2-Utah Code §63G-6a-1203.pdf
PDF 8 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- TB2660-WT
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This is a legal statute file from the State of Utah, specifically Utah Code §63G-6a-1203, which establishes void and unenforceable provisions in state and local procurement contracts effective May 7, 2025. The statute applies to the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) and other Utah governmental entities entering into procurement contracts. The related contract opportunity involves the Wasatch Elementary Tunnel Waterproofing Project, an Invitation for Bid (IFB) seeking a qualified vendor to provide comprehensive waterproofing services including labor, materials, equipment, traffic control, surface preparation, waterproofing injection, joint sealant replacement, localized concrete repair, and cleanup to address water infiltration in a pedestrian tunnel beneath South Temple at Wasatch Elementary School located at 30 R Street, Salt Lake City, Utah 84103. A mandatory pre-bid site visit is scheduled for Tuesday, April 14, 2026 at 9:00 A.M. at the south side of the elementary school near the tunnel entrance; contractors failing to attend will be prohibited from bidding. All bidder questions must be submitted in writing through the Bonfire/U3P electronic platform or asked during the site visit, with official answers provided only through Bonfire/U3P or authorized addenda issued by the SLCSD.
The statute specifies that certain contractual provisions are void and unenforceable in Utah procurement contracts, including those restricting governmental immunity, requiring indemnification or defense obligations, mandating binding arbitration, subjecting contracts to non-Utah jurisdiction, allowing unilateral vendor modifications, or limiting vendor liability for negligence or willful misconduct causing bodily injury, death, or property damage. The statute permits limited exemptions to these restrictions when authorized by the assistant attorney general or procurement official through signed, express written authorization prior to contract formation, particularly for provisions involving non-Utah jurisdiction based on disproportionate bargaining positions, market conditions, or unique circumstances. Additionally, the statute provides that neither the state nor any procurement unit may be held liable for special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages arising from any procurement contract. All bids for the Wasatch Elementary project must be submitted electronically through Bonfire/U3P and must include the base bid, alternate bid, bid bond, licensing documentation, and any other documents required by the bid specifications.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Utah Code
Effective 5/7/2025 63G-6a-1203 Void and unenforceable provisions of a contract -- Exemptions -- Limitation of liability and damages.
(1) As used in this section, "governmental entity" means the same as that term is defined in
Section 63G-7-102.
(2) This section does not apply to:
(a) a procurement contract that becomes operative or enforceable before the effective date of this section; or
(b) the extension or renewal of a contract described in Subsection (2)(a).
(3)
(a) Except as provided under Subsections (5) and (6), a provision of a procurement contract described in Subsection (4), including a provision incorporated into the contract by reference, is void and unenforceable.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of a procurement contract that is void and unenforceable under Subsection (3)(a), the remaining provisions of the contract are severable, valid, and enforceable to the fullest extent provided under Utah law.
(4) A provision is void and unenforceable under Subsection (3)(a) if the provision:
(a) restricts the state's or a procurement unit's protection under Chapter 7, Governmental
Immunity Act of Utah, from suit, liability, judgment, or obligation, including an obligation to respond to or defend against any claim;
(b) requires a governmental entity to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless another person;
(c) restricts a governmental entity's ability to seek relief in state court;
(d) subjects a governmental entity to binding arbitration or other form of dispute resolution outside the courts;
(e) disallows the procurement unit from having legal counsel and representation from:
(i) legal counsel that the procurement unit chooses;
(ii) the attorney general; or
(iii) legal counsel chosen by a person that has a contractual obligation to indemnify, defend, or hold harmless the state or a procurement unit, subject to the written consent of the state or the procurement unit;
(f) subject to Subsection (5):
(i) subjects a procurement contract or a party to the contract to the laws of any jurisdiction other than Utah; or
(ii) requires the parties to resolve a dispute in a jurisdiction or venue other than Utah;
(g) restricts a governmental entity from making disclosures of information, as required by law or for any legitimate governmental purpose;
(h) allows a vendor to unilaterally modify any part of the procurement contract, including any provision to which the contract contemplates giving legal effect upon the vendor providing notice to the procurement unit of the modification or of the created legal effect; and
(i) subject to Subsection (6):
(i) requires a governmental entity to maintain insurance coverage beyond the types and limits required by the state risk manager appointed under Section 63A-4-101.5, or to name an additional insured under that coverage;
(ii) allows a vendor to automatically renew a procurement contract or that creates a contractual term in violation of the terms permitted under Section 63G-6a-1204; or
(iii) limits the liability of a vendor or any third-party for bodily injury, death, or damage to tangible property caused by the negligence or willful misconduct of a vendor, a third-party, or the vendor's or third-party's employees or agents.
Utah Code
(5) The assistant attorney general or authorized legal counsel for the procurement unit that will sign a procurement contract may, via a signed, express, written authorization made prior to the formation of the contract, exempt the contract from a provision described in Subsection (4)(f), if the assistant attorney general or authorized legal counsel determines that an exemption is necessary to promote the best interests of the state or the procurement unit due to:
(a) the relative disproportionate bargaining positions of the contracting parties;
(b) market conditions; or
(c) other unique circumstances identified and described in the authorization.
(6) The procurement official for a procurement unit seeking to enter into a procurement contract may, via a signed, express, written authorization made prior to the formation of the contract, exempt the contract from a provision described in Subsection (4)(i), if the contract indicates the procurement unit's intent to include the provision, with explicit reference to this section.
(7) Notwithstanding any provision of a procurement contract to the contrary, under no circumstance may the state or a procurement unit be held liable for any special, incidental, indirect, or consequential damages arising from or relating to a procurement contract.
Amended by Chapter 69, 2025 General Session
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .