Final_Environmental_Services_Report_for_Floyd_Bennet_Field_Part_1_-_5.10....pdf

FINAL REPORT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES

AT

BUILDINGS 69, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 & Walkway Pavilion

FLOYD BENNETT FIELD, GATEWAY NATIONAL

RECREATIONAL AREA, NEW YORK

Prepared For:

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Prepared By:

96 Morton Street, 8th Floor New York, New York 10014

Tel. (212) 612-7900

NPS PMIS NO. GATE 147079A&D

LOUIS BERGER PROJECT NO. 2004294.090

Final Submission: May 10, 2018

Final Report of Environmental Investigation Services at Bldgs. 69, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 & Walkway Pavilion, Floyd Bennett Field, Gateway National Recreation Area, New York

May 10, 2018

Romorno Coney Landscape Architect/Project Manager, Design and Construction Denver Service Center, National Park Service 12795 W. Alameda Parkway, P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287

Subject: Final Report of Environmental Investigation Services for Buildings 69, 129, 139, 131, 132, 133 & Walkway Pavilion Floyd Bennett Field, Gateway National Recreational Area, New York Louis Berger Project No. 2004294.090

Dear Mr. Coney:

Louis Berger (LB) has completed supplemental building materials/environmental investigations in buildings 69, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 & Walkway Pavilion, located at Floyd Bennett Field, Gateway National Recreational Area, New York. These investigations involved visual surveys as well as laboratory sample analysis of suspect Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), PCB solids (PCB), Lead-Based Paints (LBP), Soils and the quantification of Universal Wastes in these buildings, as required, which are targeted for demolition.

The attached report presents descriptions and results of the material sampling procedures and analysis.

Relevant general project information is provided, followed by our findings, assessments and recommendations. Laboratory analysis data and certifications are provided in the Appendices.

If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further assistance to you, please contact us.

Sincerely, LOUIS BERGER (LB)

Michael Gelfand Manager, Emergency Management & IH Services

Final Report of Environmental Investigation Services at Bldgs. 69, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 & Walkway Pavilion, Floyd Bennett Field, Gateway National Recreation Area, New York

Louis Berger Page 1

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 ASBESTOS INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS METHODS

2.1 INSPECTION SCOPE AND MATERIAL ASSESSMENT

2.2 ASBESTOS INSPECTION RESULTS

2.3 CONDITION, QUANTITY AND FRIABILITY TABLE

2.4 SAMPLE ANALYSIS TABLE……………………………

2.5 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE………………………………

3.0 LEAD FIELD INSPECTION PROCEDURES

3.1 INSPECTION SUMMARY

3.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

3.3 CONDITION ASSESSMENT TABLE

3.4 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE………………………………

3.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...………

4.0 PCB INSPECTION PROCEDURES

4.1 INSPECTION SUMMARY

4.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

5.0 UNIVERSAL WASTES

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7.0 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, ASSUMPTIONS AND CERTIFICATION

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Asbestos Sample Analysis Results in Tabular Form Appendix B: Asbestos Bulk Sample Chain of Custodies & Laboratory Results Appendix C: PCB Bulk Sample Chain of Custodies & Laboratory Results Appendix D: Lead in Soil Sample Chain of Custodies & Laboratory Results Appendix E: Laboratory Accreditations & Personnel Certifications Appendix F: Sample Location Drawings Appendix G: Asbestos & Lead Containing Materials Location Drawings Appendix H: Photographic Documentation Appendix I: Previously Completed Pertinent Hazmat Reports

New York

Louis Berger Page 2

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Louis Berger (LB) has performed supplemental environmental investigations for the presence or absence of Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), Lead-based Paints (LBP), PCBs, soils, and universal wastes within buildings 69, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 & Walkway Pavilion at Floyd Bennett Field, Gateway National Recreational Area, New York. The inspections were conducted at the request of the National Park Service for use in their upcoming GATE 147079A&D and 201023B Hazmat Remediate and Demolish Excess Buildings, FBF, GATE – Jamaica Bay Unit project. The scope of work for this project received by LB was based on section 1.3.1 – Conduct Hazardous Materials Testing – Supplemental Testing/Reports in the Scope of Services document titled DESIGN SERVICES FOR PREDESIGN, HAZMAT STUDY-Update, DEMOLITION DOCUMENTS, AND MISCELLANEOUS NEEDS, dated January 29, 2018. The intent of this inspection was to confirm the accuracy/validity of existing environmental reports and to locate, identify and quantify all ACM, LBP, PCBs and universal wastes which will be impacted during the upcoming project.

Drew Cheskin, Josue Garcia and Jordan Wong performed these surveys on March 5th, 6th & 14th 2018. Drew Cheskin is a certified New York State Asbestos Inspector and Designer (05-04280), New York City Asbestos Investigator (119879) and USEPA-certified Lead Risk Assessor (NY-R- 11931-1). Josue Garcia is a certified New York State Asbestos Inspector and Designer (01-04292), New York City Asbestos Investigator (119168) and USEPA-certified Lead Risk Assessor (LBP- R-6928-1). Jordan Wong is a certified New York State Asbestos Inspector (09-09397) and USEPA-certified Lead Inspector (LBP-I-183144-1).

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected during the supplemental inspection indicate that the following materials contain asbestos in the amount greater than 1% [ACM]:

Building 129 (Cafeteria):

• Duct Insulation, White (Roof Mechanical Room)

Building 130 (Boy’s Dormitory):

• Stone Window Sill Caulk, White (Exterior Windows)

• Exterior Door Frame Caulk, Black (Exterior Doors)

• Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey (Exterior Windows)

Building 131 (Girl’s Dormitory):

Building 132 (Laundry/Electrical):

New York

Louis Berger Page 3

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected during the supplemental indicate that the following materials contain detectible level of asbestos of less than 1% [Non-ACM], triggering OSHA worker regulations:

• Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey (Roof Mechanical Room)

Results from previously completed survey reports indicate that the following materials contain asbestos in the amount greater than 1% [ACM]:

• 12-inch x 12-inch Green Floor Tile with White Flecks and Associated Mastic (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• 12-inch x 12-inch Brown Floor Tile with White and Brown Flecks and Associated Mastic (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Black Mastic Residue from Removed 9-inch x 9-inch Floor Tile (BVNA Project No.

12015-000171.00)

• Old White Expansion Joint Caulk in Window Sill (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White on Gray Exterior Window Frame Caulk (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Black Tar on Duct (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Pipe Fitting Debris (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Compressed Paper Debris (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Aircell Debris (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Kitchen Exhaust Hood Duct Seal/Black Mastic (GRB Report August 31, 2017)

• Gray Vinyl Tile Along South Wall (GRB Report August 31, 2017)

Building 130 (Boys Dormitory):

• 12-inch x 12-inch Beige Floor Tile and Associated Black Mastic (BVNA Project No.

12015-000171.00)

• 12-inch x 12-inch Reddish/Pink Mottled Floor Tile (contaminated) and Associated Black Mastic (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Tar and Tar Paper Roof Material (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

Building 131 (Girls Dormitory):

• Tar and Tar Paper Roof Material (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• 12-inch x 12-inch Reddish Beige Floor Tile (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• 12-inch x 12-inch Beige Floor Tile with White Specks and Black Mastic (BVNA Project

No. 12015-000171.00)

• 12-inch x 12-inch Brown Mottled Floor Tile (contaminated) and Associated Black Mastic

(BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

New York

Louis Berger Page 4 May 10, 2018

• Aircell Pipe Insulation Remnants (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Black Tar and Tar Paper Roof Material (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

Building 133 (Boiler Building):

• White on Brown Large Pipe Fitting Insulation (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Gray Patch on Rope Associated with Boilers (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Black Pipe Gasket (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Gray Pipe Gasket (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Black Tar and Tar Paper Roof Material (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

Walkway Pavilion:

• Tar and Paper Roof Material (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

Results from previously completed survey reports indicate that the following materials contain detectible level of asbestos of less than 1% [Non-ACM], triggering OSHA worker regulations:

• 12-inch x 12-inch White Floor Tile (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Yellow Mastic on Wall (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Off White Exterior Window Pane Caulk (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• None

• Black Roof Flashing (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• 12-inch x 12-inch Reddish Beige Floor Tile Black Mastic (BVNA Project No. 12015-

000171.00)

New York

Louis Berger Page 5

Results from previously completed survey reports and paint chip sample analysis have determined that the following paints are Lead-Based Paints (0.50% by weight):

• Off White on Beige on Green on Greenish & Gray Paint-Wall Plaster (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Beige & Dark Green on Light Green-Metal Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Dark Green, Light Green & Brown-Wall Plaster (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Gray-Wall Plaster (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Beige-Metal Window Frame (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Black Paint-Metal Windows (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Brown Paint-Metal Windows (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Gray Paint-Window Exterior (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White over Orange-Metal Under Stairs (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White-Window (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Brown on White-Exterior Window Frame (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

Results from previously completed survey reports and paint chip sample analysis have determined that the following paints are Lead-Containing Paints (detectible, less than 0.50% by weight) triggering OSHA worker regulations:

• White-Metal Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White-Concrete (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White-Conduit (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Green on Blue-Cove Base Molding & Metal Radiator Covers (BVNA Project No. 12015-

000171.00)

• Off White Paint-Plaster (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

New York

Louis Berger Page 6 May 10, 2018

• Light Brown-Plaster (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White on Dark Gray-Metal Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Light Blue Paint Only (sandwiched between white & light gray)-Plaster (BVNA Project

No. 12015-000171.00)

• White-Plaster (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Dark Brown-Metal Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White-Sheetrock, Plaster, Concrete (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White Paint-Window Exterior (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White Over Brown-Metal Door Frames (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Light Blue Paint-Sheetrock & Plaster Walls (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Off White Paint-Doors (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Pink on White Wall Paint-Plaster, Gypsum Board (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Dark Gray on White Paint-Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Dark Red on White Paint-Metal Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Light Green Wall Paint-Plaster Under Wall Paint (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• White Paint-Concrete Ceiling (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Greenish Blue-Concrete and Ceramic Wall Block (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Gray on White on Beige on Greenish Blue-Ceramic Wall Block (BVNA Project No.

12015-000171.00)

• Brown on Gray-Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Gray-Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Black-Metal Supports (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Reddish Brown Paint-Tanks (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

• Gray on Brown-Door (BVNA Project No. 12015-000171.00)

Building 129, 130 & 131 Driplines:

Analytical results of soil samples collected indicate that the soils at the perimeters/drip lines of buildings 129, 130 & 131 contain Lead, but all are below the regulatory limit of 1,200 Parts Per Million (PPM) for bare soil/drip line areas of buildings. See section 3.2 for sample results.

New York

Louis Berger Page 7

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected of suspect polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) materials indicate that the following materials are PCB:

Building 69:

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected of suspect polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) materials indicate that the following materials are Non-PCB:

Building 69:

• Cream Paint on Transite Siding

• Cream Paint on Wood Siding

• Brown Paint on Metal Railings

• Beige Paint on Concrete Foundation

• White Paint on Wood

• Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Grey

• Exterior Hatch Frame Caulking, Brown

• Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey

• Caulking to Metal Cap Flashing, Grey

New York

Louis Berger Page 8 May 10, 2018

• Expansion Joint Caulk in Window Sills

• Exterior Window Frame Caulk

• Exterior Door Frame Caulk

• Gray Window Frame Caulk

• White Exterior Window Pane Caulk

• Old White Expansion Joint Caulk in Window Sill

• White on Gray Exterior Window Frame Caulk

• Pale Green Window Pane Exterior Caulk

• Off-White Exterior Window Pane Caulk

• Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Black

• Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey

• White Caulk Pipe End Cap

• Brown Window Caulk

• Black Window Caulk

• Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black

• Exterior Door Frame Caulk, Black

• Stone Window Sill Caulk, White

• Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Brown

• Window Frame Caulk, Grey

• Black Exterior Window Pane Caulk

• Black Door Frame Caulk

• Soil

• Black Door Frame Caulk

2.0 ASBESTOS FIELD INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS

METHODS

Guidelines used for the inspection were established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the Guidance for Controlling Asbestos Containing Materials in Buildings, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Doc 560/5-85-024, and 40 CFR Part 763, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).

New York

Louis Berger Page 9

Field information was organized in accordance with the AHERA methodology of homogenous area (HA). During the Inspection, reasonable effort was made to identify all locations and types of ACM materials associated with the scope of work. Sampling has included multiple samples of the same materials chosen at random. However, due to inconsistencies of a manufacturer's processes and the contractor’s installation methods, materials of similar construction may contain various amounts of asbestos. Furthermore, some materials that were not originally specified to contain asbestos may in fact contain this mineral. For example, cementitious pipe insulation and plaster were frequently mixed with asbestos at the construction site for ease of application.

Locating all asbestos materials can only be definitively achieved by conducting exploratory demolition and sampling every section of pipe insulation, fitting or valve covering, fireproofing, and other suspect ACM.

Bulk samples of suspect ACM are analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining, as described in 40 CFR Part 763 and the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). NESHAPS is the standard industry protocol for the determination of asbestos in building materials. A suspect material is immersed in a solution of known refractive index and subjected to illumination by polarized light. The color displays that result are compared to a standardized atlas whereby the specific variety of asbestos is determined.

It should also be recognized that PLM is primarily a qualitative identification method whereby asbestos percentage, if any, is estimated. While EPA, New York State, and New York City regulations governing ACM consider materials containing greater then 1-percent as asbestos, accurately quantifying asbestos content below 5-percent has been shown to be unreliable.

The New York State Department of Health has recently revised the PLM Stratified Point Counting Method. The March 25th, 2011 method, "Polarized Light Microscopy Methods for Identifying and Quantifying Asbestos in Bulk Samples" can be found as Item 198.1 in the Environmental Laboratory Approval program (ELAP) Certification manual. Whereas the procedure of analysis for bulk samples that fall into the category of "Non-friable Organically Bound" (NOB) can be found in the March 25th 2011 method “Polarized-Light Microscope Method for Identifying and Quantifying Asbestos in Non-Friable Organically Bound Bulk Samples”, Item 198.6 in the ELAP Certification Manual. This category includes any sample in a flexible to rigid asphalt or vinyl matrix (floor tiles, mastic, roofing shingles, roofing felt, etc.). These samples must be “ashed” in a muffle furnace at 480-degrees Celsius (to remove organic matrix), treated with acid (to remove any mineral carbonate), and filtered through a 0.4-micron polycarbonate filter before being analyzed by PLM. The sample must be weighted between each of these steps to track the percent loss of organic matrix.

ELAP has determined that analysis of NOB materials is not reliably performed by PLM. Therefore, if PLM analysis yields results of 1-percent asbestos or less, the result must be confirmed by TEM.

For bulk samples that undergo TEM analysis, the March 25th, 2011 method “Transmission Electron Microscope Method for Identifying and Quantitating Asbestos in Non-Friable organically Bound Bulk Samples” must be used and can be found as Item 198.4 in the ELAP Certification Manual. ELAP certified laboratories must include the following statement with their PLM analysis results for each “negative” (1-percent or less asbestos) NOB sample: "Polarized-light microscopy

New York

Louis Berger Page 10 May 10, 2018 is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in floor coverings and similar non-friable organically bound materials. Before this material can be considered or treated as non-ACM, confirmation must be made by quantitative transmission electron microscopy".

All samples are initially analyzed by Polarized Light Microscopy in accordance with Item 198.1 and 198.6 of the ELAP Certification Manual. Samples which yield a negative PLM result and which are classified as a "non-friable" material, are then re-analyzed utilizing TEM methodology in accordance with Item 198.4 of the ELAP Certification Manual.

The laboratory performing this analysis procedure was EMSL Analytical, Inc. located at 528 Mineola Avenue, Carle Place, NY 11514. The laboratory has received accreditation from the following agencies:

New York State Environmental Laboratory Approval Program (ELAP) (Lab No. 11469) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (Lab Code 101048-10) American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited Laboratory (Lab No. 102344)

2.1 INSPECTION SCOPE AND MATERIAL ASSESSMENT FOR ASBESTOS

The buildings inspected for ACM materials which may exist:

• Building 129 (Cafeteria)

• Building 130 (Boy’s Dormitory)

• Building 131 (Girl’s Dormitory)

• Building 132 (Laundry/Electrical)

• Building 133 (Boiler Building)

• Walkway Pavilion

• Pavilions (Adjacent to Basketball Court)

The supplemental inspection was characterized by observations of accessible areas. Suspect materials, not noted in existing environmental reports, were sampled and quantified.

Materials examined during the supplemental inspection included:

• Duct Insulation, White

• Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Grey

• Exterior Hatch Frame Caulking, Brown

• Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey

• Caulking to Metal Cap Flashing, Grey

• Stone Window Sill Caulk, White

New York

Louis Berger Page 11 May 10, 2018

• Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Black

• Exterior Door Frame Caulk, Black

• Stone Window Sill Caulk, White

• Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Brown

• Duct Vibration Cloth, Green

Pavilions (Adjacent to Basketball Court):

• Vapor Barrier Under Roof Shingles, Black

• Roof Shingles, Brown

• Roof Shingles, Grey

2.2 ASBESTOS INSPECTION RESULTS

The supplemental asbestos inspection involved a thorough visual examination of all areas of each building. The following suspect materials were sampled and analyzed for asbestos content:

Homogenous Material Material Location Asbestos Content

Building 129 (Cafeteria)

01 Duct Insulation, White Roof Mechanical Room 57.10% Chrysotile

02 Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Grey North Exterior Doors @ Loading Platform NAD

03 Exterior Hatch Frame Caulking, Brown Roof Mechanical Room NAD

04 Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey Roof Mechanical Room <1.00% Chrysotile

05 Caulking to Metal Cap Flashing, Grey Roofs NAD

Building 130 (Boy’s Dormitory)

01 Stone Window Sill Caulk, White Exterior Window Sills 10.20% Anthophyllite

02 Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Black Exterior Doors 2.50% Anthophyllite

03 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey Exterior Windows 5.30% Anthophyllite

New York

Louis Berger Page 12 May 10, 2018

Homogenous Material Material Location Asbestos Content

Building 131 (Girl’s Dormitory)

01 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey Exterior Windows 5.30%

Anthophyllite 1.60% Tremolite

02 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black Exterior Windows NAD

03 Exterior Door Frame Caulk, Black Exterior Doors NAD

04 Stone Window Sill Caulk, White Exterior Windows NAD

05 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Brown Exterior Windows NAD

06 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black Exterior Windows NAD

07 Duct Vibration Cloth, Green Second Floor, Girl’s Room NAD

Building 132 (Laundry/Electrical)

01 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey Exterior Windows 8.40% Anthophyllite

Pavilions (Adjacent to Basketball Court)

01 Vapor Barrier Under Roof Shingles, Black North Pavilion Roof NAD

02 Roof Shingles, Brown North Pavilion Roof NAD

03 Roof Shingles, Grey South Pavilion Roof NAD NAD = No Asbestos Detected NA/PS = Not Analyzed/Positive Stop Bold – Positive for ACM Trace=Trace amount of asbestos

2.3 CONDITION, QUANTITY AND FRIABLITY TABLE

For each inspection conducted, the inspector classifies ACM materials by friability and condition.

This helps to determine the extent of damage in certain areas as well as the potential for further damage and Asbestos release due to disturbance of the material. The following table summarizes the confirmed ACM and their approximate quantities.

Material Location Quantity Friability Condition

Building 129 (Cafeteria)

Duct Insulation, White Roof Mechanical Room 150 SF Friable Good

12-inch x 12-inch Green Floor Tile with White Flecks and

Associated Mastic Main Room, West 200 SF Non-

Friable Good

12-inch x 12-inch Brown Floor Tile with White and Brown

Flecks and Associated Mastic Main Room, West 20 SF Non-

Friable Good

Black Mastic Residue from Removed 9-inch x 9-inch

Floor Tile

Main Room, West (South section of floor) 1,000 SF Non-

Friable Damaged

New York

Louis Berger Page 13 May 10, 2018

Material Location Quantity Friability Condition

Old White Expansion Joint Caulk in Window Sill

Eastern and Southern Facades & Roof

29 Windows

90 LF

Non- Friable Damaged

White on Gray Exterior Window Frame Caulk Loading Platform Window 1 Window

21 LF

Non-

Friable Damaged

Black Tar on Duct Roof 10 SF Non- Friable Good

Pipe Fitting Debris Crawl Spaces TBD Friable Significantly Damaged

Compressed Paper Debris Crawl Spaces TBD Friable Significantly Damaged

Aircell Debris Crawl Spaces TBD Friable Significantly Damaged

Kitchen Exhaust Hood Duct Seal/Black Mastic Main Room, East 3 SF Non-

Friable Good

Gray Vinyl Tile Along South Wall

Main Room, East, & Assoc.

Storage Room 3,000 SF Non-

Friable Good

Building 130 (Boy’s Dormitory)

Stone Window Sill Caulk, White Exterior Windows 45 Windows

1,250 LF

Non- Friable Good Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey Exterior Windows

Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Black Exterior Doors 4 Doors

80 LF

Non-

Friable Good

12-inch x 12-inch Beige Floor Tile and Associated Black

Mastic

Southern Bedrooms on First & Second Floors 5,600 SF Non-

Friable Good

12-inch x 12-inch Reddish/Pink Mottled Floor Tile

(contaminated) and Associated Black Mastic

Hallway Adjacent to Bathrooms on First Floor 110 SF Non-

Friable Damaged

Tar and Tar Paper Roof Material Roof 7,500 SF Non- Friable Good

Building 131 (Girl’s Dormitory) Exterior Window Frame

Caulk, Grey Exterior Windows 45 Windows

1,170 LF

Non- Friable Good

Tar and Tar Paper Roof Material Roof 7,500 SF Non-

Friable Good

12-inch x 12-inch Reddish Beige Floor Tile

Southern Bedrooms on First Floor 2,900 SF Non-

Friable Good

12-inch x 12-inch Beige Floor Tile with White Specks and

Black Mastic

Northern and Southern Bedrooms on Second Floor 4,000 SF Non-

Friable Good

12-inch x 12-inch Brown Mottled Floor Tile

(contaminated) and Associated Black Mastic

First Floor Room @ North Exit Door 150 SF Non-

Friable Good

Aircell Pipe Insulation Remnants

First Floor Lobby & First Floor Room, South End 8 LF Friable Damaged

Building 132 (Laundry/Electrical) Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey Exterior Windows 4 Windows

104 LF

Non- Friable Good

New York

Louis Berger Page 14 May 10, 2018

Material Location Quantity Friability Condition

Black Tar and Tar Paper Roof Material Roof 1,000 SF Non-

Friable Significantly

Damaged Building 133 (Boiler Building)

White on Brown Large Pipe Fitting Insulation Mechanical Systems 15 SF Friable Damaged

Gray Patch on Rope Associated with Boilers Boilers 360 LF Non-

Friable Damaged

Black Pipe Gasket Mechanical Systems 8 Gaskets @ 1 SF Each

Non- Friable Good

Gray Pipe Gasket Mechanical Systems 8 Gaskets @ 1 SF Each

Non- Friable Good

Black Tar and Tar Paper Roof Material Roof 850 SF Non-

Friable Significantly

Damaged Walkway Pavilion

Tar and Paper Roof Material Walkway Roof 550 SF Non- Friable Good

Condition Definitions:

Good: None/Minimal apparent damage to ACM Damaged: Up to 10% localized damage or up to 25% of the entire ACM is damaged Significantly Damaged: Over 10% localized damage or over 25% of the entire ACM is damaged SF: Square Feet LF: Linear Feed Notes:

Quantities are an approximation and should be confirmed by contractor during pre-abatement walk through.

Asbestos abatement contractor shall be responsible to remove all layers of materials to substrate.

2.4 SAMPLE ANALYSIS TABLE

Laboratory analysis results, in tabular form, are included in Appendix A.

2.5 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE

The various crawl spaces underneath building 129 were inaccessible due to their entryways being boarded up. These areas will be inspected at the beginning of demolition activities to assess any potential environmental hazards.

The two boilers in building 133 were not dismantled for inspection purposes. These two boilers should either be abated in their entirety, assuming materials within, or dismantled at the time of abatement to assess any additional materials which may be present inside.

There were no inaccessible spaces in the remaining buildings (130, 131, 132, 133 & Pavilions)

New York

Louis Berger Page 15

3.0 LEAD FIELD INSPECTION PROCEDURES

A lead-based paint inspection is an interior and/or exterior investigation to identify all lead-based paint on a surface-by-surface basis by paint chip or soil sampling methodology. As previous reports have detailed results for paint chip testing in buildings 129, 130, 131, 132 & 133, no additional paint chip sampling was performed.

The lead in soil inspection consisted of collecting composite soil samples from bare soil in the dripline/foundation areas of buildings 129, 130 & 131. Soil samples were collected with a scooping technique. Soil samples were collected up to a depth of approx. ½ inches, following the US EPA HUD (US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development) Scoop Sampling Guidelines (Appendix 13.3).

The lead regulatory levels provided below are those used when preparing this lead-based paint evaluation or when evaluating data collected.

EPA Levels

Lead-Based Paint 1.0 mg/cm2 or 0.5% by weight (or 5,000 pm)

Lead-in-Soil, Building Perimeter/Drip Line 1,200 μg/g (or PPM)

The laboratory performing this analysis procedure was EMSL Analytical, Inc. located at 528 Mineola Avenue, Carle Place, NY 11514. The laboratory has received accreditation from the following agencies:

National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (Lab Code 101048-10) American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited Laboratory (Lab No. 102344)

3.1 INSPECTION SUMMARY

The buildings for which lead in soil sampling was performed included:

• Building 131 (Girl’s Dormitory)

Based upon Soil Sampling results, lead was not detected above the regulatory limit of 1,200 PPM at the perimeter/drip line of building 129, 130 or 131.

New York

Louis Berger Page 16

3.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

The lead in soil inspection consisted of collecting composite soil samples from bare soil in the dripline/foundation area of the building. The following soils samples were tested for lead content:

LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE RESULTS [PPM]

Building 129, Northwest Side of Building Composite Soil 84 PPM

Building 129, Northeast Side of Building Composite Soil 160 PPM

Building 129, South Side of Building Composite Soil 63 PPM

Building 130, North Side of Building Composite Soil 320 PPM

Building 130, South Side of Building Composite Soil 210 PPM

Building 130, East Side of Building Composite Soil 150 PPM

Building 130, West Side of Building Composite Soil 53 PPM

Building 131, North Side of Building Composite Soil 130 PPM

Building 131, South Side of Building Composite Soil 63 PPM

Building 131, East Side of Building Composite Soil <40 PPM

Building 131, West Side of Building Composite Soil 93 PPM Bold=Positive for Lead

3.3 CONDITION ASSESSMENT TABLE

Previous survey efforts where paint chip sampling was performed in buildings 129, 130, 131, 132 & 133 resulted in identification of lead-based paints in buildings 129, 130 & 132. The following table summarizes the confirmed LBP.

Location Component Name Substrate Color Condition Results Quantity

Building 129 (Cafeteria)

First Floor Walls Plaster Off White on Beige on Green on

Greenish & Gray Paint-Wall Plaster

Poor 1.30%

2,850 SF

First Floor Walls Plaster Dark Green, Light Green &

Brown-Wall Plaster Poor 0.63%

First Floor Wall Plaster Gray-Wall Plaster Poor 2.70%

First Floor Metal Door Beige & Dark Green on Light Green-Metal Door Poor 1.50% 1 Door

(50 SF)

First Floor Metal Windows Beige-Metal Window Frame Poor 0.84% 29 Windows

(8) @ 10’x7’

(3) @ 5’x2’

(18) @ 6’x7’

First Floor Metal Windows Black Paint-Metal Windows Poor 0.66%

First Floor Metal Windows Brown Paint-Metal Windows Poor 12.0%

New York

Louis Berger Page 17 May 10, 2018

Location Component Name Substrate Color Condition Results Quantity

First Floor Metal Windows Gray Paint-Window Exterior Poor 1.20% Building 130 (Boy’s Dormitory)

First Floor Staircase Metal White over Orange Poor 1.80% 100 SF Building 132 (Laundry/Electrical)

First Floor Windows Metal White Poor 0.56% 4 Windows

@ 8’x5’ First Floor Windows Metal Brown on White Poor 3.80%

Condition Definitions:

Intact condition = paint is intact with no sign of peeling or damage over the component system;

Fair condition = paint shows signs of wear less than 10% of a component surface (or less than 2 square feet);

Poor condition = paint is substantially delaminating greater than 10% of the component surface or 25% in focused area (or greater than 2 square feet).

3.4 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE

At the time of inspection, Berger’s inspection team was able to access all subject buildings at Floyd Bennett Field

3.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Various Lead-based Paints are present in buildings 129, 130 and 132.

Any work which disturbs painted surfaces containing lead shall be performed, and waste managed and transported in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction Standard), and EPA’s 40 CFR 745 regulation, and New York State 6 NYCRR 364. Personal air monitoring should be conducted when disturbing lead based paints and lead containing materials as per 29CFR1926.62 (OSHA).

In addition, all waste generated as part of the project, regardless of the lead content in the paint, shall be tested in accordance with the EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to determine the classification of the waste. Under RCRA, any waste material that when tested by Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results in a leachate lead concentration of five (5) parts per million or greater must be disposed of at an EPA licensed hazardous waste facility.

The finer renovation debris and paint chips that result from renovation of components with measurable quantities of lead can be tested by TCLP, or can be assumed hazardous waste and disposed of accordingly. If the scope of work is increased to include removal of actionable building components, we recommend that a TCLP test be performed on one typical component (e.g. metal, sheetrock, masonry, etc.) to determine proper disposal for all similar components.

The incurred cost for disposal of lead based paint materials/debris may depend upon the TCLP results for materials/debris collected and the total weight of items which return TCLP results above the EPA allowed 5 parts per million.

New York

Louis Berger Page 18

The cost of the TCLP depends on the laboratory and location; but typically, a lead TCLP analysis may cost from $40 to $80. Any waste material that when tested by TCLP results in a leachate lead concentration of five (5) parts per million or greater must be disposed of at an EPA licensed hazardous waste facility. Cost of disposal may range for $5,000 to $7,000 per ton of waste.

4.0 PCB INSPECTION PROCEDURES

Due to the concern about polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB) exposure, it is recommended that facilities constructed or renovated between 1950 and 1977 and undergoing current renovation or demolition be evaluated prior to any renovation or demolition work to determine whether they contain contaminated PCB Caulk materials. Per US EPA regulations, materials with PCB content greater than 50 ppm (mg/kg) are determined hazardous.

4.1 INSPECTION SUMMARY

The areas inspected for PCBs included:

• Building 131 (Girl’s Dormitory)

• Building 132 (Laundry/Electrical)

• Building 133 (Boiler Building)

Suspect materials examined during the inspection included:

• Window Pane Glazing/Caulking

• Window Frame Caulking

• Door Frame Caulking

• Cap Flashing Caulking

• Soil

4.2 PCB INSPECTION RESULTS

HA Material Description Location Results Quantity

Building 69 01 Cream Paint on Transite Siding Building 69 - South Non-PCB NA 02 Cream Paint on Wood Siding Building 69 - East Non-PCB NA 03 Brown Paint on Metal Railings Breezeway Non-PCB NA 04 Beige Paint on Concrete Foundation Building 69 - South Non-PCB NA 05 White Paint on Wood Breezeway Non-PCB NA

Building 129 (Cafeteria)

02 Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Grey North Exterior Doors @ Loading Platform Non-PCB NA

03 Exterior Hatch Frame Caulking, Brown Roof Mechanical Room Non-PCB NA 04 Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey Roof Mechanical Room Non-PCB NA 05 Caulking to Metal Cap Flashing, Grey Roofs Non-PCB NA

New York

Louis Berger Page 19 May 10, 2018

52 Expansion Joint Caulk in Window Sills Windows, South Side of Building Non-PCB NA

53 Exterior Window Frame Caulk Windows, South Side of Building Non-PCB NA

54 Exterior Door Frame Caulk Doorway, South West Corner Non-PCB NA

56 Gray Window Frame Caulk Windows, South Side of

Building Non-PCB NA

57 White Exterior Window Pane Caulk Windows, South Side of Building Non-PCB NA

58 Old White Expansion Joint Caulk in Window Sill

Windows, South Side of Building Non-PCB NA

60 White on Gray Exterior Window Frame Caulk

Windows @ Loading Platform Non-PCB NA

61 Pale Green Window Pane Exterior Caulk Windows @ Loading

Platform Non-PCB NA

69 Off-White Exterior Window Pane Caulk Roof Middle Non-PCB NA Building 130 (Boy’s Dormitory)

01 Stone Window Sill Caulk, White Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA 02 Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Black North/South Exterior Doors Non-PCB NA 03 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA

39 White Caulk Pipe End Cap First Floor, Men’s Bathroom Non-PCB NA

45 Brown Window Caulk Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA 46 Black Window Caulk Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA

Building 131 (Girl’s Dormitory) 02 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA 03 Exterior Door Frame Caulk, Black North/South Exterior Doors Non-PCB NA 04 Stone Window Sill Caulk, White Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA 05 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Brown Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA 06 Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA

Building 132 (Laundry/Electrical) 01 Window Frame Caulk, Grey Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA

304 Black Exterior Window Pane Caulk Exterior Windows Non-PCB NA 313 Black Door Frame Caulk Exterior Doors Non-PCB NA 01* Soil Entrance to Electrical Room Non-PCB NA

Building 133 (Boiler Building) 414 Black Door Frame Caulk Exterior Doors Non-PCB NA

* – Soil Sample NA – Not applicable

5.0 UNIVERSAL WASTES

Universal Wastes (i.e., batteries, thermostats, lamps, ballasts, mercury-containing equipment, radioactive sources, CFCs) are regulated pursuant to the USEPA Universal Waste Requirements (40 CFR Part 273), and New York State 6 NYCRR Parts 370 series regulations. Similarly, these sampling procedures may also be used to determine disposal/management or clean-up options for Universal Wastes. Typical equipment that might contain universal wastes are emergency light batteries, CFC containing refrigerators, water fountains, mercury containing bulbs, thermostats and thermometers.

New York

Louis Berger Page 20 May 10, 2018

The below table itemizes the number of assumed universal wastes based on Bureau Veritas’ report for Project No. 12015-000171.00 and LB observations while on site. It should be noted that the conditions of the buildings are significantly more deteriorated (vandalized) now versus when Bureau Veritas performed their inspections. Bulbs which were previously installed in ceiling fixtures may now be on the floor in either intact or broken condition. Batteries from lights may no longer be located within the fixture itself. Since it was impossible to determine if certain items were removed from the premises vs just being relocated within a specific building, LB utilized Bureau Veritas’ Universal Waste findings as the basis of the below table, with adjustments to numbers being made where possible.:

Facility (Floor/Level)

Fluorescent Bulbs

/Lamps

CFC

Containing Materials

Mercury Containing Materials

PCB

Containing Materials

Radioactive Materials

Miscellaneous Materials

Building 129 (Cafeteria)

Throughout (184) 4 ft. ---

(6) High Pressure Light Fixtures/Bulbs

(previously installed on exterior facades)

(122) Ballasts

(10) Smoke Detectors

(3) Exit Light Batteries

(4) Dry Chemical Fire Extinguishers

Cafeteria (Main Room, East)

(78) 8 ft. --- (7) Heat

Detectors --- ---

(4) Dry Chemical Fire Extinguishers

– Cooking Hood

South Hallway

(10) 4 ft.

U shaped) --- --- --- --- ---

Exterior --- --- --- --- --- (1) Unlabeled 55 Gallon Drum

Building 130 (Boy’s Dormitory)

Throughout (117) 4 ft.

(2) Water Fountains (one on each floor)

--- (81) Ballasts

(42) Smoke Detectors

(13) Exit Light Batteries

(35) Door Closers

(3) Dry Chemical Fire Extinguishers

Restrooms (18) 8 ft. --- --- --- --- --- Lobby & Hallway

(28) 4 ft.

U shaped) --- --- --- --- ---

Lobby Reception (1) 2 ft. --- --- --- --- ---

Mechanical Rooms --- --- (3) Heat

Detectors --- --- ---

Main Hallways &

Exterior --- --- (4) Sodium

Lamps --- ---

(9) Emergency

Backup Lighting Batteries

Building 131 (Girl’s Dormitory)

Throughout (90) 4 ft.

(2) Water Fountains (one on each floor)

--- (87) Ballasts

(44) Smoke Detectors

(8) Exit Light Batteries

(35) Door Closers

(2) Dry Chemical Fire Extinguishers

Restrooms (25) 8 ft. --- --- --- --- ---

New York

Louis Berger Page 21 May 10, 2018

Facility (Floor/Level)

Fluorescent Bulbs

/Lamps

CFC

Containing Materials

Mercury Containing Materials

PCB

Containing Materials

Radioactive Materials

Miscellaneous Materials

Lobby & Hallway

(78) 4 ft.

U shaped) --- --- --- --- ---

Lobby Reception (1) 2 ft. --- --- --- --- (1) Television

Mechanical Rooms --- --- (2)

Thermometers --- --- ---

Main Hallways &

Exterior

(9) Emergency Backup Lighting

Batteries

Exterior --- --- --- --- --- (1) Unlabeled 55 Gallon Drum

Building 132 (Laundry/Electrical) Laundry (8) 4 ft. --- --- (4) Ballasts --- ---

Transformer Room --- --- --- --- ---

(3) Switch Gear (Sulfuric

Hexafluoride)

Pump Room --- --- --- --- ---

(18 Gal.) Misc.

Paints/Supplies (5 Gal.) Paint

Stripper Building 133 (Boiler Building)

Throughout --- --- (13) Thermometers --- --- (1 Qt.) Motor Oil

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Various ACM, LBP & Universal Wastes have been identified in our inspection efforts that will be impacted by the upcoming building demolition project.

The Asbestos materials, listed in Section 2.3 of this report, will require complete abatement prior to the start of the project as per all federal and state regulations.

Due to the presence of Lead-Based Paints, as listed in section 3.3 of this report, all demolition debris which contains materials coated in these paints will require testing via TCLP methodology to determine the proper disposal location for the debris. Abatement of lead-based paints before demolition will reduce the likelihood of demolition debris needing to be treated as lead containing waste for disposal.

Universal Waste Materials, as noted in section 5.0, should be removed following all proper regulations, prior to any renovation/demolition activities.

New York

Louis Berger Page 22

7.0 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, ASSUMPTIONS AND CERTIFICATION

This report, and the supporting data, findings, conclusions, opinions, and recommendations it contains represent the result of LB’s efforts for the environmental investigation work for NPS.

Opinions and recommendations presented in this report apply to site conditions and features as they existed at the time of LB’s site visit, and those reasonably foreseeable. They cannot necessarily apply to conditions and features of which LB is unaware and has not had the opportunity to evaluate.

The conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based solely upon LB’s visual observations of accessible areas, laboratory test data, previous environmental documents as supplied by NPS, and current regulatory requirements. These conclusions are intended exclusively for the purpose stated herein, at the site indicated, and for the project indicated.

It is important to recognize that even the most comprehensive scope of services may fail to detect all asbestos containing materials that may be associated with the property. Therefore, LB cannot act as insurers and cannot “certify” that all hazardous materials associated with the property have been identified, and no expressed or implied representation or warranty is included or intended in our reports, except that our services were performed, within the limits prescribed by our client, with the customary thoroughness and competence of our profession.

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

Drew Cheskin Michael Gelfand Manager, Emergency Management & Manager, Emergency Management & IH Services IH Services

APPENDIX A:

ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

IN TABULAR FORM

ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

IN TABULAR FORM

Homogeneous

No.

Sample

No. Material Location PLM Result TEM Result

BUILDING 129 (Cafeteria) 01 01A Duct Insulation, White Roof Mechanical Room 57.10% Chrysotile NA

01 01B Duct Insulation, White Roof Mechanical Room NA/PS NA

01 01C Duct Insulation, White Roof Mechanical Room NA/PS NA

02 02A Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Grey

North Exterior Doors @ Loading Platform NAD NAD

02 02B Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Grey

North Exterior Doors @ Loading Platform NAD NAD

03 03A Exterior Hatch Frame Caulking, Brown Roof Mechanical Room NAD NAD

03 03B Exterior Hatch Frame Caulking, Brown Roof Mechanical Room NAD NAD

04 04A Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey Roof Mechanical Room NAD <1.00%

Chrysotile

04 04B Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey Roof Mechanical Room NAD <1.00%

Chrysotile

05 05A Caulking to Metal Cap Flashing, Grey Roof East NAD NAD

05 05B Caulking to Metal Cap Flashing, Grey Roof West NAD NAD

BUILDING 130 (Boy’s Dormitory)

01 01A Stone Window Sill Caulk, White West Side of Building 10.20%

Anthophyllite NA

01 01B Stone Window Sill Caulk, White East Side of Building NA/PS NA

02 02A Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Black North Exterior Door 2.50%

Anthophyllite NA

02 02B Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Black South Exterior Door NA/PS NA

03 03A Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey West Side of Building 5.30%

Anthophyllite NA

03 03B Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey East Side of Building NA/PS NA

BUILDING 131 (Girl’s Dormitory)

01 01A Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey East Side of Building

5.30% Anthophyllite

1.60% Tremolite

NA

01 01B Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Grey East Side of Building NA/PS NA

02 02A Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black East Side of Building NAD NAD

02 02B Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black East Side of Building NAD NAD

03 03A Exterior Door Frame Caulk, Black North Exterior Door NAD NAD

NAD = No Asbestos Detected NA/PS = Not Analyzed/Positive Stop NA = Not Applicable Bold – Positive for ACM

03 03B Exterior Door Frame Caulk, Black South Exterior Door NAD NAD

04 04A Stone Window Sill Caulk, White West Side of Building NAD NAD

04 04B Stone Window Sill Caulk, White East Side of Building NAD NAD

05 05A Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Brown East Side of Building NAD NAD

05 05B Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Brown East Side of Building NAD NAD

06 06A Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black West Side of Building NAD NAD

06 06B Exterior Window Frame Caulk, Black West Side of Building NAD NAD

07 07A Duct Vibration Cloth, Green

Second Floor, Girl’s Room NAD NA

07 07B Duct Vibration Cloth, Green

Second Floor, Girl’s Room NAD NA

07 07C Duct Vibration Cloth, Green

Second Floor, Girl’s Room NAD NA

BUILDING 132 (Laundry/Electrical)

01 01A Window Frame Caulk, Grey East Side of Building 8.40%

Anthophyllite NA

01 01B Window Frame Caulk, Grey East Side of Building NA/PS NA

PAVILIONS (Adjacent to Basketball Court)

01 01A Vapor Barrier Under Roof Shingles, Black North Pavilion Roof NAD NAD

01 01B Vapor Barrier Under Roof Shingles, Black North Pavilion Roof NAD NAD

02 02A Roof Shingles, Brown North Pavilion Roof NAD NAD

02 02B Roof Shingles, Brown North Pavilion Roof NAD NAD

03 03A Roof Shingles, Grey South Pavilion Roof NAD NAD

03 03B Roof Shingles, Grey South Pavilion Roof NAD NAD

Draft Report of Environmental Investigation Services at Bldgs. 69, 129, 130, 131, 132, 133 & Pavilions, Floyd Bennett Field, Gateway National Recreation Area, New York

APPENDIX B:

ASBESTOS BULK SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODIES

& LABORATORY RESULTS

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

528 Mineola Avenue Carle Place, NY 11514

Tel/Fax: (516) 997-7251 / (516) 997-7528 http://www.EMSL.com / carleplacelab@emsl.com

061804378EMSL Order:

Customer ID: LBAP78

Customer PO: 2004294.090.01

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Michael Gelfand (212) 612-7900

Fax:Louis Berger U.S., Inc

Received Date:96 Morton Street 03/08/2018 4:08 PM

Analysis Date:8th floor 03/12/2018

Collected Date:New York, NY 10014 03/05/2018

Project: Project No: 2004294.090.01, National Park Service, Floyd Bennett Field, Building 129

Test Report:Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material

Test Color

Analyzed

Date Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos

Non-Asbestos

Sample ID 01-01A Description Roof Mechanical Room - Duct Insulation, White

061804378-0001 Homogeneity Homogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Gray03/12/2018 40.00% Cellulose 2.90% Non-fibrous (other) 57.10% Chrysotile

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Not Analyzed

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Not Analyzed

Sample ID 01-01B Description Roof Mechanical Room - Duct Insulation, White

061804378-0002 Homogeneity

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)03/12/2018

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Not Analyzed

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Not Analyzed

Sample ID 01-01C Description Roof Mechanical Room - Duct Insulation, White

061804378-0003 Homogeneity

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)03/12/2018

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Not Analyzed

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Not Analyzed

Sample ID 02-02A Description North Exterior Doors @ Loading Platform - Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Grey

061804378-0004 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Beige/ Rust Inconclusive: None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Beige/ Rust None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

Sample ID 02-02B Description North Exterior Doors @ Loading Platform - Exterior Door Frame Caulking, Grey

061804378-0005 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Beige/ Rust Inconclusive: None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Beige/ Rust None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

Initial Report From: 03/12/2018 16:32:13

Page 1 of 3ASB_198x_0009_0001 Printed 3/12/2018 4:32:17PM

Tel/Fax: (516) 997-7251 / (516) 997-7528 http://www.EMSL.com / carleplacelab@emsl.com

061804378EMSL Order:

Customer ID: LBAP78

Customer PO: 2004294.090.01

Project ID:

Test Report:Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material

Test Color

Analyzed

Date Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos

Non-Asbestos

Sample ID 03-03A Description Roof Mechanical Room - Exterior Hatch Frame Caulking, Brown

061804378-0006 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Beige Inconclusive: None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Beige None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

Sample ID 03-03B Description Roof Mechanical Room - Exterior Hatch Frame Caulking, Brown

061804378-0007 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Beige Inconclusive: None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Beige None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

Sample ID 04-04A Description Roof Mechanical Room - Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey

061804378-0008 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Beige Inconclusive: None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Beige03/12/2018 None 100.00% Other <1.00% Chrysotile

Sample ID 04-04B Description Roof Mechanical Room - Exterior Louver Frame Caulking, Grey

061804378-0009 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Beige Inconclusive: None Detected03/12/2018 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Beige03/12/2018 None 100.00% Other <1.00% Chrysotile

Sample ID 05-05A Description Roof East - Caulking to…