1-TB2723-EFDP - Attachment E - RFSQ Evaluation Scoresheet.pdf
PDF 124 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- TB2723-EFDP
- Issued by
- Salt Lake County, Salt Lake City, Utah
About this file
This document is an RFSQ (Request for Statement of Qualifications) Evaluation Scoresheet for Design Professional Services related to the East High School Fieldhouse Addition project, issued by the Salt Lake City School District (SLCSD) in Utah. The scoresheet is designed to evaluate vendor responses for architectural, engineering, and consulting services for a new fieldhouse addition at East High School located at 840 South 1300 East, Salt Lake City, Utah 84102. The solicitation requires attendance at a mandatory site visit and pre-proposal conference scheduled for 1:00 PM on Monday, November 9, 2026, at East High School. The evaluation process includes both pass/fail mandatory requirements (professional and business licenses, insurance requirements, project list for possible site tours, mandatory pre-proposal conference attendance, and page limits) and scoreable technical criteria weighted to a total of 1,000 possible points.
The technical evaluation criteria are organized into three major categories: Vendor Qualifications and Relevant Company Experience (350 points), Project Management Team (250 points), and Project Approach/Management Plan (400 points). Specific evaluation areas include understanding of scope, ability to perform the scope of work, experience with athletic facilities and parking structures, accuracy of construction cost estimates, vendor qualifications and key personnel experience, current workload and team availability, project scheduling and risk assessment, design approach for the fieldhouse and parking garage, change order management, construction delivery methods, school operations maintenance, plan review and approval processes, coordination with the Department of Facilities Construction and Management under SB 164, cost control and value engineering, and submittal and reporting procedures. A minimum of 750 points (75 percent of total technical criteria points) is required to advance in the evaluation process. The scoresheet utilizes a 0-10 point scale with half-point increments permitted at the evaluation committee's discretion.
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
DRAFT: This document is intended to be a draft and should not be returned to the Purchasing Department. Please return this document to the evaluation committee chairperson This document is not subject to GRAMA pursuant to Utah Administrative Code R33-7-702(2).
RFSQ
Section
Evaluation (Pass/Fail)
1 2.2(A) 2 2.2(B) 3 2.2(C) 4 2.2(D) 5 2.2(E)
RFSQ
Section
Evaluator Score (0-10)
Criteria Weight
% of Tech Criteria
Points Possible
Points Earned
1 2.3(A) 2.3(A) 5 5.0% 50 0 2.3(A) 8 8.0% 80 0 2.3(A) 10 10.0% 100 0 2.3(A) 6 6.0% 60 0 2.3(A) 6 6.0% 60 0
2 2.3(B) 2.3(B) 15 15.0% 150 0 2.3(B) 10 10.0% 100 0 2.3(B) 5 5.0% 50 0
3 2.3(C) 2.3(C) 7 7.0% 70 0 2.3(C) 4 4.0% 40 0 2.3(C) 7 7.0% 70 0 2.3(C) 3 3.0% 30 0 2.3(C) 3 3.0% 30 0 2.3(C) 1 1.0% 10 0 2.3(C) 4 4.0% 40 0 2.3(C) 2 2.0% 20 0 2.3(C) 2 2.0% 20 0 2.3(C) 2 2.0% 20 0
100% 1000 0
RFSQ
Section Min Percent
Min Points Required
Points Earned
Percent Earned
Evaluation
4.2 75% 750 0 0%
ATTACHMENT E
Design Professional Services, East High School Fieldhouse Addition
Solicitation # TB2723-EFDP RFSQ Evaluation Scoresheet
Firm Name: Scores will be assigned as follows:
0 = Fail, the SOQ does not answer or address the requirement
Evaluator: 1-4 = Unsatisfactory, the SOQ has major gaps in addressing some or all of the requirements of the RFSQ or has serious deficiencies in support or detail for multiple requirements.
Date: 5-7 = Substandard, the SOQ does not address all of the requirements or criteria in the RFSQ or does not provide sufficient support or detail to address all of them.
7.5 = Pass, the SOQ addresses all requirements with sufficient support and detail for each requirement.
8 = Good, the SOQ addresses all aspects of the requirements, with ample support and detail for each requirement.
9 = Great, the SOQ addresses all aspects of the requirements, with abundant support and detail for each requirement.
10 = Excellent, the SOQ addresses all aspects of the requirements, with exceptional support and detail for each requirement.
NOTE: the evaluation committee may also utilize half points (i.e. 1.5, 2.5, 3.5, etc) where it deems appropriate
Minimum Mandatory Requirements
Professional & Business License Requirement Insurance Requirement Project List for Possible Site Tours Mandatory Pre-Proposal Conference Page Limits
Scoreable Technical Criteria
Vendor Qualifications & Relevant Company Exp.
- Understanding of Scope Based on Quality of SOQ
- Ability to Perform Scope of Work (Section 2.1)
- Experience w/ Athletic Facilities & Parking Structures
- Accuracy of Construction Cost Estimates on Past Projects
- Project Examples and Related References
Project Management Team
- Knowledge & Experience of PMT/Key Personnel
- Relevant Experience of Key Consultants
- Current Workload & Availability of Team
Project Approach / Management Plan
- Project Scope, Phasing, Scheduling, Budget, Other Key Issues
- Assessment of SLCSD Schedule & Schedule Risks
- Site Evaluation & Fieldhouse/Parking Garage Design
- Minimizing Design Change Orders/Reviewing Change Requests
- Construction Delivery Method
Required Technical Point Threshold
- Maintaining School Operations
- Managing Plan Reviews & Approvals
- Working with DFCM under SB 164
- Cost Control, Value Engineering & Risk Mitigation
- Handling Submittals, RFIs, Minutes, Reports
Score Sheet
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .