B08_Attachment_12_Proposal_Submission_Package_CACO_0001.docx
DOCX document 75 KB Posted
- Attached to
- CACO 227735 - Reconstruct Mill Creek Water Control Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 140P2023R0112
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
Show all 27
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Cape Cod National Seashore
Reconstruct Mill Creek Water Control Structure to Support Herring River Restoration 140P2023R0112
CACO 227735
REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL
(RFP)
Proposal Submission Package
NATIONAL PARK SERVICE
DENVER SERVICE CENTER
Project Experience Questionnaire Solicitation: 140P2023R0112
Submit responses to the questions below that address experience relative to the elements noted under the Project Experience evaluation subfactor in solicitation section L. Expand the response sections shown below as needed to adequately address each question (this questionnaire may be expanded to multiple pages if needed).
| Offeror |
| Company Name |
REFERENCED PROJECT INFORMATION
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Project Location |
| City, State |
| Brief Project Description |
| Description |
| Project Owner |
| Company Name |
| POC: |
| First & Last Name |
| Phone: |
| (XXX) XXX-XXXX |
CONTRACTOR LIST
List Contractor(s) whose experience on the referenced project is being submitted for evaluation on this proposed project. If more than one contractor is listed (i.e. prime and subcontractors), provide information specific to that contractor.
| Contractor Name |
| Role on Referenced Project |
(Prime or Sub)
| Trade |
| Price |
(list for each contractor’s specific work) Performance Period (calendar days) (list for each contractor’s specific work)
| Original |
| Final |
| Original |
| Final |
| Sparky’s Electrical Company |
| Prime |
| Prime |
| $XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XX |
| XX |
| ABC Plumbing & Heating, Co |
| Subcontractor |
| Plumbing & Mechanical |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| XXX |
| XXX |
Subcontractor
PROJECT EXPERIENCE QUESTIONS
1. Describe the project work performed by all contractors listed above.
Response
2. Identify which Project Experience elements listed in section L of the solicitation each contractor’s work addresses.
Response
3. Describe & provide reasons for any changes to the original price for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
4. Describe and provide reasons for any changes to the original schedule for the work described in question 2 above.
Response
5. Describe problems, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were encountered and how they were resolved. Describe how the offeror’s proposal accounts for similar issues.
Response
6. Describe the means and methods, associated with the work described in question 2 above, which were successful. Would you implement the same means and methods on the proposed project? Why or why not?
Response
7. Provide any other additional project information you believe should be presented.
Response
CONTRACT PRICE SCHEDULE
SOLICITATION NUMBER: 140P2023R0112
PARK - PMIS: CACO 227735
PROJECT TITLE: Reconstruct Mill Creek Water Control Structure to Support Herring River Restoration
Instructions for the Contract Price Schedule: Offerors are required to submit, at a minimum, an offer that conforms to the solicitation documents with pricing for Base line items and all option line items. Failure to do so may render the proposal unacceptable. On lump-sum line items, provide the total price only. If no specific line item exists for a portion of the work, include the costs in a related item. In case of error in calculation of extended prices, the unit price governs. In case of summation error, the total corrected amounts govern. Round totals & extended prices to whole dollars.
Contract Line Item Number (CLIN)
Contract Line Item (CLI) Title
Quantity
Unit of Measure
Unit Price
Total Price
| 1 |
| Mobilization |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 2 |
| General Requirements |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 3 |
| Demobilization |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 4 |
| Site Clearing and Demolition |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 5 |
| Remnant Dike Excavation |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 6 |
| Temporary Access and Erosion and Sedimentation |
Controls
| 1 |
| LS |
| 7 |
| Control of Water |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 8 |
| Precast Modular Concrete Block Retaining Wall |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 9 |
| Permanent Gravel Access Drive |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 10 |
| Articulating Concrete Block Matting Access Drive |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 11 |
| Steel Sheet Pile Wall |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 12 |
| Steel Sheeting Concrete Cap |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 13 |
| Cantilevered Steel Walkway |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 14 |
| Earthwork |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 15 |
| Steel-Backed Timber Guardrail |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 16 |
| Concrete Water Control Structure |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 17 |
| Soil-Filled Stone Armor Slope and Overtopping |
Protection
| 1 |
| LS |
| 18 |
| Sediment-Filled Stone Armor Channel Scour |
Protection
| 1 |
| LS |
| 19 |
| Trailer-Mounted Generator |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 20 |
| Water Control Gates and Power/Control System |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 21 |
| Water Control Gate System Testing and |
Commissioning
| 1 |
| LS |
| 22 |
| Site Restoration |
| 1 |
| LS |
| 23 |
| Unsuitable Soil Structural Excavation |
| 475 |
| CY |
| 24 |
| Crushed Stone for Structure Foundation |
| 70 |
| CY |
| 25 |
| Tidal Channel Dredging - Off-Site Disposal |
| 50 |
| CY |
| 26 |
| Tidal Channel Dredging - Benefical Reuse |
| 400 |
| CY |
| 27 |
| Steel H-Piles |
| 500 |
| LF |
| 28 |
| Additional Subgrade Reinforcement Stone |
| 10 |
| CY |
TOTAL BASE PRICE (Contract Line Item Number 1 through 28) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| 29 |
| Contract Option Item 1 - Pavement Micromilling |
and Overlay
| 250 |
| SY |
TOTAL PRICE FOR ALL OPTIONS (Contract Line Item 1) -----------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL PROPOSED PRICE - BASE PLUS ALL OPTIONS (Contract Line Item Number 1 through 29) --------------------------
All measurement and payment information is included in Division 01 Specifications Section 01 22 19 Payment Items.
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
SOLICITATION NO. 140P2023R0112
INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.
Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to Contracting Officer listed in section E.
Notice to Contractor Information provided in this questionnaire is intended for use as source selection information and as such is deemed Source Selection Sensitive. Statements or comments provided in the questionnaire do not signify an express or implied endorsement of any product, supply, service, or enterprise.
This information shall not be construed as an endorsement by the Government or its employee(s) of the contractor for advertising purposes or in a manner that implies the contractor, its products, or services, are approved, endorsed, or considered by the Government to be superior to other products or services.
The contractor shall not be permitted to use any information provided in this questionnaire to publicize, or otherwise circulate, promotional materials that state or imply Governmental, organizational, group, expert, or individual endorsement or consumer testimonial of a product, service, or position which the contractor represents.
A. OFFEROR INFORMATION
| Company Name |
| Company |
| Street Address |
| Address |
| City |
| City |
| State |
| State |
| Zip Code |
| XXXXX |
| Unique Entity Identifier (UEI) Number / SAM |
| XXXXXXX |
| Point of Contact |
| Name, Email, Phone |
B. CONTRACT INFORMATION FOR PAST PROJECT (PROJECT SUBMITTED UNDER PROJECT EXPERIENCE)
| Project Title |
| Title |
| Contract Number |
| XXXXXXXXXX |
| Contract Type |
| Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other |
| Awarded Contract Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Current / Final Price |
| $X,XXX,XXX |
| Contract Award Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Contract Completion Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
| Period of Performance |
| XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX |
| Project Location |
| Park or Street address, City, State |
| Client / Owner |
| Company |
| Brief description of the contract & work effort: |
| Scope of work description |
C. REFERENCE:
| Name |
| First, Last |
| Position / Title |
| Title |
| Organization |
| Agency or Company |
| Phone Number |
| XXX-XXX-XXXX |
| Email Address |
| Signature |
| Signature |
| Date |
| XX/XX/XXXX |
D. EVALUATION
| Rating |
| Definition |
| Exceptional |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective. |
| Very Good |
| Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective. |
| Satisfactory |
| Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| Marginal |
| Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. |
| Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| Evaluation Area |
| Rating |
Quality
| Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of and adherence to quality control plan? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality of informational and technical submittals? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Quality Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Schedule (& Time Management)
| Met project schedule milestones? |
| Choose an item. |
| Responded to owner requests in a timely manner? |
| Choose an item. |
| Informational and technical submittals submitted timely? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly addressed scheduling issues? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Cost Control
| Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs? |
| Choose an item. |
| Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications? |
| Choose an item. |
| Submitted accurate and complete invoices? |
| Choose an item. |
| Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Cost Control Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Management
| General oversight by project manager and superintendent? |
| Choose an item. |
| Coordination with and control of subcontractors? |
| Choose an item. |
| Avoidance of accidents & safety violations? |
| Choose an item. |
| Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)? |
| Choose an item. |
| Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives? |
| Choose an item. |
| Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Management Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)
| Met regulatory and contractual labor standards? |
| Choose an item. |
| Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses? |
| Choose an item. |
| Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.): |
Regulatory Compliance
| Met building and life safety codes? |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Recommendation: |
| Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts: |
| Choose an item. |
| Overall Comments: |
E. RETURN:
| Return by |
| Proposal due date |
| Name |
| Tony Jasper |
| Title |
| Contracting Officer |
| Organization |
| National Park Service – Denver Service Center |
| Tony_Jasper@nps.gov |
Report on Limitations on Subcontracting [Template Version 7/25/19]
This report is required for small business, 8(a) or other socio-economic set-aside service contracts (including construction) priced at or above $150,000.
| Contract Number: |
| [Insert contract #] |
| Prime Contractor: |
| [Insert prime contractor's company name] |
| Current Total Contract Price: |
| [Insert the amount of the original contract + all excuted contract modifications] |
| Type of Set Aside: |
| [Insert type of set-aside: Small Business, HUBZone, SDVOSB, WOSB, 8(a), etc.] |
| Period of Performance |
| MM/DD/YYYY - MM/DD/YY |
| Type of Service (Required Participation): |
| [Put an X in the applicable box below per clause 52.219-3, 14, 27,29,30] |
1) Services (except construction). 50% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors
2) General construction. 85% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors
3) Construction by special trade contractors. 75% maximum may be subcontracted to non-similary situated Subcontractors
Participartion Calculation as of the Current Invoice
Amounts shown below shall include amounts from all previous invoices and the current invoice. Exclude the cost of materials.
| 1) Amount Invoiced by the Prime Contractor: |
| $0 |
| 2) Portion of Amount Invoiced for All Similarly Situated Subcontractors (SSS)* |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| 3) Portion of Amount Invoiced for Non-Similarly Situated Subcontractors (NSS) |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert NSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| Total Amount Paid To: |
| [Insert SSS company name] |
| $0 |
| 4) Prime & SSS Participation % |
| #DIV/0! |
| 5) % subcontracted to NSS |
| #DIV/0! |
* Similarly Situated Subcontractor (SSS): is a small business subcontractor that is a participant of the same Small Business Administration (SBA) program that qualified the prime contractor as an eligible offeror and awardee of the contract as defined in 13 CFR 125.6 (i.e. Small Business, HUBZone Business, Service Disabled Veteran Owned Small Business (SDOVB), etc.)
** Limitation on Subcontracting Percentage = (Total amount invoiced by the Prime Contractor - Portion of total amount invoiced for Non-Similarly Situated Subcontractors (NSS)/ Total amount invoiced by the Prime Contractor)
Corrective Action Plan
If the NSS % noted in line 5 above is not in compliance with the % required by contract clause 52.219-3, 14, 27,29,30 then the prime contractor shall provide a written corrective action plan below:
General References READ CAREFULLY: The purpose of this form is for the offeror to provide the Government with general references in the spaces provided as described in the Instructions, Conditions, and Notices to Offerors (Section L). Include Area Codes with all telephone numbers. Fill in the information by typing or printing legibly.
It is especially important that the offeror disclose instances in which their relationships with the references may be considered less than fully satisfactory. The offeror should tell their side of the story and describe remedial corrective action that has been taken or will be taken to correct the deficiency. Failure to do so may result in a determination that an offeror has been less than candid with the Government, which could result in an unfavorable assessment of the offeror’s past performance record. Provide explanations on separate sheets as necessary.
NAME OF CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR:
SURETY
Name of Surety:
Address of Surety:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
CORPORATE BANK
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Numbers of Accounts:
CORPORATE BANK
Name of Bank:
Address of Bank:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types and Numbers of Accounts:
INSURANCE COMPANY
Name:
Address:
Name of Agent:
Telephone Number:
Types of Policies:
SUBCONTRACTOR
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
SUBCONTRACTOR
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
SUBCONTRACTOR
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Area of Specialized Work:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
MATERIAL SUPPLIER
Name:
Address:
Name of Contact:
Telephone Number:
Types of Material:
image1.wmf
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .