Preproposal_Slide_Show.pdf

GATE 147079 A&D & 201023B HAZMAT REMEDIATE

AND DEMOLISH EXCESS BUILDINGS FLOYD

BENNETT FIELD

GATE – JAMAICA BAY UNIT

Preproposal Conference/ Site Visit

Thursday, November 30, 2017

Request for Proposals No.1443N5010070901

AGENDA

• Purpose: Understand solicitation and work effort; conduct a site visit and answer questions

• Introductions

• Solicitation/Work review

• Questions

• Site Visit

THE WORK

Removal of Job Corp Buildings; # 129, 130, 131, 132, and 133, adjacent paved parking, basketball court, handball court, fencing, brick wall, concrete sidewalks and appurtenances, including capping and abandoning in place underground utilities

•Work includes the removal of the Job Corp Buildings; Buildings #129, 130, 131, 132 •and 133, adjacent paved parking, basketball court, handball court, fencing, brick wall, •concrete sidewalks and appurtenances, including capping and abandoning in place •underground utilities, as identified in the plans.

•2. Site restoration to existing natural grade and provide a smooth transition between new and •existing grade to maintain pre-demolition drainage patterns. Contractor shall take select •survey shots to ensure proper drainage to existing drainage structures.

Site restoration to existing natural grade and provide a smooth transition between new and existing grade to maintain pre-demolition drainage patterns. Ensure proper drainage to existing drainage structures.

•Work includes the removal of the Job Corp Buildings; Buildings #129, 130, 131, 132 •and 133, adjacent paved parking, basketball court, handball court, fencing, brick wall, •concrete sidewalks and appurtenances, including capping and abandoning in place •underground utilities, as identified in the plans.

•2. Site restoration to existing natural grade and provide a smooth transition between new and •existing grade to maintain pre-demolition drainage patterns. Contractor shall take select •survey shots to ensure proper drainage to existing drainage structures.

Removal of Building 69, adjacent parking, concrete sidewalks, capping & abandoning utilities and site restoration

PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE QUESTIONS

• Direct Questions to Victoria, Romorno or Jay on index cards

• Responses to questions do not change the solicitation document, because changes to the solicitation document shall be made by formal written amendment only

• Preproposal Conference/Site Visit meeting notes, questions, and answers will be issued by a formal written amendment to the solicitation for information only

REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS AND PERMITS

The Contractor is responsible for all permits

SPEC 31 00-901

Potential permits are -

Storm Water Prevention Plan Port-a-John Hazardous Material Abatement, Handling Storage, Transportation and Disposal

Work Restrictions – Site Security

• Precaution in protecting your equipment

• Raccoons

• Fencing

• Level of Disturbance

• Coordination with Park Staff and Other Contractors

QUESTIONS AFTER PREPROPOSAL CONFERENCE

• Direct all questions to Victoria Nosal, Contracting Officer victoria_nosal@nps.gov or Carmen Clarke, Contracting Specialist, carmen_clarke@nps.gov. All questions and/or requests for information are due NLT 0800 MT, August 6, 2018.

• Questions directed to any other Government team member will be redirected to Victoria and Carmen. No answers will be provided by any other team member. All questions and answers will be provided to all prospective offerors by amendment to the solicitation

• Request for Proposal (Solicitation Document) shall only be changed by formal amendment issued by the Contracting Officer at the website – www.fbo.gov

AWARD OF A CONTRACT

• Small Business Set Aside

• Best Value -- Trade-off Negotiated Acquisition

• Bid Bond is required

• The Government will evaluate offers for award purposed by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement.

Solicitation No. 140P2018R0043

Contract Line Items Section B – Contract Price Schedule Base Price CLIN 1 - Building 129 Demolition CLIN 2 – Building 130 Demolition CLIN 3 - Building 131 Demolition CLIN 4 – Building 132 Demolition CLIN 5 – Building 133 Demolition CLIN 6 – Site Demolition for Job Corps CLIN 7 – Site Restoration for Job Corps

OPTION PRICE

OPTION CLIN 8 – Building 69 Demolition OPTION CLIN 9 – Site Restoration for Building 69 OPTION CLIN 10 – Site Telecom Utilities Building 69

Section F Clauses

52.211-10 COMMENCEMENT, PROSECUTION, AND COMPLETION

OF WORK

The Contractor shall be required to (a) commence work under this contract within 10 calendar days after the date the Contractor receives the Notice to Proceed, (b) prosecute the work diligently, and

(c) complete the entire work ready for use within 320-Calendar days.

The time stated for completion shall include final cleanup of the premises.

52.211-12 LIQUIDATED DAMAGES—CONSTRUCTION

(a) If the Contractor fails to complete the work within the time specified in the contract, the Contractor shall pay liquidated damages to the Government in the amount of $1,482.00 for each calendar day of delay until the work is completed or accepted.

(b) If the Government terminates the Contractor’s right to proceed, liquidated damages will continue to accrue until the work is completed.

These liquidated damages are in addition to excess costs of repurchase under the Termination clause.

Section H Clauses

Special Clause 1: Key Personnel

(a) The Contractor shall assign to this contract the following key personnel

• Project Manager

• Superintendent/Safety Manager

• Quality Control Manager

• Environmental Manager

Prospective Contractor shall not be allowed to change Key Personnel during the first 90 days of performance.

Section H - Liability Insurance Requirements

• Contractor shall provide and maintain required insurance

• Contractor shall insert this requirement in all subcontracts

• Proof of insurance shall be provided by Contractor and Subcontractors before they are allowed access to work at the construction site

Proposals Due: August 15, 2018, 1500 MT.

– Volume I – Technical Proposal (Original plus 3 Copies)

– Volume II – Business and Price Proposal (Original plus 1 Copy)

Solicitation No. P17PS01037

Section L Instructions for the Submission of Offers

Section L Instructions for Submission of Offers

• Government may award without discussions

• Electronic Proposals via thumb drive or CD and

Hardcopy proposals to Carmen Clarke at address listed in solicitation

• Identify outside of package with Solicitation No.

140P2018R0043

• Will not evaluate late proposals

EVALUATION FACTORS

(Sections L& M)

• The evaluation factors and subfactors (M) are correlated to the proposal preparation instructions (L). are listed in descending order of importance. Within Factor 2, Subfactors A and B are equal in importance. All evaluation factors

• All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined, are approximately equal to cost or price

Volume I – Technical Proposal

Evaluation Factor 1 – Technical Approach and Plan for the removal of hazardous material, buildings, and adjacent features at 2 work sites in Kings County, NY

Offeror/Plan shall

• describe proposed technical approach and plan for the hazmat remediation and structure demolition in Kings County NY that includes 2 separate sites: the removal of Building 69 & adjacent features and 5 job corp buildings and adjacent features

• The technical approach shall detail the hazmat abatement to include logistics, methods, and sequencing of the two sites as well as details of obtaining permits, process for asbestos abatement, lead paint abatement and hazardous waste removal and disposal in the NY City Area. Technical approach shall address site restoration to natural grade and proper drainage for both sites.

Section M Evaluation

Evaluation Factor 1 -- Technical Approach and Plan for the removal of hazardous materials, building and adjacent features and the restoration of 2 work sites in Kings County New York

Offerors representing the most thorough understanding, realistic and comprehensive approach to the work at two sites in the New York City area will be more favorably rated. Offerors showing a higher level of planning will be more favorably evalulated.

Evaluation Factor 2 – Qualifications and Experience

Subfactor 2a: Key Personnel

Offeror shall identify Key Personnel (PM, Superintendent/Safety, QC & Environmental Manager) and include the authority of the invididual to actor for and on behalf of Offeror and proposed % of time assigned to project. Offeror shall provide resumes for key personnel that addresses qualifications, prior experience and capabilities. Offeror shall submit a narrative describing each of the key personnel’s roles and responsibilities couple with qualifications and experience represented in their resumes.

Evaluation Factor 2 – Qualifications and Experience

Subfactor 2a: Key Personnel

Offeror submitting a comprehensive narrative with key personnel representing a high level of qualification and experience on similarly complex projects in the New York City area will be more favorably evaluated.

Evaluation Factor 2 – Qualifications and Experience Subfactor 2b: Prior Experience

The proposal shall identify the respective role of each firm and the work element that the firm will perform under the project.

For the environmental remediation subcontractor, Offer shall submit a signed letter of commitment form the subcontractor indicating its role in the project, its resources and its intent to enter into a subcontract with the Offeror. In addition the proposal shall describe prior project experience working together, and how the proposed project team will enhance and ensure a well coordinated and successful out for this project.

Evaluation Factor 2 – Qualifications and Experience Subfactor 2b: Prior Experience cont.

The Offeror shall describe prior experience that addresses the following:

• Projects of similar size, scope, and technical complexity

• Work performed in the New York City Area

(The Offeror may use the form entitled “Experience Questionnaire” provided in the proposal submission package)

Evaluation Factor 2 – Qualifications and Experience Subfactor 2b: Prior Experience

Offerors submitting a comprehensive narrative with key personnel representing a high level of experience on similarly complex projects in the New York City Area and exhibiting coordination between the prime and subcontractor personnel will be more favorably evaluated.

Evaluation Factor 3 Proposed Project Schedule The Offeror shall submit a realistic and comprehensive proposed project schedule in a Gantt chart format, utilizing CPM. The Offerors proposed schedule shall include at a minimum the following:

• For the purposes of the proposed project schedule, use contract award date of November 5, 2018, and a contract completion date of 320 days from the Notice to Proceed.

• The Offeror’s schedule shall be detailed and have no activities (except for procurement of materials) longer than 30 days in length without explanation.

• The Offeror’s schedule shall reflect options exercised at 180 days after award.

Evaluation Factor 3 Proposed Project Schedule The comprehensiveness and realism of the proposed schedule in Gantt chart format, utilizing the critical path method (CPM) will be evaluated. Contractors submitting a schedule reflecting a realistic finish date within 320 calendar days from NTP will be more favorably rated.

Evaluation Factor 4 Past Performance

• Complete and submit form entitled “Past Performance Questionnaire” (Offeror and key subcontractors)

• Offerors may submit other Government project assessments in lieu of a new Past Performance Questionnaire.

• Disclose any instances that may be considered by others to be less than fully satisfactory and describe remedial action taken

• Government may contact references on past performance questionnaire or use automated retrieval systems or other sources

Evaluation Factor 4 Past Performance

The past performance of the Offeror and/or its proposed subcontractors on projects similar in scope and complexity will be evaluated in the areas of quality, timeliness, and business relations.

Offerors demonstrating a higher level of successful past performance in the evaluated areas will be more favorably rated. In the case of an Offeror without a record of relevant, recent past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available, the Offeror will be evaluated neither favorably nor unfavorably.

Evaluation Factors

• Technical factors are listed in descending order of importance.

• Subfactors 2a and 2b are of equal importance.

• All evaluation factors other than cost or price, when combined are approximately equal to cost or price.

VOLUME II – BUSINESS/PRICE PROPOSAL

Complete and Submit (Original + 1)

• Proposed Equals Form

• General References

• Hazardous Material Identification Listing

• SF 1442 and acknowledgement of all amendments

• Contract Price Schedule

• Section K - Fillable

Questions