ATTACHMENT_10_PAST_PERFORMANCE_QUESTIONNAIRE.docx

DOCX document 53 KB Posted

Attached to
GWMP 214371 Netherlands Carillon Federal contract opportunity
Solicitation number
140P2018R0067
Issued by
Department of the Interior National Park Service National Office

About this file

Attachment 10

View the file

Other files for this federal contract opportunity

Other files attached to GWMP 214371 Netherlands Carillon, newest first.
File Type Posted
ATTACHMENT_9_REV_1_WD_HEAVY_VA190043_FEB_22_2019_VA_43.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_14_WD_BUILDING_VA190178_April_05_2019_VA178.pdf PDF
140P2018R0067_amendment_0006.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_9_REV_1_WD_HEAVY_VA190043_FEB_08_2018_VA_43.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_13_ANSWERS_TO_PHASE_TWO_QUESTIONS.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_14_WD_BUILDING_VA190178_01042019_VA178.pdf PDF
140P2018R0067_Ammendment_0005.pdf PDF
140P2018R0067_Ammendment_0004.pdf PDF
140P2018R0067_Amendment_0003_FBO.pdf PDF
140P2018R0067_GWMP_214371_AMENDMENT_0002.pdf PDF
GWMP_214371_PHASE_1_Q&A_AM_0002.pdf PDF
140P2018R0067_GWMP_214371_AMENDMENT_0001.pdf PDF
GWMP_214371_PHASE_1_Q&A.pdf PDF
GWMP_214371_Netherland_Carillon-Nov_prebid.pdf PDF
PreProposal_Conference_Attendance_Record.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_2_GWMP_214371-Volume_2-_Final_RFP-Binder.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_1_GWMP_214371_Volume_1_Final_RFP.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_9_Wage_Decision_No_VA180043_Heavy_092818.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_3_GWMP_214371_Volume_3_Final_Presdesign_binder_102017.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_11_PROPOSAL_SUBMISSION_PACKAGE.rtf RTF text file
ATTACHMENT_5_GWMP_214371-BellReanalysisReport-Final-030818.PDF PDF
ATTACHMENT_4_GWMP_214371_Full_Scanned_Drawings_Set.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_12__LIMITATIONS_ON_SUBCONTRACTING_REPORT.xlsx XLSX spreadsheet
140P2018R0067_GWMP_214371_FINAL_SOLICITATION.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_7_ACM-LBP_Survey_Report_-_Netherlands_Carillon.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_6_GWMP_214371-BellReanalysisCalcs-Final-030818.pdf PDF
ATTACHMENT_8_Carillon_Geotechnical_Report.pdf PDF
B01_Amended_PreSolicitation_Notice_GWMP_214371_10_24_18.pdf PDF
B01_Amended_PreSolicitation_Notice_GWMP_214371_Draft.pdf PDF
B01_PreSolicitation_Notice_GWMP_214371.pdf PDF
Show all 30

On GovTribe

Work with this file on GovTribe

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

INSTRUCTIONS: Offeror to complete Sections A and B and transmit questionnaire to reference.

Reference to complete Sections C and D and transmit back to the offeror for inclusion in proposal. References are not to send completed questionnaires to the Contracting Officer.

A. CONTRACTOR INFORMATION

Company Name
Company
Street Address
Address
City
City
State
State
Zip Code
XXXXX
DUNS Number
XXXXXXX
Point of Contact
Name, Email, Phone

B. CONTRACT INFORMATION

Project Title
Title
Contract Number
XXXXXXXXXX
Contract Type
Firm Fixed Price / Time & Materials / Cost Reimbursable / Other
Awarded Contract Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Current / Final Price
$X,XXX,XXX
Contract Award Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Contract Completion Date
XX/XX/XXXX
Period of Performance
XX/XX/XXX – XX/XX/XXX
Project Location
Park or Street address, City, State
Client / Owner
Company
Brief description of the contract & work effort:
Scope of work description

C. REFERENCE:

Name
First, Last
Position / Title
Title
Organization
Agency or Company
Phone Number
XXX-XXX-XXXX
Email Address
Email
Signature
Signature
Date
XX/XX/XXXX

D. EVALUATION

Rating
Definition
Exceptional
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded many to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were highly effective.
Very Good
Performance met contractual requirements and exceeded some to the owner’s benefit. The element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
Satisfactory
Performance met contractual requirements. The element being assessed contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
Marginal
Performance did not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.
Unsatisfactory
Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The element being assessed contains a serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s corrective actions appear or were ineffective.
Evaluation Area
Rating

Quality

Quality of workmanship (including subcontractors)?
Choose an item.
Quality of and adherence to quality control plan?
Choose an item.
Quality of informational and technical submittals?
Choose an item.
Overall Quality Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Schedule (& Time Management)

Met project schedule milestones?
Choose an item.
Responded to owner requests in a timely manner?
Choose an item.
Informational and technical submittals submitted timely?
Choose an item.
Promptly addressed scheduling issues?
Choose an item.
Overall Schedule (& Time Management) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Cost Control

Addressed differing & unforeseen site conditions so as to minimize additional costs?
Choose an item.
Provided fair and reasonable pricing for contract modifications?
Choose an item.
Submitted accurate and complete invoices?
Choose an item.
Promptly paid subcontractors and suppliers?
Choose an item.
Overall Cost Control Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Management

General oversight by project manager and superintendent?
Choose an item.
Coordination with and control of subcontractors?
Choose an item.
Avoidance of accidents & safety violations?
Choose an item.
Addressed location factors (especially remote locations)?
Choose an item.
Maintained good working relationship with owner representatives?
Choose an item.
Demonstrated flexibility, innovativeness and cooperation in resolving potential problems?
Choose an item.
Overall Management Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards)

Met regulatory and contractual labor standards?
Choose an item.
Successfully contracted with small and socio-economically disadvantaged businesses?
Choose an item.
Quality and adherence to applicable subcontracting plans?
Choose an item.
Overall Small Business Subcontracting (& Labor Standards) Rating
Choose an item.
Comments (Please provide comments supporting the above ratings. Comments supporting ratings of excellent, marginal, & unsatisfactory are especially helpful.):

Regulatory Compliance

Met building and life safety codes?
Choose an item.
Overall Regulatory Compliance Rating
Choose an item.
Overall Recommendation:
Given what I know today about the contractor's ability to perform in accordance with the contract’s most significant requirements, I would recommend them for similar contracts:
Choose an item.
Overall Comments:

File details come from the government source that posted it.