12-RFP26-06 Software Functionality Matrix FINAL.docx

DOCX document 53 KB Posted

Attached to
Court Case Management Software
Solicitation number
RFP26-06
Issued by
Los Alamos County, New Mexico

About this file

This document is a Software Functionality Matrix for the County of Los Alamos Procurement Division, specifically targeting a court case management software solution for the Los Alamos Municipal Court. The procurement seeks a comprehensive software system that will support case management functions for judges, probation courts, and court clerks, with requirements spanning seven core functional areas: case management, document management, calendar management, payment processing, reporting and analytics, security features, and system integration capabilities. The matrix outlines detailed functionality requirements, allowing potential vendors to indicate how their solution meets each specified feature using a standardized legend (S = Standard, M = Modification, T = Third-Party, C = Customization, N = Unable to Provide).

The software solution must integrate with existing systems including Infor/EIS Law Enforcement RMS, Authorize Net (Citepay), Tyler Munis (Cashering), and payment processors, while also supporting data migration of approximately 25 GB from an existing Oracle Database 19c Standard Edition 2. Vendors are expected to demonstrate their solution's capabilities across various functionalities such as case tracking, document filing, hearing scheduling, payment processing, reporting, security controls, and data management. The functionality matrix provides a comprehensive evaluation framework for potential software providers, allowing the County to assess each vendor's ability to meet their specific court management technology requirements.

View the file

Other files

Show all 12

On GovTribe

Work with this file

  • Download the original file
  • Contacts named in this file
  • Similar government files
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this file

Text version

SOFTWARE FUNCTIONALITY MATRIX

Incorporated County of Los Alamos Procurement Division 101 Camino Entrada, Building 3 Los Alamos, NM 87544

Offeror Company Name:

Solicitation No.:

Solicitation Title:

Instructions for Offerors: The following are minimum features and functionality requested by the County. For each line item, indicate if the functionality is provided as described below in the legend and provide a description of how the Solution provides the requested feature or if an alternate Solution is proposed. Offerors should prepare to, at a minimum, present during the optional demonstration all of the features and functionalities below in the order shown below. Each gray section identifies a functional area.

Legend:

S = Standard functionality out-of-the-box or meets requirement fully

M = Modification required (i.e. standard script or other work-around)

T = Provided by a third-party. Name the third-party and describe Offeror’s relationship with this third-party.

C = Requires customization to the base code/API

N = Unable to currently provide this feature or requirement

Ref.

No.

Functionality: Please indicate with letter matching the legend above in the identify per legend column, using the legend above, to indicate how Offeror’s Software provides the following features and functionality. Provide a description to detail how the functionality is provided in the Description field.
Judge
Probation
Court Clerk
Identify per Legend
Description of Solution
1
Case Management
1.1
Case initiation and intake and closing
X
X
1.2
Case status tracking, notifications and reminders
X
X
X
1.3
Case assignment and routing
X
X
1.4
Document filing and linking
X
X
1.5
Pleading and motion management
X
X
X
1.6
Hearing scheduling and updates, docket management
X
X
X
1.7
Judge Notes
X

X

1.8
Decision and judgement entry
X

X

1.9
Appeals management

X

1.10
Probation meeting notes

X

1.11
Sanction completion
X
X
2
Document Management
2.1
Electronic document filing
X
X
2.2
Document version control
X
X
2.3
Document redaction and annotation
X
X
2.4
Document indexing and tagging
X
X
3
Calendar Management
3.1
Court calendar generation
X
X
3.2
Automated calendar reminders
X
X
3.3
Calendar conflicts detection and scheduling closures
X
X
X
3.4
Scheduling of hearings and conferences
X
X
X
3.5
Texting from the system as a reminder of court appointments to defendants
X
X
X
4
Payment Processing
4.1
Fee calculation and tracking
X
X
4.2
Payment receipt generation
X
X
4.3
Integration with payment getaways

X

5
Reporting and Analytics
5.1
Caseload statistics
X
X
X
5.2
Performance metrics
X
X
X
5.3
Judicial efficiency reports
X
X
X
5.4
Customizable report generation (ad hoc)
X
X
X
6
Security Features
6.1
User Access controls
X
X
X
6.2
Data encryption and system security
X
X
X
6.3
Audit trails
X
X
X
6.4
Backup and disaster recovery
X
X
X
7
Integration and Data Migration
7.1
Integration with Law Enforcement RMS system (Currently Infor/EIS)

X

7.2
Integration with Authorize Net (including Citepay)

X

7.3
Integration with Tyler Munis (Cashering)

X

7.4
Integration with First Data Merchant Processing or Other Payment Processor, please describe in the Description Field

X

7.5
Migration of 25 GB of existing County data, housed in Oracle Database, 19c Standard Edition 2.
X
X
X
8
Additional or Optional Features and Technical Specifications

Describe any additional or optional features and technical specifications not already stated that may be relevant or offered to County. Use a separate document if more space is needed.

Describe whether the feature is provided as part of the standard base proposal or if it is offered optionally for free or for a fee. Include all costs for these additional or optional features in the Cost Proposal

RFP No. 24-15 Issued by Procurement Division: J. Kephart image1.jpeg

File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .