16073_MKT TECH_RFP_Inquiry Response_3-1-23.pdf
PDF 164 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RFP 16073 - Marketing Technology Services
- Solicitation number
- S-177000-00005746
- Issued by
- Marion County, Oregon
About this file
This document is an RFP (Request for Proposal) issued by the Oregon Lottery for Marketing Technology Services. The RFP is open to companies outside the USA, including those from India and Canada. Proposers may perform tasks related to the RFP outside the USA. Proposals must be submitted through OregonBuys and cannot be submitted via email. The RFP provides instructions and guidance on completing the required attachments, including Attachment F8 and Attachment RT2. Proposers are advised to follow the instructions in Addendum Two regarding the formatting and submission of attachments.
The RFP does not restrict companies from outside the USA from proposing or working with the Oregon Lottery. The Oregon Lottery will provide clarification on site visits, performing tasks outside the USA, and the submission of attachments in Addendum Two. Proposers can utilize Lottery references if they have completed work for the Lottery previously, and can use the same reference for multiple projects with the same client.
View the file
Other files
Show all 19
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
RFP [16073] – [Marketing Technology Services – Inquiry Response]
RFP #16073
MARKETING TECHNOLOGY SERVICES
Response to Questions and Requests for Clarification
Date of Issue: March 1, 2023
Question / Request for Clarification:
Lottery’s Response:
1. “Whether companies from outside USA can apply for this (…India or Canada)?”
The RFP does not restrict companies from outside the US from proposing or working with the Oregon Lottery. Companies outside the USA may submit a proposal to this RFP.
2. “Whether we need to come over there for meetings”
See Addendum Two.
3. “Can we perform the tasks (related to RFP) outside USA (…from India or Canada)?”
4. “Can we submit the proposals via email?”
No. Proposals must be submitted through OregonBuys on or before Closing.
See RFP Section 4.6.4, Electronic Delivery.
5. “RFP Section 4.6.1:
a. Are there instructions for Attachment
F8?
b. There is content in Attachment F8 that does not apply to us or would apply directly to WP Engine or other vendors we use. The RFP does say to fill it out if attestations or certifications are not
a. RFP, Section 4.6.1, Table, Attachment F8, includes instructions.
b. See Addendum Two.
RFP [16073] – [Marketing Technology Services – Inquiry Response] available, but does that mean only the questions that apply or the entire form?”
6.
“RFP Section 4.6.3:
Should attachments be filled out and submitted in the exact provided Word docs (exported as PDFs), including all pages, even title/table of contents?”
7.
“RFP Section 4.6.3:
Is any design/branding formatting allowed (e.g., pulling questions from the attachment and re-formatting in a branded PDF), or are Proposers encouraged to maintain the exact documents as they currently exist?”
8. “In RFP Section 4.6.3., the wording appears to indicate that only the cost information is to be submitted separately – Should the remaining attachments be submitted as a combined PDF? Or are all attachments submitted individually in OregonBuys?”
9. “Attachment RT2, Section 2.13:
When providing a copy of service level agreements for clients whose work is comparable to RFP Section 3.1, for confidentiality can information be redacted if required/requested by said client?”
10. “Attachment RT2, Section 3.0:
a. If work has been completed for the
Lottery, is there any issue with utilizing a Lottery reference for this RFP?
b. Can the same reference be used for multiple projects if the latest examples are for the same client, or should different projects be selected in order to allow for different references?”
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .