RFP letter - Amendment 0002 Signed.pdf

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

LOUISVILLE DISTRICT, CORPS OF ENGINEERS

P.O. BOX 59

LOUISVILLE,KENTUCKY 40201-0059

REPLY T O

ATTENTION OF

Contracting Division 04 December 2025

AR6-Cram Company, Inc.

Brazos Roofing International of South Dakota Carmen Roofing Services, LLC Defense Roofing Solutions, LLC Reasor Roofing, LLC South Central Roofing, Inc.

Southwest Construction & Property Management, Inc.

Sustainable Building Solutions, LLC Tabcon, Inc.

Tri-Coast-Pac Tech JV LLLP

Dear MATOC Contractors:

Reference is made to Solicitation Number W912QR-52803153 for repair roofs at Fort Campbell CSO DoDEA Roof and RTU Replacement at Fort Campbell, KY.

SUMMARY OF CHANGES – AMENDMENT 0002

The required response date/time has changed from 05-DEC-2025 01:00 PM to 12-DEC-

2025 01:00 PM.

The following RFP components have been revised and replaced in their entirety:

00 10 00 SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

01 03 00.00 06 DESIGN SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AFTER AWARD

ATTACHMENT C CONCEPT DRAWINGS

All other terms and conditions remain unchanged.

END SUMMARY OF CHANGES

The amendment response is due with the proposal due date of 01:00 PM ET on 12 December 2025. Submit your proposal by email to Thomas Nauert at Thomas.S.Nauert@usace.army.mil, and Josh Westgate at Joshua.K.Westgate@usace.army.mil. Proposals not received by the stated date/time will not be considered. Please acknowledge receipt of this RFP amendment by signing below in the space provided and returning it with your proposal.

-2-

Please contact Thomas Nauert at Thomas.S.Nauert@usace.army.mil, and Josh Westgate at Joshua.K.Westgate@usace.army.mil with any remaining questions. If an Offeror believes that the requirements in the RFP contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound; the offeror shall immediately notify the Contract Specialist in writing with supporting rationale. The Offeror is reminded that the Government reserves the right to award this RFP based on the initial proposals, as received, without discussion.

Sincerely, Joshua K. Westgate Contracting Officer

W912QR-52803153 AMENDMENT 0002 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT:

(Signature) (Date)

(Printed Name)

(Firm Name)

P2#: 517619 DoDEA FT Campbell CSO Roof and RTUs FT Campbell, KY

SECTION 00 10 00

Certified Final Submittal

SECTION 00 10 00 – SOLICITATION CONTRACT FORM

SECTION 00 10 00 – Solicitation Contract Form

PRICE BREAKOUT SCHEDULE

OFFEROR’S NAME:

BID SCHEDULE

ITEM

NUMBER Description UNIT AMOUNT

BASE Design for RTU Replacement 0001 All work, labor, and materials required to design the Base and Options 1,2,and 3 work as described in this RFP

JOB $ __

0002 All work, labor, materials, and equipment required to construct RTU replacement as described in this RFP JOB $ _ _

TOTAL PROJECT BASE PROPOSAL $ __

OPTION 1 Construction of Roof Replacement 0003 All additional work, labor, and materials required to replace the roof system as described in this RFP. JOB $ __

OPTION 2 Construction of New BAS-DDC HVAC Controls

0004 All additional work, labor, materials, and equipment required to replace the BAS-DDC HVAC controls as described in this

RFP. JOB $ __

OPTION 3 Construction of Exterior Awning and Exterior Door Replacement

0005 All additional work, labor, and materials required to replace the exterior awning and exterior door replacement as described in this RFP. JOB $ __

OPTION 4 Design and Construction of New Lightning Protection System

0006 All additional work, labor, materials, and equipment required to design and construct new lightning protection system as described in this RFP. JOB $ __

TOTAL ALL OPTIONS PROPOSAL $_ __

Total All CLINs $_ __

*** AMENDMENT 0002***

P2#: 517619 DoDEA FT Campbell CSO Roof and RTUs FT Campbell, KY

SECTION 00 10 00

Certified Final Submittal

NOTES FOR CONTRACT LINE ITEM (CLIN) SCHEDULE

NOTE NO. 1. To better facilitate the receipt and proposal process, all modifications to proposals are to be submitted on copies of the latest Contract Line Item (CLIN) schedules as published in the solicitation or the latest amendment thereto. In lieu of indicating additions/deductions to line items, all Offerors should state their revised prices for each item.

NOTE NO. 2. Offerors must insert a price on all numbered items including options of the CLIN schedule. Failure to do so may result in the offer being unacceptable.

NOTE NO. 3. The Offeror’s Base Bid and all Options will be evaluated by lowest price. In accordance with 52.217-5, Evaluation of Options, the Government will evaluate offers for award purposes by adding the total price for all options to the total price for the basic requirement.

Evaluation of options will not obligate the government to exercise the option(s).

NOTE NO. 4. CLINs 0003 through 0006 are for the additional costs associated with increasing the project construction scope as described in the request for proposal.

NOTE NO. 5. All options may be exercised within 90 calendar days from issuance of Notice to Proceed. Exercising any, or all, of the options will not extend the Task Order period of performance.

NOTE NO. 6. Design for options 1,2,and 3 should be included in the base

CLIN 0001.

NOTE NO. 7. Design for Option 4 should be included in CLIN 0006.

P2# 517619 DODEA CSO ROOF AND RTU REPLACEMENT

FORT CAMPBELL, KY

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06

DESIGN SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AFTER AWARD

05/20

Amendment 0002

PART 1 GENERAL

1.1 INTRODUCTION

This section contains information needed after the successful Offeror has been selected. This information is provided to all Offerors as an outline of the Design requirements to be anticipated after award.

The information contained in this section applies to the design required for FTC CSO DoDEA ROOF AND RTU REPLACEMENT .

1.2 DESIGNER OF RECORD

The Design/Build (DB) Contractor shall identify the Designer of Record for each area of work, also to be indicated in the Design Quality Control Plan. One Designer of Record may be responsible for more than one area.

All areas of design disciplines including architectural, structural, mechanical, electrical, fire protection, shall be accounted for by a listed, Professional Registered, Designer of Record.Designer of Record shall also be a Registered Roof Consultant (RRC) in addition to all other requirements of the base MATOC. The Designers of Record shall stamp, sign, and date each design drawing submitted under their responsible discipline for the 100% Design; Corrected Final Design; and Released for Construction Design submittals.

Designers of Record shall be employees of, or contracted directly by, the Prime Contractor, or shall be an employee of an independent design firm that is contracted directly by the Prime Contractor. The Designer of Record shall not be an owner, employee, agent, or consultant of a construction sub-contractor hired for this project.

PART 2 PRODUCTS (Not Applicable)

PART 3 EXECUTION

3.1 CONTRACTOR'S GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AFTER AWARD

3.1.1 Design Quality Control Plan

The DB Contractor must submit for Government Acceptance, a Design Quality Control Plan in accordance with LRL Section 01 45 04.10 06 CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL before design may proceed.

3.1.2 Pre-Work Conference

See LRL Section 00 80 00.00 06 SPECIAL PROVISIONS, paragraph DESIGN

CONFERENCES.

ADMENDMENT 0002*************************************************************

3.1.3 Design Charette

The DB Contractor shall arrange for and conduct a design charette within 30

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 1

AMENDMENT 0002

days after NTP at Community Superintendent’s Office (CSO), Building 84, at Fort Campbell. All Designers of Record shall participate in the charette , but at a minimum the PM, Architect, and Mechanical Engineer are to be onsite. All other DORs must participate Virtually.

**********************************************************ADMENDMENT 0002

An agenda, charette goals, meeting place, and meeting time shall be provided to charette participants at least 10 days prior to the meeting.

Charette goals shall include production of the following items prior to adjourning the charette to assure all participants agree with the contractor's intended design direction: schematic design and narrative outlying the following: Site laydown area, equipment curb layout/ heights.

Additional requirements for selected options: roof sloping with drainage demark, BAS-DDC connection location, Awning layout (size, slope), and LPS attacment locations and grounding. .

Within 14 days after the charette, charette meeting minutes, including drawings developed during the charette, shall be prepared in Word format by the DB Contractor and provided to all charette participants by email.

The charette minutes shall be included in the Design Analysis for record.

Amendment 0002**************************************************************

3.1.4 Design Submittals for Fast Track

Design Submittals for Fast Track: The DB Contractor shall design and detail a complete and useable facility as outlined in this solicitation.

The DB Contractor may propose up to Two design/construction "parts" or "breaks" in the Project Schedule to facilitate fast track. The "parts" indicated in this specification are for example only.

Each "part" of this project shall be provided in a minimum of three formal review submittals, 65% design, 95% design, and corrected final. Each "part" shall be packaged separately from other "parts" or color coded through the entire project to assure that each "part" is adequately reviewed and completed in its entirety. "Parts" shall not have repeat drawings or specifications from other "parts".

Once established by the DB Contractor and accepted by the Government in the project schedule, the design/construction breaks for the "parts" shall not change without approval by the Contracting Officer. The design submittals shall include specifications, drawings, and design analysis, that pertain to the "part" submitted.

The following design and construction break-out "parts" are for example only. The DB Contractor may propose up to Two "parts" using the same series of submittals for each "part".

PART I Includes design for sitework and foundations with:

65% Design Submittal 95% Design Submittal Corrected Final Design Submittal Released for Construction documents

PART II Includes design for all work not accomplished with Part I with:

65% Design Submittal 95% Design Submittal

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 2

Corrected Final Design Submittal Released for Construction documents

3.1.5 Design Requirements

The design shall be completed in accordance with the requirements, codes, and standards itemized in LRL Section 01 11 50.00 06 SUMMARY OF WORK and further detailed in other sections in this RFP document.

**************************************************************Amendment 0002

3.1.6 NOT USED3.1.7 Design Documents Released for Construction

The DB Contractor shall provide a complete set of construction drawings, specifications, and design analysis, as defined in this RFP. This LRL Section 01 03 00.00 06 provides instructions for preparing design documents, Released for Construction, which differ from industry standard procedures, requiring a more complete and extensive analysis and documentation than is customary in private practice.

3.2 SUBMISSION OF DESIGN DOCUMENTS

The DB Contractor shall submit design documents with cover letter by overnight mail at each design submittal. The letter shall indicate the project name, due date for comments to be provided in DrChecks, and where/when the review meeting will be held.

The DB Contractor shall independently prepare and submit for review a complete design in "parts" for fast track. The DB Contractor's Designers of Record shall independently confirm and be responsible for the technical accuracy and adequacy of all aspects of the project design. The submission requirements outlined herein are the MINIMUM requirements. The Government may request that additional data be included in the design analysis and drawings for record through review comments to support design decisions.

3.2.1 Design Review Meetings

Formal Design Reviews shall be held at Community Superintendent’s Office (CSO), Building 84 for the following milestone meetings, similar for each designed "part" proposed by the DB Contractor:

95% Design Submittal Each Part: 95% Design Submittal

Design reviews shall not be taken as an approval or acceptance and do not relieve the DB Contractor from responsibility for compliance with the RFP solicitation, code regulations, or betterments, either listed with the DB Contractor's proposal or identified during the proposal evaluation.

3.2.2 Construction NTP

The DB Contractor shall submit a set of corrected final hardcopy drawings, specifications, and design analysis to the Contracting Officer for the any one "part". Construction for any one "part" may not proceed until the Government has verified the incorporation of resolutions of all review comments for that "part".

If all comments are satisfied and the Government accepts the Corrected Final Design documents for that "part", this set can become the Released for Construction documents. Non-critical comments, as determined by the Contracting Officer, can be resolved by a document change issued by the

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 3

Designer of Record.

If critical changes are still required to satisfy comments, the Contracting Officer may request a new set of documents for consideration as the Released for Construction documents. The DB Contractor will be notified in writing when the design has been cleared for construction and accepted by the Government.

Until the Released for Construction documents have been issued for any one "part" of the construction, any construction work performed for that "part" shall be at the DB Contractor’s expense and risk and shall be subject to inspection and correction of any non-conforming work. No progress payments will be made for such work under FAR 52.232-5, PAYMENTS UNDER FIXED PRICE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTS, subparagraph (b) Progress Payments, until the Released for Construction documents have been issued and the work inspected and accepted by the Government in accordance with

FAR 52.246-12, INSPECTION OF CONSTRUCTION.

3.2.3 Design Submittal Delivery

Document quantities and delivery addresses are specified at the end of this specification section for each required submittal.

3.2.4 Drawing Requirements

Computer-Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) drawings shall be organized and easily referenced electronically, presenting complete construction information. The DB Contractor shall prepare the drawings with the expectation that the Corps of Engineers, in the role of supervision, can construct the facility with any contractor.

Drawings shall be complete. Avoid unnecessary graphics, duplicate views, notes, and repetitive details. Do not include any details not applicable to the project and minimize blank page space. Do not include details of standard products or items adequately covered by specifications.

Detail the drawings such that conformance with the RFP can be confirmed, and to the extent that shop drawings can be checked. Do not use shop drawings as design drawings. Drawings shall include room finish schedules, corresponding color/finish/special items schedules, and exterior finish schedules that agree with the submitted SID binders.

The DB Contractor shall follow the latest release of the A/E/C CADD STANDARDfor presentation graphics, level/layer assignments, electronic file naming, and standard symbology. The standard is located on internet site, https://cadbim.usace.army.mil/CAD .

The design documents shall consist of drawings on a 34" x 22" format. The DB Contractor shall use the Corps of Engineers standard sheet border, available by download on internet site, https://cadbim.usace.army.mil/CAD , on all drawings with the appropriate DB Contractor firm name included within the title block area.

3.2.4.1 CADD System Requirements

Prepare all CADD drawings with the Using Agency's Computer-Aided Design and Drafting (CADD) system indicated in LRL Section 00 80 00.00 06 SPECIAL PROVISIONS, paragraph AS-BUILT DOCUMENTS FOR DESIGN BUILD PROJECTS.

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 4

3.2.4.2 Electronic Drawing Files (PDF)

In addition to the native CADD files, provide separate electronic drawing files for each project drawing in Adobe 6.0 or newer pdf format. Each file shall contain all the data for one complete drawing, including the date, submittal phase, and border. Each drawing file shall be completely independent of any data in any other file.

3.2.4.3 Drawing Index

Provide an index of drawings sheet in CADD as part of the drawing set, and an electronic list in Microsoft Excel of all drawings required for the submittal. Include the electronic file name, the sheet reference number, the sheet number, and the sheet title, containing the data for each drawing.

3.2.4.4 Hard Copies

Submitted hard copy drawings shall be plotted directly from the electronic PDF files and copied for quantities and sizes indicated in the distribution list at the end of this specification section. The original hard copy sheets shall be stamped and signed by the Designers of Record for 100% Design, Corrected Final Design, and Released for Construction documents, with copies provided for distribution from this set.

3.2.5 Specifications

3.2.5.1 Specification Format

Provide project specifications in electronic document files using the SpecsIntact system and format. The designers are expected to learn to properly use this system to generate printouts of indexes, submittal registers, automatic page numbering, automatic paragraph numbering, and specifications with mark-ups. Indexes, submittal registers, paragraph numbering, and formatting are created through the print command of the system.

The SpecsIntact system can be loaded from the Whole Building Design Guide (WBDG) internet site, http://www.wbdg.org/ccb/ccb.php . A teaching tutorial is provided with the system.

The master UFG specifications can be loaded from the same WBDG site.

Louisville District (LRL) versions of the guide specifications can be loaded from the district internet site, http://www.lrl.usace.army.mil/Missions/Engineering/GuidePubFTC.aspx , select"Louisville District Guide Specs".

3.2.5.2 Page Numbering

Provide page numbering at the bottom of each page for each specification section. The page number shall incorporate the specification section number (e.g. Section 01 03 00.00 06 Page 1).

3.2.5.3 Editing

The DB Contractor shall submit marked-up or final draft technical specifications as required for design submittals. Technical requirements provided in this RFP indicate minimum requirements that shall be used by

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 5 the Designers of Record to develop the corresponding UFGS. The Designers of Record shall edit appropriate Unified Facilities Guide Specifications (UFGS) in preparation of the technical specifications for the project.

The Louisville District (LRL) versions of the technical guide specifications shall be used in all cases where they are applicable. All other specifications shall be the UFGS army edition guide specifications unless otherwise noted or allowed by the Government. Use only this specification source for the project.

No additions or deletions shall be made to the products and execution methods of the UFGS unless allowed by the Government or instructions herein. When editing the UFGS, the Designers of Record shall fill in all blanks, make choices indicated by brackets, delete entire paragraphs pertaining to items not required in the project, and follow all recommendations in the hidden "Notes".

The technical requirements in the form of discipline specifications included in this RFP shall be used to develop the technical specifications for the project by the Designers of Record.

If the design is based on a specific product, the specification shall consist of the important features of the product in addition to the product and manufacturer. The specification shall be detailed enough such that another product meeting the specification could be substituted and it would not adversely impact the project.

3.2.5.4 Divisions 00 and 01

The DB Contractor shall not edit or reproduce Divisions 00 and 01. To assure consistency, copies of Division 00 and 01 shall not be included with the technical specifications; only the contract documents shall be used for Divisions 00 and 01. Divisions 00 and 01 are contract requirements; therefore, can only be changed by contract modification.

3.2.5.5 Hard Copies

Submitted hard copy documents shall be printed directly from the electronic specification files including an index of all specifications and, for each specification section, a specification index, the body of the specification, and the specification's submittal register. Provide adequate copies for quantities indicated in the distribution list at the end of this specification section.

3.2.5.6 Submittal Register

Develop the submittal requirements during construction at the design phase of the contract by producing a DB Contractor Submittal Register using the SpecsIntact system. The DB Contractor shall be responsible for listing all required submittals necessary to insure the project requirements are met. The submittal register shall identify submittal items such as shop drawings, manufacturer's literature, certificates of compliance, material samples, guarantees, test results, etc. that the DB Contractor shall submit for review and action during the life of the construction contract to the Designers of Record and Government.

In addition to submittals specifically identified with "G" in the UFG Specifications, submittals considered critical by the Designer of Record shall be marked as "G" in the specifications after the appropriate submittal. All submittals with "G" designation shall be approved by the

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 6

Designer of Record prior to purchase and installation. Submittals with no designation shall default to being submitted for information only (FIO), and shall be reviewed by the Designers of Record for compliance to the design. See Division 1 specifications in the RFP Package for additional construction submittal requirements.

The Contractor shall place all the Submittal Register pages for each specification in an appendix of the 65%, 100%, corrected final, and released for construction specifications.

3.2.6 Electronic Data

Electronic data of the drawings and specifications documents must be provided with each submittal. Data shall be on ISSO 9660 compact disc(s).

Amendment 0002**************************************************************

3.2.7 Design Analysis

The Designers of Record shall prepare a design analysis for record and review to support decisions made during the design process in accordance with the ER 1110-345-700; ENGINEERING AND DESIGN - DESIGN ANALYSIS, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS, which is available on the internet at the following website:

http://www.publications.usace.army.mil/USACEPublications/EngineerRegulations.aspx The design analysis shall be assembled as a single document with the following information included:

Table of Contents Design Quality Control Plan Architectural and Interior Design Narrative Mechanical Design Narrative Electrical Design Narrative Fire Protection/Life Safety Code Review AT/FP Review and Certification Structural Calculations Plumbing Calculations Mechanical Calculations Electrical Calculations Meeting Minutes and Official Correspondence All Annotated Review Comments (those received in the previous review) DD Form 1354 Building Information Checklist

************************************************************Amendment 0002

The narratives shall provide a complete explanation of the basis for design including a scope of work, applicable criteria, floor area analysis including gross and net areas compared to the RFP, seismic analysis, economic factors influencing system choices, results of field investigations, operation and maintenance requirements, and any other items that warrant special attention.

Design calculations shall be computed and checked by separate individuals. Include designer and checker with firm name on calculations. Show all design loads and conditions. List the source of loading conditions, formulas, and references. Explain assumptions and conclusion.

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 7

3.2.8 As-Built Documents

Provide as-built drawings and specifications in accordance with LRL Section 00 80 00.00 06 , SPECIAL PROVISIONS, paragraph AS-BUILT DOCUMENTS

FOR DESIGN BUILD PROJECTS.

3.3 DESIGN REVIEW & ACCEPTANCE REQUIREMENTS

3.3.1 Review Period

The Government requires 14 calendar days of review time for each design submittal phase of each part, including the Corrected Final Design. The Project Schedule must allow 14 calendar days after the Government's receipt of documents for review for each design submittal. If the submittal is considered incomplete by the Contracting Officer (not including required items as indicated in the paragraph above), the 14 day review period will start over upon the Government's receipt of the complete submittal.

The Project Schedule shall allow adequate time for mailing, designers receipt and review of comments, coordination and occurrence for a review meeting, acceptance by reviewers of comment resolutions, correction of the documents by all designers for the following submittal, and backchecking for corrections in accordance with comment resolutions by the DB Contractor prior to the following submittal.

DrChecks shall be used by the contractor and designers of record to monitor progress in comment resolution and respond to all comments from government reviewers.

3.3.2 DrChecks Review Comments

Review sets shall be distributed by the DB Contractor as shown on the attached distribution list. Copies of DrChecks comments shall be provided by the DB Contractor at review meetings to discuss preliminary responses.

Designers of Record shall be prepared to discuss the comments at the meetings since the comments are immediately available in the DrChecks system. Review meetings shall be held at Community Superintendent’s Office (CSO), Building 84 .

The DB Contractor shall keep the minutes of the meetings. The DB Contractor shall monitor DrChecks to assure all comments (including comments made on previous review submittals) are annotated and agreed to by the designers and reviewers prior to the next submittal. The DrChecks comments and responses shall be printed and included in the design analysis for record with meeting minutes.

The Government's review will likely result in a significant number of comments. Reviewers will expect coordination between Design Analysis calculations and the submitted design. Reviewers will also focus on the design submittal's satisfaction of the RFP Package, previously made review comments, and UFGS requirements.

The Designers of Record shall answer each comment in DrChecks with a formal response prior to the next submittal, clearly indicating what action will be taken and what drawing/specification will change.

Designers of Record are encouraged to directly contact reviewers to discuss and agree to the formal comment responses rather than relying only on DrChecks and review meetings to discuss comments. With the next

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 8 submittal, reviewers will backcheck answers to the comments against the submittal, in addition to reviewing additional design work.

Comments that, in the DB Contractor's opinion, require effort outside the scope of the contract will be clearly indicated as such in DrChecks. The DB Contractor shall not proceed with work outside the contract until a modification to the contract is properly executed.

3.3.2.1 DrChecks Initial Account Set-Up

To initialize an office's use of DrChecks, choose a POC within the office and call one of the LRL POCs (Jennifer Lopp 502-315-6465 or Mona Waldeck 502-315-6448), and request a new office be set-up through ProjNet.

ProjNet will issue the POC an office Vendor ID to distribute to others in the office. Individuals can then go to the www.projnet.org website and register as a first time user with this Vendor ID. Upon registration, each user will be given a personal password to the DrChecks system.

Once the office and individuals are registered, the COE project manager or lead reviewer can assign the individuals and/or offices to the specific project for review. At this point, persons assigned can make comments, annotate comments, and close comments, depending on their particular assignment.

3.3.2.2 DrChecks Reviewer Role

The role of the reviewer is to review the submittal and enter comments into the DrChecks system. To enter comments:

1. Log into DrChecks.

2. Click on the appropriate project.

3. Click on the appropriate review (60%, 95%, etc.). An Add comment screen will appear.

4. Select or fill out the appropriate sections (particularly comment discipline and type of document for sorting) of the comment form and enter the comment in the space provided.

5. Click the Add Comment button. The comment will be added to the database and a fresh screen will appear for the next comment you have.

6. Once comments are all entered, exit DrChecks by choosing "My Account" and then Logout.

3.3.2.3 DrChecks Comment Evaluation

The role of the designers of record is to evaluate and respond to the comments entered by reviewers. To respond to comments:

1. Log into DrChecks.

2. Click on the appropriate project.

3. Under “Evaluate” click on the number under “Pending”.

4. Locate the comments that require your evaluation. (Note: If you know the comment number you can use the Quick Pick window on your home

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 9 page in DrChecks; enter the number and click on go.)

5. Select the appropriate evaluation (concur, non-concur, for information only, or check and resolve) and add the response.

6. Click on the Add button. The evaluation will be added to the database and a fresh screen will appear with the next comment.

7. Once evaluations are all entered, exit DrChecks by choosing "My Account" and then Logout.

3.3.2.4 DrChecks Backcheck

Reviewers will backcheck comment annotations against new submittals to verify that the designers' responses are acceptable and completed. To backcheck comments:

1. Log into DrChecks.

2. Click on the appropriate project.

3. Under “My Backcheck” click on the number under “Pending”.

4. If you agree with the designer’s response select “Close Comment” and add a closing response if desired.

5. If you do not agree with the designer’s response or the submittal does not reflect the response given, select “Issue Open”, enter additional information.

6. Click on the Add button. The backcheck will be added to the database and a fresh screen will appear with the next comment.

7. Once backchecks are all entered, exit DrChecks by choosing "My Account" and then Logout .

The review is completed when there are no pending comments to be evaluated and there are no pending or open comments under backcheck.

3.3.3 Review Comments

Review sets will be distributed by the DB Contractor as shown on the attached distribution list. Comments will be made available to the Designers of Record prior to the review meetings. Review meetings to discuss the comments and preliminary responses will be held at Community Superintendent’s Office (CSO), Building 84 . The DB Contractor shall keep the minutes of the meetings. The DB Contractor shall collect and organize comments to assure all comments are annotated and agreed to by the designers and reviewers prior to the next submittal. The comments and responses shall be printed and included in the design analysis for record with meeting minutes.

The Government's review will likely result in a significant number of comments. The Designers of Record shall respond to comments, clearly indicating what action will be taken and what drawing/spec will change.

Designers of Record are encouraged to directly contact reviewers to discuss and agree to the formal comment responses rather than relying only on review meetings to discuss comments. With the next submittal, reviewers will backcheck answers to the comments against the submittal, in

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 10 addition to reviewing additional design work.

Comments that, in the DB Contractor's opinion, require effort outside the scope of the contract will be clearly indicated as such in the comment annotation. The DB Contractor shall not proceed with work outside the contract until a modification to the contract is properly executed.

3.3.4 Design Acceptance

The Government's review shall be considered a quality assurance review rather than a quality control review. The DB Contractor shall provide internal quality control as required by the DB Contractor's Design Quality Control Plan (LRL Section 01 45 04.10 06 CONTRACTOR QUALITY CONTROL) before the design is submitted to the Government. The DB Contractor's entire design team shall agree with the submitted design documents before submitting to the Government. Each design submittal shall be stamped "approved" by the DB Contractor, major constructors, and each designer of record involved, prior to submission for review. The Government's review or acceptance of design documents does not relieve the DB Contractor of his responsibility to provide a safe, functional project in accordance with the terms of the contract.

All copies of drawings submitted for the 100%, Corrected Final, and Released for Construction documents shall show signatures and seals by the Designers of Record. Quality control procedures shall consist of design and/or checking by the registered Designers of Record and an Independent Technical Review completed by a separate design professional. Complete names of designers and independent reviewers shall appear in each drawing title block to signify their review and approval.

Amendment 0002************************************************************

3.3.5 Project Design Progress Meetings

The DB Contractor (including appropriate design representatives) shall participate in project design progress meetings through phone conferences as dictated by the Contracting Officer. The DB Contractor shall be responsible for preparation and distribution of meeting minutes to all subcontractors, designers of record, and the Contracting Officer. Meeting requirements include the following:

Monthly Design Progress Meetings - At a minimum, the Construction Project Manager, Design Project Manager, and appropriate Design Professionals shall attend.

Additional meetings may be required, if in the Government's opinion, they are required to facilitate the design process.

**************************************************************Amendment 0002

3.4 DESIGNER REQUIREMENTS DURING CONSTRUCTION

Notice-to-Proceed for construction for any Part will be provided in writing from the Contracting Officer to the DB Contractor after that "part" of design has been completed and approved by the Designers of Record, all comments pertaining to that "part" have been cleared through DrChecks, the Corrected Final documents have been reviewed by the Government, and any corrections made to the satisfaction of the Designers of Record and the Government reviewers.

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 11

3.4.1 Documents Released for Construction

As the first item of work after notice to proceed is given for construction to begin on any "part", the DB Contractor shall furnish to the Government 3 sets 11"x17" and 3 full size 22"x34" sets of the Released for Construction drawings for that "part", and 3 sets of the Released for Construction specifications for that "part". Each part's set of drawings and specifications shall be clearly marked for the "part" included and as "Released for Construction" and stamped by responsible Designers of Record. At no time shall drawings or specifications NOT marked "Released for Construction" be used on the site for construction.

Provide "Released for Construction" hardcopy drawings, specifications, and design analysis. Also provide native CADD files, drawing pdf files, native specification files, specification pdf files, and design analysis pdf files on CD. See Distribution List for quantity and distribution.

3.4.2 Construction and Design Progress

Construction shall only be allowed on work for which the design has been reviewed and approved by the Designers of Record and accepted by Government reviewers.

Amendment 0002**************************************************************

3.4.3 Construction Progress Meetings

The DB Contractor (including appropriate design representatives) shall participate in project progress meetings at Community Superintendent’s Office (CSO), Building 84 . The DB Contractor shall be responsible for preparation and distribution of meeting minutes to all subcontractors, designers of record, and the Contracting Officer. Meeting minutes shall include a list of those in attendance and notes from any site visits after the meeting with the designers of record. Meeting requirements include the following:

(1) Weekly Coordination Meetings - At a minimum, the Construction Project Manager (onsite or virtual) , Project Superintendent, Design Project Manager (as needed ) , and appropriate sub-contractors shall attend.

(2) Additional meetings may be required, if in the Government's opinion, they are needed to facilitate the construction process.

**************************************************************Amendemnt 0002

3.4.4 Site Visits

The Designers of Record shall be required to visit the site during construction, prior to and during critical work. Site visits shall be scheduled with the Contracting Officer for a minimum of 3 site visits per discipline for appropriate Designers of Record for which work is taking place.

3.4.5 Construction Submittals

The Designers of Record shall review and approve all project construction submittals.

Amendment 0002*************************************************************

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 12

3.4.6 Pre-Inspection Meeting (Red Zone)

The contractor shall participate in the pre-inspection meeting (Red Zone Meeting) 45 days prior to the Building Occupancy Date (BOD). The Red Zone Meeting can align with the 3 required site visits for the DORs.

************************************************************Amendment 0002

3.5 95% SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

The 95% design submission shall consist of 95% complete drawings, specifications, and design analysis for utilities, architectural, structural, mechanical, HVAC direct digital controls, and electrical.

The government will NOT accept the design submittal for review if any of these items are not provided at 100% completion.

The 95% design submission shall consist of drawings, specifications, and design analysis for each "part" submitted. The government will NOT accept the design submittal "part" for review if any of the following items are not provided at 95% completion.

3.5.1 Drawings

Submit 11"x17" review drawings complete with all RFP requirements incorporated into the documents to provide a 100% design for utilities, architectural, structural, mechanical, HVAC direct digit controls and electricaleach "part" submitted.

All drawings submitted shall be designed and/or checked by licensed professionals in the applicable area of expertise (Designers of Record).

Each 100% Design Drawing shall bear the seal of the licensed professional responsible for the design work on that drawing (Designers of Record).

3.5.2 Design Analysis

The Design Professional shall prepare an independent Design Analysis and calculations necessary to confirm and support all design documents submitted for acceptance. The designers of record shall prepare an independent design analysis with calculations necessary to confirm and support all design work submitted. For parts including sitework, site specific civil calculations shall be included. For parts including structural work, structural calculations shall be included. For parts including architectural work, life safety and building code analysis and building floor area analysis shall be included. For parts including mechanical work, HVAC analysis and calculations, and sprinkler system analysis shall be included. For parts including electrical work, electrical load analysis and calculations, electrical short circuit and protective device coordination analysis and calculations shall be included.

Provide hardcopy design analysis.

3.5.3 Specifications

Specifications shall be 100% complete for all disciplines. Specifications and indexes shall be provided clean, using SpecsIntact with all tags, deletions, and underlines turned off. Provide hardcopy specifications.

3.5.4 Submittal Register

The DB Contractor shall prepare the Submittal Register using the SpecsIntact program and submit it with the 100% design specifications (see

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 13

LRL Section 01 33 00.00 06 SUBMITTAL PROCEDURES ). Submittals for each specification section shall be included in the submittal register.

3.5.5 Preparation of DD Form 1354 (Transfer of Real Property)

This form itemizes the types, quantities and costs of various equipment and systems that comprise the project, for the purpose of transferring the new construction project from the Corps Construction Division to the Installation's inventory of real property. The "DD Form 1354 Building Information Checklist" from UFC 1-300-08, Appendix D is included in the appendices to be completed by the DB Contractor. The completed checklist shall be submitted with the 100% design in the Design Analysis.

Near project construction completion, the DB Contractor shall coordinate with the Contracting Officer to provide this checklist, updated for the as-built conditions including information such as manufacturers and model numbers for equipment installed. The Government will use this checklist to complete the final DD 1354 upon completion of construction.

3.5.6 NOT USED

Amendment 0002**************************************************************

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 14

3.6 DESIGN SUBMITTAL DISTRIBUTION LIST

Each submittal reviewer copy shall include all items for any one design submittal, ie. hardcopy drawings of 1/2 size , specifications, and design analysis. Provide CDs w/ drawings, specifications, and design analysis files.

SID and FF&E binders will be returned to the DB Contractor after each review for revisions. Reviewers will not insert/exchange pages/boards for revisions.

The 100% completed design binders, and any changes to the binders during construction, will be mailed to those listed below for record and reference. The DB Contractor shall retain one copy for field use.

Note: 100% for SID and FF&E represents the corrected final, completing shortly after the Released For Construction Design submittal.

Submittal Reviewers & Mailing Addresses Copies Required

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1 Project Engineer: William Firisin USACE, Louisville District 600 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Place Louisville, KY 40202

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers 1 Project Manager Jack Oakley

USACE, Louisville District 600 Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Place Louisville, KY 40202

USACE RRC 1

Timothy M. McClellan USACE, Louisville District 600 Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr Place Louisville, KY 40202

DoDEA Angela Graben, PhD 2 Supv. Facilities Operations Specialist DoDEA Americas Southeast District 1110 Falcon Loop Ft. Campbell, KY 422233

FT Campbell DPW: 1 Marc Lewis 3709 Polk Rd. Ste. B FT Campbell, KY 42223

Ft Campbell 2 Laura Villar: Resident Engineer Ft Campbell Resident Office Louisville District US Army Corps of Engineers 3709 Polk Road Suite B Ft Campbell, KY 42223 ************************************************************Amendment 0002

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 15

-- End of Section --

SECTION 01 03 00.00 06 Page 16

PROJECT SITE

PROJECT SITE

AREA OF

CONSTRUCTION

ACCESS

GATE

ACCESS ROUTEACC

ESS R

O U

TE

PROJECT SITE

MAP ENLARGEMENT

.ARCHITECTURAL.

AD1.0 ROOF - CONCEPT DEMOLITION PLAN

A1.3 ROOF PLAN

.GENERAL.

G1.1 GENERAL NOTES, SYMBOLS AND ABBREVIATIONS

US Army Corps of Engineers ®

SHEET ID

U S

A R

M Y

C O

R P

S O

F E

N G

IN

E

E R

S

D R

A W

N B

Y

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

S U

B M

IT

T

E D

B Y

S

IZ

E

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

A N

S I D

IS

S

U E

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T

N O

S O

L

IC

IT

A

T

IO

N N

O

N

3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

L

J

G

E

C

A

D A

T E

US Army Corps of Engineers ®

SOLICITATION NO.:

CONTRACT NO.:

ISSUE DATE:

VOLUME:

M A

R K

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

P

M

K

H

F

D

B

G0.1

C O

V E

R S

H E

E T

F O

R T

C A

M P

B E

L L K

E N

T U

C K

Y

C O

N C

E P

T N

O T

F O

R C

O N

S T

R U

C T

IO

N

F T

C C

S O

D o D

E A

R O

O F

A N

D R

T U

R E

P L A

C E

M E

N T

FORT CAMPBELL, KENTUCKY

FTC CSO DoDEA ROOF AND RTU REPLACEMENT

CONCEPT, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION

DRAWING INDEX

.MECHANICAL.

M1.0 MECHANICAL PLAN

.ELECTRICAL.

E-1.0 ROOFTOP POWER EQUIPMENT PLAN

E-2.0 DODEA Rooftop HVAC Power

BUILDING ID: 84

NORTHNORTH

CONSTRUCTION LAYDOWN AREAVICINITY MAP ENLARGEMENTVICINITY MAP

NORTH

118' - 2" 60' - 1 1/8" 110' - 4 1/8"

66' - 1 1/4" 43' - 0 3/8"

/8

/8

3' - 6 5/8"

3' - 5 1/2"

18' - 0 1/8" 73' - 1 1/2" 16' - 11 7/8" 33' - 0 3/4"

/4

/8

D-22.1

D-22.1

E07-01

D-23.1

E07-02

E07-02

E07-02

D-23.1

D-22.1

D-23.1

D-22.1D-22.1

D-23.1

D-22.1

D-22.1

D-23.1

D-22.1

D-23.1

D-22.1

D-22.1

D-23.1

D-22.1D-22.1

D-23.1

D-22.1

D-23.1

D-22.1

D-22.1

D-07.1

D-22.1

D-23.1

D-07.1

D-07.1D-07.1

D-07.1D-07.1

D-07.1D-07.1

D-07.1D-07.1

E07-01

E07-01

D-10.1

D-07.3

D-07.2

D-07.3

D-07.3

D-07.3

D-07.3

D-07.3 D-07.3

D-07.3

D-07.3

D-07.3 D-07.3

D-07.3

D-07.3

A1.3

A1.3

REFERENCE KEYNOTES

EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE JOISTS

EXISTING GYPSUM FORM BOARD

TO REMAIN

EXISTING POURED GYPSUM,

THICKNESS VARIES FROM 2" TO 2.5"

TO REMAIN

EXISTING NAILED FIBERGLASS

BASE SHEET TO BE DEMO'D

SPRAYED POLYURETHANE FOAM

TO BE DEMO'D

SILICONE COATING TO BE DEMO'D

SKIM COAT / PATCH POURED GYP

AFTER CUTTING BULB TEES N

E

W

US Army Corps of Engineers ®

SHEET ID

U S

A R

M Y

C O

R P

S O

F E

N G

IN

E

E R

S

D R

A W

N B

Y

D E

S

IG

N E

D B

Y

S U

B M

IT

T

E D

B Y

S

IZ

E

C H

E C

K E

D B

Y

A N

S I D

IS

S

U E

D A

T E

C O

N T

R A

C T

N O

S O

L

IC

IT

A

T

IO

N N

O

N

3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19

L

J

G

E

C

A

D A

T E

M A

R K

D E

S C

R

IP

T

IO

N

2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20

P

M

K

H

F

D

B

AD1.0

R O

O F

C

O N

C E

P T

D E

M O

L

IT

IO

N

P L A

N

F O

R T

C A

M P

B E

L L K

E N

T U

C K

Y

F T

C C

S O

D o D

E A

R O

O F

A N

D R

T U

R E

P L A

C E

M E

N T

SCALE: 1" = 10'-0"

CONCEPT ROOF DEMO PLAN

SCALE: 1" = 1'-0"

EXISTING ROOF CONCEPT DEMO

NORTH

D-07.1 BID OPTION 1: DEMO EXISTING ROOFING SYSTEM TO

DECK. PATCH DECK WHERE DAMAGED BY DEMO AND

PREVIOUS BULB TEE FASTENERS.

D-07.2 BASE BID: REMOVE 4FT PERIMETER SECTION OF

ROOFING AROUND THE RTU REPLACEMENTS TO ALLOW

PROPER FLASHING AND PUT BACK OF ROOFING

SYSTEMS. (NOT APPLICABLE IF BID OPTION 1 ACCEPTED)

D-07.3 BID OPTION 1: DEMO SECTION AROUND ROOF DRAIN

PENETRATION TO ALLOW FOR CAPPING OF PIPE AND

PATCH BACK OF ROOFING. NOTE LOCATIONS WHERE

DRAIN BODY IS WITHIN 4FT DISTANCE OF RTU

REPLACEMENT; IN THIS INSTANCE ONLY DRAINS TO BE

REMOVED AND CAPPED WITH BASE BID SCOPE.

D-10.1 BID OPTION 3: REMOVE EXISTING FABRIC AWNING AND

FRAME.

D-22.1 BID OPTION 1: DEMO EXISTING ROOF DRAINS. REMOVE

DRAIN BODY AND PIPING BELOW DECK. CAP ABANDONED

LINES AND LABEL LINES WHERE UNABLE TO REMOVE.

D-23.1 BASE BID: DEMO EXISTING ROOF TOP UNITS TO PREPARE

FOR NEW REPLACEMENT OF UNITS, COORDINATE WITH

MECHANICAL INFO FOR REMOVAL.

D-23.2 BASE BID: DEMO ABANDONED GAS LINES ON ROOF.

E07-01 EXISTING ROOF EDGE

E07-02 EXISTING ROOF EXPANSION JOINT TO BE REMOVED AND

REPLACED.

R E

V

IS

E D

IN

A

C C

O R

D A

N C

E W

IT

H

A M

E N

D M

E N

T

ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES

A. ROOF PLAN GENERAL NOTES APPLY TO ALL ROOF PLAN

SHEETS.

B. ROOF SLOPES ARE CREATED BY TAPERED IN INSULATION.

C. TAPERED INSULATION SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM OF 1/2-INCH

PER FOOT OF SLOPE TO ROOF DRAINS, UNLESS NOTED

OTHERWISE.

D. ALL ROOF CURBS TO BE A MINIMUM OF 8 INCHES ABOVE

ROOFING LEVELS. PROVIDE TAPERED INSULATION ROOF

SADDLES AT ROOF CURBS TO PROVIDE DRAINAGE AROUND

CURB.

COORDINATE THE SIZE AND LOCATION OF ROOF PENETRATIONS

FOR MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT. REFER TO

MECHANICAL AND ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR PENETRATIONS

NOT SHOWN ON THIS DRAWING.

E. FLASH PENETRATION, CURBS, VENTS AND STACKS PER

MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS IF DETAIL NOT SHOWN

ON DRAWINGS.

/2

1/2" / 1'-0"

/2

1/2" / 1'-0"

/8

" / 1 '-0

/8

A-10.1

A-7.2

A-7.3

A-7.21 A-7.4

A-7.5

A-7.5

A-7.5

A-7.2

A-7.21

A-7.4

A-7.4

A-7.2

A-7.2

A-7.21

A-7.2

A-7.21

A-7.2

A-7.21

A-7.21

A-7.3

A-7.3 A-7.4

A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6

A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6 A-7.6

A-7.7

A-7.6

A-7.7

A-7.8

/2

/2

/2

/2

A-7.9

A-7.9 A-7.10

A-7.10 A-7.9 A-7.9

A-7.9

A-7.9

A-7.9

RIDGERIDGE RIDGE RIDGE RIDGE

RID

GE

RIDG

E

RID

GE

RIDG

E

A-7.11

A-7.11

A-7.11

2' - 6" TYP.

/8

5' - 0"

2' - 6"

2' - 6"1

A1.3

TYP.

A1.3

TYP.

"4' - 0"

4' - 0"

PRE-FINISHED METAL DRIP EDGE

WITH HEMMED EDGE

ROOFING MEMBRANE.

SHINGLE LAP OVER

EDGE PER

MENUFACTURER

WRITTEN INSTRUCTIONS

GALVANIZED ROOFING SHEET

METAL FASTERNERS AT 4" OC

STAGGERED OR PER MFG

WRITTEN INSTARTUCTIONS

RIGID POLY-ISO

ROOFING INSULATION

EXISTING ROOF

DECK SYSTEM.

TREATED WOOD NAILERS

METAL FASCIA CLEAT FASTENED

TO NAILERS 12"OC MIN

PRE-FINISHED SHEET

METAL GUTTER EXISTING EXTERIOR WALL

SELF ADHERED FLASHING

EDGE MEMBRANE

WOOD NAILER

METAL

COUNTERFLASHING

WITH DRIP EDGE,

INSTALL SELF

ADHERED FLASHING AT

POINT OF SCREW

ATTACHMENT

RTU

INSULTATED

RTU CURB

ROOF DECK ASSEMBLY

ROOFING MEMBRANE

FASTENERS AT 12" OC

WOOD NAILERS

A B

O V

E F

IN

IS

H E

D R

O O

F

IN

G

M

IN

REFERENCE KEYNOTES

EXISTING ROOF STRUCTURE JOISTS

EXISTING GYPSUM FORM BOARD TO

REMAIN

EXISTING POURED GYPSUM, THICKNESS

VARIES FROM 2" TO 2.5"

EXISTING NAILED FIBERGLASS BASE

SHEET

EXISTING SPRAYED

POLYURETHANE FOAM

EXISTING SILICONE COATING

CUT EXISTING ROOFING SYSTEM BACK

PER PLANS

INSTALL SEPARATION BOARD AND SEALANT

JOINT AT INSTALL OF NEW ROOFING COVER

BOARD HEIGHT TRANSITION. THIS CAN BE

REMOVED AT LATER DATE TO ALLOW INSTALL

OF REMAINED OF ROOFING.

NEW ROOFING ASSEMBLY SLOPED TO DRAIN

OVER EDGE

APPLY FLEXIBLE MEMBRANE IN CONTINUOUS

BED OF SILICONE ADHESIVE BETWEEN

EXISTING ROOFING AND NEW MEMBRANE

BACKER ROD AND SEALANT OVER EXTERIOR

ROOFING BOARD TO ASSIST IN SETTING NEW

POLY ISO.

NEW EXISTING

1/2" / 1'-0"

V A

R

IE

S

ROOF SLOPE LINE FOR FULL ROOF

REPLACEMENT. CONTINUOUS

UNINTERUPTED SLOPE TO EDGES

• IF BASE BID OPTION ALONE IS ACCEPTED WITHOUT

THE FULL ROOF REPLACEMENT IN OPTION 1 THE

ROOFING MATERIAL TRANSITIONS SHALL BE

JOINTED FROM NEW TO OLD AS FOLLOWS:

• REPLACEMENT OF RTU UNITS WITH CURBS

AND FLASHINGS AS DESCRIBED ABOVE.

1. RTU VERTICAL PLACEMENT SHALL BE

SET TO THE HEIGHT OF THE NEW ROOF

SLOPE ELEVATION.

• REPLACE ROOFING SYSTEM A DISTANCE OF

4FT OFFSET FROM ALL FINISHED EDGES OF

THE RTU UNITS AS INDICATED IN THE

DRAWINGS. PROVIDE TRANSITION STRIP

AND FLASHING TO THE EXISTING ROOFING

SYSTEM FROM THE NEW.

THE INTENT OF THIS DETAIL IS TO FACILITATE AN

EASIER ROOFING SYSTEM REPLACEMENT FOR THE

MAJORITY OF…