BNJ - Coolidge Audio System Modernization - Shure.pdf
PDF 465 KB Posted
- Attached to
- Audio System Modernization
- Solicitation number
- 030ADV26R0049
- Issued by
-
Library of Congress
View the file
Other files
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Justification and Approval For Other than Full and Open Competition
Plan ID Number:
Form Updated 12/28/2022
Justification & Approval
As a legislative branch agency, the Library is subject to the competition and advertising requirements of 41 U.S.C. § 6101. Like the Competition in
Contracting Act and the FAR, 41 U.S.C. § 6101 does not require competition when a contracting officer certifies that only one source or brand-name item is available, when dictated by public exigency, or when otherwise authorized by law.
This document sets forth the justification and approval for award of a contract or order by means providing for other than full and open competition per 41 U.S.C. § 6101, LCR 7-210, and, as applicable, FAR 6.302, FAR 13.106-1, FAR 8.405, and FAR 16.505. Contracting without competition shall not be justified on the basis of a lack of advance planning or concerns related to availability of funds.
This form shall be used to support instances where competition will be limited to a single source, a limited number of sources, including where a brand name product is required.
Part 1 – Identification
1. Contracting Agency and Activity: Library of Congress, LIBN/MMG
2. Nature of Action Being Approved Contract (or modification)
LoC or Leg Branch Order (or modification)
GSA Schedule or GWAC: Identify Schedule/Contract
Other: Identify
Plan ID Number: 2026-LBN-0037
Contractor (or Brand Name): Shure
Estimated Value (Base and all options):
Period of Performance: 09/29/2026 – 09/28/2028
3. Description of Supplies or Services Required to Meet Library Needs
Describe the supplies or services that are required to meet the Library’s minimum needs and the delivery schedule required to meet those needs. Do not focus on a description of the program.
The Library requires the following supplies or services:
Shure, Inc. microphones and components.
Part 2 – Program Office Justification & Approval
4. Authority for Contracting Without Competition
Over $250,000 For this requirement over $250,000, under FAR part 6, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
There is only one responsible source and no other supplies or services will satisfy Library requirements.
41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(C); FAR 6.302-1.
Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by contractor’s unique capabilities or products. FAR 6.302-1(b)(1).
Source controls copyrights, patents, raw materials, or secret processes cannot be acquired otherwise, or similar circumstances. FAR 6.302-
1(b)(2).
Other exception identified in FAR 6.302-1: Identify the exception
There is such unusual & compelling urgency that the Government would be seriously injured if competition is not limited.
41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(B); FAR 6.302-2. Option years are not permitted.
Source is expressly authorized or required by statute (e.g., AbilityOne, UNICOR, GPO, GSA Public Buildings Service, Appropriations Act, etc.) per 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 6.302-5: Identify the authority
Other basis authorized in 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b) or FAR part 6.302: Identify the exception
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product or item which is essential to the Government’s requirement. FAR 6.302-1(c).
The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
IT Standard Data Sheet)
Up to and including $250,000 For this requirement up to $250,000, using simplified acquisition procedures under FAR part 13, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
Only one responsible source is reasonably available to meet Library requirements. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b); FAR 13.106-1.
Product or service is reasonably available from only one source.
Source controls copyrights, patents or other exclusive licensing arrangements.
Urgent circumstances; only one source can reasonably deliver by required date. Option years are not permitted.
Source is expressly authorized or required by statute: Identify the authority
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product
The Product is listed the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
GSA Schedule Order For this GSA schedule order under FAR part 8, the basis for not competing among GSA schedule-holders and/or specifying a brand name product or item is:
An urgent and compelling need exists, and following GSA procedures would result in unacceptable delays.
FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(A).
Only one GSA source is capable of fulfilling the requirement at the level of quality required because the supplies or services are unique or highly specialized. FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(B).
In the interest of economy and efficiency, the new work is a logical follow-on to an original order that was placed competitively among GSA schedule-holders (i.e., the original order was not sole-source or limited-source.) FAR 8.405-6(a)(1)(i)(C).
Library’s needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product
The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
Order Under Multiple Award Indefinite-Delivery Contract or GWAC For this order under FAR subpart 16.5, the basis for contracting without providing for full and open competition is:
The need is so urgent fair opportunity would result in unacceptable delays. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(C) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(i)(A).
The Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by contractor’s unique capabilities or products. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR
16.505(b)(2)(i)(B).
A logical follow-on order in the interest of economy and efficiency. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(i)(2)(C).
To satisfy a minimum guarantee. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(D).
Authorized or required by statute. 41 U.S.C. § 6101(b)(1) and FAR 16.505(b)(2)(E).
The Library’s minimum needs can only be satisfied by a brand-name product or item which is essential to the Government’s requirement. 41
U.S.C. § 6101(b)(2)(B) and FAR 16.505(a)(4)(i).
The Product is listed on the Library of Congress Enterprise Architecture Repository (LCEAR) database (Attach applicable
8. Efforts to Solicit from As Many Potential Sources As Practicable Unless a justification is based on FAR 6.302-2, Unusual and compelling urgency, contracting officers shall post justifications for other than full and open competition, including brand name justifications, to the Contract Opportunities website on sam.gov (or eBuy for Brand Name Justifications under FAR Part 8) prior to requesting a proposal or otherwise entering into negotiations.
Advance notice will be published in sam.gov for 15 days before a contract is awarded. FAR 5.203(a).
Advance or concurrent notice will be published in sam.gov for a reasonable time for commercial items FAR 5.203(a) and 12.204(b).
Advance notice will not be published because the action meets the following FAR exception:
Notice would compromise national security. FAR 5.202(a)(1).
Unusual and compelling urgency; notice period would seriously injure Government. FAR 5.202(a)(2).
Expressly authorized or required to be made through another Government agency. FAR 5.202(a)(4).
Order will be placed against an IDIQ contract awarded under FAR 16.5. FAR 5.202(a)(6).
Order will be placed against GSA schedule or other competitively-awarded contract. FAR 5.202(a)(11).
Other:
Advance notice will not be published per 41 U.S.C. § 6101; see attached deviation from the FAR per LCR 7-210 § 3.A.
We made the following efforts to interest potential sources in this award:
9. Listing of Sources That Expressed Interest in Writing
The following sources expressed interest in this award:
10. Additional Information
The following additional information is relevant to this justification and approval:
11. Contracting Officer Determination that Price Is Fair and Reasonable As explained in detail below, I have determined that the prices for this contracting action are fair and reasonable based on comparison of the prices to the following (see FAR 15.404-1(b)(2)):
Historical prices paid by the Government Published competitive price lists
Library’s Independent Government Estimate Prices obtained through market research
Other: Prices obtained through competitive proposals
The following analysis (based on attached pricing information) supports my determination:
12. Contracting Officer Determination of Responsibility Checked System for Award Management (or will check in the case of competitive proposals for a brand name product)
13. Contracting Officer Determination of Best Value I have determined that this action represents the best value to the Government because:
14. Contracting Officer Certification I certify that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, this justification is accurate and complete. For those actions up to $700,000, I approve contracting without competition for this requirement.
Name
Signature
Date
Part 4 – Competition Advocate Approval
(Required for actions valued at greater than $700,000)
Approved. Based on the information, determinations, and certifications provided by the program office and the contracting officer, and in accordance with the instructions below, I approve contracting without competition for this requirement.
Option periods: No Yes, Number through Date
Not Approved. As explained below, I do not approve contracting without competition for this requirement.
Comments or instructions:
________________________ Assist/Assoc General Counsel __________________________________ ________________ Name Title
Signature
Part 5 – Senior Procurement Executive
(Required for actions valued at greater than $13,500,000)
17. Head of the Procurement Activity Approval
Approved. Based on the information, determinations, and certifications provided by the program office and the contracting officer, and in accordance with the instructions below, I approve contracting without competition for this requirement.
Not Approved. As explained below, I do not approve contracting without competition for this requirement.
Comments or instructions:
Name
Director, Contracts and Grants
Signature
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .