2d. Day 2_6_ PFAS Construction and Best Management Practices.pdf
PDF 1 MB Posted
- Attached to
- FA8501-27-RAPID-PAVE-OTA
- Solicitation number
- FA8501-27-RAPID-PAVE-OTA
About this file
This document is an Air Force instructional presentation on best management practices (BMPs) for addressing per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) contamination at Military Construction (MILCON) and Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM) construction sites. The presentation addresses the widespread occurrence of PFAS at Air Force installations resulting from historical Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF) releases, which has created significant cost and schedule impacts on construction projects. The regulatory framework governing PFAS management includes Department of War (DoW) oversight under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), with Regional Screening Levels used to determine investigation triggers rather than disposal standards. PFOA and PFOS are listed as CERCLA hazardous substances, while PFAS is not currently regulated as a Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) waste, though nine PFAS chemicals have been proposed as hazardous constituents. State-specific standards for groundwater, surface water, and soil management vary by jurisdiction.
The March 2025 SAF/IEE BMP guidance provides a three-phase management strategy spanning planning, design, and execution phases. During planning, key practices include early communication with environmental professionals, desktop due diligence using geospatial databases, and baseline sampling prior to site selection with treatment and disposal costs incorporated into project budgeting (DD 1391). Design phase BMPs emphasize project relocation to avoid contamination, design alterations to minimize earthworks and dewatering, and excavation minimization through soil segregation. Execution phase requirements include coordination with Remedial Project Managers (RPMs) for regulatory compliance, development of Soil Management Plans, focused investigation and characterization where data is limited, and appropriate sampling based on stockpile size. For soil management, contaminated material below detection or screening levels may be reused or disposed without restrictions; PFAS-impacted soils may be placed back in original excavation areas with documentation or disposed at RCRA Subtitle C or D landfills with appropriate permits and liners. Dewatering activities must comply with Clean Water Act regulations and DAFMAN 32-1067 requirements, with extracted groundwater requiring treatment via granular activated carbon (GAC) or ion exchange before discharge, particularly when centralized treatment plants lack PFAS treatment capabilities.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Your Success is Our M ission!UNCLASSIFIED
Air Force Installation & Mission Support Center
Best Management Practices for
Addressing PFAS at Construction Sites
Mahalingam Ravichandran, PhD AFCEC PFAS Integrator
Overview Topics
Background Regulatory Framework Dept of War Guidance and Policies Dept of Air Force Best Management Practices
Planning and Programming Phase Design and Construction Phase
Background
Widespread occurrence of PFAS at many construction sites from historical AFFF releases, high GW mobility, low screening levels
Major impacts on cost/schedule of Military Construction (MILCON) and Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization (FSRM) projects, affecting mission readiness MILCON Projects programmed years back when PFAS was not an issue No clear disposal standards or cost-effective disposal options MILCON/FSRM use different funding and timelines than DERP cleanup
March 2025 SAF/IEE issued BMPs to avoid, minimize, or manage excavated soil/groundwater impacted with PFAS and other contaminants at MILCON/FSRM sites
Regulatory Framework
DoW conducts environmental cleanup of PFAS under CERCLA Use of Regional Screening Levels for soil/groundwater to determine whether further investigation is needed – RSLs are NOT disposal standards PFOA and PFOS are listed as CERCLA hazardous substances
SDWA (MCLs) – applicable to Public Water Systems, not construction sites
RCRA – not a regulated waste (listed or characteristic) 9 PFAS chemicals were proposed as hazardous constituents under RCRA; it’s unknown if
EPA intends to finalize those rules
State Standards Some states have promulgated PFAS standards for groundwater, surface water, soil etc.
States may have screening levels for soil management, waste disposal
DoW Guidance / Policies
Jan 2026 Guidance for MILCON projects w/ Historical Contamination Planning Phase
Collaboration between planning & env. staff (e.g., use PFAS scoping checklist) Baseline sampling prior to site selection, cost for treatment/disposal in DD 1391 Use Geospatial data to identify contaminated area, LUCs, and in Master Planning
Construction Phase – Management of Impacted Media Dewatering – meet CWA standards, discharge permits Soil – temporary stockpile need engineering and erosion controls
Feb 2026 Updated Interim Guidance on Destruction or Disposal Carbon reactivation units (for used GAC), Haz waste Landfills, Solid waste landfill with liners + gas/leachate collection/treatment systems, Haz waste incinerators, underground injection control wells, thermal desorption, others
SAF/IEE BMPs
March 2025 BMP guidance from SAF/IEE: “Best Management Practices for Addressing Contaminated Soils on Military Construction and Facilities Sustainment, Restoration, and Modernization Projects”
Addresses handling of contaminated soil with all types of contaminants, but emphasis on PFAS, from planning to execution phase
BMPs to avoid, minimize, or manage excavated soil & dewatered fluid in MILCON & FSRM projects
Other BMPs forthcoming - for contaminated construction and demolition debris (e.g., asphalt, concrete, piping, carpet padding, drywall, etc), large dewatering operations
Summary of Soil BMPs
BMPs - Project Planning Phase
Early communication with environmental professionals (e.g., RPMs) regarding potential for contaminants in project footprint, land use controls
Conduct desktop due diligence using GEOMAP and available environmental databases to identify restoration sites, evaluate project area for contaminants in soil, groundwater
Address implication of environmental regulations and funding considerations on project schedule, execution and cost
Efforts underway to include checklists during the planning process
BMPs - Project Design Phase
Project relocation to avoid impacted soil / groundwater
Design alteration or innovative methods to avoid or reduce earthworks and dewatering (e.g., deep foundations, build up, direct push casing instead of trenching)
Minimize excavation and segregate soils to limit generation and stockpiling of impacted soils
Mitigate exposure risks to onsite workers and on-base personnel during project execution
BMPs - Project Execution
Coordinate with RPMs for compliance with applicable regulations, and coordination with regulatory agencies
Soil Management Plan (SMP) for storage, handling and management of soils
Focused investigation and characterization of soil and groundwater in project area where no prior data or limited data Sampling not required unless the area is a known restoration site or there is suspected release Recommend developing a sampling and analysis plan, including a decision matrix, and coordinated with RPMs and regulatory agencies (as required) Compare to applicable standards or screening levels
Contaminated soil will require sampling based on stockpile size
Soil Management If levels are below lab detection levels or screening levels, soils can be reused on-site or disposed without restrictions Soil that contains RCRA hazardous waste have storage limitations (Note: PFAS is currently not regulated as RCRA waste) While not preferred, PFAS-containing soil may be placed back in the same area of excavation, with appropriate documentation for future investigations and ensuring contamination is not spread
Per DoD Interim Guidance, soils impacted with PFAS may be disposed of at RCRA Subtitle C or D landfills (with appropriate permits, liners, and leachate collection systems)
In some cases, in-situ chemical stabilization of soil or modeling of leaching potential to groundwater may allow storage of soil and reduce disposal cost
Contaminated soil stockpile should be protected with impermeable liners to prevent runoff, wind erosion, and leaching to groundwater
Dewatering and Water Treatment Water removed during construction activities must comply with Clean Water Act regulations prior to discharge to surface water or injected to groundwater, including dewatering permits and construction stormwater permits
DAFMAN 32-1067: “Industrial wastewater treated for PFAS or with residual PFAS contamination from known releases will only be discharged in accordance with applicable regulations, permit conditions and AF guidance and policy, and with authorization from receiving treatment works”
For discharge to the sanitary sewer, coordinate and get written permission from the receiving POTW, which may have its own PFAS requirements
Extracted groundwater may be transferred to a centralized water treatment plant ONLY if it is capable of treating for PFAS (most WWTP are not designed to treat for PFAS)
Depending on the concentration, volume and water quality, on-site treatment of water using GAC or Ion-Exchange may be more cost effective
Questions
| Slide Number 1 |
| Overview Topics |
| Background |
| Regulatory Framework |
| DoW Guidance / Policies |
| SAF/IEE BMPs |
| Summary of Soil BMPs |
| BMPs - Project Planning Phase |
| BMPs - Project Design Phase |
| BMPs - Project Execution |
| BMPs - Project Execution |
| BMPs - Project Execution |
| Questions |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .