Preproposal conference March 2011.ppt
PPT presentation 2 MB Posted
- Attached to
- Replace Squadron Operations Facility
- Solicitation number
- W912TF-11-R-0502
About this file
Slides from site visit arch 23 2011
View the file
Other files
Show all 42
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Replace Squadron operations Facilities At Pease ANGB, Newington NH Pre-proposal conference March 23, 2011 USPFO for New Hampshire
SS 2011 Module 5
Replace Squadron operations Facilities At Pease ANGB, Newington NH
W912TF-11-R-0502
Introduction Contracting Officer MSgt Scott Ballweg – scott.ballweg@us.army.mil MSgt Regina Rockwood – regina.rockwood@us.army.mil
Base Civil Engineer Maj Gene Mozzoni
Deputy Base Civil Engineer Capt Autumn Ricker
Introduction Small Business Administration
Keith Waye – keith.waye@sba.gov
Ben Manzano – ben.manzano@sba.gov
Procurement Technical Assistance Program
Dave Pease – david.pease@dred.state.nh.us
Oak Point Associates Peter MacGovern
Synopsis Remove existing one story, flat roof, approximately 7,095 square foot (655 sm)
Construction of a two story mixed use facility, and associated site work.
A firm-fixed price contract will be awarded
Synopsis Notice of 100% small business set-aside
The contract will be awarded using Source Selection trade-off procedures
Evaluation factors – technical; past performance and price
Contract Period Construction period is 485 calendar days after receiving the notice to proceed *
Contract Period Period of Performance is 485 days total. This is a change and overrides the Period of Performance stated in the Specification There will be two phases to this project. There will be two Notice to Proceed (NTP) letters issued; the first NTP will include demolition of the building and all critical submittals to be submitted and approved and the second NTP will include the construction phase of the project. ***Construction of the new building will not be approved to start until the work listed in the first NTP is complete. See Section 0800 for the list of critical submittals.
Solicitation, Plans & Specifications
| On The Web http://www.fbo.gov |
| Solicitation |
| Exhibits |
| Plans & specifications |
| Questions & answers document |
| Amendments |
| Check regularly & refresh web page |
Invitation for Bid vs.
Request for Proposal
| IFB | |
| Open process | |
| Public bid opening | |
| Abstract releasable | |
| No discussions | |
| Only price considered | |
| No revisions | |
| Additive Bid Items (ABI) | |
| Award to lowest responsive/responsible bidder |
| RFP | |
| Closed process | |
| No public opening | |
| Limited info at award | |
| Discussions allowable | |
| Past Performance and other non cost factors considered with price | |
| Revisions possible | |
| Options | |
| Award based on best value |
What You Must Submit
| Section 00110 of the RFP details the required information and format for the proposal |
| 2 Volumes are required |
| VOL 1 – Price/Cost |
| To include Exhibit D – Option Periods |
| VOL 2 – Technical and Past Performance Proposals |
Volume 1- Price/Cost
| Offeror portion of SF 1442 |
| Section 00010 – Pricing Info |
| Section 00600 – Representations and Certifications (R&C) |
| Complete R&Cs in ORCA on the web |
| Complete and return DoD R&Cs in Section 0600 |
| Include supplemental information |
| Completed Exhibit D – Option execution period |
| If JV include Joint Venture Agreement |
Volume 2 Past Performance
NO PRICES/COST IN THIS VOLUME
| Exhibit A- Part 1- Performance Relevancy Questionnaires – |
| Prepare not more than 10 of these documents for projects completed or completed to 70% in the last five years |
| Select your projects carefully because the quality of the relevant performance is more important than the quantity of projects submitted |
| Do this early – reference send to KO by closing date – please follow-up |
Volume 2 Past Performance Continued If you do not have relevant Past Performance and are using experience of key personnel, predecessor companies or subcontractors to obtain this ensure you clearly state this in the proposal
To be considered subcontractor must complete a consent form - Exhibit B
Volume 2 Past Performance Continued
| If key personnel to be used on this project were not participants in Exhibit A projects include |
| Names of Project Mgr/Superintendent/QC Mgr |
| a resume or detailed summary of experience |
| Include letter of intent if not with company |
| Must be a member of prime contractors organization |
Technical Capability Proposal
| Discuss experience with building to United States Green Building Council (USGBC) LEED® standards. Indicate any previous projects that achieved USGBC LEED® certification, any level of recognition |
| Demonstrate that lead construction personnel have experience and required qualifications in assigned roles with building to USGBC LEED® standards |
| If no experience so state and indicate in detail how you plan to overcome this weakness. |
Exhibits
| Exhibit A = Relevancy Questionnaire |
| PART 1 (not more than 10) |
| PART 2 (1) |
| Exhibit B = Subcontractor Consent Form- if applicable |
| Exhibit C = Past Performance Letter and Questionnaire (send out to references)-do not put in proposal |
Exhibits
| Exhibit D = Option Execution Period (submit with Vol. 1, pricing info) |
| Exhibit F = Proposal Inquiry Form |
Proposal Due Dates
| Proposal due 1400 Hours (2:00 P.M.), 14 April, 2011 |
| Proposal must be signed by officer of your company |
| No facsimile or electronic offers |
| Reference questionnaires are also due by this time and date |
| Send reference questionnaires out as soon as possible |
| Have returned to KO via mail or email |
Proposal Evaluation
| Process is detailed in RFP section 00120 |
| Carefully review section 00120 when preparing proposal |
| Comply with section 00100 and 00110 requirements |
| Failure to furnish a complete proposal may result in elimination from consideration |
| Price proposed must be determined reasonable and realistic to be considered |
Proposal Evaluation Technical Capability proposal must rate an acceptable
Proposals rated unacceptable will be removed from the competition
Award The contractor whose proposal provides the best value to the Government
| Technical Acceptability and Past Performance is approximately equal to price |
| The best value may not be the lowest price |
Important Reminders When using a subcontractor to obtain/enhance relevancy provide subcontractor consent form, Exhibit B, or the information will not be considered Limitations on Subcontracting Clause applies Must do 15% with own forces IAW clause requirements Award in this process does not necessarily mean the lowest price wins
How Questions Will Be Handled
| Questions must be submitted in Exhibit F format via email to: Scott.ballweg@us.army.mil & regina.rockwood@us.army.mil |
| Submit questions NOT LATER THAN the fifth working day prior to closing and will be posted not later than two working days prior to closing. |
| Questions received after may be held and addressed after RFP closing with those offerors determined to be in the competitive range if discussions are deemed necessary |
| Do not call technical personnel or A&E- this will delay getting an answer |
Answers to Questions All questions, on a non-attribution basis, and the answers will be posted to the web site
| https://www.fbo.gov |
| If necessary addendums, issued by an amendment, will also be posted |
| Check web site regularly and don’t forget to refresh web page |
Helpful Websites
| www.ccr.gov/ |
| http://orca.bpn.gov/ |
| http://www.gpo.gov/davisbacon/all states.html |
| https://www.fbo.gov |
Questions
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .