L60 - Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan.pdf

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan

(QASP)

For

Rocky Mountain Arsenal Environmental Remediation Services (ERS) Contract

Approved By:

Program Manager

Contracting Officer’s Representative

10 May 2023

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Section Subject Page #

1 Overview 3

2 Description of Services 3

3 Roles and Responsibilities 3

4 Contract Quality Requirements 5

5 Government Surveillance 6

6 Non-Conforming Performance 7

7 Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract 7

8 Contract Discrepancy Reports 7

9 Data Analysis 8

10 Good Performance 8

11 Acceptance of Services 8

12 Monthly COR Status Report 9

13 Contractor Manpower Reporting Application (CMRA) 9

14 Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) 9

15 COR/Quality Assurance Surveillance Files 12

16 QASP Changes 12

REVISION HISTORY

REV Description of Change Author Effective Date

0 Initial Version Scott Greene 10 May 2023

Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) 10 May 2023

1. Overview.

1.1 Purpose The purpose of this QASP is to identify the Government’s systematic approach/method for evaluating contractor services to ensure contract performance objectives and standards are satisfactorily met, and provide detailed direction to Government personnel performing contract surveillance activities. This QASP will ensure that the Contractor performs in accordance with the Performance Objectives set forth herein (and in the contract documents), that the Government receives the service outcomes called for in the contract/task orders, and that the Government only pays for acceptable levels of service. This QASP identifies the roles and responsibilities of participating Government officials; it identifies the services to be surveyed and the applicable performance standards; and it identifies the surveillance methodology to be utilized to include scheduling, observing, documenting, accepting services, and determining payments due. This QASP was developed by the Rocky Mountain Arsenal Technical Team including the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR), Technical Representatives, and Quality Control Manager. Government personnel assigned to survey contractor performance will be required to read and understand the QASP prior to them being appointed. They will also be required to periodically review the QASP throughout the life of the contract.

1.2. Intent. The intent of this QASP is to:

• Ensure Contractor performance meets or exceeds contract terms, conditions and specifications

• Hold the Contractor accountable for quality control

• Encourage the Contractor to take appropriate steps to continuously improve quality

• Ensure all sections of FAR 46 are applied as required and applicable

Accordingly, the Government COR will conduct surveillance on the contract in accordance with this QASP, but reserves the right to monitor the contract in any manner, time, and at all places necessary to ensure that the services rendered conform to contract requirements. Sub-contract service providers shall be accountable to the Contractor who, in turn, is responsible for successful overall contract performance to the Government. Resolution of non-conforming services discovered at the Subcontractor level will be addressed with the prime Contractor. The Government will not exercise any supervisory controls over the contract service providers performing the services herein.

2.0 Description of Services.

2.1 Scope of Work. The Contractor shall ensure all work, performed as identified in the Performance Work Statement (PWS), meets all environmental remediation system operations and maintenance standards as specified in the RMA Records of Decision, Long-Term Care and Post-Closure Plans, RMA Standard Operating Orders (SOOs), Plant Operations Manuals, manufacturer’s recommendations, and all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations.

2.2 Type of Contract. This will be an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Cost Plus Incentive Fee (CPIF) contract.

3.0 Roles and Responsibilities. The following provides a synopsis for the roles and their respective authority during the performance of the contract:

3.1 Government.

3.1.1 Contracting Officer (KO). The KO is the only person authorized to direct changes for any requirement under this contract. In the event the Contractor effects any such change at the direction of any person other than the KO, the change will be considered to have been made without authority, and solely at the risk of the Contractor. No changes in, or deviation from the terms and conditions shall be made without a written modification to the contract, executed by the KO authorizing such changes. The KO is responsible for appointing the Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR) and will review the COR’s assessment of the Contractor’s performance.

The KO will resolve any differences that may occur between the COR’s interpretation of the requirement and the Contractor’s interpretation.

The Contracting Officer will be responsible for:

1. Administering the ERSC contract, to include awarding contract changes

2. Awarding and terminating task orders under the ERSC contract

3. Making determinations and findings related to the ERSC contract

4. Designating, in writing, a qualified Government employee to act as a COR for the ERSC contract

5. Delegating authority to the COR to assign Government Site Representative(s)

6. Terminating COR designations and/or delegations of authority

3.1.2 Contract Administrator. The official Government representative delegated authority by the Contracting Officer to administer a contract. This individual, also at times referred to as a Contract Specialist, is normally a member of the appropriate Contracting/Procurement career field and advises on all technical contractual matters.

3.1.3 Contracting Officer’s Representative (COR). The COR is an individual designated in writing by the KO to act as his/her authorized representative to assist in the technical administration of the contract. The COR will monitor all technical and performance aspects of the contract, and assist the (KO) in contract administration.

The COR will be responsible for:

• Maintaining a complete copy of the contract, any task orders, and all modifications

• Establishing and maintaining a file for all documents and correspondence pertaining to technical and performance aspects of the contract

• Assigning Government Site Representative (s) (if delegated this authority by the

Contracting Officer)

• Ensuring that the Contractor performs the technical requirements of the contract

• Performing inspections necessary to ensure Contractor performance meets the standards specified in the PWS

• Issuing written interpretations of technical requirements, including Government drawings, designs, and specifications

• Monitoring Contractor's performance, document the performance, and notify both the

Contracting Officer and Contractor of all deficiencies

• Enforcing Contracting Officer authorized corrections of deficient work

• Coordinating availability of Government Furnished Property

• Providing site entry of Contractor personnel

• Reviewing Technical Representatives monthly reports and completing reports evaluating

Contractor performance

• Assuring satisfactory subcontractor performance by observing the Contractor’s surveillances

• Completing required performance reports (thoroughly and accurately)

• Completing six-month assessments of Contractor performance against the Performance

Incentive Fee Plan criteria

A letter of designation issued to the COR, a copy of which is sent to the Contractor, states the responsibilities and limitations of the COR, especially with regard to changes in cost, price, or delivery dates. The COR is not authorized to change any of the terms and conditions of the resulting order.

The COR will use the DoD Contracting Officer’s Representative Tracking (CORT) Tool to upload their surveillance documents, particularly the Monthly Status Reports (MSR). Also, the COR may upload trip reports, correspondence with the Contractor, and other miscellaneous documents into the CORT Tool within their online CORT Profile for this contract. The CORT Tool is available within the WAWF suite of tools at: https://wawf.eb.mil/.

https://wawf.eb.mil/

3.1.4 Technical Representatives. Technical Representatives are appointed by the COR to provide additional surveillance personnel for monitoring and documenting the Contractor’s performance. These alternate surveillance support personnel may serve as on-site representatives of the COR in performance of contract surveillance. This term will apply to other Government surveillance personnel as defined in Army Regulation 70-13, paragraph 2-2 g. All surveillance personnel shall use the CORT Tool to upload their surveillance documents.

Technical Representative will be responsible for:

• Monitoring Contractor activities

• Submitting reports to the COR

• Providing task order status to the COR

4.0 Contract Quality Requirements. Contract quality requirements are the technical requirements in the contract relating to the quality of the services provided, and those contract clauses prescribing inspection, and other quality controls incumbent on the Contractor, to assure that the product or service conforms to the contractual requirements. (See FAR 46.101)

4.1 Contractor’s Quality Control Program. The Contractor's Quality Control Program requirements are defined in Section C4.0 of the PWS. The Contractor shall develop, maintain, enforce, and document a Quality Control Plan (QCP) which complies with the requirements of this contract and outlines how they will ensure that the Government will receive all the services required by the contract at the specified quality level.

The Government will evaluate the adequacy of the Contractor’s QCP submitted to the KO for acceptance prior to performance under this contract. The Contractor’s QCP shall include a process that can identify, prevent, and ensure non-recurrence of defective services.

The Contractor’s QCP shall ensure that the Contractor maintains evidence that all goods and services provided conform to contract quality requirements. The Contractor shall provide inspection data to the Government upon request for validation.

5.0 Government Surveillance. The COR will perform Government contract quality assurance by executing various functions, including inspection, to determine whether the Contractor has fulfilled the contract obligations pertaining to quality and quantity.

The Government will ensure that the Contractor is performing in accordance with the standards specified in the PWS through the use of this QASP. The monthly schedule shows where and what the COR will be monitoring.

5.1 Methods of Government Surveillance include, but are not limited to, the following:

• 100% Inspection - This is an inspection method whereby all outputs are monitored. This method provides the best indication of contractor performance and the most documented basis for determining contract payment actions. However, it requires extensive COR resources, and therefore, is not practical for most service requirements. 100 percent inspection is preferred when the PWS requirement is so critical that nonperformance would pose a direct risk to the safety of personnel or property, or when the work occurs infrequently and the output population is small.

• Random Sampling – This method will be used when a service is performed relatively frequently and a statistically valid sample can be selected for audit. It is the most appropriate method for frequently recurring tasks. Random Sampling is a means of evaluation by observing or inspecting some part (a sample), but not all, of a population or portion of the contract requirements to assist the Government with determining whether standards set forth in the contract have been met.

• Periodic Sampling - This method, sometimes called "planned inspection," consists of the evaluation of tasks selected on other than a 100 percent or random basis. It may be appropriate for tasks that occur infrequently, and where 100 percent inspection is neither required nor practical. A predetermined plan for inspecting part of the work is established using subjective judgment and the analysis of agency resources to decide what work to inspect and how frequently to inspect it.

• Report Reviews – Much of the work under this contract will consist of preparing technical reports and plans for submittal to the Army and Regulatory Agencies to meet environmental regulatory requirements. These reports must be reviewed by the Army prior to submittal to the Regulatory Agencies to ensure that they meet technical and quality requirements, and accurately convey the data collected. All reports prepared by the Contractor will be reviewed by the COR or a Technical Representative.

5.2 Monthly Surveillance Schedule. The COR will develop a monthly schedule of surveillance activities based on the Performance Standards as outlined in the Performance Requirements Summary (PRS), as well as any other critical contractual requirements determined to be higher risk requiring oversight. The surveillance outlined in the monthly schedule will be as detailed and in-depth as necessary to provide the Government with the objective quality evidence required to support acceptance of the services provided by the Contractor. The schedule will identify the method of surveillance, the date of inspection, place of inspection, activity to be monitored, and who will conduct the surveillance. The DA Form 5475-R (COR/ACOR Surveillance Schedule) may be tailored to be used for this purpose, or a similar form developed locally. The monthly schedule will be completed no later than seven calendar days prior to the beginning of the period it covers and a copy forwarded to the KO. After it is completed, this form is “For Official Use Only” and must not be shown to the Contractor.

5.3 Inspection instructions/checklists. The COR will develop checklists for all planned inspections requiring special instructions on inspection performance. The checklists should include the type of observations to be made, and specific details of how to identify acceptable performance. The Surveillance Activity Checklists, DA Form 5476 may be tailored for this purpose or a locally developed similar form may be used.

5.4 Documentation of Inspections. All inspections will be documented and will include, at a minimum, the date and time, the person(s) who performed the inspection, the subject of the inspection, the performance standard(s), and the results. Successful or exceptional performance will be documented as well as deficiencies in contractor performance.

Documentation will be maintained for future reference and/or audit, proof of inspection and for a record of past performance. The Tally Checklist DA Form 5481 may be tailored for this purpose.

6.0 Non-Conforming Performance. The COR will notify the Contractor, in person, each time an unacceptable observation has been recorded and ask the Contractor to correct the problem or re-accomplish the service. The COR will record the contract requirement, the specific deficiency to the requirement, the date and time it was discovered, and have the Contractor initial the entry. The Contractor will be given a time line after notification to correct the deficiency in accordance with the requirements of the contract. Deficiencies that cannot be corrected within the identified time line will be reported to the Contracting Officer. Again, the Tally Checklist DA Form 5481 may be used for this purpose.

7.0 Cost Plus Incentive Fee Contract. As a Cost Plus Incentive Fee contract, the Contractor’s performance will be evaluated each month by the COR, Quality Control Manager, and Technical Representatives. Every six months, the Incentive Fee Review Board, consisting of the Program Manager, the COR, and the Quality Control Manager and designated Technical Representative, convenes to evaluate the Contractor’s performance against the Performance Incentive Plan (PIP) during the previous 6-month rating period.

The PIP will be developed to include both objective and subjective criteria to evaluate Contractor performance and determine appropriate fee. The PIP is revised semi-annually to focus the Contractor on areas that require improvement or to emphasize specific success factors for the overall RMA Remediation Program. Thus, this contract is structured to motivate the Contractor (with incentives) to not only perform the work as cost-efficiently as possible, but to also exceed the Government’s goals in safety, quality, subcontracting, environmental compliance, schedule, and other technical areas. This will ensure that the Army remains in compliance with the Regulatory Agency-approved environmental standards applicable to RMA.

8.0 Contract Discrepancy Reports. The COR will report more serious (systemic in nature) deficiencies or recurring deficiencies that could indicate a trend by using the DA Form 5479-R, Contract Discrepancy Report (CDR). The CDR will state the Contract Requirement, the specific contract reference and the specific violation (s) to the requirement. The COR will forward copies of CDRs to the KO within one working day.

The KO will notify the Contractor of the non-conformance and request identification of the root cause and completion of a corrective action by a required suspense date. The KO may require the Contractor to re-perform any services that do not meet contract requirements at no additional cost to the Government. The Contractor will return a copy of the completed and signed DA Form 5479-R along with their Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to the KO for review, approval and inclusion in the contract/order file. The KO should include the COR in the review of the CAP and re-inspection of services that were found to be deficient to ensure that the CAP includes an adequate root cause analysis, a corrective action for the root cause and an agreed upon timeframe for completion of the corrective action.

The KO and COR will not consider the CDR closed until all deficiencies have been corrected and all agreed upon actions of the CAP have been completed. The Contractor’s failure to follow through and complete corrective actions will be reported immediately to the KO for further action. (Note: If the COR has to repeatedly perform re-inspection activities, there could be a Government re-inspection cost which could be recovered from the Contractor.) The COR will also follow-up after the Contractor has completed the corrective action to ensure that the Contractor’s corrective action was sufficient to preclude recurrence.

9.0 Data Analysis. The COR shall perform and document an analysis of available data monthly and make adjustments to the surveillance schedule as required based on results of analysis. Analysis shall be used to look for and document trends in performance which may indicate shifts in performance risk that could result in increased or reduced surveillance. Data can be based on Government observations or Contractor observations.

Negative trends noted using Government observations could result in issuing a Contract Deficiency Report (CDR) to the Contractor. Trends noted using Contractor data should never result in a CDR unless the Contractor is not addressing the negative trend.

Documentation of data analysis will be in the Monthly COR Activity Report.

10.0 Good Performance. When a Contractor’s quality control program works, good performance results. If the result of a COR’s surveillance shows consistently good performance, the amount of surveillance can be decreased. The KO and COR must agree to reduce the frequency/level of inspection.

11.0 Acceptance of Services. When all services have been deemed acceptable and there is documented objective quality evidence to support acceptable performance, the COR will accept the services provided and authorize payment upon satisfactory completion of the work. This is done by approving the Contractor’s invoice in Wide Area Workflow https://wawf.eb.mil/.

12.0 Monthly COR Activity Report. The COR will submit a brief monthly activity report to the KO which will include the surveillance schedule for the following month, summary of inspections performed with results, summary of customer complaints with analysis, summary of contract discrepancies, results of data analysis, recommended adjustments to surveillance, invoices accepted, and any other pertinent contract activities.

13.0 Contractor Manpower Reporting (CMR). The COR shall fill in required information and verify that the Contactor has complied with the required Contractor manpower reporting and document any observations. Reporting is for the 12-month period ending https://wawf.eb.mil/

Sept. 30th of each FY and reporting is due from the Contractor by 31 October of each FY.

Registration information and manual can be found at https://www.ecmra.mil/.

14.0 Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) Documented surveillance data IAW this QASP will be used as objective data to support Contractor ratings. The inclusion of detailed documented inspection results provides objectivity to the Contractor Performance Assessment Report (CPAR). The CPAR will be prepared annually or at the end of a Task Order, whichever occurs first.

15.0 Quality Assurance Surveillance File: Reference ACC PAM 70-1 and the ACC COR

Facts Page. The Quality Assurance, or COR Surveillance file, shall contain the following as applicable:

a. Copy of the COR designation letter from the KO, any changes to that letter, and any termination letters.

b. Training Certifications for COR and refresher training.

c. Copy of the contract and all contract modifications.

d. Copy of the applicable Quality Assurance Surveillance Plan (QASP) with attached schedule and checklist.

e. Copy of the Contractor’s Quality Control Plan (QCP).

f. All correspondence initiated by authorized representatives (Contractor or Government) concerning performance of the contract.

g. Names, position titles, and contact information for all key personnel assigned to this contract, both Government and Contractor.

h. Monthly surveillance schedules.

i. Surveillance Checklists.

j. Records of all inspections performed and the results.

k. Customer feedback.

l. Memoranda for record of minutes of any meeting, telephone conversations, and discussions with the Contractor or others pertaining to the contract.

m. Documentation pertaining to acceptance of services, reports, or data.

n. AT/OPSEC Training Certificates.

16.0 QASP Changes. The QASP is a living document and, as such, may be changed as needed.

The COR will submit recommended changes to the KO for approval.

https://www.ecmra.mil/ https://shortcut.dau.mil/acq/cpar_cpars http://acc.army.mil/contractingcenters/acc-nj/COR.html http://acc.army.mil/contractingcenters/acc-nj/COR.html

ATTACHMENT 1

Performance Requirements Summary

Performance Objectives. The list below identifies the service outcomes (as defined in Section C – Performance Work Statement and the Performance Requirements Summary) that will be monitored to ensure acceptable Contractor performance. In general, oversight and assessment of the Contractor’s performance will be based upon direct and indirect interface with the Contractor. The direct and indirect interface with the Contractor will typically be actions by the COR/Government Technical Representative(s) such as 1) safety walks, 2) review and participation in audits/surveillances, 3) review of treatment and storage facilities and annual operating reports, 4) review of Contractor prepared reports for required content, 5) work site visits/inspections, 6) review of environmental compliance inspections and reports, 7) verifying annual transfer of operating records to be included in the Site Record and required data bases, and 8) observation of Land Use Control annual inspections.

Safety & Health

- Perform safety walks of all facilities and work areas. At least one safety walk, or Behavior

Based Safety Observation, must be conducted each month. Facilities/work areas, or behavior observation will be determined based on a random or rotating basis.

- Monthly review of Contractor safety logs and OSHA statistics

- Monthly review of accident/incident reports and lessons learned

Quality Assurance

- Monthly review of Contractor’s audit/surveillance schedule

- Monthly review of Contractor’s audit/surveillance reports

- Participation in Contractor’s on-site surveillances.

Water Treatment Plants O&M

- Participate in and observe inspections

- Ensure Operating Manuals are updated annually

- Monthly review of plant discharge chemical concentrations against criteria

- Quarterly review of achievement of performance objectives (water levels)

- Ensure Quarterly Data Reports and the Annual Summary Report are complete and delivered on schedule

Landfills and Covers O&M

- Participate in and observe monthly inspection

- Ensure annual operating reports are issued on schedule

- Ensure lysimeter data is presented quarterly

- Ensure all reports include required information

- Ensure routine and non-routine maintenance is performed within prescribed timeframes

Infrastructure and Facilities Maintenance

- Inspect facilities and infrastructure for safety and code compliance, maintenance requirements, and security compliance

- Review facilities and infrastructure reports for required information (surface water operator log book, review of sanitary sewer system operator log book, review of Standard Operating Orders, and review and approval of Individual Job Orders)

- Ensure Standard Operating Orders and System are updated and being followed

- Ensure facility repairs are made in a timely manner

Regulatory Interface

- Monitor attendance and support at meetings between the Government and Regulatory

Agencies

- Evaluate support of the COR and Government Site Representative(s)

Records Management

- Confirm reports, data, and operating records have been uploaded to the Site Record and required databases (chain of Custody Database, RMA Transfer File Check, Sample Tracking, Water Management Program, Vegetation Database, Environmental Database, RMA Water Data Application, GIS, and Electronic Data Tracking Center)

Reports

- Review reports to ensure documents are technically accurate and comprehensive

- Confirm reports are issued on schedule

Land Use Controls

- Ensure annual LUC inspections are performed

- Ensure annual LUC monitoring report is issued on schedule

- Ensure LUC monitoring report contains required information

Environmental Compliance

- Ensure support of RCRA inspections

- Review annual environmental compliance inspection reports

- Provide notifications to Army of trigger event exceedances within 24 hours

- Ensure that annual RCRA training is provided

Performance Requirements Summary Table

Performance Requirements Summary 10-May-23

Required Service

PWS

Refer ence

Performance Standard Acceptable Variance

Frequenc y

How Evaluated by Government Comments

Quality Control C1.7 Conduct Monthly Quality Surveillances

Minimum of 10 Surveillance Inspections Monthly

Review Surveillance Report

Per Quality Control Management Program

Quality Control C1.7 Conduct Lessons Learned Reviews No Variance Annual

Review Lessons Learned Report

Health and Safety

C1.1

Conduct Monthly Safety Inspections

Minimum of 10 Safety Inspections Monthly

Review Safety Inspection Report

Safety Inspection or Behavior Based Observation

Health and Safety

C1.1

Prepare Incident Reports

Achieve Within 48 hours of Incident

As Needed

Review Incident Report

Operations Oversight C3.3

Prepare Monthly Report

Achieve Within 5 Days of End of Month Monthly

Review Monthly Status Report

Project Management

C5.1.

Submit Monthly Status Report

Achieve Within 5 Days of End of Month Monthly

Review Monthly Status Report

Project Controls C5.1.

Submit Project Schedule

Achieve Within 5 Days of End of Month Monthly

Review Project Schedule

Water Treatment Plants C5.2

Minimize Treatment Plant Downtime

Maximum of 5% of Downtime per Year Annually

Review Annual Summary Report

(Annual Performance Review Meeting Instead?)

Water Treatment Plants C5.2

Meet Reverse Gradient IAW LTMP

Achieve Within 90 Days of Loss of Reverse Gradient Quarterly

Review Quarterly Effluent Report

See Table 1-7 of SQAPP for Schedule

Water Treatment Plants C5.2

Meet CSRG Standards IAW LTMP

Achieve Within 90 Days of Exceedance Quarterly

Review Quarterly Effluent Report

See Table 1-8 of SQAPP for Schedule

Water Treatment Plants C5.2

Demonstrate Plume Edge Capture

Achieve Within 90 Days of Loss of Containment Quaterly

Review Quarterly Effluent Report

Monitoring Well Sampling C5.3

Sample Wells IAW

LTMP

Achieve Within 30 Days of End of Fiscal Year Annually

Review Annual Summary Report

(Annual Performance Review Meeting Instead?)

Landfills - Inspections C5.4

Meet Erosion Less than 4.8 Inches

Remedy Within 90 Days of Notification Annually

Review Annual Summary Report

Inspections Conducted Semi- Annually

Landfills - Leakage Rate C5.4

Meet Action Leakage Trigger Rate

Remedy Within 90 Days of Notification Annually

Review Annual Summary Report HWL ALR - 85%, ELF ALR - 50%

Covers - Inspections C5.4

Meet Erosion Less than 6 Inches

Remedy Within 90 Days of Notification Annually

Review Annual Summary Report

Covers - Inspections C5.4

Meet Vegetation Cover Standard (25%)

Remedy Within 180 Days of Notification Annually

Review Annual Summary Report

Covers - Lysimeter Monitoring C5.4

Meet Percolation Rate Limits

Remedy Within 90 Days of Notification Quarterly

Review Quarterly Reports

9 Month Trigger Level - 1.0mm (Rolling Average)

Conduct Facility Maintenance C5.5

Perform In Accordance with

SOO

Achieve Within 30 Days of End of Fiscal Year Annually

Annual Performance Review

Records Management C5.7

Maintain Administrative Record

File Documents Within 5 Days of Issuance Monthly

Review Monthly Status Report

Reporting C5.9 Meet Report Submittal Deadlines No Variance Monthly

Review Monthly Status Report

Land Use Controls Monitoring

C5.1

Ensure Compliance with LUC No Variance Annually

Review Annual LUC Report

Provide Notification within 24 Hours if LUC Requirement not Met

Environmental Compliance

C5.1

Avoid Consultative Process Triggers

Provide Notice Within 24 Hours

As Needed

Review Notification

Environmental Compliance

C5.1

Avoid Notice for Violations Triggers

Provide Notice Within 24 Hours

As Needed

Review Notification

Notes:

Government surveillance of contractor performance is not limited to the Performance Objectives as outlined in this PRS.

The Government reserves the right to conduct compliance surveillance of any contractual requirement of this acquisition.

If Acceptable Variance date can not be met, the contractor must provide a plan with a schedule to remedy the deficiency. Plan must be provided within 30 days of deficiency.

ATTACHMENT 2

Inspection Schedule

Inspection Schedule 10-May-23

Category Inspection Frequency Inspection Type Date of Inspection Health and Safety Safety Walks - Plants, Facilities Monthly Random Health and Safety Review Safety Logs/Statistics Monthly Periodic Health and Safety Review Accident/Incident Reports Monthly Periodic Quality Assurance Review Surveillance Schedule Monthly Periodic Quality Assurance Review Surveillance Reports Monthly Periodic Quality Assurance Review Quality Control Plan Annually Periodic Water Treatment Plants Inspect Plant Operations Monthly Random Water Treatment Plants Updated Operating Manuals/Log Books Annually Periodic Water Treatment Plants Review Quarterly Reports Quarterly Periodic Water Treatment Plants Review Plant Effluent Levels Quarterly Periodic Water Treatment Plants Review Water Elevations Quarterly Periodic Landfills/Covers Inspect Cover - Type I Monthly Periodic Landfills/Covers Inspect Cover - Type II Sem-Annual Periodic Landfills/Covers Review Annual Report Annually Periodic Landfills/Covers Review Lysimeter Reports Quarterly Periodic Landfills/Covers Inspect Repair Work Situational Random Infrastructure Review Standard Operating Orders Annually Periodic Infrastructure Review Operational Reports Monthly Periodic Infrastructure Inspect Facility Repairs Situational Random Regulatory Interface Evaluate Quality of Support to Army Monthly Periodic Records Management Inspect EDMS Database - Updated Monthly Periodic Records Management Inspect Program Databases Quarterly Random Reporting Review Reports - Quality, Timeliness Situational Periodic Land Use Controls Review Annual LUC Report Annually Periodic Land Use Controls Inspect LUC Surveillance Annually Periodic Environmental Compliance Review Compliance Inspection Reports Annually Periodic