05 - Participation Information.docx
DOCX document 269 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Category 4 - Credit Monitoring Services
- Solicitation number
- 25
- Issued by
- Ada County, Idaho
About this file
This document is an attachment to a Request for Proposals (RFP) issued by the State of Idaho in collaboration with the NASPO ValuePoint cooperative purchasing program for Information Security Services, specifically Credit Monitoring Services. The RFP is seeking Master Agreements from suppliers to provide these services. The document outlines the NASPO ValuePoint Lead State Model, a collaborative procurement process that engages multiple states and public entities to identify shared needs, provide input on the RFP, and execute participating addenda. The document also lists the Interested States that have requested to be named as potential participants, along with their self-reported estimated annual volume, which totals $12,345,678. Participating entities will determine the terms and conditions applicable to them through negotiation of a Participating Addendum.
The document does not provide specific details on pricing terms, set asides, incumbents, funding requirements, or other salient information. It focuses on the NASPO ValuePoint cooperative procurement process and the potential participation of various states in the resulting Master Agreements.
View the file
Other files
Show all 23
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Request for Proposals for
[PORTFOLIO NAME]
Issued by the State of [Lead State] Solicitation Number: [#######]
Request for Proposals for INFORMATION SECURITY SERVICES: Credit Monitoring Services Issued by the State of Idaho Solicitation Number:RFP Event 25 Attachment 5
PARTICIPATION INFORMATION
The NASPO ValuePoint Process The NASPO ValuePoint Lead State Model™ is a collaborative procurement process representing the input and interests of public entities across the nation.
THE LEAD STATE MODEL™
Members & Stakeholders Identify Shared Cooperative Contracting Needs
NASPO ValuePoint Engages Lead State & Multistate Sourcing Team
Members & Stakeholders Provide Input on RFP Specifications & Objectives
RFP
Lead State Issues RFP in Compliance with Lead State Laws
Lead State & Multistate Sourcing Team Evaluate Supplier Proposals
Lead State Negotiates & Executes Master Agreements
Participating States & Entities Execute Participating Addenda
Purchasing Entities Buy Directly from NASPO ValuePoint Contractors
NASPO ValuePoint does not charge fees to Participating Entities or Purchasing Entities—including state departments, institutions, agencies, and political subdivisions, federally recognized tribes, and other eligible public and nonprofit entities in the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. territories—to use NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreements. Suppliers pay only a nominal administrative fee based on their total sales. By leveraging the collective volume of potential purchases nationwide, NASPO ValuePoint is able to offer customers the best value in cooperative contracting while giving suppliers the opportunity to reach multiple markets through a single solicitation.
Historical Usage The following table identifies total sales reported by the Information Security Services Portfolio and Data Breach and Credit Monitoring Portfolio contractors through NASPO ValuePoint Master Agreements over the past five (5) calendar years:
| Year |
| Reported Historical Sales Volume |
| 2018 |
| $911,760* |
| 2019 |
| $417,980* |
| 2020 |
| $934,690* |
| 2021 |
| $2,460,000 |
| 2022 |
| $3,500,000 |
*Data Breach and Credit Monitoring Portfolio only No minimum or maximum level of sales volume is guaranteed or implied.
Interested States The states below have requested to be named in this RFP as potential participants in the resulting Master Agreement(s). This list neither guarantees execution of a Participating Addendum by an Interested State nor precludes execution of a Participating Addendum by any state or entity not identified as an Interested State.
| Interested States |
| Reported Estimated Annual Volume |
| Sample Participating Addendum Terms and Conditions |
| South Dakota |
| $1,500,000 |
| n/a |
| California |
| n/a |
| Attached |
| Washington |
| $1,663 |
| Attached |
| Maine |
| $150,000 |
| n/a |
| Rhode Island |
| n/a |
| Attached |
| Virginia |
| n/a |
| Attached |
| North Dakota |
| n/a |
| n/a |
| Montana |
| n/a |
| n/a |
TOTAL ESTIMATED ANNUAL VOLUME FROM INTERESTED STATES: $12,345,678
The Reported Estimated Annual Volume above aggregates usage estimates, self-reported by the Interested States, which may be based on any factor considered relevant by each Interested State, including historical usage and anticipated future usage. No minimum or maximum level of sales volume is guaranteed or implied.
Some Interested States have also provided state-specific terms and conditions, included in this attachment, that may apply to a Participating Addendum executed with an Offeror awarded a Master Agreement through this RFP. These terms and conditions are being provided for informational purposes only and will not be incorporated into the Master Agreement or addressed or negotiated by the Lead State. Participation and the terms and conditions applicable to each Participating Entity will be determined by the Participating Entity following negotiation of a Participating Addendum with a Contractor.
Page 2 of 9 – Attachment [X], RFP TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Attachment 5, PARTICIPATION INFORMATION image1.png image2.svg image3.png image4.svg image5.png image6.svg image7.png image8.svg image9.png image10.svg image11.png image12.svg image13.png image14.png image15.png image16.svg image17.png image18.png
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .