RFP Phase I Attachment 2 - PPQ.docx

ATTACHMENT 2

Past Performance Questionnaire

Request for Proposal 15F06725R0000020

This Offeror is currently preparing a proposal for a multiple award source selection effort with the Federal Bureau of Investigation, Request for Proposal No. 15F06725R0000020. As part of the proposal, this agency/company has been listed as a reference for work performed under the previous/current contract listed below. Input on past performance is therefore requested.

Please complete this Questionnaire and email to the following personnel:

Amanda Mobley, Contracting Officer, at almobley@fbi.gov Eric Thomas, Contracting Officer, at ejthomas3@fbi.gov Sara Hardy, Contract Specialist, at sjhardy@fbi.gov Ezekiel Galyon, Contract Specialist, at ecgalyon@fbi.gov

The Questionnaire is due no later than 12:00 PM Central on May 28, 2025. Questionnaire must be submitted directly to the Contracting Officers and Contract Specialist on company letterhead, if faxed or emailed from a corporate email account.

If you will not be available between May 28 and June 16, 2025 for verification of this past performance evaluation, please indicate below another POC for the FBI to contact:

Alternate POC name:

Alternate POC phone number: Alternate POC e-mail address:

****************************************************************************** NAME OF OFFEROR:

Phone: Fax:

E-Mail:

I. Current or Historical Contract Information CONTRACT REFERENCED:Contract Number:

Contract Value:

Period of Performance:

Brief description of work performed:

Name of Person Completing Questionnaire:

Agency/Company:

Email:

II. Evaluation

Please rate the Contractor utilizing the guide below. It will greatly assist our evaluation to include as many explanatory narratives as possible in your responses. Feel free to attach additional pages if more space is needed.

Evaluation Definitions – The following definitions should be used in the assessment of Contractor’s performance.

EXCEPTIONAL

Performance EXCEEDED MOST contractual requirements. The work performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns.

VERY GOOD

Performance EXCEEDED SOME contractual requirements. The work performance was accomplished with few minor issues or concerns, for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were highly effective.

SATISFACTORY

Performance MET contractual requirements. The performance of the areas being assessed contains minor issues or concerns, for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were effective.

MARGINAL

Performance MET SOME contractual requirements. The work performance included significant problems, issues, or concerns for which corrective actions taken by the Contractor were only somewhat effective.

UNSATISFACTORY

Performance DID NOT MEET contractual requirements. The work performance included serious problems, issues, or concerns for which the Contractor’s corrective actions were ineffective.

Question 1. Performance What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to meet performance requirements?

Performance

Comments

Question 2. Timeliness What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to perform in a timely manner?

Timeliness

Ability to Resolve Timeliness Problems

Question 3. Quality of Work What is your assessment of the Contractor’s ability to provide quality work and the overall quality of the project?

Quality of Work

Question 4. Overall Rating What is your overall rating of the Contractor’s performance (meeting requirements, quality, schedule, and price value) on contract being assessed?

Question 5. Would you work with this firm again and why?

General Comments: