Attachment_J2_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.docx
DOCX document 36 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Flooring Product and Install Services IDIQ
- Solicitation number
- 030ADV24R0013
- Issued by
-
Library of Congress
About this file
This document contains a past performance questionnaire template for references to evaluate contractors providing flooring and installation services. The Library of Congress requires these services to maintain, renovate, and preserve both historic spaces and modern business, assembly, storage, and processing areas across multiple facilities totaling over 2 million square feet. The questionnaire evaluates contractors on quality, cost control, timeliness, business relations, and provides an overall assessment. Ratings are on a scale of 0-4 for unsatisfactory to outstanding performance in areas such as technical expertise, project management, compliance with contract terms, and ability to deliver services at the agreed upon price and schedule. The reference is also asked if they would select the contractor again.
View the file
Other files
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Document Title: Flooring and Product Install Services Solicitation Document Number: 030ADV24R0013
Page: 2 of 2
ATTACHMENT 2 – Past Performance Questionnaire for References
CLIENT
Information about the person who filled out this form:
Name:
Title:
Organization:
Address:
Telephone:
Email address:
CONTRACTOR
Information about the contractor being evaluated:
Contractor:
Contract Number, if known:
Contract Value, if known: $ Period of Performance:
Brief Description of Project:
RATING GUIDELINES
To summarize contractor performance for each of the rating questions, assign each question one of the following ratings:
| 0 = | Unsatisfactory |
| 1 = | Marginal |
| 2 = | Satisfactory |
| 3 = | Good |
| 4 = | Outstanding |
N/A = Not applicable
A. QUALITY
| 1. | Technical Performance |
| 1.a. | How would you rate the technical expertise of the contractor’s staff? ___ |
(Includes: Experience or knowledge in technical areas specific to task, ability to effectively communicate technical concepts)
Comments:
1.b. How would you rate the technical quality of the products produced and services provided? ___ (Includes: Achievement of critical success factors, functionality, downtime, and appropriateness of solution)
| 2. | Project Approach and Contract Management Evaluation | |
| 2.a. | How would you rate the quality of the contractor’s project management? ___ |
(Includes: Effectiveness in responding to critical problems and issues, completeness and quality of problem identification, adequacy of corrective action plans, effectiveness of project overview and review)
3. Contract Compliance 3.a. How would you rate the contractor’s compliance with contract terms related to deliverables/services? ___
B. COST CONTROL
1. How would you rate the contractor’s cost control for the project? ___ (Includes: Ability to deliver products/services at the price agreed to in the contract)
C. TIMELINESS
1. How would you rate the contractor’s timeliness in delivering products and/or services? ___ (Includes: ability to meet contract milestones and other contract schedules)
Comments:
| D. | BUSINESS RELATIONS | |
| 1. | How would you rate your business relations with the contractor at the corporate level? ___ |
(Includes: Working relationship between the contractor and contract administration team; User satisfaction; Professional behavior with all parties; Effective corporate points of contact; Initiative in meeting and anticipating Customer needs.)
Comments:
2. If given the opportunity, would you select the firm again? ___Yes ___No
Comments:
E. OVERALL EVALUATION
1. Provide your overall assessment of the contractor. ___
Comments:
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .