20200318_Exhibit8_RE_ReviewChecklist-for-MC-Tests_MIPR.docx

DOCX document 34 KB Posted

Attached to
DLI QC and Validation Support Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
W9124N20R0001
Issued by
Department of the Army Materiel Command Mission and Installation Contracting Command Fort Eustis

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to DLI QC and Validation Support, newest first.
File Type Posted
20200330_W9124N20R0001_Govt_Rsp_to_Questions.pdf PDF
20200330_SF33_ConformCpy_Amend.pdf PDF
20200330_Amend0001_Questions_GovtRsp.pdf PDF
Attach1_Consent_Form_Template.docx DOCX document
20200318_Exhibit3_Blank_TestSecurityAgreement.doc DOC document
Attach4_Staff Matrix.xls XLS spreadsheet
20200318_PRS_DLI_QCVal.pdf PDF
20200318_Exhibit2_Blank_ILR-and-Passage-review-form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20200318_Exhibit6_Modes_Addendum.pdf PDF
20200318_PWS_DLI_QCVal.pdf PDF
20200318_Exhibit9_Travel_Expenses_Form.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
20200318_Exhibit5_DLPT_FrameworkDocument.pdf PDF
20200318_Exhibit4_DLIFLC_Reg_611_1.PDF PDF
Attach2_Relevant_Contract_Form_Template.docx DOCX document
20200318_Exhibit1_AR 611-5 ArmyPersTesting.pdf PDF
Attach3_DRAFT_TO1_Languages_Quantities.docx DOCX document
20200319_W9124N20R0001_Solicitation_DLI_QCVal.pdf PDF
20200318_Exhibit7_RE_ReviewChecklist-for-CRT-Tests_MIPR.docx DOCX document
Show all 18

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

RE Review Checklist for MC Tests Orientation Statement

· Correctly represents Target Language Passage text type

· Does not give away the Key to any Item Target Language Passage

· Required language or language variant

· Grammar, vocabulary, spelling [RC only], and register reflect generally accepted usage and are appropriate for communicative context and intent

· Content is for contemporary readers and listeners and reflects a FLO Topic

· Authentic, or scripted in a manner that simulates cultural and linguistic authenticity

· Cultural schematic demands appropriate to level

· [LC] Words/phrases are distinguishable to a listener at the targeted ILR Level, with regard to speed, enunciation, background noise, and/or audio distortion

· [LC] Speaker identity and turn-taking are clear and resulting demands are appropriate to targeted ILR level

· [LC] Accent or accents of the speaker or speakers conforms/conform to the ILR descriptors

· [LC] Transcript matches audio English Rendering

· Adheres closely to the grammatical and lexical convention of the target language, while also observing the rules of English grammar

· Accurately and completely reflects TL Passage content/intent

· Identifies/explains language features of TL (idioms, syntactic patterns, “false friends,” etc.) that are significantly different from those of US EN in parenthetical notes and/or footnotes

· Explains relevant aspects of TL culture that are different from those of the US in parenthetical notes and/or footnotes

· Approximates Level of TL Passage, if possible [note if EN is significantly harder or easier than TL]

· The English equivalent of the target language (TL) words or phrases that appear in the stems are marked by gray highlight in the rendering as well as in the TL passage. Please refer to the Rendering Guidelines document.

Item

· Item tests comprehension of the Core of the TL Passage at the targeted Level

· Item or the focus of the item corresponds to an ILR can-do statement

· Combination of Stem + Key correctly represents TL Passage content/intent

· There is only one Key (no Distractor is keyable)

· All distractors are based on the content or context of the TL passage

· [If more than one Item in set] Items do not overlap/depend on one another/give away each other’s Keys

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .