Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Operation, Maintenance, and Modernization
Closed Special Notice Posted
Not the latest version. See the latest special notice from .
- Agency
-
ACC Rock Island
Army Contracting Command, Department of Defense
- Responses due
- Set-aside
- No set-aside
Opportunity facts
- NAICS code
- 325920 Explosives Manufacturing
- PSC
- M1EA Operation Of Ammunition Facilities
- Place of performance
- Radford, Virginia, United States
Notice details come from SAM.gov. Updated .
About this opportunity
The U.S. Army Contracting Command - Rock Island (ACC-RI), in support of the U.S. Army Joint Munitions Command and Project Lead for Joint Services, has issued a Request for Information (RFI) regarding the Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Operation, Maintenance, and Modernization. This special notice focuses on evaluating contract strategy options for facility maintenance and operations across multiple critical areas including environmental management, fire protection, installation security, facility maintenance, and production line operations. The RFI specifically covers the Radford Army Ammunition Plant, a critical munitions manufacturing facility, and seeks industry input on potential contracting approaches. The notice was published on December 13, 2024, with responses due by January 21, 2025. The document covers a comprehensive range of operational and strategic considerations for future facility management.
The primary objective of this RFI is to gather innovative strategies that ensure long-term viability and affordability of propellant production capabilities while meeting procurement objectives. The U.S. Government is specifically seeking input on five key areas: risk mitigation under fluctuating Department of Defense demand scenarios, maximizing operational efficiencies, expanding non-DoD workload opportunities, exploring direct funding operations, and developing variable pricing mechanisms based on production volumes. Contractors are encouraged to provide feedback on cost recovery models, incentive structures, and risk-sharing approaches that could improve facility operations. The RFI emphasizes that this is an informational request only, with no guarantee of future contract award, and participation is strictly voluntary. Interested parties are instructed to submit written questions via email to specific government contacts and are advised to identify any proprietary information in their submissions. The ultimate goal is to develop a robust acquisition strategy that can adapt to changing defense manufacturing needs while maintaining operational readiness.
Notice text
2 versions
Update #2 · Latest ·
20 Dec 2024 Update: Closing date extended to 21 Jan 2025
W519TC-24-R-ROMM - Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Operation, Maintenance, and Modernization
Request for Information – Strategies for Contracting and Facility Operations
The U.S Army Contracting Command – Rock Island (ACC-RI), in support of the U.S. Army Joint Munitions Command (JMC) located at Rock Island Arsenal, IL and the Project Lead for Joint Services (PL JS) located at Picatinny Arsenal, NJ, are currently evaluating various contract strategy options for the Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Performance Work Statements (PWS) for facility maintenance and operations. This evaluation includes, but is not limited to, the following areas:
- Environmental Management
- Fire Protection and Emergency Services
- Government Property in Possession of Contractor
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Installation Security and Antiterrorism Measures
- Facility Maintenance
- General Facility Maintenance
- Production Line Maintenance
- Safety Operations Management
- Energy and Utility Service Management
- Purchased Natural Gas and Electricity
- Facility Operations and Production Reporting
- Cybersecurity
- Program Management
The U.S. Government (USG) seeks strategies to ensure the long-term viability and affordability of both propellant and overall capability retention while meeting the procurement objectives. In particular, the focus is on identifying methods to mitigate the risk under fluctuating DoD demand scenarios, incentivize operational efficiencies, and enable the pursuit of non-DoD workloads.
The USG is interested in receiving information and proposed strategies that address the following objectives:
1. Risk Mitigation under Fluctuating DoD Demand:
- Strategies should address how to recover costs specific to the PWS under varying DoD demand scenarios.
- Strategies should aim to minimize financial risk to the contractor while maintaining operational readiness and efficiency.
2. Maximizing Efficiencies:
- Strategies should outline methods to incentivize the contractor to maximize operational efficiencies across the facility, including the production line, maintenance, and energy management.
3. Non-DoD Workload Expansion:
- The USG encourages strategies that demonstrate how contractors can diversify their workload to include non-DoD customers and projects, thus creating additional revenue streams while maintaining core operational capabilities.
4. Direct Funding Operations for PWS Scopes:
- The USG is considering the direct funding of certain PWS scopes, which would be priced separately and would not be tied to production orders. Strategies should address how such funding options might impact overall operations, cost structures, and effectives.
5. Variable Pricing Features Based on Production Volumes:
- Strategies should explore the potential for variable pricing based on plant-wide production volumes. This may be implemented in conjunction with or in lieu of direct funding for PWS scopes.
Industry feedback is requested on the benefits and risks inherent to these approaches. This includes strategies to manage fluctuating demand while ensuring continuity and efficiency in operations, particularly in the context of the specific PWS scopes. Cost recovery models should address both USG-funded and non-USG-funded activities, with consideration for pricing mechanisms that align with production volume changes. Incentive structures should encourage long-term cost savings, efficiency improvements, and the pursuit of non-DoD workload. Risk-sharing approaches should address the impact of fluctuating DoD demands, particularly in relation to USG-funded PWS scopes. Lastly, feedback is requested for any innovative solutions or alternative approaches to facility operations, maintenance, and production that might assist in meeting the USG’s procurement objectives.
This Request for information (RFI) is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or commitment by the USG. The USG does not intend to award a contract on the basis of this request for information or otherwise pay for the information solicited. Participation in this effort is strictly voluntary. Please identify any proprietary information submitted. The USG intends to utilize the information received only to develop the acquisition strategy for future requirements. Any of the information stated above is subject to change. If a formal solicitation is generated at a later date, the USG will publish a solicitation notice.
Telephone inquiries will not be accepted. The USG will accept written questions via email. Email your questions to Amanda Carlson at amanda.l.carlson25.civ@army.mil and Anna Whitcomb at anna.e.whitcomb2.civ@army.mil.
Update #1 ·
W519TC-24-R-ROMM - Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Operation, Maintenance, and Modernization
Request for Information – Strategies for Contracting and Facility Operations
The U.S Army Contracting Command – Rock Island (ACC-RI), in support of the U.S. Army Joint Munitions Command (JMC) located at Rock Island Arsenal, IL and the Project Lead for Joint Services (PL JS) located at Picatinny Arsenal, NJ, are currently evaluating various contract strategy options for the Radford Army Ammunition Plant (RFAAP) Performance Work Statements (PWS) for facility maintenance and operations. This evaluation includes, but is not limited to, the following areas:
- Environmental Management
- Fire Protection and Emergency Services
- Government Property in Possession of Contractor
- Occupational Health and Safety
- Installation Security and Antiterrorism Measures
- Facility Maintenance
- General Facility Maintenance
- Production Line Maintenance
- Safety Operations Management
- Energy and Utility Service Management
- Purchased Natural Gas and Electricity
- Facility Operations and Production Reporting
- Cybersecurity
- Program Management
The U.S. Government (USG) seeks strategies to ensure the long-term viability and affordability of both propellant and overall capability retention while meeting the procurement objectives. In particular, the focus is on identifying methods to mitigate the risk under fluctuating DoD demand scenarios, incentivize operational efficiencies, and enable the pursuit of non-DoD workloads.
The USG is interested in receiving information and proposed strategies that address the following objectives:
1. Risk Mitigation under Fluctuating DoD Demand:
- Strategies should address how to recover costs specific to the PWS under varying DoD demand scenarios.
- Strategies should aim to minimize financial risk to the contractor while maintaining operational readiness and efficiency.
2. Maximizing Efficiencies:
- Strategies should outline methods to incentivize the contractor to maximize operational efficiencies across the facility, including the production line, maintenance, and energy management.
3. Non-DoD Workload Expansion:
- The USG encourages strategies that demonstrate how contractors can diversify their workload to include non-DoD customers and projects, thus creating additional revenue streams while maintaining core operational capabilities.
4. Direct Funding Operations for PWS Scopes:
- The USG is considering the direct funding of certain PWS scopes, which would be priced separately and would not be tied to production orders. Strategies should address how such funding options might impact overall operations, cost structures, and effectives.
5. Variable Pricing Features Based on Production Volumes:
- Strategies should explore the potential for variable pricing based on plant-wide production volumes. This may be implemented in conjunction with or in lieu of direct funding for PWS scopes.
Industry feedback is requested on the benefits and risks inherent to these approaches. This includes strategies to manage fluctuating demand while ensuring continuity and efficiency in operations, particularly in the context of the specific PWS scopes. Cost recovery models should address both USG-funded and non-USG-funded activities, with consideration for pricing mechanisms that align with production volume changes. Incentive structures should encourage long-term cost savings, efficiency improvements, and the pursuit of non-DoD workload. Risk-sharing approaches should address the impact of fluctuating DoD demands, particularly in relation to USG-funded PWS scopes. Lastly, feedback is requested for any innovative solutions or alternative approaches to facility operations, maintenance, and production that might assist in meeting the USG’s procurement objectives.
This Request for information (RFI) is for informational purposes only and does not constitute a solicitation or commitment by the USG. The USG does not intend to award a contract on the basis of this request for information or otherwise pay for the information solicited. Participation in this effort is strictly voluntary. Please identify any proprietary information submitted. The USG intends to utilize the information received only to develop the acquisition strategy for future requirements. Any of the information stated above is subject to change. If a formal solicitation is generated at a later date, the USG will publish a solicitation notice.
Telephone inquiries will not be accepted. The USG will accept written questions via email. Email your questions to Amanda Carlson at amanda.l.carlson25.civ@army.mil and Anna Whitcomb at anna.e.whitcomb2.civ@army.mil.
Notice history
Similar open opportunities
| Opportunity | Agency | Set-aside | Responses due |
|---|---|---|---|
| Request for Information - Energetics Center of Excellence | ACC Rock Island | No set-aside | |
| Radford Army Ammunition Plant - Virtual Library | ACC Rock Island | No set-aside | |
| CY26 Administrative Contracting Officer Support and GSA Vehicle Support at IAAAP and MLAAP | ACC Rock Island | No set-aside | |
| Information Technology (IT) Services and Support | ACC Rock Island | No set-aside | |
| Telecommunications Fiber Optic Upgrades at Iowa Army Ammunition Plant | ACC Rock Island | No set-aside |
On GovTribe
Work this opportunity
- Track it in your pipeline
- Find teaming partners
- Similar opportunities
- Ask GovTribe AI about this opportunity