19AQMM26R0156-0001.pdf

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 1 of 9

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE RATING

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

04/21/2026

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

CODE

Khoa D Tran

NAME

703-875-5854

TEL.

TranKD@state.gov

EMAIL

6. ISSUED BY GAAMCODE

Regional Support

GA/AM/TSS/SVC/RS

Bureau of Global Acquisitions 1200 Wilson Blvd (SA-06B) Arlington, VA 22209

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

19AQMM26R0156

CODE FACILITY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, country, state and ZIP Code) (X)

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

04/21/2026

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER

NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X XThe above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended, Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods: (a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning ____copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT

ORDER NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return _______ copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

Amendment 0001 is issued for the following:

1) Provide responses to solicitation questions.

2) Add 52.222-90

3) Revise L.5.1.1.e and L.5.2

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print) 16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

Khoa D Tran

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 15C. DATE SIGNED

By (Signature of Contracting Officer)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 16C. DATE SIGNED

04/29/2026

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV.

11/2016) Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

CGFS // CGFS

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 2 of 9

Section A - Solicitation/Contract Form

Line Item Summary

Solicitation Number:

19AQMM26R0156

Contract Number: Title:

Specialized Operational Equipment

Date of Solicitation:

04/21/2026

Number Supplies or Services Qty Unit Unit Price Total (Inc. disc., tax, and fees)

PSC: 5865

PSC Description: ELECTRONIC

COUNTERMEASURES, COUNTER-

COUNTERMEASURES AND QUICK REACTION

CAPABILITY EQUIPMENT

Type of Contract Pricing: Other

Original: 1.0

Change: 0.0

Current: 1.0

EA Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Description: Option Period 3 - Logistic Support and ODCs

Pricing Options: Unexercised Option 004

CLIN Funding: Cost:

Base Totals: Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Exercised Options Totals: Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Unexercised Options Totals: Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Base and Options Totals: Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

Original: $0.00

Change: $0.00

Current: $0.00

652.242-70 - CONTRACTING OFFICER'S REPRESENTATIVE (COR) (AUG 1999)

(a) The Contracting Officer may designate in writing one or more Government employees, by name and position title, to take action for the Contracting Officer under this contract. Each designee shall be identified as a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR).

Such designation(s) shall specify the scope and limitations of the authority so delegated; provided, that the designee shall not change the terms or conditions of the contract, unless the COR is a warranted Contracting Officer and this authority is delegated in the designation.

(b) The COR is [insert job title of COR] .

(End of clause)

G-002 - CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA

Contracting Officer: [NAME]

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 3 of 9

Contract Administrator: [NAME] Telephone Number: [NUMBER] Facsimile Number: [NUMBER] First Class Mailing:

U.S. Department of State Office of Acquisition Management P.O. Box 9115, Rosslyn Station Arlington, Virginia 22219

Courier or Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of State Office of Acquisition Management 4th Floor 1735 N. Lynn Street Arlington, Virginia 22209

Contracting Officer's Representative (COR): [NAME FOR CONTRACT, TBD FOR SOLICITATION] Telephone Number: [NUMBER] Facsimile Number: [NUMBER] U.S. Department of State: [ADDRESS] (end of clause)

H-016 - KEY PERSONNEL

(a) The Contractor shall assign to this contract the following key personnel:

Program Manager, Deputy Project/Logistics Manager, and WMD SME. PM certification or equivalent is required for PM and DP/ LM. At least one key personnel assigned to this contract shall possess TOP SECRET personnel security clearance prior to contract performance.

(b) The Contractor agrees that a partial basis for award of this contract is the list of key personnel proposed. Accordingly, the Contractor agrees to assign to this contract those key persons whose resumes were submitted with the proposal necessary to fulfill the requirements of the contract. No substitution shall be made without prior notification to and concurrence of the Contracting Officer. During the first ninety days of performance, the Contractor shall make no substitutions of key personnel unless the substitution is necessitated by illness, death, or termination of employment.

(c) All proposed substitutes shall meet or exceed the qualifications of the person to be replaced. The Contracting Officer shall be notified in writing of any proposed substitution at least forty-five days, or ninety days if a security clearance is to be obtained, in advance of the proposed substitution. Such notification shall include:

(1) an explanation of the circumstances necessitating the substitution;

(2) a complete resume of the proposed substitute; and

(3) any other information requested by the Contracting Officer to enable him to judge whether or not the Contractor is maintaining the same high quality of personnel that provided the partial basis for award.

(end of clause)

H-031 - SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

H-031 - SECURITY REQUIREMENTS

(a) A facility security clearance at the TOP SECRET is required for contract performance in accordance with the DD Form 254, Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification, attached to this contract.

(b) Since it will be necessary for some Contractor Personnel to have access to classified material and/or enter into areas requiring security clearances, each Contractor employee requiring such access must have a TOP

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 4 of 9

SECRET personnel security clearance issued by the Defense Counterintelligence and Security Agency (DCSA) prior to contract performance.

(c) The Contractor shall obtain a Department of State building pass for all employees performing under this contract who require frequent and continuing access to Department of State facilities in accordance with Bureau of Diplomatic Security Instructions.

(d) Performance of this contract shall be in accordance with the attached DD Form 254, Department of Defense Contract Security Classification Specification and FAR 52.240-92 "SECURITY REQUIREMENTS."

(e) Classified material received or generated in the performance of this contract shall be safeguarded and disposed of in accordance with the National Industrial Security Program Operating Manual (NISPOM) (32 CFR Part 117)

Clause 52.222-90 Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors (DEVIATION APR 2026) was added or modified.

52.222-90 - Addressing DEI Discrimination by Federal Contractors (DEVIATION APR 2026)

(a) Definitions. As used in this clause—

Program participation means membership or participation in, or access or admission to: training, mentoring, or leadership development programs; educational opportunities; clubs; associations; or similar opportunities that are sponsored or established by the contractor or subcontractor.

Racially discriminatory diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) activities means disparate treatment based on race or ethnicity in the recruitment, employment (e.g., hiring, promotions), contracting (e.g., vendor agreements), program participation, or allocation or deployment of an entity's resources.

(b) In connection with the performance of work under this contract, the Contractor agrees as follows:

(1) The Contractor will not engage in any racially discriminatory DEI activities;

(2) The Contractor will furnish all information and reports, including providing access to books, records, and accounts, as required by the Contracting Officer, for purposes of ascertaining compliance with this clause;

(3) In the event of the Contractor's or a subcontractor's noncompliance with this clause, this contract may be canceled, terminated, or suspended in whole or in part, and the Contractor or subcontractor may be declared ineligible for further Government contracts;

(4) The Contractor will report any subcontractor's known or reasonably knowable conduct that may violate this clause to the Contracting Officer and take any appropriate remedial actions directed by the Contracting Officer;

and

(5) The Contractor will inform the Contracting Officer if a subcontractor sues the Contractor and the suit puts at issue, in any way, the validity of this clause.

(6) The Contractor recognizes that compliance with the requirements of this clause are material to the Government's payment decisions for purposes of 31 U.S.C. 3729(b)(4).

(c) The Contractor must include the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in subcontracts at any tier, including those for commercial products and commercial services, except those where the place of delivery or performance is outside the United States.

(End of clause)

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 5 of 9

L-001 - INSTRUCTIONS TO OFFERORS

L.1 Award without Discussions and Final Proposal Revisions DOS reserves the right to make contract award based on initial proposal submissions without holding discussions and/or requesting final proposal revisions. Therefore, the initial proposal should contain the Offerors best overall proposal from a technical and price standpoint. However, DOS reserves the right to conduct discussions with the Offeror(s) included in the competitive range during the evaluation of proposals. DOS reserves the right to conduct a Final Proposal Revision (FPR) evaluation process, if deemed necessary.

If a FPR process is initiated, instructions will be communicated to the Offeror(s).

Offerors, including any offeror organized as a joint venture, must have an active SAM registration at the time of proposal submission and throughout the procurement process. Any offeror whose registration is not active in SAM at the time of proposal submission will be excluded from the process and their proposals will not be evaluated.

L.2 Exceptions and Deviations Offerors are cautioned that any exceptions or deviations taken to any portion of this solicitation may result in the Offeror’s entire proposal being declared unacceptable. It is the Government’s intent that a successful Offeror will satisfactorily meet all requirements as stated in the solicitation. Should the Offeror request exceptions and/or deviations from any requirement, the SOW, and/or any other clauses, provisions, or terms and conditions of the solicitation, that request must be justified (e.g., the requirement is not technically achievable, or the Government referenced the wrong standard). The Offeror shall identify each requirement, clause, provision, or term and condition for which exceptions and/or deviations are requested in the appropriate proposal. Each exception and/or deviation identified shall be fully explained including sufficient justification as to technical problems, cost savings, and/or benefits to the Government so that the Government can thoroughly evaluate the Offeror’s input and determine if it is in the best interests of the Government to amend the solicitation and allow all Offerors to respond to the amended requirement(s). If the Offeror’s explanation is not acceptable to the Government, the exception and/or deviation will not be allowed and, unless the original requirement is met, the proposal may be found unacceptable.

L.3 Incurring Costs The Government is not obligated to pay any cost incurred by the Offeror in the preparation and submission of a proposal in response to this solicitation. The Offeror is advised that the Contracting Officer is the only person who can legally obligate the Government for the expenditure of public funds in connection with this procurement.

L.4 Use of Non-Government Evaluators Contractor support services may be used to assist the Government in performing technical and/or price/cost evaluations of the Offeror's proposals. Support contractors, if used, will be authorized access only to those portions of the proposal data and discussions that are necessary to enable them to provide advice on specialized matters or on particular problems. Support contractors may participate as non-voting members of a source evaluation board and participate as technical advisors to a source selection board.

However, in no event shall support contractors participate as voting members of any source selection board. The proposal shall be used and disclosed for evaluation purposes only.

L.5 Proposal Preparation Instructions and Formatting Offerors shall review and follow all instructions because failure to do so may result in the proposal being determined to be unacceptable and removed from consideration for award.

This section will specify the contents and formatting for the offeror to use when preparing and submitting their proposal. The entire proposal shall consist of two (2) separate volumes as follows:

Technical Proposal: Electronic Submission Only Price Proposal: Electronic Submission Only

The proposal shall be prepared using 12 point, Times New Roman font, with 1-inch margins, and pages shall be numbered consecutively. The font shall be Times New Roman with one exception, Arial may be used for tables, figures, and graphics. The font size for tables and figures, and any other type of inserts can be no smaller than 8 point; the font size for any graphics as it appears on the printed page can be no smaller than 8 point.

Pricing shall be prepared in Microsoft Excel and all formulas shall be displayed in all applicable data cells.

L.5.1 Volume I: Technical Proposal

The Offeror’s Volume I: Technical Proposal shall be organized as described below.

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 6 of 9

NO PRICE INFORMATION SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE TECHNICAL PROPOSAL.

VOLUME I: TECHNICAL PROPOSAL

Cover Page, Letter, and Table of Contents: No page limit Factor 1: Technical Understanding of the Overall Requirement: 10 page limit Factor 2: Technical & Management Approach to Sample Call Order: 15 page limit Factor 3: Relevant Past Performance: 2 page limit per past performance summary Assumptions and Exceptions: 2 page limit

The following supplemental instructions are provided to ensure a consistent and detailed description of the Offeror’s approach and the associated price. The Offeror must address all instructions as directed below. Failure to comply with this requirement may eliminate an Offeror’s proposal from consideration.

L.5.1.1 Cover Letter A cover letter shall accompany the proposal to set forth any information that the Offeror wishes to bring to the attention of the Government. The cover letter shall contain a statement that the Offeror’s proposal is valid for a period of 180 calendar days from the submission date of the proposal.

The following introductory information is required in the Cover Letter of Volume I of the proposal:

a. RFP Number

b. Name and address of Offeror

c. Name, telephone number & Email address of main point-of-contact

d. Name, title and signature of authorized representative

e. Offeror UEI

L.5.1.2 Past Performance Information Provide at least three (3) Past Performance Summaries as the prime or as a subcontractor reflecting work similar to that described in the SOW that is underway or has been completed within the past three (3) years. Include a brief description of the project, contract number, period of performance, contract amount, client identification (including agency), point of contact information (e-mail and telephone number), and retention rate of personnel over the entirety of the contract/order. The contract information must be current.

Indicate whether the past performance reference is for the prime contractor, or subcontractor, if any. The contract value shall reflect the revenue realized by the Offeror for services actually performed by the Offeror. For example, if the Offeror was a subcontractor, the dollar value shall only reflect the Offeror’s portion of the work as subcontractor, not the value of the entire contract as realized by the Prime contractor.

L.5.2 Volume II: Price Proposal The Government anticipates adequate price competition under this solicitation therefore Offerors are not required to submit certified cost or pricing data with their proposals. However, in order to determine compliance with the FAR 52.222-46, Professional Services Compensation Plan, the Government has determined that supporting documentation is needed to conduct effective or meaningful reviews of the proposed prices.

Price Proposal shall depict the development of the Pricing proposal inclusive of equipment, proposed labor rates, and estimated travel cost as applicable for the base and all option years. The Offeror shall display all formulas used in calculating the overall Pricing proposal in the appropriate data cells.

M-001 - EVALUATION FACTORS AND BASIS FOR AWARD

M.1 Basis for Award

The contract award will be made to the Offeror proposing the best value to the Government based upon an integrated assessment of the evaluation factors described below in Section M.3. Four factors will be used in this evaluation.

FACTOR 1: Technical Understanding of the Overall Requirement FACTOR 2: Technical & Management Approach to Sample Call Order FACTOR 3: Relevant Past Performance

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 7 of 9

FACTOR 4: Price

M.2 Relative Order of Importance

Award will be made to the offeror: who is deemed responsible in accordance with FAR Subpart 9.1; whose proposal conforms to the solicitation’s requirements; and whose proposal is determined to provide the best value to the Government. The proposal offering the best value is the one that is most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. Such an offer may not necessarily be the one offering the lowest price or receiving the highest non-price rating.

For this solicitation, all evaluation factors other than price, when combined, are significantly more important than price. Award will not be automatically determined by numerical calculation or formula relationship between cost or price and technical merit.

As non-price factors, when combined, become more equal, the evaluated price rises in importance and may become the determining factor. The Contracting Officer will determine what trade-off between the non-price factors and price promises the best value to the Government, price and other factors considered.

Factor 1 (Technical Understanding of the Overall Requirement), Factor 2 (Technical & Management Approach to Sample Call Order), Factor 3 (Relevant Past Performance) are equally important and are the most important factors. When combined all three (3) factors are significantly more important than price.

The evaluation of the non-price factors will be based on the evaluation criteria identified in Section M.4.

M.3 Evaluation of Factors

FACTOR 1: Technical Understanding of the Overall Requirement The offeror proposal will be evaluated to assess the degree to which the proposal illustrates a thorough and comprehensive understanding of the requirements as defined in the Statement of Work (Attachment A), including the integrated strategies to be employed in acquiring the diverse items of equipment in keeping with the requirements of the SOW as needs arise for the delivery of the current, latest model, parts and specialized training for all items of equipment comprising the list of equipment set forth in Attachment B. Communication Plan and Risk Mitigation Plan are required. Subcontracting Plan is also required if Offeror is a Large Business entity based on the NAICS code used in the solicitation.

FACTOR 2: Technical & Management Approach to Sample Call Order The Offeror proposal will be evaluated to assess the degree to which the proposal illustrates a comprehensive Technical & Management Approach to executing and fulfilling the requirement of the proposed Sample Call Order (Attachment C). The proposal will be evaluated to assess whether the proposal demonstrates a comprehensive understanding of Call Order requirements and details how the Offeror shall innovatively and cost-effectively devise a strategy and plan to maintain a state of readiness and preparedness to advise and assist the NDF in the effective operation, management and timely fulfillment of its critical mission in fulfilling the needs of respective host countries with little or no advance notice as needs arise and orders are placed. This will encompass an assessment of the following areas:

1. Organizational structure.

2. Lines of communication with the Government and integration of effort.

3. Proposed team composition and key personnel to be assigned to the project.

4. Call Order and subcontract management.

5. Process for identifying, coordinating, and resolving programmatic problems, and incorporating lessons learned.

6. The routine means of communicating issues, corrective actions, and standard reports/deliverables to the Government.

7. The Offeror’s Management Approach clearly and comprehensively demonstrates the Offeror’s ability to integrate ALL components of the requirements as defined in the Call Orders requirements.

FACTOR 3: Relevant Past Performance Offerors’ past performance will be evaluated on the basis of information contained in the Offeror's proposal and the information that the Government obtains through other means such as through the Contractor’s Performance Assessment Reporting Systems (CPARS). Specifically, past performance will be evaluated to assess:

1. Whether the work is similar to that described in the BPA’s SOW based upon the nature and description of the project and specialized items of equipment comprising the Specialized Operational & CBRNE Equipment List set forth in Attachment B, relevant contract number, period of performance, contract amount, client identification (including agency), point of contact information (e-mail and telephone number), and retention rate of personnel over the entirety of the BPA period. The contract information must be current.

2. Whether the contract value reflects the revenue realized by the Offeror for services actually performed by the Offeror. For example, if the Offeror was a subcontractor, the dollar value shall only reflect the Offeror's portion of the work as subcontractor, not the value of the entire contract as realized by the Prime contractor.

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 8 of 9

3. How well the contract has performed prior relevant contracts and whether there have been issues with performance reflected on CPARS or based on information otherwise obtained.

M.4 Ratings of Non-Price Factors

The Government will evaluate the non-price factors using an adjectival rating system. The Government will assign an adjective, as defined below, based on the offeror’s ability to support the Government’s non-price requirements. Once the adjective is assigned for each area, an overall adjectival score will be assigned for the Offeror’s non-price proposal(s).

Ratings of Non-Price Factors (excluding Relevant Past Performance)

The following adjectival ratings characterize the strengths, weaknesses, and deficiencies in determining technical ratings.

RATING DESCRIPTION

Superior Proposal meets all solicitation requirements, demonstrates a good understanding of the requirements and has features that offer some advantage to the Government. Advantages/strengths generally outweigh any disadvantages/weaknesses. Good probability of success with very low degree of risk of unsuccessful performance.

Acceptable Proposal meets basic solicitation requirements and demonstrates an adequate understanding of the requirements but does not offer significant advantages to the Government over basic RFP requirements. Disadvantages/weaknesses are not significant, unless significant advantages are proposed that outweigh significant disadvantages. Reasonable probability of success with low degree of risk of unsuccessful performance.

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet requirements nor does it demonstrate an adequate approach and understanding of the requirements.

The proposal contains significant weaknesses and deficiencies.

Some areas of concern may not have been fully addressed by offeror, leaving some ambiguities. Risk of unsuccessful performance is high. Proposal is un-awardable without being rewritten.

Note: “Weakness” and “Deficiency” are defined in FAR 15.001 (Definitions).

Ratings of Relevant Past Performance

RATING DESCRIPTION

Satisfactory Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, the

Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort. Little to no Government intervention is expected/needed in order to obtain the required service.

Unkown Confidence (Neutral) No recent/relevant performance record is available or the offeror’s performance record is so sparse that no meaningful confidence assessment rating can be reasonably assigned.

No Confidence Based on the offeror’s recent/relevant performance record, substantial doubt exists that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

M.5 Price Evaluation

The Government will evaluate offers price for price reasonableness in determining contract award of the total proposed amount for the base period plus the total proposed amount for all option periods. Evaluation of options will not obligate the Government to exercise the option(s).

Document Number: 19AQMM26R0156 PROCESSED Page 9 of 9