25MASFSKM1 - Research Scorecard - Final.docx

DOCX document 113 KB Posted

Attached to
25MASFSKM1 | Support DESE, District Safe & Healthy Learning Environments Efforts Departmental MA
Solicitation number
BD-24-1026-DOE02-DOE01-98418
Issued by
Middlesex County, Massachusetts

About this file

This document is an Evaluation Criteria Scorecard that will be used by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (DESE) to evaluate all responses submitted to Solicitation 25MASFSKM1. The scorecard outlines the evaluation criteria and associated point values that will be used to assess the qualifications of bidders responding to this opportunity. The key evaluation criteria include the bidder's status as an academic institution, independent research organization, or individual researcher, the bidder's impartiality and lack of affiliations that could undermine credibility, the expertise and experience of the proposed staff, the completeness and reasonableness of the proposed budget, the bidder's Supplier Diversity Program Plan, and the bidder's demonstrated experience working with diverse and economically disadvantaged communities.

The related state and local contract opportunity, 25MASFSKM1 | Support DESE, District Safe & Healthy Learning Environments Efforts Departmental MA, seeks bids from vendors with the capacity to successfully support schools, districts, their community-based partners, and state efforts to promote high-quality, safe, and supportive learning environments for students and their families. This is a Department Master Agreement (MA) issued by the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
Prompt Pay Discount Form.pdf PDF
StandardContractForm_Instructions 7.22.2021.pdf PDF
CommonwealthTermsAndConditions.pdf PDF
25MASFSKM1 - Bid final - UPDATED.docx DOCX document
DESE Required Language 10.28.2022.docx DOCX document
Supplier Diversity Plan Language.docx DOCX document
25MASFSKM1 - Scorecard - final - UPDATED.docx DOCX document
IP Language.docx DOCX document
Supplier Diversity Program Plan Form~1.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
25MASFSKM1- Amendment I - Final.docx DOCX document
25MASFSKM1 Questions and Answers 7.22.24.pdf PDF
25MASFSKM1 Questions and Answers 8.09.24.pdf PDF
25MASFSKM1 Services_Matrix - final UPDATED.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
Standard Contract Form- 7.22.2021.docx DOCX document
RFR - Required Specifications from OSD 10.1.21.docx DOCX document
IT RFR Required Specifications.doc DOC document
25MASFSKM1 - Attachment A - Amendment I - UPDATED.docx DOCX document
25MASFSKM1 - Measures - Final UPDATED.docx DOCX document
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

135 Santilli Highway, Everett, MA 02149 Main Telephone: (781) 338-3000 TTY: N.E.T. Relay 1-800-439-2370

EVALUATION CRITERIA SCORECARD

Agency Staff use only (This document will be used to evaluate all responses submitted to this Solicitation)

Name of Bidder:
Name of Reviewer(s):
Date Reviewed:

Scoring rubric:

Non-Responsive
Qualifications is not applicable to request; elements missing / non-responsive to request
Unsatisfactory:
Little evidence of qualification. Many required elements are missing.
Below Average:
Evidence of expertise or qualification in some areas is unclear or unsubstantiated by supporting documentation. Some required elements are missing.
Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest adequate qualifications, providing clear evidence of expertise.
Above Average:
Application materials are complete and suggest solid qualifications, providing clear and well-documented evidence of expertise.
Outstanding:
Application materials is complete, suggest exemplary qualifications, providing compelling, clear, and well-documented evidence of expertise.

Alternate ID: 25MASFSKM1 – Research and Evaluation COMMBUYS Document #: BD-24-1026-DOE02-DOE01-98286 Non-Responsive 0 pts.

Unsatisfactory 1 pt.

Below Average 2 pts.

Average 3 pts.

Above Average 4 pts.

Outstanding 5 pts.

Multiplier
Maximum

Points Available (5 x Multiplier) Points Awarded (0 – 5 x Multiplier)

Additional Evaluation Criteria:

1
The extent to which the vendor demonstrates they are an academic institution, an independent, nonpartisan research organization, or an individual researcher affiliated with one of the above.
(x1)
5
2
The extent to which the vendor and its individual researchers demonstrate they are not in an advocacy role with respect to the topics they propose to study, they do not have a stake in the research's outcomes.
(x1)
5
3
The extent to which the vendor and its individual researchers have a reputation of impartiality and no known affiliations that would undermine, or may appear to undermine, credibility and impartiality.
(x1)
5
4
Staff members with the requisite experience, expertise, and skills to deliver the services proposed; Expertise in delivering the identified service category(ies) and areas of content expertise from the scope of service section.
(x4)
20
5
For each area of content expertise, describes knowledge and experience and provides relevant staff resumes.
(x2)
10
6
For each proposed offering, provides a sample budget that is deliverables-based and/or based on hourly/daily rates that are inclusive of all costs. Rates are clear and reasonable.
(x1)
5
7
Completed contact information, service matrix and provided references.
(x2)
10
8
Supplier Diversity Program Plan (Any Bidder responding to an RFR Bid, valued over $250,000 annually, must submit the SDP Form uploaded to COMMBUYS with this Bid, at the time of submission with a percentage 1% or greater. This form will be part of the evaluation on this scorecard and points will be calculated as follows: 1 % - 1.9% = 5 points, 2% - 2.9% = 10 points, 3% - 3.9% = 15 points, 4% - 4.9% = 20 points, 5% or higher = 25 points.
(x5)
25
9
Bidder has completed and submitted the Prompt Payment Discount (PPD) form with a 1% (average) or higher (above average) discount.
(x1)
5
10
Demonstrated experience of the proposed staff in working with diverse and/or economically disadvantaged communities/districts and conducting research that involves multiple stakeholders using culturally responsive practices. Commitment to educational equity and dismantling structural racism. The quality of demonstrated awareness of and commitment to diversity and equity and research that reflects these.
(x1)
5
11
The degree to which the proposed staff have demonstrated experience successfully completing complex projects with educational stakeholders across all levels of the public education sector, including state education agencies, district administration, school-based staff, other providers, and students and families.
(x1)
5
Total:
100

Comments:

image1.jpeg image2.gif

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .