25MASFSKM1 - Scorecard - final - UPDATED.docx

DOCX document 123 KB Posted

Attached to
25MASFSKM1 | Support DESE, District Safe & Healthy Learning Environments Efforts Departmental MA
Solicitation number
BD-24-1026-DOE02-DOE01-98418
Issued by
Middlesex County, Massachusetts

About this file

This document is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard used by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to evaluate responses to Solicitation 25MASFSKM1 for vendors to support safe and healthy learning environments in schools and districts. The solicitation seeks bids from vendors with demonstrated expertise in providing local and/or national subject matter expertise, utilizing evidence-based practices, and addressing racial equity. Vendors will be evaluated on their qualifications, including staff experience, ability to assess progress and adapt, content expertise, proposed service offerings and evidence of effectiveness, budget, and supplier diversity plan. The total possible score is 100 points across these evaluation criteria.

The related state and local contract opportunity, 25MASFSKM1, is a Departmental Master Agreement (MA) through which DESE seeks to engage vendors to support schools, districts, community partners, and state efforts to create high-quality, safe, and supportive learning environments for students and their families. This is an open solicitation for the state of Massachusetts.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Prompt Pay Discount Form.pdf PDF
25MASFSKM1 - Research Scorecard - Final.docx DOCX document
StandardContractForm_Instructions 7.22.2021.pdf PDF
CommonwealthTermsAndConditions.pdf PDF
25MASFSKM1 - Bid final - UPDATED.docx DOCX document
DESE Required Language 10.28.2022.docx DOCX document
Supplier Diversity Plan Language.docx DOCX document
IP Language.docx DOCX document
Supplier Diversity Program Plan Form~1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
25MASFSKM1- Amendment I - Final.docx DOCX document
25MASFSKM1 Questions and Answers 7.22.24.pdf PDF
25MASFSKM1 Questions and Answers 8.09.24.pdf PDF
25MASFSKM1 Services_Matrix - final UPDATED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Standard Contract Form- 7.22.2021.docx DOCX document
RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx DOCX document
IT RFR Required Specifications.doc DOC document
25MASFSKM1 - Attachment A - Amendment I - UPDATED.docx DOCX document
25MASFSKM1 - Measures - Final UPDATED.docx DOCX document
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02149 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation) Updated October 1, 2022

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Required Qualifications Criteria (Bidder must receive a “yes” on all the following criteria to move on to the next evaluation section)

1
Demonstrated track record of providing local and/or national expertise in area/subject matter for which they are proposing services/supports.
Yes |_|
No |_|
2
Demonstrated track record of providing high-quality services that utilize evidence-based or evidence-informed practices
Yes |_|
No |_|
3
Demonstrates some evidence that they have examined and are working to improve their practices and supports (internal and/or external) from a racial equity lens.
Yes |_|
No |_|

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 25MASFSKM1 COMMBUYS Document #: BD-24-1026-DOE02-DOE01-98418 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
Required Qualification: Staff members with the requisite experience, expertise, and skills to deliver the services proposed; evidence that their work with state agencies, districts, schools and community partners have contributed to successful outcomes in those settings; Expertise in delivering the identified service category(ies) and areas of content expertise from the scope of service section; Commitment to educational equity and dismantling structural racism; Maintain commitment to the duration of a project
(x2)
10
2
Preferred Qualifications: Ability to assess progress frequently and adapt through making mid-course corrections as necessary; Ability to communicate and work with a wide array of education stakeholders including, where relevant, constituencies within all levels of state and district administration, principals, teachers, community partners, families, and other providers in a coordinated effort to meet education improvement priorities.
(x1)
5
3
For each area of content expertise, describes knowledge and experience and provides relevant staff resumes.
(x4)
20
4
For each proposed service category and respective offerings, describes background, staff, evidence of effectiveness, readiness and current/recent engagement.
(x4)
20
5
For each proposed offering, provides a sample budget that is deliverables-based and/or based on hourly/daily rates that are inclusive of all costs. Rates are clear and reasonable.
(x2)
10
6
Completed contact information, service matrix and provided references.
(x1)
5
7
Supplier Diversity Program Plan (Any Bidder responding to an RFR Bid, valued over $250,000 annually, must submit the SDP Form uploaded to COMMBUYS with this Bid, at the time of submission with a percentage 1% or greater. This form will be part of the evaluation on this scorecard and points will be calculated as follows: 1 % - 1.9% = 5 points, 2% - 2.9% = 10 points, 3% - 3.9% = 15 points, 4% - 4.9% = 20 points, 5% or higher = 25 points
(x5)
25
8
Bidder has completed and submitted the Prompt Payment Discount (PPD) form with a 1% (average) or higher (above average) discount.
(x1)
5
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.gif image2.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .