Final_Environmental_Services_Report_for_GATE201023B_Bldg_69-5.10.18_subm....pdf

FINAL REPORT OF

ENVIRONMENTAL INVESTIGATION SERVICES

AT

BUILDING 69, FLOYD BENNETT FIELD, GATEWAY NATIONAL

RECREATIONAL AREA, NEW YORK

Prepared For:

NATIONAL PARK SERVICE

Prepared By:

48 Wall Street, 16th Floor

New York, New York 10005

TEL. (212) 612-7900

FAX (212) 363-4341

NPS PMIS NO. GATE 201023B

LOUIS BERGER PROJECT NO. 2004294.070.01

Final Submission: October 26, 2017

Report of Environmental Investigation Services at Bldg. 69, Floyd Bennett Field

October 26, 2017

Romorno Coney Landscape Architect/Project Manager, Design and Construction Denver Service Center, National Park Service 12795 W. Alameda Parkway, P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287

Subject: Final Report of Environmental Investigation Services at Building 69, Floyd Bennett Field Gateway National Recreational Area, New York Louis Berger Project No. 2004294.070.01

Dear Mr. Coney, Louis Berger (LB) has completed a building materials/environmental survey at the Building 69, located in the Floyd Bennett Field Gateway National Recreational Area,, New York. This investigation involved visual surveys as well as laboratory sample analysis of suspect Asbestos- Containing Materials (ACM), AAS testing of suspect Lead-Based Paints, and Soils and the quantification of Universal Waste in this building which is targeted for demolition and removal.

The attached report presents descriptions and results of the material sampling procedures and analysis. Relevant general project information is provided, followed by our findings, assessments and recommendations. Laboratory analysis data and certifications are provided in the Appendices.

If you have any questions concerning this report or if we may be of further assistance to you, please contact us.

Sincerely, LOUIS BERGER (LB)

Prakash Saha Resource Director, Emergency Management & IH Services

Louis Berger Page 1 October 26, 2017

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

2.0 ASBESTOS INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS METHODS

2.1 INSPECTION SCOPE AND MATERIAL ASSESSMENT

2.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

2.3 CONDITION, QUANTITY AND FRIABILITY TABLE

2.4 SAMPLE ANALYSIS TABLE……………………………

2.5 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE………………………………

3.0 LEAD PROCEDURES

3.1 INSPECTION SUMMARY

3.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

3.3 CONDITION ASSESSMENT TABLE

3.4 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE………………………………

3.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS...………

4.0 SOILS INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SCOPE OF WORK

4.1 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5.0 UNIVERSAL WASTES

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7.0 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, ASSUMPTIONS AND CERTIFICATION

APPENDICES

Appendix A: Asbestos Sample Analysis Results in Tabular Form Appendix B: Lead Sample Analysis Results in Tabular Form Appendix C: Bulk Sample Chain of Custodies & Laboratory Results Appendix D: Soil Sample Analytical Results Appendix E: Laboratory Accreditations & Personnel Certifications Appendix F: Sample Location Drawings Appendix G: Asbestos and Lead Containing Materials Location Drawings Appendix H: Photographic Documentation

Louis Berger Page 2 October 26, 2017

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Louis Berger (LB) has performed a full pre-demolition inspection for the presence or absence of Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM), Lead-based Paints (LBP), soils, and universal wastes at Building 69, Floyd Bennett Field, Gateway National Recreational Area. The inspection was conducted at the request of the National Park Service for use in their upcoming demolition and removal of historic property buildings project. The scope of work for this project received by LB was based on the National Park Service written scope of work. The intent of this inspection was to locate, identify and quantify ACM, LBP and universal wastes that will be impacted during the upcoming project.

Michael Gelfand and Dmitri Kirnossenko performed this survey on July 27 and 28, 2017. Michael Gelfand holds certification from the New York State Department of Labor as an Asbestos Inspector (NYSDOL Cert # 98-17113) and from the USEPA as a Lead Risk Assessor (NY-R- 128763-1). Dmitri Kirnossenko holds certification from the New York State Department of Labor as an Asbestos Inspector (NYSDOL Cert #07-01720) and from the USEPA as a Lead Inspector

(NYI-16279-1).

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected indicate that the following materials contain asbestos in the amount greater than 1% [ACM]:

• Mastic assoc. with 12”x12” Grey Floor Tiles (brown) – 2nd Floor Lunch Room

• 12”x12” Grey Floor Tiles (brown) – 2nd Floor Lunch Room

• Glue assoc. with 12”x12” Light Blue Floor Tiles (yellow) – 2nd Floor Lunch Room

• 12”x12” Light Blue Floor Tiles – 2nd Floor Lunch Room

• Transite Wall/Ceiling Panels (grey) – Throughout

• Fitting Insulation assoc. with Fiberglass Pipe Insulation (white) – Crawlspace, Toilets

• Exterior Bldg. Transite Siding (grey) – Exterior

• 9”x9” Black Floor Tiles – Throughout (previous survey results)

• 9”x9” Brown Floor Tiles – Throughout (previous survey results)

• 9”x9” Green Floor Tiles – Throughout (previous survey results)

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected indicate that the following materials contain less than 1% asbestos [Non-ACM]:

• 12”x12” Green Floor Tiles

• Carpet Glue (brown)

• Mastic assoc. with 12”x12” White Floor Tiles (black)

• 12”x12” White Floor Tiles

• 12”x12” Black Floor Tiles with Mastic/Glue

• Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Green Floor Tiles (black)

• Glue assoc. with 12”x12” Blue Floor Tiles (brown)

• 12”x12” Blue Floor Tiles

• Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Black Floor Tiles (black)

• Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Brown Floor Tiles (black)

• Vapor Barrier under Soft Concrete (black)

Louis Berger Page 3 October 26, 2017

• Soft Concrete Flooring (grey)

• Leveling Compound (white)

• 2’x4’ Ceiling Tiles (white)

• Ceramic Wall Tile Backing Glue (brown)

• Leveling Compound under Floor Tiles (white)

• Gypsum Board Walls (white)

• Joint Compound assoc. with Gypsum Board Walls (white)

• Gypsum Board Ceilings (white)

• Joint Compound assoc. with Gypsum Board Ceilings (white)

• Pipe Sleeve Insulation (white)

• Paper assoc. with Fiberglass Attic Insulation (black)

• Chimney Brick Mortar (grey)

• Roofing Tar Paper (black)

• Roofing Shingles (black)

• Roofing Top Membrane with Insulation (grey)

• Cinderblock Wall Mortar (grey)

• Exterior Window Frame Caulking (grey)

• Roofing Vapor Barrier (black)

• Vapor Barrier behind Transite Siding (black)

• Vapor Barrier behind Wood Siding (black)

• Vapor Barrier under Shingle Roof (black)

• Asphalt Parking Lot (black)

• Pipe Sleeve Debris (grey)

• Debris in Soil (brown)

• Foundation Waterproofing (black)

• Paper assoc. with Fiberglass Pipe Insulation (black)

The results of the visual inspection and paint chip sample analysis have determined that the following Lead-Based Paints exist in the building:

• White Paint on Transite Walls – Throughout

• Beige Paint on Concrete Floor – Rooms 222 and 206

• White Paint on Wood Wall Panels – 1st Floor Rooms

• Black paint on Metal Handrails – West Entrance

• Brown Paint on Metal Hatches and Vents – Exterior Foundation

• Beige Paint on Wood Siding Walls – Original Siding behind Transite Siding Throughout

• White Paint on Wood Roof Joints and Supports – Breezeway

• Brown Paint on Cinderblock Columns – Breezeway

• Off-white Paint on Electrical Conduits – Breezeway

• Brown Paint on Metal Handrails – Breezeway

Analytical results of the bulk samples collected indicate that the following testing combinations are not coated with lead-based paint (less than 0.5% by weight):

• Grey Paint on Transite Walls & Ceilings

• Grey Paint on Concrete Floor

• Yellow Paint on Transite Walls

Louis Berger Page 4 October 26, 2017

• Off-white Paint on Gypsum Board Walls

• Beige Paint on Wood Door Frames

• Brown Paint on Wood Door Frames

• Beige Paint on Wood Wall Panels

• Blue Paint on Concrete Baseboards

• Black Paint on Metal Handrails

• White Paint on Meal Doors/Frames

• Brown Paint on Metal Crawlspace Hatch Door

• Dark Green Paint on Metal Generator Fuel Tank

• Light Green Paint on Metal Generator

• White Paint on Wood Roof Trim

• Beige Paint on Concrete Foundation

• White Paint on Wood Window Frames

Louis Berger has prepared this letter report for the National Park Service (NPS) to document the findings of a hazardous materials assessment conducted at Building 69. The environmental investigation consisted of the collection of soil samples from around the emergency generator and aboveground storage tank (AST) concrete pad.

Analytical results of soil samples collected at Building 69 indicate there is no soil contamination associated with the emergency generator and AST.

2.0 ASBESTOS FIELD INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SAMPLE ANALYSIS

METHODS

Guidelines used for the inspection were established by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in the Guidance for Controlling Asbestos Containing Materials in Buildings, Office of Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Doc 560/5-85-024, and 40 CFR Part 763, Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA).

Field information was organized in accordance with the AHERA methodology of homogenous area (HA). During the survey, reasonable effort was made to identify all locations and types of ACM materials associated with the scope of work. Sampling has included multiple samples of the same materials with locations chosen at random. However, due to inconsistencies of a manufacturer's processes and the contractor’s installation methods, materials of similar construction may contain various amounts of asbestos. Furthermore, some materials that were not originally specified to contain asbestos may in fact contain this mineral.

Bulk samples of suspect ACM were analyzed using polarized light microscopy (PLM) coupled with dispersion staining, as described in 40 CFR Part 763 and the National Emissions Standard for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAPS). NESHAPS is the standard industry protocol for the determination of asbestos in building materials. A suspect material is immersed in a solution of

Louis Berger Page 5 October 26, 2017 known refractive index and subjected to illumination by polarized light. The color displays that result are compared to a standardized atlas whereby the specific variety of asbestos is determined. It should also be recognized that PLM is primarily a qualitative identification method whereby asbestos percentage, if any, is estimated. While EPA regulations governing ACM consider materials containing greater than 1-percent as asbestos, accurately quantifying asbestos content below 5-percent has been shown to be unreliable.

The laboratory performing this analysis procedure was EMSL located at 307 West 38th Street, New York, New York. The laboratory has received accreditation from the following agencies:

New York State Environmental Laboratory Approval Program (ELAP) (Lab No. 11506) National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (Lab Code 101048-9) American Industrial Hygiene Association Accredited Laboratory (Lab No. 102581)

2.1 INSPECTION SCOPE AND MATERIAL ASSESSMENT FOR ASBESTOS

The areas inspected for ACM materials which may exist:

• Building 69, throughout Interior and Exterior, Roofs

The inspection was characterized by observations of accessible areas. Predominant suspect materials were sampled and quantified.

Materials examined during the inspection included:

• Mastic assoc. with 12”x12” Grey Floor Tiles (brown) – 2nd Floor Lunch Room

• 12”x12” Grey Floor Tiles (brown) – 2nd Floor Lunch Room

• Glue assoc. with 12”x12” Light Blue Floor Tiles (yellow) – 2nd Floor Lunch Room

• 12”x12” Light Blue Floor Tiles – 2nd Floor Lunch Room

• Transite Wall/Ceiling Panels (grey) – Throughout

• Fitting Insulation assoc. with Fiberglass Pipe Insulation (white) – Crawlspace, Toilets

• Exterior Bldg. Transite Siding (grey) – Exterior

• 9”x9” Black Floor Tiles

• 9”x9” Brown Floor Tiles

• 9”x9” Green Floor Tiles

• 12”x12” Green Floor Tiles

• Carpet Glue (brown)

• Mastic assoc. with 12”x12” White Floor Tiles (black)

• 12”x12” White Floor Tiles

• 12”x12” Black Floor Tiles with Mastic/Glue

• Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Green Floor Tiles (black)

• Glue assoc. with 12”x12” Blue Floor Tiles (brown)

• 12”x12” Blue Floor Tiles

• Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Black Floor Tiles (black)

• Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Brown Floor Tiles (black)

Louis Berger Page 6 October 26, 2017

• Vapor Barrier under Soft Concrete (black)

• Soft Concrete Flooring (grey)

• Leveling Compound (white)

• 2’x4’ Ceiling Tiles (white)

• Ceramic Wall Tile Backing Glue (brown)

• Leveling Compound under Floor Tiles (white)

• Gypsum Board Walls (white)

• Joint Compound assoc. with Gypsum Board Walls (white)

• Gypsum Board Ceilings (white)

• Joint Compound assoc. with Gypsum Board Ceilings (white)

• Pipe Sleeve Insulation (white)

• Paper assoc. with Fiberglass Attic Insulation (black)

• Chimney Brick Mortar (grey)

• Roofing Tar Paper (black)

• Roofing Shingles (black)

• Roofing Top Membrane with Insulation (grey)

• Cinderblock Wall Mortar (grey)

• Exterior Window Frame Caulking (grey)

• Roofing Vapor Barrier (black)

• Vapor Barrier behind Transite Siding (black)

• Vapor Barrier behind Wood Siding (black)

• Vapor Barrier under Shingle Roof (black)

• Asphalt Parking Lot (black)

• Pipe Sleeve Debris (grey)

• Debris in Soil (brown)

• Foundation Waterproofing (black)

• Paper assoc. with Fiberglass Pipe Insulation (black)

2.2 ASBESTOS INSPECTION RESULTS

The asbestos inspection involved a thorough visual examination of all areas which may be impacted by any potential renovation. The following suspect materials were sampled and analyzed for asbestos content:

Homogenous Material Location Material Asbestos Content

A 1st Floor Hallway 12”x12” Green Floor Tiles NAD

B 1st and 2nd Floors Carpet Glue (Brown) NAD

C 1st Floor Lab Rms. Mastic assoc. with 12”x12” White Floor Tiles (black) NAD

D 1st Floor Lab Rms. 12”x12” White Floor Tiles NAD

E 1st Floor Lab Rms. 12”x12” Black Floor Tiles with Mastic/Glue NAD

F 1st and 2nd Floors Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Green Floor Tiles (black) Trace Chrysotile

G 1st and 2nd Floors Glue assoc. with 12”x12” Blue Floor Tiles (brown) NAD

Louis Berger Page 7 October 26, 2017

Homogenous Material Location Material Asbestos Content

H 1st and 2nd Floors 12”x12” Blue Floor Tiles NAD

I 1st and 2nd Floors Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Black Floor Tiles (black) Trace Chrysotile

J 1st and 2nd Floors Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Brown Floor Tiles (black) Trace Chrysotile

K Rooms 222 and 206 Vapor Barrier under Soft Concrete (black) NAD

L Rooms 222 and 206 Soft Concrete Flooring (grey) NAD

M 1st and 2nd Floors Leveling Compound (white) NAD

N 2nd Floor Lunch Room

Mastic assoc. with 12”x12” Grey Floor Tiles (brown) 1.3% Chrysotile

O 2nd Floor Lunch Room 12”x12” Grey Floor Tiles NA/PS

P 2nd Floor Lunch Room

Glue assoc. with 12”x12” Light Blue Floor Tiles (yellow) NA/PS

Q 2nd Floor Lunch Room 12”x12” Light Blue Floor Tiles NA/PS

R 1st and 2nd Floors 2’x4’ Ceiling Tiles (white) NAD

S 1st and 2nd Floor Toilets Ceramic Wall Tile Backing Glue (brown) NAD

T 1st and 2nd Floors Transite Wall/Ceiling Panels (grey) 18.8% Chrysotile

U 1st and 2nd Floors Leveling Compound under Floor Tiles (white) NAD

V 1st and 2nd Floors Gypsum Board Walls (white) NAD

W 1st and 2nd Floors Joint Compound assoc. with Gypsum Board Walls (white) NAD

X 1st and 2nd Floors Gypsum Board Ceilings (white) NAD

Y 1st and 2nd Floors Joint Compound assoc. with Gypsum Board Ceilings (white) Trace Chrysotile

Z 1st Floor Toilets, Crawlspace Pipe Sleeve Insulation (white) NAD

A1 1st & 2nd Floor Toilets, Crawlspaces

Fitting Insulation assoc. with Fiberglass Pipe Insulation (white) 36.4% Chrysotile

B1 Attic Paper assoc. with Fiberglass Attic Insulation (black) NAD

C1 Exterior Chimney Brick Mortar (grey) NAD

D1 Roofs Roofing Tar Paper (black) NAD

E1 Roofs Roofing Shingles (black) NAD

F1 Roofs Roofing Top Membrane with Insulation (grey) NAD

G1 Breezeway Cinderblock Wall Mortar (grey) NAD

H1 North Entrance Roof Roof Vapor Barrier (black) NAD

I1 North Entrance Roof Roof Shingles (black) NAD

Louis Berger Page 8 October 26, 2017

Homogenous Material Location Material Asbestos Content

J1 Sheds Roof Shingles (black) NAD

K1 Exterior Exterior Window Frame Caulking (grey) NAD

L1 Mechanical Room Roof Roofing Vapor Barrier (black) NAD

M1 Mechanical Room Roof Roofing Shingles (black) NAD

N1 Exterior Exterior Bldg. Transite Siding (grey) 18.2% Chrysotile

O1 Exterior Vapor Barrier behind Transite Siding (black) NAD

P1 Exterior Vapor Barrier behind Wood Siding (black) NAD

Q1 Breezeway Vapor Barrier under Shingle Roof (black) NAD

R1 Breezeway Roof Shingles (black) NAD

S1 Exterior Asphalt Parking Lot (black) NAD

T1 Crawlspace under Mech. Room Pipe Sleeve Debris (grey) NAD

U1 Crawlspace under Breezeway Debris in Soil (brown) NAD

V1 Crawlspace under Breezeway Foundation Waterproofing (black) NAD

W1 Crawlspace under Breezeway

Paper assoc. with Fiberglass Pipe Insulation (black) NAD

Bold=Positive for ACM NAD=No Asbestos Detected NA/PS=Not Analyzed/Positive Stop Trace=Trace amount of asbestos

2.3 CONDITION, QUANTITY AND FRIABLITY ASSESSMENT TABLE

For each inspection conducted, the inspector classifies ACM materials by friability and condition.

This helps to determine the extent of damage in certain areas as well as the potential for further damage and Asbestos release due to disturbance of the material. The following table summarizes the confirmed ACM and their approximate quantities.

Material Location Quantity Friability Condition Transite Wall/Ceiling

Panels Throughout 1st and 2nd Floors 4,200 SF Non- Friable Good

9”x9” Black Floor Tiles under Carpets

1st Floor Rooms 126, 123, 1st Floor Hallway, 2nd Floor

Rooms 202, 205, 209, 210, 211, 212, 213, 215, 217, 219, 220, 214, 2nd Floor Hallway, Stairway Landings

1,700 SF Non- Friable Damaged

9”x9” Green Floor Tiles under Carpets

1st Floor Rooms 116, 118, 120, 129, 131, 1st Floor Hallway, 2nd Floor Rooms 226, 229, 229A

3,800 SF Non- Friable Damaged

Louis Berger Page 9 October 26, 2017

Material Location Quantity Friability Condition Fitting Insulation assoc.

with Fiberglass Pipe Insulation

1st and 2nd Floor Toilets 20 LF Friable Good

9”x9” Black Floor Tiles with contaminated 12”x12” Blue Floor Tiles, 12”x12”

Green Floor Tiles and assoc. Mastic top layer under Carpets

1st Floor Hallway 240 SF Non- Friable Damaged

9”x9” Black Floor Tiles with contaminated

Linoleum Flooring above 1st Floor Server Room 120 SF Non-

Friable Damaged

12”x12” Light Blue Floor Tiles, assoc. Glue, 12”x12” Grey Floor Tiles & assoc.

Mastic

2nd Floor Lunch Room 200 SF Non- Friable Damaged

9”x9” Brown Floor Tiles under Carpets 2nd Floor Rooms 224, 225, 227 900 SF Non-

Friable Damaged

Fitting Insulation assoc.

with Fiberglass Pipe

Insulation Throughout Crawlspaces 40 LF Friable Damaged

Exterior Bldg. Transite Siding Throughout Exterior 9,200 SF Non-

Friable Damaged

Condition Definitions:

Good: None/Minimal apparent damage to ACM Damaged: Up to 10% localized damage or up to 25% of the entire ACM is damaged Significantly Damaged: Over 10% localized damage or over 25% of the entire ACM is damaged

Notes:

Quantities are an approximation and should be confirmed by contractor during pre-abatement walk through.

Asbestos abatement contractor shall be responsible to remove all layers of materials to substrate.

2.4 SAMPLE ANALYSIS TABLE

Laboratory analysis results, in tabular form, are included in Appendix A.

2.5 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE

At the time of inspection, Berger’s inspection team was able to access all areas at Building 69.

3.0 LEAD FIELD SURVEY PROCEDURES

The lead-based paint inspection is an interior and exterior investigation to identify all lead-based paint on a surface-by-surface basis by paint chip sampling methodology.

The lead in soil inspection consisted of collecting composite soil samples from bare soil in the dripline/foundation area or the building. Soil samples were collected with a scooping technique.

Louis Berger Page 10 October 26, 2017

Soil samples was collected up to a depth of approx. ½ inches, following the US EPA HUD (US Dept. of Housing and Urban Development) Scoop Sampling Guidelines (Appendix 13.3).

The lead regulatory levels provided below are those used when preparing this lead-based paint evaluation or when evaluating data collected.

EPA Levels

Lead-Based Paint 1.0 mg/cm2 Or 0.5% by weight (or 5,000 pm)

Lead-in-Soil, Building Perimeter/Drip Line 1,200 μg/g (or PPM)

3.1 INSPECTION SUMMARY

The areas inspected for LBP which may exist:

• Building 69, Interior and Exterior

The inspection was characterized by observations of accessible areas. Suspect surfaces were tested.

Coated surfaces examined during the inspection included:

• White Paint on Wood Wall Panels – 1st Floor Rooms

• Black paint on Metal Handrails – West Entrance

• Brown Paint on Metal Hatches and Vents – Exterior Foundation

• Beige Paint on Wood Siding Walls – Original Siding behind Transite Siding Throughout

• White Paint on Wood Roof Joints and Supports – Breezeway

• Brown Paint on Cinderblock Columns – Breezeway

• Off-white Paint on Electrical Conduits – Breezeway

• Brown Paint on Metal Handrails – Breezeway

• Grey Paint on Transite Walls & Ceilings

• Grey Paint on Concrete Floor

• Yellow Paint on Transite Walls

• Off-white Paint on Gypsum Board Walls

• Beige Paint on Wood Door Frames

• Brown Paint on Wood Door Frames

• Beige Paint on Wood Wall Panels

• Blue Paint on Concrete Baseboards

• Black Paint on Metal Handrails

• White Paint on Meal Doors/Frames

• Brown Paint on Metal Crawlspace Hatch Door

Louis Berger Page 11 October 26, 2017

• Dark Green Paint on Metal Generator Fuel Tank

• Light Green Paint on Metal Generator

• White Paint on Wood Roof Trim

• Beige Paint on Concrete Foundation

Based upon Paint Chip Sampling results, lead has been confirmed to exist in the following tested combinations within the building:

• White Paint on Wood Wall Panels – 1st Floor Rooms

• Black paint on Metal Handrails – West Entrance

• Brown Paint on Metal Hatches and Vents – Exterior Foundation

• Beige Paint on Wood Siding Walls – Original Siding behind Transite Siding Throughout

• White Paint on Wood Roof Joints and Supports – Breezeway

• Brown Paint on Cinderblock Columns – Breezeway

• Off-white Paint on Electrical Conduits – Breezeway

• Brown Paint on Metal Handrails – Breezeway

Based upon paint chip sample analysis results, lead was not detected in the following tested combinations within the building via paint chip sample analysis results:

• Grey Paint on Transite Walls & Ceilings

• Grey Paint on Concrete Floor

• Yellow Paint on Transite Walls

• Off-white Paint on Gypsum Board Walls

• Beige Paint on Wood Door Frames

• Brown Paint on Wood Door Frames

• Beige Paint on Wood Wall Panels

• Blue Paint on Concrete Baseboards

• Black Paint on Metal Handrails

• White Paint on Meal Doors/Frames

• Brown Paint on Metal Crawlspace Hatch Door

• Dark Green Paint on Metal Generator Fuel Tank

• Light Green Paint on Metal Generator

• White Paint on Wood Roof Trim

• Beige Paint on Concrete Foundation

Based upon Soil Sampling results, no lead has been detected in the soil samples collected.

3.2 INSPECTION RESULTS

The lead inspection involved a thorough visual examination of all accessible areas impacted by the

Louis Berger Page 12 demolition project. The following suspect surfaces were tested for lead content:

LOCATION COMPONENT NAME COLOR SUBSTRATE RESULT

1st and 2nd Floors Walls White Transite 1.8%

1st Floor Mechanical Room Walls & Ceiling Grey Transite <0.01%

1st Floor Mechanical Room Floor Grey Concrete <0.01%

2nd Floor, Rm 222 Walls Yellow Transite 0.36%

1st and 2nd Floors Walls Off-white Gypsum Board 0.34% 2nd Floor, Rms. 222 &

206 Floor Beige Concrete 3.9%

1st Floor Mechanical Room Walls & Ceiling Grey Gypsum Board 0.012%

1st and 2nd Floors Door Frame Beige Wood 0.11%

1st and 2nd Floors Wall Panels White Wood 0.92%

1st and 2nd Floors Door Frame Brown Wood 0.4%

1st and 2nd Floors Wall Panels Beige Wood 0.016%

2nd Floor, Lunch Room Baseboard Blue Concrete 0.14%

1st Floor Mechanical Room Handrails Black Metal 0.022%

West Entrance Handrails Black Metal 0.59%

North Entrance Doors/Frames White Metal <0.01%

Breezeway Crawlspace Hatch Door Brown Metal 0.015%

Exterior Foundation Hatch/Vent Brown Metal 4.6% Exterior Walls (behind

Front siding) Siding Walls Beige Wood 17%

SE side Generator Fuel Tank Dark Green Metal 0.01%

Breezeway Roof Joists White Wood 7.2%

Breezeway Roof Supports White Wood 8.5%

SE side Generator Light Green Metal <0.01%

Bldg. Roof Roof Trim behind Aluminum Soffit White Wood 0.01%

Breezeway Columns Brown Cinderblock 7.0%

Foundation Foundation Beige Concrete 0.14%

Breezeway Electrical Conduits Off-white Metal 5.7%

Main Bldg. Window Frames White Wood <0.01%

Breezeway Handrails Brown Metal 16% Bold=Positive for LBP

Louis Berger Page 13

The lead in soil inspection consisted of collecting composite soil samples from bare soil in the dripline/foundation area or the building. The following soils samples were tested for lead content:

LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE RESULTS [PPM]

Building Drip Line, East side Composite Soil 150 PPM

Building Drip Line, NE corner Composite Soil 130 PPM

Building Drip Line, North side Composite Soil 290 PPM

Building Drip Line, SW side Composite Soil 510 PPM Bold=Positive for Lead

3.3 CONDITION ASSESSMENT TABLE

For the inspection conducted, the inspector classifies the LBP and the condition of the surface.

The following table summarizes only the confirmed LBP.

Location Component Name Substrate Color Condition Results Quantity

1st and 2nd Floors Walls Transite White Fair LBP 2,800 SF*

2nd Floor, Rms. 222 & 206 Floor Concrete Beige Fair LBP 310 SF

Room 106, 207, 225, Storage Room under

Attic Stair Wall Panels Wood White Fair LBP 780 SF

West Entrance Handrails Metal Black Poor LBP 30 SF

Exterior Foundation Hatch/Vent Metal Brown Fair LBP 100 SF

Exterior Walls (behind Front siding) Siding Walls Wood Beige Poor LBP 9,200 SF

Breezeway Roof

Joists/Struts/ Paneling

Wood White Poor LBP

3,450 SF

Breezeway Roof Support Beams Wood White Poor LBP

Breezeway Columns Cinderblock Brown Fair LBP 1,100 SF

Breezeway Electrical Conduits Metal Off-white Poor LBP 120 SF

Breezeway Handrails Metal Brown Poor LBP 240 SF

Louis Berger Page 14 October 26, 2017

Notes:

* Material will be removed as ACM.

3.4 AREAS NOT ACCESSIBLE

At the time of inspection, Berger’s inspection team was able to access all areas at Building 69.

3.5 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Various Lead-based Paints have been identified in our inspection effort.

Any work which disturbs painted surfaces containing lead shall be performed, and waste managed and transported in accordance with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), 29 CFR 1926.62 (Lead in Construction Standard), and EPA’s 40 CFR 745 regulation, and New York State 6 NYCRR 364. Personal air monitoring should be conducted when disturbing lead based paints and lead containing materials as per 29CFR1926.62 (OSHA).

In addition, all waste generated as part of the project, regardless of the lead content in the paint, shall be tested in accordance with the EPA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) to determine the classification of the waste. Under RCRA, any waste material that when tested by Toxicity Characteristics Leaching Procedure (TCLP) results in a leachate lead concentration of five (5) parts per million or greater must be disposed of at an EPA licensed hazardous waste facility.

The finer renovation debris and paint chips that result from renovation of components with measurable quantities of lead can be tested by TCLP, or can be assumed hazardous waste and disposed of accordingly. If the scope of work is increased to include removal of actionable building components, we recommend that a TCLP test be performed on one typical component (e.g. metal, sheetrock, masonry, etc.) to determine proper disposal for all similar components.

The incurred cost for disposal of lead based paint materials/debris may depend upon the TCLP results for materials/debris collected and the total weight of items which return TCLP results above the EPA allowed 5 parts per million.

The cost of the TCLP depends on the laboratory and location; but typically, a lead TCLP analysis may cost from $40 to $80. Any waste material that when tested by TCLP results in a leachate lead concentration of five (5) parts per million or greater must be disposed of at an EPA licensed hazardous waste facility. Cost of disposal may range for $5,000 to $7,000 per ton of waste.

4.0 SOILS INVESTIGATION PROCEDURES AND SCOPE OF WORK

The environmental investigation consisted of a field investigation of the soil around the emergency generator and diesel aboveground storage tank (AST). This summary includes a description of the field sampling efforts performed, tables summarizing the analytical results, and a discussion of the findings and conclusions based on the data.

Louis Berger Page 15 October 26, 2017

The Diesel Fuel AST measures approximately 6 feet in length, by 4 feet in width and 4 feet in height and is constructed of a steel interior and exterior. Based on these dimensions, the tank volume is assumed to be approximately 700 gallons. The tank sits on a concrete pad measuring approximately 8 feet by 12.5 feet long. Grass and soil surrounds the concrete pad. Soil borings were collected from the area adjacent to the emergency generator and AST pad. A total of four (4) borings were performed using a decontaminated stainless steel hollow stem hand auger to a depth of 0.5 feet below ground surface (bgs) in an effort to investigate the potential presence of contamination. A boring was advanced to the north, east, south and west sides (1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively) of the pad. Groundwater was not encountered during the investigation. Upon completion of sampling, each boring was backfilled to grade with the remaining material that was removed, as well as clean sand to ensure proper restoration of the boring location. No investigation derived waste was generated during the field activities.

Soil was screened with a photoionization detector (PID) to measure the presence of volatile organic compounds. Prior to use, the PID was calibrated with a 100 ppm isobutylene gas as well as a fresh air calibration. No PID readings were observed above 0.0 parts per million (ppm). One sample was collected at each boring location from the 0.1 to 0.5 feet depth interval and sent to Hampton- Clarke, Inc. Laboratory of New Jersey for analysis. Each sample was analyzed for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOCs) in accordance with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC) CP-51 Soil Cleanup Guidance Table 3 for fuel oils. A summary of samples collected and soil sample results are described below.

Analytical Boring Results can be found in Appendix D.

SAMPLE

ID

SAMPLE

LOCATION

HIGH

PID

(PPM)

SAMPLE

INTERVAL

(FTBG)

DEPTH

TO

WATER

(FTBG)

TOTAL

DEPTH

(FTBG)

OTHER COMMENTS

1 East side of concrete slab <1 0.0 - 0.5 NE 0.5

No visual or olfactory signs of contamination observed

2 South side of concrete slab <1 0.0 - 0.5 NE 0.5

No visual or olfactory signs of contamination observed

3 West side of concrete slab <1 0.0 - 0.5 NE 0.5

No visual or olfactory signs of contamination observed

4 North side of concrete slab <1 0.0 - 0.5 NE 0.5

No visual or olfactory signs of contamination observed

Notes:

- All soil samples were analyzed for the Table 3 Target Compound List (TCL) Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) and TCL Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds (SVOC)

- In accordance with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation CP-51 Soil Cleanup Guidance

- PID = Photoionization detector

- NE = Not Encountered

- ftbg = feet below ground surface

Louis Berger Page 16

4.1 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Based on the evaluation of the field screening data and the laboratory analytical results, and a comparison to applicable regulatory standards, the following conclusions are presented:

Emergency Generator and AST

• An emergency generator and AST are located South-east of Building 69. Both units are located on top of a concrete slab on grade. The AST appears to be a 700-gallon tank assumed to contain or have contained at one time diesel fuel.

• No visual or olfactory evidence of contamination was observed in the soil at any boring locations and PID readings were not detected above background level in any of the boring locations.

• Analytical results indicate no soil contamination.

5.0 UNIVERSAL WASTES

Universal Wastes (i.e., batteries, thermostats, lamps, ballasts, mercury-containing equipment, radioactive sources, CFCs) are regulated pursuant to the USEPA Universal Waste Requirements (40 CFR Part 273), and New York State 6 NYCRR Parts 370 series regulations. Similarly, these sampling procedures may also be used to determine disposal/management or clean-up options for Universal Wastes. Typical equipment that might contain universal wastes are emergency light batteries, CFC containing refrigerators, water fountains, mercury containing bulbs, thermostats and thermometers. Please see the below table itemizing the number of assumed universal wastes:

Facility (Floor/Level)

Fluorescent Bulbs

/Lamps

CFC

Containing Materials

Mercury Containing Materials

PCB

Containing Materials

Radioactive Materials

Miscellaneous Materials

1st Floor 282 None 26 thermostats

Ballasts- 138 None Smoke detectors-47

2nd Floor 268 None 29 thermostats

Ballasts- 132 None

Refrigerator-1;

Cooler-1;

Window AC-1;

Smoke detectors-48

Attic 6 None None Ballasts-3 None -

Breezeway None None None None None -

Exterior, Entrances 4 None None Ballasts-2 None -

The Attic contains file boxes, paperwork and general office equipment/supplies which are damaged by animal (raccoon) infiltration into the Attic space. Most of the damage is on the South

Louis Berger Page 17 October 26, 2017 end of the Attic, immediately to the left and right of the Attic entrance doors. There is approximately 650 SF of damaged stored materials which may be contaminated with raccoon fecal matter.

6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Various ACM and LBP have been identified in our inspection effort that will be impacted by the upcoming hazmat remediation, demolition and site restoration and project. These materials, reported in Section 2.0 and Section 3.0 of this report, will require complete abatement prior to the start of the project as per all federal and state regulations.

Universal Waste Materials were identified and should be removed following all proper regulations, prior to demolition.

Analytical results from the soil sampling around the concrete pad of the emergency generator and AST were compared to the New York State Department of Environmental Conservations (DEC) CP-51 Soil Cleanup Guidance criteria for fuel oil contaminated soils. The analytical laboratory results indicate that there is no contamination in the soils around the concrete pad associated with the emergency generator and AST.

7.0 LIMITATIONS, EXCEPTIONS, ASSUMPTIONS AND CERTIFICATION

This report, and the supporting data, findings, conclusions, opinions, and recommendations it contains represent the result of LB’s efforts for the environmental investigation work for NPS.

Opinions and recommendations presented in this report apply to site conditions and features as they existed at the time of LB’s site visit, and those reasonably foreseeable. They cannot necessarily apply to conditions and features of which LB is unaware and has not had the opportunity to evaluate.

The conclusions presented in this report are professional opinions based solely upon LB’s visual observations of accessible areas, laboratory test data, and current regulatory requirements. These conclusions are intended exclusively for the purpose stated herein, at the site indicated, and for the project indicated.

Louis Berger Page 18

It is important to recognize that even the most comprehensive scope of services may fail to detect all asbestos containing materials that may be associated with the property. Therefore, LB cannot act as insurers and cannot “certify” that all hazardous materials associated with the property have been identified, and no expressed or implied representation or warranty is included or intended in our reports, except that our services were performed, within the limits prescribed by our client, with the customary thoroughness and competence of our profession.

Prepared by: Reviewed by:

Michael Gelfand Prakash Saha Manager, Emergency Management & IH Services Resource Director, Emergency Management

& IH Services

APPENDIX A:

ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

IN TABULAR FORM

ASBESTOS SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

Homogeneous

No.

Sample

No. Location Material PLM Result

A 1 1st Floor Hallway, by Lab Rm

101 12”x12” Green Floor Tiles

NAD

2 1st Floor Hallway, by Rm 126 NAD

B 3 1st Floor, Rm 131

Carpet Glue (brown)

NAD

4 2nd Floor, Rm 213 NAD

C 5 1st Floor, Rm 101, Lab Mastic assoc. with 12”x12”

White Floor Tiles (black)

NAD

6 1st Floor, Rm 102, Lab NAD

D 7 1st Floor, Rm 101, Lab

12”x12” White Floor Tiles

NAD

8 1st Floor, Rm 102, Lab NAD

E 9 1st Floor West Exit Vestibule 12”x12” Black Floor Tiles with

Mastic/Glue

NAD

10 1st Floor West Exit Vestibule NAD

F 11 1st Floor Hallway, by Rm 119 Mastic assoc. with 9”x9”

Green Floor Tiles (black)

<1% Chrysotile

12 2nd Floor, Rm 229A <1% Chrysotile

G 13 1st Floor Men’s Toilet Glue assoc. with 12”x12” Blue

Floor Tiles (brown)

NAD

14 1st Floor Women’s Toilet NAD

H 15 1st Floor Men’s Toilet

12”x12” Blue Floor Tiles

NAD

16 1st Floor Women’s Toilet NAD

I 17 1st Floor, Rm 127 Mastic assoc. with 9”x9” Black

Floor Tiles (black)

<1% Chrysotile

18 2nd Floor, Rm 215 <1% Chrysotile

J 19 2nd Floor, Rm 225 Mastic assoc. with 9”x9”

Brown Floor Tiles (black)

<1% Chrysotile

20 2nd Floor, Rm 224 <1% Chrysotile

K 21 2nd Floor, Rm 222 Vapor Barrier under Soft

Concrete (black)

NAD

22 2nd Floor, Rm 206 NAD

L 23 2nd Floor, Rm 222

Soft Concrete Flooring (grey)

NAD

24 2nd Floor, Rm 206 NAD

M 25 2nd Floor Lunch Rm

Leveling Compound (white)

NAD

26 2nd Floor Lunch Rm NAD

Sample No. Location Material PLM Result

N 27 2nd Floor Lunch Rm Mastic assoc. with 12”x12”

Grey Floor Tiles (brown)

<1% Chrysotile

28 2nd Floor Lunch Rm 1.3% Chrysotile

O 29 2nd Floor Lunch Rm

12”x12” Grey Floor Tiles

NA/PS

30 2nd Floor Lunch Rm NA/PS

P 31 2nd Floor Lunch Rm Glue assoc. with 12”x12”

Light Blue Floor Tiles (yellow)

NA/PS

32 2nd Floor Lunch Rm NA/PS

Q 33 2nd Floor Lunch Rm 12”x12” Light Blue Floor

Tiles

NA/PS

34 2nd Floor Lunch Rm NA/PS

R 35 1st Floor Hallway, by Rm 105

2’x4’ Ceiling Tiles (white)

NAD

36 2nd Floor Hallway, by Rm 213 NAD

S 37 2nd Floor, Women’s Toilet #2 Ceramic Wall Tile Backing

Glue (brown)

NAD

38 2nd Floor, Private Toilet in Rm

202 NAD

T 39 1st Floor Men’s Toilet Transite Wall/Ceiling Panels

(grey)

18.2% Chrysotile

40 2nd Floor Lunch Rom 214 NA/PS

U 41 1st Floor Hallway, by West

Exit Vestibule Leveling Compound under Floor Tiles (white)

NAD

42 1st Floor Hallway, by Rm 120 NAD

V 43 1st Floor, Rm 129

Gypsum Board Walls (white)

NAD

44 2nd Floor, Rm 220 NAD

W 45 1st Floor, Rm 129 Joint Compound assoc. with

Gypsum Board Walls (white)

NAD

46 2nd Floor, Rm 220 NAD

X 47 1st Floor Hallway, by Rm 101 Gypsum Board Ceilings

(white)

NAD

48 2nd Floor, Rm 220 NAD

Y 49 1st Floor Hallway, by Rm 101 Joint Compound assoc. with

Gypsum Board Ceilings (white)

NAD

50 2nd Floor, Rm 220 0.25% Chrysotile

Z

51 1st Floor, Rm 122 Closet

Pipe Sleeve Insulation (white)

NAD

52 Crawlspace, South side NAD

53 Crawlspace, East side NAD

Sample No. Location Material PLM Result

A1

54 Crawlspace, South side Fitting Insulation assoc. with

Fiberglass Pipe Insulation (white)

36.4% Chrysotile

55 Crawlspace, East side NA/PS

56 Crawlspace, East side NA/PS

B1 57 Attic, East side Paper assoc. with Fiberglass

Attic Insulation (black)

NAD

58 Attic, West side NAD

C1 59 Exterior, West side

Chimney Brick Mortar (grey)

NAD

60 Exterior, West side NAD

D1 61 Main Roof, West side

Roofing Tar Paper (black)

NAD

62 Lower Roof, West side NAD

E1 63 Main Roof, West side

Roofing Shingles (black)

NAD

64 Lower Roof, West side NAD

F1 65 Main Roof, West side Roofing Top Membrane with

Insulation (grey)

NAD

66 Lower Roof, West side NAD

G1 67 Breezeway, South Cinderblock Wall Mortar

(grey)

NAD

68 Breezeway, Middle NAD

H1 69 North Entrance Roof

Roof Vapor Barrier (black)

NAD

70 North Entrance Roof NAD

I1 71 North Entrance Roof

Roof Shingles (black)

NAD

72 North Entrance Roof NAD

J1 73 Shed 1

Roof Shingles (black)

NAD

74 Shed 2 NAD

K1 75 North side, 1st Floor Exterior Window Frame

Caulking (grey)

NAD

76 West side, 2nd Floor NAD

L1 77 Mech. Rm Roof

Roofing Vapor Barrier (black)

NAD

78 Mech. Rm Roof NAD

M1 79 Mech. Rm Roof

Roofing Shingles (black)

NAD

80 Mech. Rm Roof NAD

Sample No. Location Material PLM Result

N1 81 Exterior, South side Exterior Bldg. Transite

Siding (grey)

18.2% Chrysotile

82 Exterior, North side NA/PS

O1 83 Exterior, South side Vapor Barrier behind Transite

Siding (black)

NAD

84 Exterior, North side NAD

P1 85 Exterior, SE corner Vapor Barrier behind Wood

Siding (black)

NAD

86 Exterior, West side NAD

Q1 87 Breezeway, South side Vapor Barrier under Shingle

Roof (black)

NAD

88 Breezeway, Middle NAD

R1 89 Breezeway, South side

Roof Shingles (black)

NAD

90 Breezeway, Middle NAD

S1 91 Front Parking Lot

Asphalt Parking Lot (black)

NAD

92 Back (North) Parking Lot NAD

T1

93 Crawlspace under Mech. Rm

Pipe Sleeve Debris (grey)

NAD

94 Crawlspace under Mech. Rm NAD

95 Crawlspace under Mech. Rm NAD

U1

96 Crawlspace under Breezeway

Debris in Soil (brown)

NAD

97 Crawlspace under Breezeway NAD

98 Crawlspace under Breezeway NAD

V1 99 Crawlspace under Breezeway Foundation Waterproofing

(black)

NAD

100 Crawlspace under Breezeway NAD

W1 101 Crawlspace under Breezeway Paper assoc. with Fiberglass

Pipe Insulation (black)

NAD

102 Crawlspace under Breezeway NAD

NAD = No Asbestos Detected NA/PS = Not Analyzed/Positive Stop Bold – Positive for ACM

APPENDIX B:

LEAD SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS

LEAD-BASED PAINT SAMPLE ANALYSIS RESULTS IN TABULAR

FORM

Sample

No. Area Description Component Substrate Color Condition LEAD Result (% by Weight)

1 1st Floor Men’s Toilet Walls Transite White Fair 1.8%

2 1st Floor Mechanical Room Walls & Ceiling Transite Grey Fair <0.01%

3 1st Floor Mechanical Room Floor Concrete Grey Fair <0.01%

4 2nd Floor, Rm 222 Walls Transite Yellow Fair 0.36%

5 2nd Floor, Rm 220 Walls Gypsum Board Off-white Fair 0.34%

6 2nd Floor, Rm 222 Floor Concrete Beige Fair 3.9%

7 1st Floor Mechanical Room Walls & Ceiling Gypsum Board Grey Fair 0.012%

8 2nd Floor, Rm 220 Door Frame Wood Beige Fair 0.11%

9 1st Floor, Rm 106 Wall Panels Wood White Fair 0.92%

10 2nd Floor, Rm 220 Door Frame Wood Brown Fair 0.4%

11 1st Floor Hallway, by Rm 111 Wall Panels Wood Beige Fair 0.016%

12 2nd Floor, Lunch Room Baseboard Concrete Blue Fair 0.14%

13 1st Floor Mechanical Room Handrails Metal Black Fair 0.022%

14 West Entrance Handrails Metal Black Poor 0.59%

15 North Entrance Doors/Frames Metal White Fair <0.01%

16 Breezeway Crawlspace Hatch Door Metal Brown Poor 0.015%

17 Exterior Foundation Hatch/Vent Metal Brown Fair 4.6%

18 Exterior Walls (behind Front siding) Siding Walls Wood Beige Poor 17%

19 SE side Generator Fuel Tank Metal Dark

Green Fair 0.01%

20 Breezeway Roof Joists Wood White Poor 7.2%

21 Breezeway Roof Supports Wood White Poor 8.5%

22 SE side Generator Metal Light Green Fair <0.01%

23 Bldg. Roof Roof Trim behind Aluminum Soffit Wood White Poor 0.01%

24 Breezeway Columns Cinderblock Brown Fair 7.0%

25 Foundation Foundation Concrete Beige Poor 0.14%

26 Breezeway Electrical Conduits Metal Off-white Poor 5.7%

27 Main Bldg. Window Frames Wood White Fair <0.01%

28 Breezeway Handrails Metal Brown Poor 16%

Bold – Confirmed LBP

APPENDIX C:

BULK SAMPLE CHAIN OF CUSTODIES

& LABORATORY RESULTS

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

307 West 38th Street New York, NY 10018

Tel/Fax: (212) 290-0051 / (212) 290-0058 http://www.EMSL.com / manhattanlab@emsl.com

031723780EMSL Order:

Customer ID: LBAP78 Customer PO: 2004294.070.01

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Michael Gelfand (212) 612-7900

Fax:Louis Berger U.S., Inc

Received Date:48 Wall St. 08/01/2017 5:27 PM Analysis Date:New York, NY 10005 08/04/2017 - 08/21/2017

Collected Date: 07/27/2017

Project: 2004294.070.01/ NPS/ GATEWAY NATIONAL REC AREA, BROOKLYN, NY/ FLOYD BENNETT FIELD PARK, BUILDING 69/ GATE 234076D

Test Report:Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material

Test Color Analyzed

Date Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos

Non-Asbestos

Sample ID 1 Description 1 FLOOR HALLWAY BY LAB RM 101 - 12"X12" GREEN FLOOR TILES 031723780-0001 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Green Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Green None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 2 Description 1 FLOOR HALLWAY BY LAB RM 126 - 12"X12" GREEN FLOOR TILES 031723780-0002 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Green Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Green None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 3 Description RM 131 - CARPET GLUE (BROWN) 031723780-0003 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Brown Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Brown None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 4 Description RM 213 - CARPET GLUE (BROWN) 031723780-0004 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Brown Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Brown None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 5 Description RM 101, LAB - MASTIC ASSOC W/ 12"X12" WHITE FLOOR TILE (BLACK) 031723780-0005 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Black Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Black None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Report amended: 08/21/2017 15:02:25 Replaces initial report from: 08/04/2017 15:30:14 Reason Code: DataEntry-Other (see report comment)

Page 1 of 20ASB_198x_0009_0001 Printed 8/21/2017 3:20:25PM

Tel/Fax: (212) 290-0051 / (212) 290-0058 http://www.EMSL.com / manhattanlab@emsl.com

031723780EMSL Order:

Customer ID: LBAP78 Customer PO: 2004294.070.01

Project ID:

Test Report:Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material

Test Color Analyzed

Date Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos

Non-Asbestos

Sample ID 6 Description RM 102 - MASTIC ASSOC W/ 12"X12" WHITE FLOOR TILE (BLACK) 031723780-0006 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Black Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Black None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 7 Description RM 101,LAB - 12"X12" WHITE FLOOR TILES 031723780-0007 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB White Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB White None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 8 Description RM 102, LAB - 12"X12" WHITE FLOOR TILES 031723780-0008 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB White Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB White None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 9-Floor Tile Description 1 FLOOR WEST EXIT VESTIBULE - 12"X12" BLACK FLOOR TILE WITH MASTIC/ GLUE 031723780-0009 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Black Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Black None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 9-Mastic Description 1 FLOOR WEST EXIT VESTIBULE - 12"X12" BLACK FLOOR TILE WITH MASTIC/ GLUE 031723780-0009A Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Brown Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Brown None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 10-Mastic Description 1 FLOOR WEST EXIT VESTIBULE - 12"X12" BLACK FLOOR TILE WITH MASTIC/ GLUE 031723780-0010 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Black Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Black None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Report amended: 08/21/2017 15:02:25 Replaces initial report from: 08/04/2017 15:30:14 Reason Code: DataEntry-Other (see report comment)

Page 2 of 20ASB_198x_0009_0001 Printed 8/21/2017 3:20:25PM

Tel/Fax: (212) 290-0051 / (212) 290-0058 http://www.EMSL.com / manhattanlab@emsl.com

031723780EMSL Order:

Customer ID: LBAP78 Customer PO: 2004294.070.01

Project ID:

Test Report:Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Material

Test Color Analyzed

Date Fibrous Non-Fibrous Asbestos

Non-Asbestos

Sample ID 10-Mastic Description 1 FLOOR WEST EXIT VESTIBULE - 12"X12" BLACK FLOOR TILE WITH MASTIC/ GLUE 031723780-0010A Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Brown Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Brown None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 11 Description 1 FLOOR HALLWAY BY RM 119 - MASTIC ASSOC W/ 9"X9" GREEN FLOOR TILES

(BLACK)

031723780-0011 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Black Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other Final Residue <1%

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Black08/04/2017 None 100.00% Other <1.00% Chrysotile

Sample ID 12 Description 2 FLOOR, RM 229A - MASTIC ASSOC W/ 9"X9" GREEN FLOOR TILES (BLACK) 031723780-0012 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Black Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Black08/04/2017 None 100.00% Other <1.00% Chrysotile

Sample ID 13 Description 1 FLOOR, MEN'S TOILET - GLUE ASSOC W/ 12"X12" BLUE FLOOR TILES (BROWN) 031723780-0013 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Brown Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Brown None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 14 Description 1 FLOOR WOMEN'S TOILET - GLUE ASSOC W/ 12"X12" BLUE FLOOR TILES (BROWN) 031723780-0014 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Brown Inconclusive: None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

TEM NYS 198.4 NOB Brown None Detected08/04/2017 100.00% Other

Sample ID 15 Description 1 FLOOR, MEN'S TOILET - 12"X12" BLUE FLOOR TILES 031723780-0015 Homogeneity Heterogeneous

PLM NYS 198.1 Friable Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 VCM Not Analyzed

PLM NYS 198.6 NOB Blue…