United States to the maximum extent practicable at the project site (i.e., on site).

(b) Mitigation in all its forms (avoiding, minimizing, rectifying, reducing, or compensating for resource losses) will be required to…

This is the start of the file's text. The full file is on GovTribe.

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated Jul 20, 2026.