12639526Q0197-0001.pdf
PDF 354 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Plumbing Repairs, Phoenix Rearing Facility Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- 12639526Q0197
About this file
Amendment 1 to Solicitation 12639526Q0197 - Plumbing Repairs, Phoenix Rearing Facility
This is Amendment 1 to a federal construction solicitation issued by the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) Minneapolis office. The amendment, effective July 7, 2026, replaces page 7 of the original solicitation and modifies the evaluation criteria for contractor proposals. The solicitation concerns plumbing repairs at the Phoenix Rearing Facility and is numbered 12639526Q0197.
The amendment revises the evaluation methodology for three primary evaluation factors: price reasonableness, technical capability, and past performance. For pricing, offerors must provide a complete breakdown of key elements comprising the lump-sum price to allow evaluation for price realism and demonstration of requirements understanding. Technical capability evaluation requires offerors to demonstrate relevant experience with plumbing projects of comparable size and scope, along with a specific narrative addressing project management, quality control, safety, and execution strategies. The narrative must specifically address work sequencing with significant milestones and identification of critical project activities; responses that merely restate Statement of Work requirements are deemed unacceptable. Past performance assessment is subjective and based on customer satisfaction, schedule adherence, and regulatory compliance. References must include contract number and price, project title and location, award and completion dates, and contact person information with phone and email address.
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| RFIs-and-Responses.docx | DOCX document | |
| 12639526Q0197-0005.pdf | ||
| More RFIs and Responses.docx | DOCX document | |
| RFIs and Responses.docx | DOCX document | |
| Attendance_07212026 site visit.pdf | ||
| 12639526Q0197-0003.pdf | ||
| C04_12639526Q0197.docx | DOCX document | |
| 12639526Q0197-0002.pdf | ||
| C04_Atch 3_ Drawings.pdf | ||
| C04_Atch 1_Statement of Work.docx | DOCX document | |
| C04_Atch 4_Federal Construction Wage Rates_Maricopa.txt | TXT text file | |
| C04_12639526Q0197.docx | DOCX document | |
| C04_Atch 2_Specifications.pdf |
Show all 13
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
(x)
12639526Q0197 x x copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted ; or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT TO BE
RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR
OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted , such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
x
APHIS-MN-126395
MINNEAPOLIS MN 55401
SUITE410
250 MARQUETTE AVE
USDA APHIS
07/07/20260001
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS. IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) is not extended.is extended, Items 8 and 15, and returning
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended , by one of the following methods: (a) By completing
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
FACILITY CODE CODE
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6)CODE 6. ISSUED BY
PAGE OF PAGES
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.3. EFFECTIVE DATE2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)
1. CONTRACT ID CODE
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
07/01/2026
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority) appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return __________________ copies to the issuing office.
ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
This amendment is written to replace page 7 of the solicitation with the next page. The change is noted with a border on the left side of a paragraph.
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
15C. DATE SIGNED 16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR 16C. DATE SIGNED
(Signature of person authorized to sign) (Signature of Contracting Officer)
JAMES G. ROLOFF
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
Previous edition unusable
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9 A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect .
07/07/2026
Plumbing Repairs, Phoenix Rearing Facility Solicitation 12639526Q0197, Amendment 1
Generally, price reasonableness may be determined based on adequate competition. However, in evaluating price reasonableness, the contracting officer may consider other information as necessary to establish a fair and reasonable price. Your pricing must include a complete breakdown of the key elements making up your lump-sum price. This allows us to evaluate for price realism and analyze your understanding of the contract requirements and/or assess the risk inherent in your proposal. This evaluation technique determines if price submissions:
(1) Are realistic for the work to be performed
(2) Reflect a clear understanding of the requirements, and
(3) Are consistent with the various elements of the offeror’s technical proposal. Contractor submissions that are either too low or too high will be deemed unreasonable or incorporating too much risk for the government to accept.
Technical capability
— Relevant experience of the quoter to meet the government requirement, i.e., relevant experience with plumbing projects of this size and scope or similar.
— Technical Approach. Quoters must provide a specific narrative that describes the intended technical approach to executing this construction per the statement of work—attachment 1. The narrative must clearly and concisely describe the technical approach to project management, quality control, safety, and execution. Responses restating requirements identified in the SOW are not acceptable. Specifically, the narrative must address and thereby demonstrate the offeror’s understanding of the following elements (at a minimum), specifically related to this project:
o Work sequencing, to include significant milestones.
o Identification of critical project activities based on the project scope.
Past Performance
Past performance is a measure of the degree to which an offeror has satisfied customers in the past, and complied with federal, state, and local laws and regulations. The assessment of past performance will be subjective and based mainly on offeror reputations with customers and adherence to schedules. The Government may evaluate the performance data provided by offerors or obtained from other sources. Past performance assessments may be based on information such as the contracting officer’s and evaluator’s knowledge of previous experience with the supply or service being acquired, customer surveys, or other reasonable basis. The assessment will consider the contractor’s record of conforming to specifications, and to standards of good workmanship/customer service. In addition, adherence to contract schedules, including the administrative aspects of performance, will be taken into consideration. The currency and relevance of the information, source of the information, context of the data, and general trends in contractor’s performance shall be considered. References must include:
• Contract number and price
• Project title or name
• Location
• Award and completion dates
• Name, phone, and email address of the contact person familiar with the project
| 2026-07-07T14:18:15-0500 | |
| JAMES ROLOFF |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .