15-Evaluation Criteria, PNC2131603P1.pdf

EVALUATION CRITERIA

Consulting Services for Cruise Terminal Parking Structure(s) – Port Everglades

Submit responses to all Evaluation Criteria. Vendors who fail to submit the information and/or documentation required by any Evaluation Criteria by the solicitation’s closing date and time—excluding Reference Forms—may receive no points (if applicable) for the corresponding Evaluation Criteria.

Refer to Instructions to Vendors, Section K, for additional information. Vendors should structure proposal to align in the order of the Evaluation Criteria.

Evaluation Criteria

1. Ability of Professional Personnel Maximum Points

Prime Vendor and Subconsultant Key Personnel Qualifications

Describe qualifications and relevant experience of the Prime Vendor’s Principal-in- Charge, Project Manager, and proposed key discipline leads, including Architect, Structural, MEP, Civil, Planner. Each identified individual should demonstrate experience serving in a comparable role on projects of similar scope and complexity, preferably within the past 10 years. Comparable projects should include port or terminal facilities, parking garages, or transportation-related developments.

For each individual, provide the total years of professional experience, applicable professional licenses and certifications, and a detailed description of their specific responsibilities on comparable projects. The narrative must clearly demonstrate leadership capability, experience managing multidisciplinary teams, and direct contributions to project deliverables.

Identify key Subconsultant technical personnel, including staff responsible for traffic engineering, geotechnical engineering, surveying, LEED/sustainability, and permitting. Clearly define each individual’s role and responsibility, reporting relationships, lines of authority, availability for this Project, and any prior working relationship with the Prime Vendor that supports effective team coordination.

Provide Project Team’s Organizational Chart, identifying key staff, showing roles and/or position titles, firm name, staff names, and lines of authority. Resumes shall be provided (preferred resume length no more than 2 pages) and must substantiate the qualifications, relevant experience, professional credentials, and assigned role of each proposed team member for this Project.

2. Project Approach Maximum Points

The Prime Vendor shall present an integrated project approach outlining team organization, the utilization of in‑house staff and Subconsultants, and methods for communication and interdisciplinary coordination, including document management procedures, Building Information Modeling (BIM) integration, and quality assurance/quality control (QA/QC) processes to maintain quality, schedule, and budget control. The Prime Vendor shall demonstrate a clear understanding of the project’s goals, Evaluation Criteria including the Port’s operational environment, its long‑term Master Vision Plan, and coordination with the planned Airport-Seaport Convention Center Light Rail Transit (LRT) system, explaining how these factors will guide design development, project phasing, coordination efforts, permitting strategies, and compliance with all applicable codes and standards in coordination with the Authority Having Jurisdiction.

The Prime Vendor shall also provide a proposed Project schedule identifying major milestones including feasibility study completion, design phase submittals, permitting, bidding, and construction support services, together with a description of the tools and processes to be used for cost tracking and schedule control throughout the duration of the Project.

3. Past Performance Maximum Points

A. Prime Vendor Experience

Describe Prime Vendor’s experience on projects of similar nature, scope and duration, along with a detailed description of completion, both on time and within budget, for the past five years with projects of similar size and scope. Include a minimum of three comparable projects. Additionally, for each listed project, clearly describe the Team’s regulatory experience, including the Florida Building Code, Broward County Building Services Division, Environmental Protection and Growth Management Department (EPGMD), municipal building departments, city planning and zoning regulations, South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD), FDOT/DOT, and other relevant agencies. Clearly identify the jurisdictional authorities involved in each project, such as State, County, Municipal, Federal, and others.

The Prime Vendor’s specific past experience should include experience and expertise in:

i. Multi-level parking garages

ii. Transportation facilities

iii. Port infrastructure projects

iv. Construction Engineering and Inspection (CEI) services

v. Building Information Modeling (BIM) documentation

vi. Phased planning to maintain operations during project execution, and compliance with warranty inspection schedules

vii. Feasibility and traffic studies

viii. sustainable design (e.g., LEED)

ix. Large-scale concrete structure design.

Provide no more than three verifiable references for projects described. Refer to Vendor Reference Verification Form and submit as instructed (with proposal) or within three business days after County’s request. Only provide references for non-Broward County Board of County Commissioners’ contracts. For County contracts, the County will review performance evaluations database for previous or current contracts with the County. The County considers references and performance evaluations in the evaluation of Prime Vendor’s past performance.

B. Subconsultant Experience

Describe the Subconsultant specific past experience(s) within the last five years in similar projects. For each project Include project scope, role and responsibilities, project dollar value and project duration.

4. Workload of Vendor Maximum Points

For the Prime Vendor only, list all completed and active projects that the Prime Vendor has managed within the past five (5) years. In addition, list all projected projects in the near future. Projected projects will be defined as a project(s) that Prime Vendor is awarded a contract but the Notice to Proceed has not been issued.

Identify any projects that Prime Vendor worked on concurrently. Describe Prime Vendor’s approach to managing these projects. Were there or will there be any challenges for these projects? If so, describe how Prime Vendor dealt or will deal with the challenges of managing multiple projects concurrently.

5. Location Maximum Points

Refer to Location Certification and submit as instructed. Points shall be allocated as follows based on the Prime Vendor’s selection of one of the five options in the Location Certification Form: Option 1 (0 points); Option 2 (5 points); Option 3 (3 points); Option 4 (points range from 0-5 depending on the composition of the joint venture); and Option 5 (0 points).

6. Willingness to Meet Time and Budget Requirements Maximum Points

Indicate whether Prime Vendor is committed to meeting these requirements when identified under this agreement.

Prime Vendor is committed to meet Time (refer to Scope of Services document – “Preliminary Project Schedule”) and Estimated Study, Program, Design and Construction Administration Vendor Services Budget: $ 7,500,000.00

YES or NO

Yes = 2 Points and No = 0 Points

7. Volume of Previous Work Maximum Points

Refer to Volume of Previous Payments Attestation and submit as instructed.

The calculation for Volume of Previous Work is all amounts paid to the Prime Vendor by Broward County Board of County Commissioners at the time of the solicitation opening date within a five-year timeframe.

Points assigned for Volume of Previous Work will be based on the amount paid-to-date by the County to a Prime Vendor MINUS the Prime Vendor’s confirmed payments paid-to-date to approved certified County Business Enterprise (CBE) vendors performing services as Prime Vendor’s Subcontractor/Subconsultant to obtain the CBE goal commitment as confirmed by County’s Office of Economic and Small Business Development. The Volume of Previous Work for a Prime Vendor previously awarded a contract as a member of a Joint Venture calculation is based on the actual equity ownership of the Joint Venture.

3 points will be allocated to Prime Vendors paid $0 - $3,000,000;

2 Points will be allocated to Prime Vendors paid $3,000,001 - $7,500,000;

1 Point will be allocated to Prime Vendors paid $7,500,001 - $10,000,000;

0 Points will be allocated to Prime Vendors paid over $10,000,000

Payments for Prime Vendor will be verified by the County.

TOTAL POINTS 100

Form Date 9/23/25