2.2.1-Attachment 2 Past Performance Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 30 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 70CMSD23R00000001
- Issued by
-
Immigration and Customs Enforcement
About this file
This solicitation seeks proposals for Student and Exchange Visitor Program I-901 Fee System Operation and Maintenance Support. The selected contractor will provide hosting, software maintenance, and customer service support for the I-901 online fee payment system. Services include maintaining a continuously available online payment processing system, implementing system enhancements, and assisting users with any issues. The hosted system currently processes I-901 fees for the Department of Homeland Security Immigration and Customs Enforcement. If a new contractor is selected, the system will need to be migrated to their secure hosting environment. The solicitation is available for download on www.SAM.gov. Proposals are due by the dates provided in the attachments. The solicitation is being issued by Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
HSCENV-08-Q-00014
Attachment 2: Past Performance Questionnaire Date of Form: 3/23/2023 70CMSD23R00000001
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PART ONE: INSTRUCTIONS
The Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) have a solicitation to provide Student Exchange and Visitor Program I-901 Form Fee Collection and Receipting activities for the purpose of expediting the collection of fees and applications related to, and in support of, SEVP operations. These services and activities include hosting and software operations and maintenance (O&M) services to ensure a continuously operating and secure application available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week annually capable of processing the I-901 payments received by SEVP. Past Performance is an extremely important part of the evaluation criteria for this acquisition, so your input is very important. The information is to be provided directly to, the ICE Contracting Officer. This information will not be disclosed to the offeror. Please provide an honest assessment and return the questionnaire to ICE by email, no later than 1000 eastern, June 1, 2023. If you have questions, please contact Chris Jackson at (682) 308-7165 or Christopher.L.Jackson@dhs.gov.
PART TWO: GENERAL INFORMATION
PAST PERFORMANCE/EXPERIENCE QUESTIONNAIRE
PERFORMANCE EVALUATION
I. CONTRACT INDENTIFICATION
A. CONTRACT NUMBER:
B. OFFEROR:
C. TYPE OF CONTRACT:
☒ COMPETITIVE ☐ SOLE SOURCE
☐ FIXED PRICE ☐ TIME & MATERIAL ☐ LABOR HOUR
☐ COST REIMBURSEMENT ☐ OTHER (SPECIFY)
D. COMPLEXITY OF WORK: ☐ DIFFICULT ☐ ROUTINE
E. CONTRACT AMOUNT: $
F. CONTRACT PERIOD:
G: AGENCY NAME:
H. Nature of Effort (i.e., please describe the scope of the effort performed by the contractor and the type of tasks involved.
II. Adjectival ratings are defined below and should be used as a reference in assessing performance:
| Rating | |
| Definition |
| Exceptional (E) | |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective. |
| Very Good (VG) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was effective. |
| Satisfactory (S) |
| Performance meets contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal (M) |
| Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented. |
| Unsatisfactory (U) |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
III. EVALUATION
A. PERFORMANCE HISTORY
1. To what extent did the offeror adhere to the contract delivery schedule?
☐ E ☐ VG ☐ S ☐ M ☐ U
2. To what extent did the offeror submit required reports and documentation in a timely manner?
☐ E ☐ VG ☐ S ☐ M ☐ U
3. To what extent were the offeror’s reports and documentation accurate and complete?
4. To what extent was the offeror able to solve contract performance problems without extensive guidance from government counterparts?
5. To what extent did the offeror display initiative in meeting requirements?
☐ E ☐ VG ☐ S ☐ M ☐ U
6. Did the offeror commit adequate resources in a timely fashion to the contract to meet the requirement and to successfully solve problems?
7. To what extent did the offeror respond positively and promptly to technical directions, contract change orders, etc.?
8. To what extent was the offeror’s quality control successful to include problem tracking/reporting documentation timely, accurate, and of appropriate content?
B. TERMINATION HISTORY
9. Has this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience?
☐ Yes ☐Default ☐ Convenience ☐ No
10. Are there any pending terminations?
☐ Yes ☐ No
C. COST MANAGEMENT
11. To what extent did the offeror meet the proposed cost estimate?
☐E ☐VG ☐S ☐M ☐U
Additional comments:
Printed Name of Reviewer:
Title of Reviewer:
Phone Number:
Email address:
Signature: _______________________________________________ Date: ___________________
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .