12445123R0034 Questions Asked As Of 07062023.doc

DOC document 90 KB Posted

Attached to
USDA Forest Service NORTH CAROLINA CATAWBA FALLS TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS 2023-Phase IC
Solicitation number
12445123R0034
Issued by

About this file

This federal solicitation requests proposals for trail improvement work on the Catawba Falls Trail located in the Pisgah National Forest in North Carolina. The work includes constructing boardwalks, stairs, retaining walls, viewing platforms, and resurfacing 5,300 linear feet of trail. This project will be conducted in phases, with Phase 1C focusing on building boardwalks and stairs that wind around rock outcrops above a new stair tower. A dry stacked rock retaining wall will replace a previously planned concrete wall. The proposal deadline is July 18, 2023 at 1:00pm EST. The contract will be a firm-fixed price awarded based on best value. The estimated value is between $5-10 million. The soliciting agency is the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service.

View the file

Other files

File Type Posted
12445123R0034 Questions Asked As Of 07122023.doc DOC document
12445123R0034 Questions Asked As Of 07112023.doc DOC document
12445123R0034 Site Visit Registry 6.28.2023.pdf PDF
0004 CFT Supplemental_Specification_939.01 SIGNED.pdf PDF
0003 CFT Supplemental Specification 911-912.pdf PDF
12445123R0034 Complete Package.pdf PDF
0012 CFT Survey Controls.pdf PDF
0016 12445123R0034 Construction Experience Questionaire Fillable.pdf PDF
0002 CFT Standard Trail Specifications.pdf PDF
0006 CFT Plan Set SIGNED.pdf PDF
0009 Catawba Falls Trail 6.15.2023 - Geotechnical Report Slide 3.pdf PDF
12445123R0034 Sched B_Terms and Conditions.pdf PDF
0005 CFT Supplemental_Specification_939.02 SIGNED.pdf PDF
0001 CFT Statement of Work_Catawba Falls Trail Phase 1C 6.12.2023.pdf PDF
0014 Davis-Bacon Act WD NC20230086.pdf PDF
12445123R0034 SF1442.pdf PDF
0008 Catawba Falls Trail 3.20.2023 - Phase 0 Slide 3 Gabion Wall Plan.pdf PDF
0010 CFT Plans Dry Stacked Rock Retaining Wall 935.20.pdf PDF
0017 12445123R0034 CONTACTOR REFERENCES FILLABLE.pdf PDF
0013 CFT Geotechnical Report SIGNED.pdf PDF
0011 CFT Load Calculations.pdf PDF
0007 CFT Plans Page 15 of 34 Revision.pdf PDF
0015 12445123R0034 Attachment A Buy American_Hazardous Materials Fillable.pdf PDF
Show all 23

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

COMMENTS MATRIX FOR USDA-FS ISSUANCES: 12445122R0002 Catawba Falls Safety Improvements (PISGAH NF_NC) (Please read instructions on back before completing form.)

#
Class
Component and POC Name, Phone, and E-mail
Page
Para
Comment Type (C/S)
Comments, Justification, and Originator Justification for Resolution
A/R/P

Site visit

Bidder Comment: Is the dry stack rock retaining wall at “Phase 0 Turnaround” to be set on a rotation (or batter)?

Resolution: Yes, as specified in the provided standard drawing 935.2 section “B”; more specifically a 20% rotation angle is sufficient.

Site visit

Bidder Comment: Is the trail surfacing with ABC stone to be compacted?

Resolution: Yes, see standard trail specification 913 for general information, but machine compaction from hauling and/or grading equipment is sufficient.

Bidder Comment:

Resolution:

Bidder Comment:

Bidder Comment:

Bidder Comment:

INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLETING SD FORM 818

Coordinating OSD Component: Use this form to provide consolidated critical and substantive comments to the OSD Component that originated the issuance. Complete the classification header and footer, columns 1 through 5, and the first two entries in column 6. REVIEW THE COMMENTS, resolve any conflicting views, AND CONFIRM THAT THE COMPLETED MATRIX ACCURATELY REPRESENTS YOUR COMPONENT’S POSITIOn. Upload the form to the DoD Directives Program Portal in microsoft word format, with a scanned copy of the sign SD Form 106, “DoD Directives Program Coordination Record,” or coordination memorandum.

Originating OSD Component: Use this form to consolidate comments from all coordinators and to record adjudication of the comments. (To add comments from an SD 818 submitted by a coordinator, use the “Copy” and “Paste” tools on the Microsoft Word Standard Toolbar.) When consolidating comments, place them in the order of the pages/paragraphs they apply to (e.g., all comments from all coordinators that apply to page 1, paragraph 1.a., should be grouped together as the initial entries; all comments that apply to page 1, paragraph 1.b., should be grouped together next, and so on). Complete column 7 and the third entry in column 6. Adjust the classification header and footer and columns 1 and 2 as appropriate.

Classification – Enter the highest classification of the comments. If all are unclassified, mark the header and footer accordingly and ignore the column.

Column 1 – Enter the number of the comment. Enter comments in the order of the pages/paragraphs they apply to.

Column 2 – Enter the classification of the comment. If all comments are unclassified, mark the header and footer accordingly and ignore the column.

Column 3 – Enter the appropriate information.

Column 4 – Enter the appropriate information.

Column 5 – Enter the appropriate information.

Column 6 – Enter the comment type. Place only one comment per row. Do not include administrative comments concerning non-substantive aspects of an issuance, such as dates of references, organizational symbols, and/or grammatical errors.

(C) Critical: When a Component has one or more critical comments, that Component’s coordination shall reflect a nonconcur. THE JUSTIFICATION FOR CRITICAL COMMENTS MUST IDENTIFY:

– Violations of the law or contradictions of Executive Branch policy or of policy established in DoD issuances. The GC, DoD, or his or her representative shall identify legal objections as critical comments.

– Unnecessary risks to safety, life, limb, or DoD materiel; waste or abuse of DoD appropriations; or imposition of an unreasonable burden on a Component’s resources.

(S) Substantive: Substantive comments are made when a section in the issuance appears to be or is potentially unnecessary, incorrect, misleading, confusing, or inconsistent with other sections, or when a Component disagrees with the proposed responsibilities, requirements, and/or procedures. A substantive comment is usually not sufficient justification for a Component to nonconcur on an issuance. Several substantive comments when taken together may be grounds for a nonconcurrence.

Column 7 – Coordinating Component: Enter the comment in the area provided. Enter your justification for the comment and your requested or recommended changes in the area provided. YOU MUST PROVIDE CONVINCING SUPPORT FOR CRITICAL COMMENTS IN THE JUSTIFICATION.

– Originating Component: Enter your justification for disposition of the comment in the area provided. Include any related communications with the coordinating Component. You must provide convincing support for rejecting critical comments.

Column 8 – Enter whether you accepted (A), rejected (R), or partially accepted (P) the comment. Your justification for disposition of the comment in column 6 must be consistent with this entry.

PAGE

SD FORM 818, JAN 09

PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .