26QE047_Attachment 4_PPQ.docx
DOCX document 90 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- HE125426QE047
- Issued by
-
Department of Defense Education Activity
About this file
This is a Present and Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) template for solicitation HE125426QE047 issued by the Department of Defense Education Activity (DoDEA) for On-Board Video Surveillance System (OBVSS) Services in Okinawa, Japan. The questionnaire is designed to collect performance feedback from contractor references regarding their experience delivering OBVSS services on school transportation vehicles.
The PPQ consists of two main sections: an offeror information section to be completed by the contractor submitting the proposal, and an evaluation section to be completed by the contractor's reference or past customer. The contractor information section requires standard business details including firm name, CAGE code, Unique Entity ID, contact information, and work performance classification (prime contractor, subcontractor, or joint venture). The reference information section captures details about the contracting entity providing the performance evaluation, including the contract number, final contract value, contract type (Firm Fixed Price, Cost Reimbursement, or other), and period of performance. The evaluation section uses a six-point rating scale (Poor/Unsatisfactory, Satisfactory, Good, Very Good, Excellent, or Neutral/N/A) across eight criteria: experience with OBVSS services on buses, preventive maintenance and repair services, personnel management and responsiveness, incident response and corrective maintenance capabilities, training provision and tracking, timely delivery of reports and contract deliverables, communication effectiveness, and overall performance. Completed questionnaires must be returned via email to the DoDEA Contract Specialist David Infante or Contracting Officer Dustin Fazzini at the Alexandria, Virginia office. The template includes space for references to provide detailed comments and problem resolution narratives relevant to OBVSS requirements.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 26QE047_SF30_AMD2.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_Attachment1_PWS_AMD2.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_QandA_AMD2.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_SF30_AMD1.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_QandA_AMD1.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_Attachment1_PWS_AMD1.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_COMBSYNSOL_AMD1.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_COMBSYNSOL_042826.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_Attachment 1_PWS.docx | DOCX document | |
| 26QE047_Attachment 5_Volume III_Price.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| 26QE047_Attachment 2_Volume I_Technical Capability.docx | DOCX document | |
| 26QE047_Attachment 6_252.239-7009.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_Attachment 7_Letter of Commitment.pdf | ||
| 26QE047_Attachment 3_Volume II_Past Perf Proposal.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) Source Selection Information - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Attachment 4
PRESENT AND PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
This Questionnaire Pertains to: Solicitation HE125426QE047 Okinawa, Japan Military Community
The Offeror must complete the “To be completed by Offeror” section prior to sending the PPQ to the Offeror’s Reference/Customer. The Offeror’s Reference/Customer must complete the PPQ’s evaluation section and return the completed PPQ via e-mail to the attention of:
Department of War Education Activity Attn: Contract Specialist: Mr. David Infante Contracting Officer: Mr. Dustin Fazzini 4800 Mark Center Drive, 5th Floor, Suite #05H02-07 Alexandria, VA 22350 E-Mail: David.Infante@dodea.edu E-Mail: Dustin.Fazzini@dodea.edu
This information section is to be completed by the Offeror.
| Contractor Information: | |
| Firm Name: Click or tap here to enter text. | N/CAGE Code: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Address: Click or tap here to enter text. | Unique Entity ID: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text. | Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text. | Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Work Performed as: ☐Prime Contractor ☐Subcontractor ☐Joint Venture ☐Other (Explain)
Percent of project work performed: Click or tap here to enter text.
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #): Click or tap here to enter text.
| Reference Information: | |
| Business Name of Reference: | Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Click or tap here to enter text.
| Phone Number: Click or tap here to enter text. | Email Address: Click or tap here to enter text. |
| Point of Contact: Click or tap here to enter text. | Point of Contact Number: Click or tap here to enter text. |
Contract Number: Click or tap here to enter text. Final Contract Value (with symbol): Click or tap here to enter text.
Contract Type: ☐Firm Fixed Price ☐Cost Reimbursement ☐Other (Explain)
Period of Performance (DD/MM/YYYY-DD/MM/YYYY)/: Click or tap here to enter text.
Present and Past Performance Questionnaire
Source Selection Information1 - See FAR 2.101 and 3.104
Attachment 4
This evaluation section is to be completed by the Offeror’s customer.
Evaluation KEY: Please use the following abbreviations to assign an applicable rating for questions 1 thru 6 below:
| P/U |
| S |
| G |
| VG |
| E |
| N |
| Poor/Unsatisfactory |
| Satisfactory |
| Good |
| Very Good |
| Excellent |
| Neutral/N/A |
| Does not meet minimum acceptable standards in one or more areas; remedial action required in one or more areas; deficiencies in one or more areas which adversely affect overall performance. |
| Meets or slightly exceeds minimum acceptable standards; adequate results; reportable deficiencies with identifiable, but not substantial, effects on overall performance. |
| Effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; reportable deficiencies, but with little identifiable effect on overall performance. |
| Very effective performance; fully responsive to contract requirements; contract requirements accomplished in a timely, efficient, and economical manner for the most part; only minor deficiencies with minimal effect on overall performance. |
| Of exceptional merit; exemplary performance in a timely, efficient, and economical manner; very minor (if any) deficiencies with no adverse effect on overall performance. |
| No record of relevant past performance or past performance information is not available. |
1. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience with providing On-board Video Surveillance System (OBVSS) Services on buses? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
2. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience with providing preventive maintenance and unscheduled repair services on the OBVSS? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
3. How would you rate the Contractor’s experience in appropriately managing their personnel (i.e. Has the Contractor been responsive to deficiencies and performance issues and making timely corrections? Has the Contractor taken a proactive approach when known performance issues may hinder mission requirements?) Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
4. How would you rate the Contractor in responding to incidents and Unscheduled Corrective Maintenance/Repair requests? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
5. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing, tracking, and reporting required training to the customer/user? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
6. How would you rate the Contractor’s performance in providing timely and accurate reports and other contract deliverables? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
7. How would you rate the Contractor’s communication? Have they communicated issues as necessary to ensure all stakeholders were informed? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
8. How would you rate the Contractor’s overall performance? Comments:
| P ☐ |
| S☐ |
| G☐ |
| VG☐ |
| E☐ |
| N☐ |
Attachment 4
Explain any problems and resolutions.
Brief Description of Effort (Contract Services Rendered) to include relevancy to the solicitation requirements of the RFP.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .