Draft EO-IR Evaluation factors.docx
DOCX document 25 KB Posted
- Attached to
- EO/IR VIDEO SURVEILLANCE SYSTEM FOR THE BELL UH-1HII/UH-1ST and SIKORSKY UH-60 HELICOPTER
- Solicitation number
- 19AQMM22R0002
About this file
This document outlines evaluation factors for a solicitation seeking an electro-optical/infrared intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance system. Offerors will be evaluated on their technical approach, fleet installation and integration management plan, ability to conduct first article testing, post-installation technical services management, warranty services procedures, and training program. The solicitation will be issued by the Department of State Bureau for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Office of Aviation seeking electro-optical/infrared sensor kits and ground stations for deployment in Central and South America. Estimated requirements include modification and sensor packages for Bell UH-1HII, UH-1ST, and Sikorsky UH-60 helicopters operated by the Aviation O&M contractor AAR in Costa Rica and Peru. Offerors should monitor the announcement for further documentation releases including a draft solicitation and statement of requirements. Requests for information must be submitted by November 8, 2021.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| 19AQMM22R0002 DRAFT.pdf | ||
| Consolidated RFI Responses_Review_12 Jan 2022.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| IDIQ CLIN Structure.pdf | ||
| EO-IR SOW draft 2-4-22.docx | DOCX document | |
| UH-60 and Heuy EO-IR V2.docx | DOCX document |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
EO-IR L and M
Factor 1. Technical Approach, (meets requirement document operability demands)
| Proposal Preparation Instructions (PPI) |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Identify three areas that are critical to the overall operational and technical approach for providing an EO/IR ISR capability described in the Statement of Requirements. Address EO/IR system performance capabilities, hardware/software integration, and Data transmission solutions. |
| INL/A will evaluate the offerors three critical areas to the overall operational and technical approach for an ISR capability for relevance, accuracy, effectiveness, efficiency, realism, and comprehensiveness and the offerors understanding of the requirements described in the Statement of Requirements. |
| Submit a summary of your proposed performance, installation and integration best practices and innovations for ISR services including assumptions, rationale, and quantified efficiencies. |
| INL/A will evaluate the summary of proposed best practices and innovations for reasonableness, realism, and the effectiveness of quantified efficiencies. The Agency will evaluate any assumptions and underlying rationale associated with those assumptions. |
| Provide three examples of your most recent and relevant experience in the installation and integration of ISR systems similar to those required for this program. |
| INL/A will evaluate the offerors experience in administering and implementing ISR systems similar to those required for this program. |
Factor 2. Fleet Installation / Integration management plan
| Proposal Preparation Instructions (PPI) |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Identify your overall project management plan for the fleet EO/IR ISR system installation and integration as required in the Statement of Requirements. Provide a detailed description on how your program management responsibility for and authority over this contract will be approached. |
| INL/A will evaluate for adequacy, effectiveness, realism, and relevancy, the offerors proposed responsibilities (such as workflow, staffing, management, etc.) and authorities for program management of this contract. |
| Describe your approach to support multiple efforts that have competing requirements for technical expertise, timelines, and delivery schedules. Identify your approach to maintaining and developing technical capabilities and competencies, while providing the appropriate support throughout the duration of the contract. |
| INL/A will evaluate for effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, and realism of the offerors approach to support multiple efforts that may have competing requirements for technical expertise, the offerors approach to developing and maintaining technical capabilities throughout the contract period. |
| Provide two (2) examples on how you will address assigning work in an international, and evolving technical environment, implementing delivery schedule management, identifying, and managing risk, and obtaining user feedback for performance improvement. |
| INL/A will evaluate the two (2) examples on how the offeror will address assigning work, implement delivery schedule management, identifying and managing risk, and obtaining user feedback for performance improvement. |
Factor 3. First article testing IAW requirements documents
| Proposal Preparation Instructions (PPI) |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Describe your approach to conducting installation, first article testing, redline changes to documentation and correction to include production of technical manuals and final drawings and installation instructions. |
| INL/A will evaluate based on flexibility and the ability of the USG to provide feedback and the ability to ensure final products are accurate and complete. |
Factor 4. Post installation technical services management plan
| Proposal Preparation Instructions (PPI) |
| Evaluation Criteria |
Describe your approach for providing technical services and support related to repair OCONUS. Describe the process for providing overhaul of the system and the process for a providing a spare if required.
INL/A will evaluate based on flexibility, timeliness, and the ability of the USG to provide feedback.
Factor 5. Warranty Services procedures
| Proposal Preparation Instructions (PPI) |
| Evaluation Criteria |
| Describe your warranty approach to support OCONUS operations and the timeliness of replacement parts and repair of items. Describe if a spare will be provided or how long any units will be missing from the location. |
| INL/A will evaluate the warranty schedule based on implications of the proposed approach on the unit’s mission capability. |
Factor 6. Training
| Proposal Preparation Instructions (PPI) |
| Evaluation Criteria |
Describe your approach for a training program for aircrew and maintenance personnel to operate and maintain the system components.
The training program should include manuals and courseware in English and Spanish and electronic media if available.
INL/A will evaluate the training program based on the use of industry best practices and completeness of a training curriculum.
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .