RFP Phase I Attachment 2 - PPQ_Revised 5.20.2025.docx
DOCX document 31 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- 15F06725R0000020
About this file
This document is a Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) for the FBI's Global Multiple Award Construction Contract (GMACC) solicitation number 15F06725R0000020. The PPQ is designed to collect reference information and performance ratings from previous clients of potential contractors. The evaluation criteria cover performance, timeliness, quality of work, and overall contractor rating, with ratings ranging from Exceptional to Unsatisfactory.
The questionnaire is due by 3:00 PM Central on June 24, 2025, and must be submitted directly to specified FBI contracting officers and specialists, including Amanda Mobley, Eric Thomas, Sara Hardy, and Ezekiel Galyon. The PPQ is part of a two-phase Best Value Tradeoff source selection process for awarding multiple indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) construction contracts across three regions: National Capital Region, Redstone Arsenal, and Other United States/Overseas locations. The FBI aims to select 5-7 best-value offerors per region, with contractors expected to provide comprehensive construction services including design, construction, renovation, and site work for various federal facility types.
View the file
Other files
Show all 11
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
ATTACHMENT 2
Past Performance Questionnaire
Request for Proposal 15F06725R0000020
This Offeror is currently preparing a proposal for a multiple award source selection effort with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Request for Proposal No. 15F06725R0000020. As part of the proposal, this agency/company has been listed as a reference for work performed under the previous/current contract listed below. Input on past performance is therefore requested.
Please complete this Questionnaire and email to the following personnel:
Amanda Mobley, Contracting Officer, at almobley@fbi.gov Eric Thomas, Contracting Officer, at ejthomas3@fbi.gov Sara Hardy, Contract Specialist, at sjhardy@fbi.gov Ezekiel Galyon, Contract Specialist, at ecgalyon@fbi.gov
The Questionnaire is due no later than 3:00 PM Central on June 24, 2025. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officers and Contract Specialist on company letterhead, if faxed or emailed from a corporate email account.
If you will not be available between June 10 and June 24, 2025 for verification of this past performance evaluation, please indicate below another POC for the FBI to contact:
Alternate POC name:
Alternate POC phone number: Alternate POC e-mail address:
****************************************************************************** NAME OF OFFEROR:
Phone: Fax:
E-Mail:
I. Current or Historical Contract Information CONTRACT REFERENCED:Contract Number:
Contract Value:
Period of Performance:
Brief description of work performed:
Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:
Agency/Company:
| Title: |
| Phone No: |
Email:
II. Evaluation
Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. It will greatly assist our evaluation to include as many explanatory narratives as possible in your responses. Feel free to attach additional pages if more space is needed.
Evaluation Definitions – The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor’s performance.
EXCEPTIONAL
Performance EXCEEDED MOST contractual requirements. The work performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.
VERY GOOD
Performance EXCEEDED SOME contractual requirements. The work performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.
SATISFACTORY
Performance MET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.
MARGINAL
Performance MET SOME contractual requirements. The work performance included significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.
UNSATISFACTORY
Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirements. The work performance included serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.
| NOT APPLICABLE (N/A) |
| Work performance information is not recent or relevant as defined in the Solicitation or unable to provide assessment. |
Question 1. Performance What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet performance requirements?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Performance
Comments
Question 2. Timeliness What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to perform in a timely manner?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Timeliness
Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems
Question 3. Quality of Work What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide quality work and the overall quality of the project?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
| N/A |
Quality of Work
Question 4. Overall Rating What is your overall rating of the Contractor’s performance (meeting requirements, quality, schedule, and price value) on contract being assessed?
| Exceptional |
| Very Good |
| Satisfactory |
| Marginal |
| Unsatisfactory |
Question 5. Would you work with this firm again and why?
General Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .