L M Table UH-1 (series) PDM_H-60 (series) Repair DRAFT.docx

19AQMM22R0006

DRAFT

L & M Table

TECHNICAL EVALUATION FACTORS AND EVALUATION CRITERIA

L&M Table

Section L: Instruction to Offerors

Section M: Technical Evaluation Factors and Evaluation Criteria

L-1.0 (a): Factor 1 – Repair Station Facility Certifications

Provide documentation of Repair Station Facility Certifications that clearly state the Offeror is “Certified” for overhaul, repair, and modification of Bell/UH-1 (series) rotary wing aircraft and H-60 (series) rotary wing aircraft.

M-1.0 (a): Factor 1 – UH-1 (series) and H-60 (series) Repair Station Facility Certifications

EVALUATION CRITERIA: Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated to determine documentation clearly indicates:

Part 145 repair station certificate accompanied with an approved Bell/UH-1 (series) PDM and H-60 (series) Repair related capabilities list;

3. Offeror has a valid and current AS9100 certificate; and

4. Offeror has a valid and current AS9110 (current revision) certificate.

L-1.0 (b): Factor 2 – Repair Station experience with Corporate experience operating a Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 14 CFR PART 145 Repair Station.

Provide a narrative and applicable documentation of Repair Station Facility experience with corporate experience in the performance of PDMs, overhauls, modifications, depot level repairs of Bell/UH-1 (series) and H-60 (series) or equivalent commercial rotary wing aircraft depot level repair capabilities.

M-1.0 (b): Factor 2 UH-1 (series) and H-60 (series) or Equivalent Commercial Aircraft Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 14 CFR PART 145 Repair Station Experience with Corporate Experience

EVALUATION CRITERIA: Offeror’s proposal demonstrates recent and relevant experience with PDMs, overhauls, modifications, depot level repairs of Bell/UH-1 (series) and H-60 (series) or equivalent commercial rotary wing aircraft within the past 5 years.

L-1.0 (c): Factor 3 - Government Furnished Property (GFP) Management

Provide a narrative describing recent actual experience demonstrating the offeror can manage and maintain an inventory of all United States Government (USG) provided Government Furnished Property (GFP) in accordance with SOW requirements.

M-1.0 (c): Factor 3 - Government Furnished Property (GFP) Management

EVALUATION CRITERIA: Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated for adequate experience and documentation to demonstrate that the offeror can manage and maintain an inventory of all United States Government (USG) provided Government Furnished Property (GFP) in accordance with SOW requirements.

L-1.0 (d): Factor 4 – Sample ACI and PDM Quote Documentation including proposed Schedule Offeror shall submit a proposal with realistic labor and materials estimates with applicable pricing for labor and materials including proposed a Schedule to complete this work. Provided are a sample documentation lists of discrepancies (sample task order) as ATTACHMENT X to this RFP.

Note: Offeror shall utilize the rates and labor categories found in their proposed Labor Categories and Rate Table in response to this sample task order.

M-1.0 (d): Factor 4 - Sample ACI and PDM Quote Documentation including proposed Schedule EVALUATION CRITERIA: Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated to determine

1. appropriateness of the proposed labor categories to complete the sample task order work to include the experience level utilized to perform sub element work tasks.

1. sufficiency of the proposed qualified and/or certified labor category and hours to perform all technical, administrative and corporate efforts to successfully perform the sample Programmed Depot Maintenance (PDM) work.

L-1.0 (e): Factor 5 - ITAR Compliance

Provide a narrative and applicable documentation to demonstrate experience and expertise to comply with all International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITARs), customs clearances, and any import/export requirements.

M-1.0 (e): Factor 5: ITAR Compliance

Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated to assess the offeror has the experience and expertise to comply with all International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), customs clearances, and any import/export requirements (Ref: ITAR Clause).

L-1.0 (f): Factor 6 - On-Site Technical Assistance

Provide a narrative that addresses the SOW requirement to provide on-site technical assistance and support at both CONUS and OCONUS locations on an as needed basis engines in accordance with the requirements in this SOW.

M-1.0 (f): Factor 6 - On-Site Technical Assistance

EVALUATION CRITERIA: Offeror’s proposal will be evaluated to determine the offeror is capable of providing technical field service and engineering assistance at unspecified CONUS and OCONUS locations on an as needed basis in accordance with SOW requirements.

1) quality of product/service (meeting technical requirements),

2) adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance,

3) controlling contract costs,

4) managing the contracted effort (history of reasonable and cooperative behavior),

5) commitment to customer satisfaction and businesslike concern for the interest of its customers.