B08_-_RFP_Attachment_6_PPQ-AMD1_0001.docx

For Official Use Only/Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR SOLICITATION 140E0123R0006

OHMSETT FACILITY

To Offeror:

Please email this Past Performance Questionnaire to each of your references according to the instructions in Section L of the Solicitation and include a copy of this page in your past performance volume. If your reference is a BSEE employee, send the BSEE PPQ through the Contracting Officer (CO) identified on this PPQ and NOT directly to the BSEEemployee; the CO will forward to the appropriate BSEE employee. After the due date, the BSEE CO will notify the Prime of the received PPQs, both for the Prime and any Subcontractors. It is the Prime Contractor’s responsibility to notify their subcontractors when PPQs are received for them. Tailor this PPQ by saving the company name in the file's title. You must customize this block for each of your references:

<Comany Name> is competing for an award for the BSEE as a <prime / subcontractor> and asks that you fill out this questionnaire for the Ohmsett Facility solicitation number 140E0123R0006. The prime offeror is: _______________.

Reference Requirement Title:

Reference Prime Contractor:

Reference Contract #:

Reference Contract Type:

Reference's Name:

Reference's Agency/Company

Reference's Email:

Reference's Phone:

To Offeror’s Reference:

BSEE requests your assistance in providing past performance information on the Contractor (a prospective “Offeror” under our Solicitation) and corresponding contract. Please complete this Questionnaire in accordance with the Instructions set forth immediately below. BSEE agrees to protect your information as For Official Use Only/Source Selection Information consistent with FAR 2.101 and 3.104, as noted in the header on each page of this Questionnaire package.

Instructions for Offeror’s Reference:

1. Please complete the attached Past Performance Questionnaire regarding the Offeror based upon your most recent Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) prepared in accordance with FAR 42.15; provided, you do not have a current CPAR entry into the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS).

NOTE: If your office enters its CPARs into PPIRS, please email william.rilee@bsee.gov and do not complete this Questionnaire. In your email, tell the william.rilee@bsee.gov which agency and office you are from so that person may retrieve your latest CPAR.

2. Please use the following Rating Instruction (or the equivalent you use in producing your CPARs) in providing the rating assessments that best describe the contractor's performance on your contract.

3. Please email a copy of the completed Questionnaire directly to the BSEE Contact no later than 05 June 2023.

RATING INSTRUCTION

Please provide your assessment of each factor rated in the Questionnaire by using the following rating scale and corresponding definitions (or the equivalent you use in producing your Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (CPARs)), as may be appropriate in each case.

1. Rating Scale (Used for all factors except the “Utilization of Small Business” factor):

· Excellent - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many requirements to the Government’s benefit.

· Very Good - Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government's benefit.

· Satisfactory - Performance meets contractual requirements.

· Marginal - Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet implemented satisfactory corrective actions.

· Unsatisfactory - Performance does not meet contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. Contractor’s corrective actions to date are ineffective.

· Not Applicable (N/A) - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

2. Rating Scale: (Used only for the “Utilization of Small Business” factor. Please seek the assistance of your Office of Small Business Programs to make this assessment.)

· Excellent – Exceeded all negotiated subcontracting goals or exceeded at least one goal and met all of the other negotiated subcontracting goals.

· Very Good – Met all of the negotiated subcontracting goals in the traditional socio-economic categories (SB, SDB and WOSB) and met at least one of the other socio-economic goals (HUBZone, VOSB, SDVOSB).

· Satisfactory – Demonstrated a good faith effort to meet all of the negotiated subcontracting goals.

· Marginal – Deficient in meeting key subcontracting plan elements. Deficient in complying with FAR 52.219-8 and any other small business participation requirements in the contract.

· Unsatisfactory – Noncompliant with FAR 52.219-8 and 52.219-9, and any other small business participation requirements in the contract.

· Not Applicable (N/A) - Unable to provide a score. Performance in this area not applicable to effort assessed.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

FOR SOLICITATION 140E0123R0006

OHMSETT FACILITY

-- TO BE COMPLETED BY THE OFFEROR’S (CONTRACTOR’S) REFERENCE --

1. Your Name: ______________________________________________ Your Title: ______________________________________________ Your Role with this Contract: ________________________________________

2. Your Agency/Company Full Name: _____________________________________ Street Address: _______________________________________________ City, State, Zip: _______________________________________________

3. Contracting Office/Code: ___________________________________________

4. Period Assessed: __________________________________________________

5. Contract #: __________________________________________________

6. Name of Prime Contractor: ______________________________________________

14. Basis for Contract Award (check all that apply):

|_| Negotiated |_| Competitive |_| Non-Competitive

15. Type of Contract (check the one that applies):

16. Key Subcontractors (list as needed):

· Subcontracting under this contract is covered by a [comprehensive][commercial][N/A] (select one) small business subcontracting plan.

· Date of latest Subcontracting Report/Summary Subcontracting Report: ___________

FACTORS RATED:

1. Quality– Assess the contractor's conformance to contract requirements, specifications, quality of software product and development, and standards of good workmanship (e.g., commonly accepted technical, professional standards).

|_| Excellent |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

2. Schedule– Assess the contractor's timeliness against the completion of the contract, task orders, milestones, delivery schedules, and administrative requirements (e.g., efforts that contribute to or effect the schedule variance).

3. |_| Excellent |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

4. Cost Control – Assess the contractor’s effectiveness in forecasting, managing, and controlling contract cost, including reporting and analyzing variances.

Note: This factor is not rated for firm fixedprice, firm fixedprice with economic price adjustment, or firm fixedprice levelofeffort type contracts.

|_| Excellent |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

5. Management or Business Relations – Assess the integration and coordination of all activity needed to execute the contract, specifically the timeliness, completeness, and quality of problem identification, corrective action plans, proposal submittals, the contractor's history of reasonable and cooperative behavior, customer satisfaction, timely award and management of subcontracts. Include the adequacy of the contractor’s accounting, billing, and estimating systems and the contractor’s management of Property in Possession of Contractor (PIPC) also known as Government Furnished Property/Equipment (GFP/GFE). Address the timeliness of awards to subcontractors and management of subcontractors, including subcontractor costs.

|_| Excellent |_| Very Good |_| Satisfactory |_| Marginal |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ 5.

6. Small Business Subcontracting – Assess the contractor's success with timely award and management of subcontracts, including whether the contractor met or exceeded small business, small disadvantaged business, small business HUBZone, veteran-owned small business, service disabled veteran-owned small business, and women-owned small business participation and subcontracting goals.

Note: This factor is rated only if FAR 52.219-9 is stated in the award and the contractor is other than a small business.

|_| Excellent |_| Good |_| Fair |_| Poor |_| Unsatisfactory |_| N/A Comments:________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

OTHER AREAS ASSESSED:

1. Has the contractor been given cure notice(s), show cause notices(s), suspension of progress payments, or letters of direction, etc.?

|_| Yes |_| No |_| N/A Comments:__________________________________________________________________

2. Do you intend to exercise the option on this contract?

|_| Yes |_| No |_| N/A Comments:__________________________________________________________________

19. Recommendation: Given what you know today about the contractor’s ability to execute what they promised in the proposal, would you award to them today if you had a choice?

|_| Yes |_| No Comments:__________________________________________________________________

20. Please provide any additional comments concerning the past performance of the contractor.

Comments:__________________________________________________________________ For Official Use Only/Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104