Q A_13_thru_17.pdf
PDF 189 KB Posted
- Attached to
- JTCG/ME Analytical Services Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W91ZLK-13-R-0005
About this file
Questions and Answers through 26 November 2012
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W91ZLK-13-R-0005-0004.pdf | ||
| W91ZLK-13-R-0005_Conform_Thru_Amend_0003.pdf | ||
| W91ZLK-13-R-0005-0003.pdf | ||
| Q A_18_thru_26.pdf | ||
| QASP_20121126.pdf | ||
| CDRLs_A001_A003_A005.pdf | ||
| W91ZLK-13-R-0005-0002_Q A_01_thru_12.pdf | ||
| W91ZLK-13-R-0005-0002.pdf | ||
| W91ZLK-13-R-0005_APPENDIX_H.pdf | ||
| A036_W91ZLK-13-R-0005-0001_20121109.pdf | ||
| ASUG_v4.1_Final.pdf.pdf | ||
| Checklist.pdf | ||
| A036_W91ZLK-13-R-0005-0001_20121109.pdf | ||
| Weapon_Parameters_List_Final_14_Dec_2011.xls.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| marking-classified_national_security_information_booklet.pdf.pdf | ||
| arl-technical-report-3905.pdf | ||
| FATEPEN Vol I. Analysts Manual 1 .pdf | ||
| FATEPEN Vol.II Users Guide 1 .pdf |
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
CCAP-SCI 26 November 2012
MEMORANDUM FOR RECORD
SOLICITATION: W91ZLK-13-R-0005
SUBJECT: Questions and Answers (“Q&A”) #13 through 17
1. The purpose of this memorandum is to document the most recent Q&A received from interested vendors as of close of business 26 November 2012 regarding the subject solicitation. Question #12’s answer is also corrected.
2. The questions and answers are as follows:
Q12: On Page 69 of the RFP (L.3.2.2 (a) the government states that, “The resumes
(no more than one page per person) shall also include a description of the individual’s responsibilities.” Is the government requesting a description of the individual’s current work responsibilities, or their proposed responsibilities for this effort?
**CORRECTED A12: The former, e.g., their current job responsibilities.
Q13. Section L.3.5: Is Section B to be completed and submitted as part of Volume
V? If yes, provide guidance to complete FFP and CPFF. Section L.3.3 instructs cost proposal to be priced on CPFF basis using Sample Tasks #1 and #2. How are costs associated with basic SOW reflected in the cost proposal?
A13: The contractors shall provide cost proposals for the sample tasks only.
Q14. Section C – PWS, 3.4. Security Requirements, p. 9:
“Requirements contained in paragraphs C.3.4.1, C.3.4.2, and C.3.4.3 apply to this contract. All other requirements are specific to task orders performed at AMSAA.”
Should offerors address ONLY paragraphs C.3.4.1, C.3.4.2, and C.3.4.3 under the
Security Requirements for this IDIQ-level proposal?
A14: The offerors should specifically address C.3.4.1, C.3.4.2, and C.3.4.3. In addition, they should discuss their ability/processes to meet site-specific security requirements like those specifically required for AMSAA (C.3.4.4. to C.3.4.16).
Q15. Section C- PWS, 3.5.1 Status Reports, p. 12: “The Contractor shall submit status reports IAW Exhibit Line Item Number (ELIN) A001 of the Contract Data
Requirements List, DD Form 1423.” This CDRL, as well as A002, A003, and A005 referenced elsewhere in the solicitation were not included with the RFP. Will the
Government please provide these CDRLs?
A15: CDRLs A001, A003, and A005 have been included with this Amendment.
Q16. Section C – PWS, 3.7 Performance outcomes, p. 13:
“The Government will use the Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan provided at
Appendix A to Section C as the basis for assessing the contractor’s performance.”
Will the Government please provide Appendix A for reference purposes?
A16: Appendix A (“Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan”) has been included with this
Amendment.
Q17. Section J – Sample Task #2: Does the government desire a new tool/algorithm to replace FATEPEN? Does the government desire additional features that
FATEPEN does not currently have? How do FATEPEN predictions compare with real world results? Is more accuracy required?
A17:
(1) No. The Government does not desire a new tool/algorithm to replace FATEPEN.
(2) YES. The sample task shall produce a methodology that can be utilized as a standalone Graphical User Interface (GUI) driven code or as module that can be called by a higher-level code such as COVART or AJEM.
(3) Extensive Verification, Validation, & Accreditation (VV&A) has occurred and
FATEPEN is the accredited JTCG/ME tool
(4) No.
3. POC is the undersigned, (410) 278-4693, email david.a.macintyre.civ@mail.mil.
DAVID A. MACINTYRE
Contract Specialist mailto:david.a.macintyre.civ@mail.mil
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .