Mobile Test Enclosure (MTE)

Closed Solicitation Posted

This opportunity was awarded. See the award notice from .

Solicitation number
N6660421Q0037
Agency
ENDIST Omaha US Army Corps of Engineers, Department of Defense
Responses due
Set-aside
Total Small Business

Opportunity facts

NAICS code
332439 Other Metal Container Manufacturing
PSC
8145 Specialized Shipping And Storage Containers
Place of performance
USA

Notice details come from SAM.gov. Updated .

Notice text

6 versions

Update #6 · Latest ·

Amendment 001:  The purpose of this amendment is to update the RFQ attachment with the correct total small business set-aside restriction.

Amendment 002: The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions from industry.

Q1: Would you please reconsider the alternative dimensions with all layout requirements such as:

  • 8x24 ft = 192 sf,
  • 8x30 ft = 240 sf, or
  • 16x20 ft = 320 sf.

A1: The Container must be 20x10x8.5 due to the equipment racks and ergonomic work space.

Q2:, It appears that the customer is seeking a CSC certified container with dimensions of 10ft in width. ISO 668 and ISO 1496 only specify containers up to 8ft width. The drawing shows a 10ft wide container, so it is assumed that this dimension is necessary to meet the mission objective. With that being said, it is in our opinion that a CSC certification cannot be achieved for this dimension. Is this something that the customer would consider waiving?

A2: The vendor has the choice to:

- Modify a 20ft x 8ft x 8.5ft ISO/CSC certified container to a 10ft width. (All pre-modification certification documentation shall be retained and delivered with the container.)

or

- In lieu modifying a standard ISO container, the MTE may be constructed new and shall meet all requirements of the specification.

Either way, if it's modified or built new, the vendor shall meet all requirements of the specification, i.e., American Bureau of Shipping , USCG regulations, etc.

Amendment 003: The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions from industry.

Q3: A 10' wide shelter is not a standard ISO container size.  At this width, it no longer falls under ABS- CSC/ISO and cannot be CSC tested/CSC Certified stateside to this width.  Therefore, CSC/ISO regulations will not permit the original CSC plate to be put back onto the container after it has been modified to this width.  Can you please remove or adjust this requirement?

A3:  The CSC plate shall be removed from the container to permit sandblasting and painting, retained, and submitted with all prior ISO/CSC certification documentation with delivery.

Q4:  Please further explain the requirement for "Rounded ISO Corners".  Are you referring to the corner radius of the standard casting?

A4:  Yes.

Q5:  Does the reference to USCG regulations encompass PAM requirements?  Refer again to the point made in question 3 noting that a 10' Wide shelter does not fall under ABS-CSC/ISO regulations?

A5:  Yes.  Please see the answer to question 2 (above).

Amendment 004: The purpose of this amendment is to answer a question from industry, add Government Furnished Information as an attachment, set a cutoff date for asking questions, and extend the RFQ closing date.

Q6.  I wanted to convey that PAM has nothing to do with the Standard ISO/CSC Certification that standard shipping containers are built and tested to.   They are 2 completely different requirements

A6: Yes, PAM and ISO/CSC are two different requirements. The PAM is an ABS guideline.  ISO/CSC is a certification.  All paragraphs in the SOW shall be adhered to in accordance with Applicable Documents which include ABS guidelines and USCG standards. The PAM is an ABS Guide.

Government Furnished Information is added as attachment 710302542-00.

The Cutoff date for asking questions is 21-JAN-2021.

The RFQ closing date is extended until 26-JAN-2021.

Amendment 005: The purpose of this amendment is to answer a question from industry, add additional specification requirements, add Government Furnished Information as attachments, set a new cutoff date for asking questions, and extend the RFQ closing date.

Q7:  I am removing the roof top D-rings and installing collapsible safety rail in the open areas.  The roof top platform will be open (No railing)

A7:  No D-rings required.  A collapsible safety railing is required on the roof so that nobody falls off.

Q8: May I please have a separate drawing for layout so that I can make sure that all the receptacles are included properly.

A8: Please see Figure A-1 in the SOW.

Q9:  May I please have the separate  electrical schematic drawing

A9: Electrical schematic drawing is added to the SOW as Figure 4.

The following specifications are added to the SOW (page 8):

Multi-cable Bulkhead Transit

The enclosure shall be outfitted with modular multi-cable bulkhead transit penetrations at each corner, installed 6" below the interior ceiling and at least 6" away from any adjacent bulkhead, and recessed 3". The cable modules shall be integral to the penetration, adaptable to user required diameter fitting, and reconfigurable to future requirements.The location is shown on the Fig A-1

Government Furnished Information is added as attachment One Line Elect.

The Cutoff date for asking questions is 28-JAN-2021.

The RFQ closing date is extended until 29-JAN-2021.

See attachments

Update #5 ·

Amendment 001:  The purpose of this amendment is to update the RFQ attachment with the correct total small business set-aside restriction.

Amendment 002: The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions from industry.

Q1: Would you please reconsider the alternative dimensions with all layout requirements such as:

  • 8x24 ft = 192 sf,
  • 8x30 ft = 240 sf, or
  • 16x20 ft = 320 sf.

A1: The Container must be 20x10x8.5 due to the equipment racks and ergonomic work space.

Q2:, It appears that the customer is seeking a CSC certified container with dimensions of 10ft in width. ISO 668 and ISO 1496 only specify containers up to 8ft width. The drawing shows a 10ft wide container, so it is assumed that this dimension is necessary to meet the mission objective. With that being said, it is in our opinion that a CSC certification cannot be achieved for this dimension. Is this something that the customer would consider waiving?

A2: The vendor has the choice to:

- Modify a 20ft x 8ft x 8.5ft ISO/CSC certified container to a 10ft width. (All pre-modification certification documentation shall be retained and delivered with the container.)

or

- In lieu modifying a standard ISO container, the MTE may be constructed new and shall meet all requirements of the specification.

Either way, if it's modified or built new, the vendor shall meet all requirements of the specification, i.e., American Bureau of Shipping , USCG regulations, etc.

Amendment 003: The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions from industry.

Q3: A 10' wide shelter is not a standard ISO container size.  At this width, it no longer falls under ABS- CSC/ISO and cannot be CSC tested/CSC Certified stateside to this width.  Therefore, CSC/ISO regulations will not permit the original CSC plate to be put back onto the container after it has been modified to this width.  Can you please remove or adjust this requirement?

A3:  The CSC plate shall be removed from the container to permit sandblasting and painting, retained, and submitted with all prior ISO/CSC certification documentation with delivery.

Q4:  Please further explain the requirement for "Rounded ISO Corners".  Are you referring to the corner radius of the standard casting?

A4:  Yes.

Q5:  Does the reference to USCG regulations encompass PAM requirements?  Refer again to the point made in question 3 noting that a 10' Wide shelter does not fall under ABS-CSC/ISO regulations?

A5:  Yes.  Please see the answer to question 2 (above).

Amendment 004: The purpose of this amendment is to answer a question from industry, add Government Furnished Information as an attachment, set a cutoff date for asking questions, and extend the RFQ closing date.

Q6.  I wanted to convey that PAM has nothing to do with the Standard ISO/CSC Certification that standard shipping containers are built and tested to.   They are 2 completely different requirements

A6: Yes, PAM and ISO/CSC are two different requirements. The PAM is an ABS guideline.  ISO/CSC is a certification.  All paragraphs in the SOW shall be adhered to in accordance with Applicable Documents which include ABS guidelines and USCG standards. The PAM is an ABS Guide.

Government Furnished Information is added as attachment 710302542-00.

The Cutoff date for asking questions is 21-JAN-2021.

The RFQ closing date is extended until 26-JAN-2021.

See attachments

Update #4 ·

Amendment 001:  The purpose of this amendment is to update the RFQ attachment with the correct total small business set-aside restriction.

Amendment 002: The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions from industry.

Q1: Would you please reconsider the alternative dimensions with all layout requirements such as:

  • 8x24 ft = 192 sf,
  • 8x30 ft = 240 sf, or
  • 16x20 ft = 320 sf.

A1: The Container must be 20x10x8.5 due to the equipment racks and ergonomic work space.

Q2:, It appears that the customer is seeking a CSC certified container with dimensions of 10ft in width. ISO 668 and ISO 1496 only specify containers up to 8ft width. The drawing shows a 10ft wide container, so it is assumed that this dimension is necessary to meet the mission objective. With that being said, it is in our opinion that a CSC certification cannot be achieved for this dimension. Is this something that the customer would consider waiving?

A2: The vendor has the choice to:

- Modify a 20ft x 8ft x 8.5ft ISO/CSC certified container to a 10ft width. (All pre-modification certification documentation shall be retained and delivered with the container.)

or

- In lieu modifying a standard ISO container, the MTE may be constructed new and shall meet all requirements of the specification.

Either way, if it's modified or built new, the vendor shall meet all requirements of the specification, i.e., American Bureau of Shipping , USCG regulations, etc.

Amendment 003: The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions from industry.

Q3: A 10' wide shelter is not a standard ISO container size.  At this width, it no longer falls under ABS- CSC/ISO and cannot be CSC tested/CSC Certified stateside to this width.  Therefore, CSC/ISO regulations will not permit the original CSC plate to be put back onto the container after it has been modified to this width.  Can you please remove or adjust this requirement?

A3:  The CSC plate shall be removed from the container to permit sandblasting and painting, retained, and submitted with all prior ISO/CSC certification documentation with delivery.

Q4:  Please further explain the requirement for "Rounded ISO Corners".  Are you referring to the corner radius of the standard casting?

A4:  Yes.

Q5:  Does the reference to USCG regulations encompass PAM requirements?  Refer again to the point made in question 3 noting that a 10' Wide shelter does not fall under ABS-CSC/ISO regulations?

A5:  Yes.  Please see the answer to question 2 (above).

See attachments

Update #3 ·

Amendment 001:  The purpose of this amendment is to update the RFQ attachment with the correct total small business set-aside restriction.

Amendment 002: The purpose of this amendment is to answer questions from industry.

Q1: Would you please reconsider the alternative dimensions with all layout requirements such as:

  • 8x24 ft = 192 sf,
  • 8x30 ft = 240 sf, or
  • 16x20 ft = 320 sf.

A1: The Container must be 20x10x8.5 due to the equipment racks and ergonomic work space.

Q2:, It appears that the customer is seeking a CSC certified container with dimensions of 10ft in width. ISO 668 and ISO 1496 only specify containers up to 8ft width. The drawing shows a 10ft wide container, so it is assumed that this dimension is necessary to meet the mission objective. With that being said, it is in our opinion that a CSC certification cannot be achieved for this dimension. Is this something that the customer would consider waiving?

A2: The vendor has the choice to:

- Modify a 20ft x 8ft x 8.5ft ISO/CSC certified container to a 10ft width. (All pre-modification certification documentation shall be retained and delivered with the container.)

or

- In lieu modifying a standard ISO container, the MTE may be constructed new and shall meet all requirements of the specification.

Either way, if it's modified or built new, the vendor shall meet all requirements of the specification, i.e., American Bureau of Shipping , USCG regulations, etc.

See attachments

Update #2 ·

Amendment 001:  The purpose of this amendment is to update the RFQ attachment with the correct total small business set-aside restriction.

See attachments

Update #1 ·

See attachments

Attachments

Files attached to this notice, newest first
File Type Posted
SOW.pdf PDF
710302542-00.pdf PDF
RFQ.pdf PDF
CDRL Addendum.pdf PDF
SOW.pdf PDF
RFQ.pdf PDF
PR 1300877716 CDRLs Signed.pdf PDF

Notice history

Notices posted for this opportunity, newest first
Notice Type Posted
Mobile Test Enclosure (MTE) Award Award Notice
Mobile Test Enclosure (MTE) This notice · Latest solicitation Solicitation
Mobile Test Enclosure (MTE) Original Pre-Solicitation

On GovTribe

Work this opportunity on GovTribe

  • Track it in your pipeline
  • Find teaming partners
  • Similar opportunities
  • Ask GovTribe AI about this opportunity