A002_C05_12363N26Q4181Corral G-Z IRSC Solicitation_pgs5_6.pdf
PDF 127 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Corral G-Z Stewardship IRSC, Region 6, Fremont-Winema National Forest, Bly Ranger District, Bly , Oregon
- Solicitation number
- 12363N26Q4181
- Issued by
-
Department of Agriculture Forest Service
About this file
This document is a Schedule of Items from Amendment 002 to Solicitation 12363N26Q4181 for the Corral G-Z Stewardship project on the Fremont-Winema National Forest, Bly Ranger District. The solicitation encompasses mandatory and optional work activities across two project areas: Corral and Grizzly, with specific emphasis on timber harvesting, land restoration, and stewardship planning.
Mandatory work activities in the Corral Project Area include cutting and removing included timber (3,875 acres at no unit price), cutting, skidding, and decking control features (722 acres), and cutting, skidding, and decking timber units (1,584 acres). In the Grizzly Project Area, mandatory activities include developing a Project Area Implementation Plan for 6,095 gross acres (lump sum), locating and flagging 38 known cultural sites, flagging and GPS tagging unit boundaries (1,595,585 linear feet), preparing a detailed logging plan (lump sum), and conducting cruise plots (20 pre-cruise PNT plots and 120 final cruise PCM plots). Optional work activities in the Corral area involve additional cutting, skidding, and decking work across control features (1,296 acres), plantations (859 acres), and natural stands (723 acres), plus small tree thinning and hand-piling restoration. Grizzly optional activities include cutting and removing included timber (2,880 acres revised from 3,000 acres), transmission line treatments (820 acres), and various thinning and restoration prescriptions. The timber removal price schedules specify minimum acceptable quotes: for the Corral mandatory area, $9.29 per ton for white fir and other coniferous sawtimber (132,699 tons) and ponderosa pine sawtimber (3,059 tons); for the Grizzly optional area, quotes are to be determined from cruise results and appraisal, with price ranges of $0.91 to $9.29 per ton for estimated quantities of 58,680 tons of white fir and 1,380 tons of ponderosa pine.
View the file
Other files
Show all 30
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Corral G-Z Stewardship IRSC Fremont-Winema National Forest Solicitation 12363N26Q4181 Amendment 002 Bly Ranger District
SCHEDULE OF ITEMS
MANDATORY WORK ACTIVITIES:
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION OF
MANDATORY WORK ACTIVITIES UNIT ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
UNIT
PRICE TOTAL PRICE
Corral Project Area
1 Cut and Remove Included Timber Acre 3,875 N/A N/A
2 Cut, Skid, and Deck – Control Features Acre 722 $ $
3 Cut, Skid, and Deck – Timber Units Acre 1,584 $ $
Grizzly Project Area
4 Project Area Implementation Plan (6,095 Gross Acres)
Lump Sum 1 $ $
5 Locate, Flag, and GPS Known Cultural Sites Each 38 $ $
6 Flag, Tag, Paintng and GPS Unit Boundaries Feet 1,595,585* $ $
7 Detailed Logging Plan Lump Sum 1 $ $
8 Cruise
a) Pre-cruise plots – PNT Each 20* $ $
b) Final cruise plots – PCM Each 120* $ $
Total All Mandatory Service Items $
OPTIONAL WORK ACTIVITIES:
ITEM
NO.
DESCRIPTION OF
OPTIONAL WORK ACTIVITIES UNIT ESTIMATED
QUANTITY UNIT PRICE TOTAL PRICE
Corral Project Area Service Work
9 Cut, Skid, and Deck – Control Features Acre 1,296 $ $
10 Cut, Skid, and Deck – Plantations Acre 859 $ $
11 Cut, Skid, and Deck – Natural Stands Acre 723 $ $
12 Small Tree Thinning – Old Growth Acre 152 $ $
13 Hand-piling: Woodland, Shrubland, and Meadow Restoration Acre 777 $ $
Grizzly Project Areas
14 Cut and Remove Included Timber Acre 3,000* 2,880* N/A N/A
15 Transmission Line Treatments Acre 820* $ $
Corral G-Z Stewardship IRSC Fremont-Winema National Forest Solicitation 12363N26Q4181 Amendment 002 Bly Ranger District
16 Cut, Skid, and Deck – Control Features Acre 1,613* 1,343* $ $
17 Cut, Skid, and Deck – Timber Units Acre 2,500* $ $
18 Cut, Skid, and Deck – Natural Stands Acre 379* $ $
19 Small and Large Tree Thinning – Whitebark Pine Restoration Acre 56* $ $
20 Small Tree Thinning - Old Growth Acre 415* $ $
21 Conifer Removal – Aspen Acre 215* 200* $ $
22 DxP Prescription and Virtual Boundary Implementation Monitoring Acre 5,000* $ $
Total All Optional Service Items $
TIMBER/PRODUCT REMOVAL PRICE SCHEDULE: Corral Mandatory Project Area:
TIMBER/PRODUCT REMOVAL PRICE SCHEDULE: Grizzly Optional Project Area
SPECIES PRODUCT ESTIMATED
QUANTITY
UNIT OF
MEASURE
MINIMUM
ACCEPTABLE
QUOTE
QUOTE
(FLAT)
TOTAL
QUOTE
White fir and other coniferous species
Sawtimber 132,699 Ton $9.29 $ $
Ponderosa pine Sawtimber 3,059 Ton $9.29 $ $
Total – All Products $
SPECIES PRODUCT QUANTITY UNIT OF MEASURE MINIMUM ACCEPTABLE
QUOTE
White fir and other coniferous species
Sawtimber TBD from Cruise
58,680** Tons TBD from Appraisal $0.91 - $9.29***
Ponderosa pine Sawtimber TBD from Cruise 1,380** Tons TBD from Appraisal
$0.91 - $9.29 ***
Total Value Bid Premium **** $
Total Value – (TBD after cruise and appraisal)
N/A – TBD
Will be calculated by FS for evaluation purposes.
| General Information |
| The associated North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) code for this procurement is 113310 –Logging, with a small business size standard of 500 Employees. The product service code is F014. The government will award a firm-fixed price (... |
| SCHEDULE OF ITEMS |
| MANDATORY WORK ACTIVITIES: |
| OPTIONAL WORK ACTIVITIES: |
| TIMBER/PRODUCT REMOVAL PRICE SCHEDULE: Corral Mandatory Project Area: |
| TIMBER/PRODUCT REMOVAL PRICE SCHEDULE: Grizzly Optional Project Area |
| TIMBER SUBJECT TO AGREEMENT PRICE SCHEDULE: |
| SCHEDULE NOTES |
| Land Management Activities. |
| FAR 52.212-4 CONTRACT TERMS AND CONDITIONS - COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS AND COMMERCIAL SERVICES (Deviation NOV 2025) |
| FAR 52.212-4 Terms and Conditions—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (Nov 2025) |
| Scope of Contract |
| Administrative Changes |
| Specifications |
| Contractor Quality Control Inspection System |
| Acceptance |
| Government Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan |
| Commencement, Prosecution, and Completion of Work |
| PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE |
| CONTRACT OPERATIONS SCHEDULE |
| SCHEDULES AND REPORTS |
| SUBMITTAL DUE |
| ITEM DESCRIPTION |
| Physical Data |
| Data Rights |
| Release of Information |
| The contracting officer shall submit the contractor’s request for press release to the office of communications for approval. The contractor shall not release any information to the public without official OC approval from the contracting officer. |
| Return of Data |
| Geospatial Data |
| Stewardship Credits |
| Establishment of Stewardship Credits |
| Payment |
| Timber Payment Guarantee |
| Excess Stewardship Credits |
| Excess Timber Value |
| Refund of Excess Cash |
| FOREST PRODUCT APPRAISAL METHODOLGY |
| Timber Product Volume Estimation |
| Final Payment - Release of Claims |
| Post Award Conference |
| Use of premises |
| Key Personnel |
| Key Personnel- Representatives: |
| Employment Of Eligible Workers |
| PROTECTION MEASURES NEEDED FOR PLANTS, ANIMALS, CULTURAL RESOURCES, AND CAVE RESOURCES |
| EROSION PREVENTION AND CONTROL |
| PROTECTION OF LAND SURVEY MONUMENTS |
| PROTECTION OF IMPROVEMENTS |
| PROTECTION OF PROPERTY |
| PROTECTION OF RESIDUAL TREES |
| SANITATION AND SERVICING |
| PREVENTION OF OIL SPILLS AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES |
| EQUIPMENT CLEANING/NOXIOUS WEED CONTROL |
| MEADOW PROTECTION |
| WETLANDS PROTECTION |
| STREAMCOURSE PROTECTION |
| REQUIREMENTS OF RIGHTS-OF-WAY |
| ROAD MAINTENANCE |
| USE BY OTHERS |
| INCIDENTAL PAYMENT ITEMS |
| SAFETY |
| CONTRACTOR PERFORMANCE SYSTEM REGISTRATION |
| INVOICE PROCESSING PLATFORM (IPP) |
| AGAR 452.236-70 Emergency Response, Fire Suppression, and Liability. |
| 49.1 FIRE PRECAUTIONS AND CONTROL |
| OPTIONAL LINE ITEMS |
| OPTION FOR INCREASED QUANTITIY |
| FAR 52.252-2 Clauses Incorporated by Reference (FEB 1998) |
| STATEMENT OF EQUIVALENT RATES FOR FEDERAL HIRES (MAY 2014), the following information is provided In accordance with FAR 52.222-42: |
| AGAR 452.203-71 Anti-Discrimination and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Compliance (Dec 2025) |
| AGAR 452.203-72 Unenforceable Supplier Terms (APR 2026) |
| AGAR 452.204–70 Modification for Contract Closeout (Apr 2026) |
| LIST OF ATTACHMENTS |
| Site Visit/Preproposal Conference |
| FAR 52.237-1 Site Visit (Apr 1984) |
| FAR 52.212-2 Evaluation – Commercial Products and Commercial Services (NOV 2025) |
| The Government will use an on-the-spot consensus method to determine the best value, consistent with the stated factor order of importance and rating definitions. |
| 1. Evaluators shall independently review proposals and record notes, strengths, weaknesses, significant benefits, and risks for each factor and subfactor. |
| 2. Convene a facilitated consensus session to determine final ratings per factor; identify the material discriminators; and document a trade-off rationale where applicable. |
| 3. Document the consensus with a concise narrative that links the final ratings to evidence in the proposal and explains any tradeoffs between technical merit and price. |
| Proposals will be evaluated on the basis that the following technical factors are in descending order of importance whereby each factor is more important than the next: |
| Technical Approach |
| Relevant Past Performance |
| Benefit to the Local Community |
| Evaluation factors other than price when combined are approximately equal to cost or price. |
| Final ratings are determined by group consensus, not by averaging individual scores. The consensus record will include: (a) factor ratings, (b) key strengths/weaknesses, and (c) risks and uncertainties. After consensus on non-price factors has been de... |
| Non-Price Criteria. The technical proposals will be evaluated and ranked according to the following criteria. |
| Factor 1: Technical Approach |
| How well does the Quality Control Plan ensure that end results will be met, monitored, and documented for each Work Item? How effectively does the QC plan verify that deliverables meet required standards before submission of Items 3–8. |
| How well does Quality Control monitoring ensure that end results will be met, monitored, and documented for Optional Item 22. How efficient and effective do the methods proposed deliver usable deliverables for minimizing government Quality Assurance... |
| Individual elements of Technical Approach Ratings will be evaluated as follows. The aggregate of element |
| ratings will be weighed equally to determine the final rating for Technical Approach: |
| A. Outstanding: Proposal demonstrates a clear and logical plan with no identified risks to achieve the required end results, highly qualified key personnel are identified for all required positions, little to no scheduled work/contractual conflicts and re... |
| B. Satisfactory: Proposal demonstrates a clear plan with acceptable risks to achieve the required end results, qualified key personnel are identified for all required positions, some scheduled work/contractual conflicts that are determined acceptable and... |
| C. Marginal: Proposal demonstrates a plan with increased risks to achieve the required end results, key personnel are identified for some, but not all required positions, existing work/contractual obligations are determined an increased risk and no pla... |
| D. Unacceptable: Proposal fails to demonstrate an understanding for any of the technical requirements in the solicitation. |
| Factor 2: Relevant Past Performance |
| A. Outstanding: Quoter has a history of delivering services of high quality. High quality is considered in terms of great customer satisfaction, no instances of rework and/or deficiency reports, and no late deliveries. There is no risk anticipated with... |
| B. Satisfactory: Quoter has a history of delivering services of satisfactory quality. Satisfactory quality is considered in terms of moderate customer satisfaction, no too few instances of rework and/or deficiency reports, and no too few late deliverie... |
| C. Marginal: The quoter’s past performance history demonstrates for the most part the company’s ability to satisfy customer needs and contract requirements. There may be some minor instances of customer complaint, but no indication that corporate prac... |
| D. Unacceptable: The quoter’s past performance information clearly demonstrates a failure to meet past contract requirements and/or understand customer needs. Past contract performance has been deficient. It is a reasonable conclusion that the quoter’s... |
| E. Neutral: There is no relevant past performance available for evaluation. The quoter will neither be evaluated favorably nor unfavorably. Therefore, quoters will neither receive nor lose credit for no relevant past performance. |
| Factor 3: Benefit to the Local Community |
| A. Outstanding: The proposal demonstrates an exceptional approach with a clear, credible plan to utilize local labor, subcontractors, and local businesses within 60 miles of Bly, Oregon. Strong, detailed commitments to hire, train, and retain local re... |
| B. Satisfactory: The proposal meets requirements and demonstrates a reasonable and achievable plan to utilize local labor, subcontractors, and local businesses located within 100 miles of Bly, Oregon. Adequate commitments to local hiring or training. ... |
| C. Marginal: The proposal partially meets requirements with limited use of resources located within 100 miles of Bly, Oregon. Minimal or vague commitments to local hiring or training. Limited or poorly defined use of local subcontractors or vendors. In... |
| D. Unacceptable: The proposal fails to meet requirements with no demonstrated utilization of local labor, subcontractors, businesses, or local procurement. No meaningful commitments to hire or train local residents. No plans to subcontract with or pur... |
| FAR 52.212-1 Instructions to Quoters—Commercial Products and Commercial Services (NOV 2025) |
| Factor 1. Technical Approach |
| Work Activity Plan. Clearly describe how you and/or your subcontractors will meet both the project objectives and minimize resource damage. Include an explanation about how you have determined this approach, and what coordination will occur between ... |
| Method. Describe the method or combination of methods you plan to utilize to accomplish the Mandatory Work Activities/Items and any of the Optional Work Activities/ Items that you anticipate necessary, dependent on your operations. Include response... |
| Equipment. Describe the equipment you will use to accomplish both the timber harvest and stewardship service items. Include make and model of proposed equipment. |
| Key Personnel. List the names and proposed duties of key personnel who will be assigned to the various work items of the project including the overall Project Manager, Forester experienced in timber cruising and treatment unit layout, Logging Superv... |
| Timing. Provide a general plan for the sequence of work, including an estimated start date and completion date for both the Mandatory and Optional Work Activities/Items. |
| Availability. List all contracts and/or work commitments that may conflict with starting work immediately and/or completion of this work on time. Include acres left to complete, time estimated to complete, contractor resources allocated to those proj... |
| Factor 2. Relevant Past Performance |
| Factor 3. Benefit to Local Community |
| Factor 4. Cost/Price Quote |
| FAR 52.252-1 Solicitation Provisions Incorporated by Reference (FEB 1998) |
| AGAR 452.203-71 Anti-Discrimination and Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) Compliance (May 2026) |
| Notice For Filing Agency Protests |
| 69. EMPLOYMENT OF ELIGIBLE WORKERS- WORKFORCE CERTIFICATION |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .