20220518_North_Cargo_Feasibility_Study_Overview_Graphics_DRAFT.pdf
PDF 4 MB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 25-029-RFQ
- Issued by
- Kenton County, Kentucky
About this file
The document is a North Cargo Feasibility Assessment draft from May 2022, prepared by CVG (Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport) for evaluating potential cargo facility expansion alternatives. The study examines three site layout options for a new cargo facility, analyzing aircraft parking configurations, facility footprints, and operational requirements for different aircraft types including B747-8F, B777F, and B767-300F. Each alternative explores different scenarios for facility placement, temporary structures, cargo positions, and ground support equipment staging areas, with detailed considerations for utility infrastructure, parking needs, and operational efficiency.
The feasibility assessment includes comprehensive cost estimates for each alternative, ranging from approximately $26 million to $38.6 million, with detailed breakdowns of facility costs, sitework, design evolution, markups, and soft costs. The study also explores temporary structure options using Sprung structures, which could potentially save around $3.1 million compared to permanent structures. The analysis provides in-depth technical details such as facility requirements (tons per square foot), automation levels, parking calculations, utility load capacities, and shadow studies to assess potential impacts on surrounding airport infrastructure. Alternative configurations were evaluated to optimize cargo handling capabilities, aircraft positioning, and overall operational effectiveness for the North Cargo site.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
N o r t h C a r g o F e a s i b i l i t y As s e s s m e n t | M a y 2 0 2 2
Annual Operations
B747- 8F
B777F
B767- 300F
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
520 936
Annual Tonnage
23,712
28,912
27,560 80,184
80,184
80,184
Max Payload (tons)
53 139
High Automation/Efficiency 20,000 sq.ft.
Average Automation/Efficiency
32,100 sq.ft.
Low Automation/Efficiency (Manual) 80,200 sq.ft.
Facility Footprint
Low Automation/Efficiency (Manual)
Average Automation/Efficiency
High Automation/Efficiency
Facility Requirements (tons/SF) 1 ton/SF
1.5 – 2.5 tons/SF
2.5 – 4 tons/SF
Planning Factors
Employee Parking (Warehouse)
Visitor Parking
Truck Docks
Number of Stalls/Docks
24 – 64
Employee Parking (Office)
16 – 24
8 – 16
24 – 48
3 – 8 stalls per 10,000 SF of warehouse
1 – 2 stalls per 10,000 SF of warehouse
0.3 – 0.6 per 1,000 SF of warehouse
2 – 3 stalls per 1,000 SF of office
Landside Total Stalls
76 Recommended
Utility Load/Capacity Needs ROM Cost Estimate Existing gas line (1 ¼”) is undersized for the proposed building Recommend upsizing and connecting to 4” main gas line 150’ from building Assume a delivered pressure of 2 psi and 27,000 CFH required (3”-4”)
Existing sanitary line (6”) is adequate size and outlets to a 15” main line Recommend to evaluate condition of 6” pipe for re-use Discharge to the sewer system of about 1200 gallons per day
Existing water line (6”) is undersized for the proposed building’s fire suppression system Recommend upsizing water line and connecting to 12” water line 200’ from building 100 employees at 10 gallons per day per employee = 1,000 GPD
Existing electric line size/capacity Recommend running new service off main line and connecting 150’ from building 480 Volt Service at 800 amps
Fire service water supply should be capable of delivering 3,500 GPM at 25 psi
D R A F T
R unw ay 18C
/36C R unw ay
18C /36C
R unw ay 18C
/36C
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
80,200 SF Facility 8,020 SF Mezzanine Office
76 Parking Stalls
24 Truck Docks
213,500 SF GSE Staging, Storage, or Maintenance Areas
85’ Clearance for Nose Loading Operations
Three B747-8F Parking Positions
167.5’
Sign Shop to Remain
8,020 SF Mezzanine Office 76 Parking Stalls
85’ Clearance for Nose Loading Operations
Three B747-8F RON Positions
167.5’
Sign Shop to be Demolished
80,200 SF Facility
8,020 SF Mezzanine Office
76 Parking Stalls
24 Truck Docks
237,300 SF GSE Staging, Storage, or Maintenance Areas
25’ 167.5’
Sign Shop to Remain
24 Truck Docks
80,200 SF Facility
25’
Three B747-8F RON or Cargo Parking Positions
Three B767-300F Parking Positions
Three B747-8F Parking Positions
Potential Utility Corridor Area
Potential Utility Corridor Area
Potential Utility Corridor Area
110,500 SF GSE Staging, Storage, or Maintenance Areas
Facility ($M)
Sitework ($M)
Design Evolution
($M)
Markups ($M)
Soft Costs ($M) Total
Alternative 1 $16.1 $2.0 $3.6 $3.6 $3.9 $29,150,380
Alternative 2 $16.1 $7.8 $4.8 $4.8 $5.1 $38,653,093
Alternative 3 $16.1 $3.0 $3.8 $3.9 $4.1 $30,852,282
North Cargo Feasibility Assessment – Temporary Structure Overview | May 2022
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
D R A F T
R unw ay 18C
/36C R unw ay
18C /36C
R unw ay 18C
/36C
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
56,000 SF
Temporary Landside
Temporary Landside Connection
Two B747-8F Cargo Positions
167.5’
Sign Shop to Remain
167.5’
Sign Shop to be Demolished
167.5’
Sign Shop to Remain
Three B767-300F Cargo Positions
Three B747-8F Cargo Positions
69,300 SF
Temporary Structure
80,200 SF
Permanent Structure
140’
150’
150’
150’
534.65’
495’ Temporary Loss of One Cargo Position
Temporary Landside Connection
Two B747-8F RON Positions
80,200 SF
Permanent Structure
140’
150’
150’150’
534.65’
575’
Temporary Loss of One RON Position
Temporary Landside Connection
Two B747-8F RON/Cargo Positions
80,200 SF
Permanent Structure
140’
150’
150’
150’
300’
Temporary Loss of One RON/Cargo Position
80,500 SF
Temporary Structure
75,000 SF
Temporary Landside
42,000 SF
Temporary Structure
66,000 SF
Temporary Landside
Facility ($M)
Sitework ($M)
Design Evolution
($M)
Markups ($M)
Soft Costs ($M) Total
Alternative 1 $14.2 $2.0 $3.2 $3.3 $3.5 $26,054,812
Alternative 2 $14.2 $7.8 $4.4 $4.4 $4.7 $35,539,665
Alternative 3 $14.2 $3.0 $3.4 $3.5 $3.7 $27,738,853
Sprung Interior Finishes/Lining Options
140’ Wide Structure Cross Section
ROM Cost Estimate (Based on Sprung Option 1)
*Savings of approximately $3.1M compared to permanent structures
Sprung Cost Detail
Detail Purchase Price
36-month Rental
Freight to Site
Technical Consultant
Option 1
Insulated w/ interior liner Flat ends 15-year membrane Daylight panels
$4,455,000 $113,000/ month $120,000 $75,500
Option 2
Insulated w/o interior liner Flat ends 15-year membrane Daylight panels
$4,135,000 $104,000/ month $120,000 $50,000
Overview Lifespan – exterior fabric types 15–18-year membrane 28–30-year membrane
Interior options Insulated (9” R-30) or non-insulated Interior liner or no interior liner White polypropylene or foil shell backing with insulation exposed
Rental opportunities 1-year minimum 5-year maximum Break even point at approximately three years Opportunity to purchase (60% of payments applied to purchase price)
Engineering and Manufacturing Timelines Engineering
Structural only (base plate up) Does not include mechanical, electrical, plumbing, etc.
Minimal engineering deposit required to initiate drawings 15-20 working days to complete drawings
Manufacturing 8-10 weeks from final signed drawing and 50% deposit
Construction duration Option 1 – insulation with interior liner
14-person crew 8-hour workdays/5 days a week 172 total workdays
Option 2 – insulation without interior liner 14-person crew 8-hour workdays/5 days a week 107 total workdays
Expedite by 10-hour workdays, six-day work weeks, or two crews
Quality/Maintenance Architectural membrane provides tough, durable, flexible performance Engineered for extreme climates – winds, snow, seismic, heat, cold Engineered as permanent but designed for long term flexibility R25 – R30 blanket insulation to provide optimal heating/cooling control Designed to stand alone or enhance/expand existing facilities with connecting corridors or a direct connection to a hard structure Pressure washing/cleaning structure approximately one time per year is virtually the only maintenance necessary
N o r t h C a r g o F e a s i b i l i t y As s e s s m e n t – S h a d o w S t u d y | M a y 2 0 2 2
Alternative 1
Alternative 2
Alternative 3
D R A F T
R unw ay 18C
/36C
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
20’ Shadow 40’ Long
Three B767-300F Cargo Positions
13’ Shadow 12’ Long
6’ Shadow 67’ Long
6’ Shadow 55’ Long
6’ Shadow 62’ Long
32’ Shadow 190’ Long
30’ Shadow 160’ Long
32’ Shadow 175’ Long
13’ Shadow 12’ Long
20’ Shadow 40’ Long
3’ Shadow 18’ Long
29’ Shadow 115’ Long
29’ Shadow 100’ Long
26’ Shadow 72’ Long
11’ Shadow 12’ Long
21’ Shadow 30’ Long
13’ Shadow 33’ Long
12’ Shadow 10’ Long
3’ Shadow 41’ Long
4’ Shadow 28’ Long
29’ Shadow 116’ Long
28’ Shadow 105’ Long
28’ Shadow 98’ Long
13’ Shadow 12’ Long
20’ Shadow 40’ Long
27’ Shadow 67’ Long
25’ Shadow 62’ Long
27’ Shadow 60’ Long
18’ Shadow 16’ Long
Taxiw ay C
Three B747-8F RON or Cargo Positions
Alternative 3b Rotated 30° CW
R unw ay 18C
/36C
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Three B767-300F Cargo Positions
Taxiw ay C
Three B747-8F RON or Cargo Positions
Alternative 2b Rotated 30° CW
R unw ay 18C
/36C
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Three B747-8F Cargo Positions
Taxiw ay C
Three B747-8F RON Positions
Alternative 1b 50’ Shift East
R unw ay 18C
/36C
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Taxiw ay C
Three B747-8F Cargo Positions
R unw ay 18C
/36C
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Three B747-8F Cargo Positions
Taxiw ay C
Three B747-8F RON Positions
R unw ay 18C
/36C
Taxiw ay D
Taxiw ay E
Taxiw ay C
Three B747-8F Cargo Positions
Aircraft ADG Length Wingspan Tail Height
A300-600 IV 177.43 147.10 54.66
A310-200F IV 153.08 144.00 52.33
A319neo III 111.02 117.45 39.73 A320neo III 123.26 117.45 39.63
A321-200 III 146.03 111.88 39.70
A330-200F V 192.98 197.85 57.12 A330-900 V 208.95 209.97 56.20
MD-90 III 152.56 107.84 31.17
B737 MAX 7 III 116.67 117.85 41.01
B737 MAX 8 III 129.53 117.85 40.85
B737 MAX 9 III 138.16 117.85 40.68
B747-400F V 231.86 212.99 64.11
B747-8F VI 250.16 224.41 64.17
B757-200 IV 155.25 124.81 45.08
B757-300 IV 178.58 124.83 44.75
B767-200 IV 159.19 156.07 52.92
B767-300F IV 180.18 156.07 52.92
B777F V 209.09 212.60 62.30 B787-8 V 186.09 197.24 56.07
CRJ-200 II 87.82 69.65 20.73
CRJ-700 II 106.56 76.27 24.84
CRJ-900 III 118.90 81.53 24.11
Embraer ERJ 145 II 98.00 65.75 22.34 Embraer E170 STD III 98.10 85.30 32.25 Embraer E175 STD III 103.94 85.30 32.12 Embraer E190 STD III 118.90 94.23 34.68
ATCT Location Map
R unw ay 18C /36C
R unw ay 18R /36L
R unw ay 18L/36R
Runway 9/27
North Cargo Alternatives Site
Air Traffic Control Tower
| Slide Number 1 |
| Slide Number 2 |
| Slide Number 3 |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .