W912PL-19-R-0001_Amendment0002.pdf

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or electronic communication which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE

RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by letter or electronic communication, provided each letter or electronic communication makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NUMBER 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUISITION NUMBER 5. PROJECT NUMBER (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NUMBER

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended. is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NUMBER AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER

NUMBER IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation data, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (Number, street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

Previous edition unusable

W912PL

VA LONG BEACH COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER, LONG BEACH, CA

Amendment is issued to provide the following revisions to the above-referenced solicitation: see continuation page

USACE, Los Angeles District 915 Wilshire Boulevard, Suite 930 Los Angeles, California 90017-3401 Attn:Contracting Division CESPL-CT-W

SEE ITEM 6

W912PL-19-R-0001

1 424

12/20/2018

11/02/2018

INSTRUCTIONS (Back Page):

Instructions for items other than those that are self-explanatory, are as follows:

Item 1 (Contract ID Code). Insert the contract type identification code that appears in the title block of the contract being modified.

Item 3 (Effective date).

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

For a solicitation amendment, change order, or administrative change, the effective date shall be the issue date of the amendment, change order, or administrative change.

For a supplemental agreement, the effective date shall be the date agreed to by the contracting parties.

For a modification issued as an initial or confirming notice of termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date and the modification number of the confirming notice shall be the same as the effective date and modification number of the initial notice.

For a modification converting a termination for default to a termination for the convenience of the Government, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the termination for default.

For a modification confirming the contracting officer's determination of the amount due in settlement of a contract termination, the effective date shall be the same as the effective date of the initial decision.

(a)

(b)

(c)

(d)

(e)

(f)

Item 6 (Issued By). Insert the name and address of the issuing office. If applicable, insert the appropriate issuing office code in the code block.

Item 8 (Name and Address of Contractor). For modifications to a contract or order, enter the contractor's name, address, and code as shown in the original contract or order, unless changed by this or a previous modification.

Items 9, (Amendment of Solicitation Number - Dated), and 10, (Modification of Contract/Order Number - Dated). Check the appropriate box and in the corresponding blanks insert the number and date of the original solicitation, contract, or order.

Item 12 (Accounting and Appropriation Data).

When appropriate, indicate the impact of the modification on each affected accounting classification by inserting one of the following entries:

(2) Accounting classification Net decrease $

Include subject matter or short title of solicitation/contract where feasible.

Item 16B. The contracting officer's signature is not required on solicitation amendments. The contracting officer's signature is normally affixed last on supplemental agreements.

(i)

NOTE: If there are changes to multiple accounting classifications that cannot be placed in block 12, insert an asterisk and the words "See continuation sheet".

Item 13. Check the appropriate box to indicate the type of modification. Insert in the corresponding blank the authority under which the modification is issued. Check whether or not contractor must sign this document. (See FAR 43.103.)

Item 14 (Description of Amendment/Modification).

Organize amendments or modifications under the appropriate Uniform Contract Format (UCF) section headings from the applicable solicitation or contract. The UCF table of contents, however, shall not be set forth in this document.

Indicate the impact of the modification on the overall total contract price by inserting one of the following entries:

(i) Total contract price increased by $

(ii) Total contract price decreased by $

(iii) Total contract price unchanged.

State reason for modification.

When removing, reinstating, or adding funds, identify the contract items and accounting classifications.

(g)

(h)

When the SF 30 is used to reflect a determination by the contracting officer of the amount due in settlement of a contract terminated for the convenience of the Government, the entry in Item 14 of the modification may be limited to --

(i) A reference to the letter determination; and

(ii) A statement of the net amount determined to be due in settlement of the contract.

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 11/2016) BACK

(1) Accounting classification Net increase $

VA LONG BEACH COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER

LONG BEACH, LOS ANGELES COUNTY, CA W912PL-19-R-0001

SF 30 CONTINUATION PAGE 1 OF 2

Amendment 0002

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

DIVISION 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

Section Number Section Title

00 22 16 SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

00 73 46 DAVIS BACON ACT WAGE DECISION (RATES)

DIVISION 01 – 48 - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS

Section Number Section Title

08 00 00 GLAZING

09 67 23.50 RESINOUS TERRAZZO FLOORING

09 72 00 WALL COVERINGS

09 72 90 INTERIOR SOLID PHENOLIC WALL SYSTEMS

09 75 13 INTERIOR STONE FACING

09 77 23 FABRIC-WRAPPED PANELS

DRAWINGS

Sheet Number Sheet Title

170-AS120C CLC FLOOR PLAN LEVEL B AREA C

170-AS151E CLC RELECTED CEILING PLAN LEVEL 1 AREA E

170-AS400 CLC EXTERIOR SECTION DETAILS

170-AS401 CLC EXTERIOR SECTION DETAILS

170-AS402 CLC EXTERIOR SECTION DETAILS

170-AS405 CLC EXTERIOR SECTION DETAILS

170-AS406 CLC EXTERIOR SECTION DETAILS

170-AS407 CLC EXTERIOR SECTION DETAILS

170-AS600 CLC DOOR SCHEDULE - BASEMENT

170-AS601 CLC DOOR SCHEDULE - LEVEL 1

170-AS602 CLC DOOR SCHEDULE - LEVEL 2

170-AS603 CLC DOOR SCHEDULE - LEVEL 3 + ROOF

170-AS610 CLC WINDOW & LOUVER SCHEDULE

170-MH003 COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES

170-MH004 COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES

170-MH011 COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER EQUIPMENT SCHEDULES

170-MH121B COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL

1 AREA B

170-MH121D COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER MECHANICAL FLOOR PLAN LEVEL

1 AREA D

SF 30 CONTINUATION PAGE 2 OF 2

SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

DRAWINGS – CONTINUED

Sheet Number Sheet Title

170-MH122A COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER SECOND FLOOR MECHANICAL

PLAN AREA A

170-MH122B COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER SECOND FLOOR MECHANICAL

PLAN AREA B

170-MH122C COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER SECOND FLOOR MECHANICAL

PLAN AREA C

170-MH122D COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER SECOND FLOOR MECHANICAL

PLAN AREA D

170-MH123A COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER THIRD FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN

AREA A

170-MH123C COMMUNITY LIVING CENTER THIRD FLOOR MECHANICAL PLAN

AREA C

170-SS121B CLC FOUNDATION PLAN - LEVEL 1 AREA B

APPENDICES

Appendix Title

APPENDIX B

(NEW)

UPDATED GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION PROPOSED

MENTAL HEALTH FACILITIES, COMMUNITY LIVING CENER,

PARKING STRUCTURE, AND CO-ENGERATION PLANT

SECTION 00 22 16

SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

600-405B

VA Long Beach Community Living Center Project Long Beach, California

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.4 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND DESIGN BID BUILD PROCESS

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.2 CONTRACTOR TEAM ARRANGEMENTS

3.0 GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT

VOLUME 1 – Technical Proposal

4.0 EVALUATION FACTORS AND WEIGHTING

5.0 TAB 1A - FACTOR 1 - PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.2 SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVE

5.3 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA

6.0 TAB 1B - FACTOR 2 - PRIME CONTRACTOR KEY PERSONNEL

6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

7.0 TAB 1C - FACTOR 3 - ORGANIZATIONAL, TECHNICAL, AND RISK

MANAGEMENT APPROACH

7.1 SUMISSION REQUIREMENTS

7.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

8.0 TAB 1D - FACTOR 4 - PROPOSED SCHEDULE

8.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

8.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

9.0 TAB 1E - FACTOR 5 - SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION

9.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

9.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

VOLUME 2 – Price Proposal

10.0 PRICE

10.1 TAB 2A - PRICE (STANDARD FORM 1442 AND CONTRACT LINE

ITEM SCHEDULE)

10.2 TAB 2B – BID BOND

10.3 TAB 2C – STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

10.4 TAB 2D – SUBCONTRACTING PLAN

10.5 TAB 2E – SECTION 00 06 00 , REPRESENTATIONS AND

CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS

10.6 TAB 2F – PRE-AWARD SURVEY DATA INFORMATION

11.0 SOURCE SELECTION EVALUATION BOARD (SSEB)

11.2 EVALUATION

11.3 DEFINITIONS

12.0 EVALUATION AND RATING SYSTEM

13.0 BASIS OF AWARD

14.0 ATTACHMENTS

1. PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION SHEET

2. PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE

3. PAST PERFORMANCE TRANSMITTAL LETTER

4. RESUME FOR PRIME CONTRACTOR KEY PERSONNEL

5. PROPOSED CONTRACT DURATION, STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE

SAMPLE

6. SMALL BUSINESS PARTICIPATION PLAN

7. PROPOSAL DATA SHEETS

1.0 OVERVIEW

1.1 This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits for the construction of a new 181,000 SF, 120-bed Community Living Center (CLC). This is to be a three-story building located at the VA Long Beach campus in Long Beach, CA.

1.2 This contract will be Firm Fixed Price awarded competitively through an unrestricted solicitation process and will utilize a best value/tradeoff process as per FAR Part 15.101.

1.3 In response to this RFP, Offerors shall prepare a proposal that is: 1) specific and complete in every detail; 2) straightforward and concise in describing the Offerors capabilities to satisfactorily perform the contract; 3) practical, legible, clear, and coherent: and 4) clear in communicating how the Offeror shall perform in accordance with the attached Scope of Work, contract documents, and within strict accordance of the terms and conditions specified herein.

1.4 Failure to submit all the data in the format indicated in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for evaluation, and for subsequent award.

1.5 PROPOSAL SUBMISSION AND BEST VALUE/TRADE-OFF PROCESS.

This process permits tradeoffs among cost or price and non-cost factors and allows the Government to accept other than the lowest priced proposal. Offerors submit their performance and capability information (non-cost factors) for review and consideration by the Government. Relative weights among technical factors are provided in paragraph 4, Evaluation Factors & Weighting. The Government reviews, evaluates, and rates the proposals against the source selection criteria in the RFP. If discussions are necessary a competitive range consisting of the most highly qualified technical offerors will be established. Concurrently, the Government analyzes the Offerors’ price proposals. Price will not be rated, but will be a factor in making the final best value determination for award. The Source Selection Authority (SSA) compares proposals to one another and determines the best value for the government.

2.0 GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Firms formally organized as single entity firms that have associated specifically for this project, consortia of firms, or any other interested parties may submit proposals. Associations may be as joint ventures or as key team subcontractors. Any legally organized Offeror may submit a proposal.

2.2 CONTRACTOR TEAM ARRANGEMENTS

2.2.1 Contractor Team Arrangements are considered an arrangement in which (1) two or more companies form a partnership or joint venture to act as a potential prime contractor; or (2) a potential prime contractor agrees with one or more other companies to have them act as its subcontractors under a specified Government contract or acquisition program. In accordance with FAR Subpart 9.6, the Government will recognize the integrity and validity of contractor team arrangements;

provided, the arrangements are identified and company relationships are fully disclosed in the offer. The Offeror shall identify the major or critical aspects of the requirements to be performed by those identified in the Contractor Team Arrangement. The submission must contain a narrative that clearly explains the relevance to a particular factor of information concerning a company that is part of a Contractor Team Arrangement. The Government will consider the adequacy of this explanation in deciding the relevance of the information to this procurement.

2.2.2 Any Offeror submitting an offer in the name of a joint venture, shall include a fully executed copy of the joint venture agreement with the offer. Joint venture agreements which require SBA approval may be submitted absent the requisite SBA Servicing Agency approving authorities' signature; however, the Offeror shall submit evidence from the Offerors SBA Servicing Agency that the Offeror has notified and discussed the proposed joint venture for this project with the appropriate SBA personnel.

2.3 Offerors shall submit their proposal to the address shown in Block 7 of Standard Form 1442.

2.4 Proposals are due no later than the time and date specified in Block 13 of Standard Form 1442.

2.5 Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer and not to assume that discussions with the Government will be held and/or that they will be asked to submit a revised offer.

3.0 GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT

3.1 Title Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, Offeror name, and date of the submittal.

3.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents. If more than one binder is used, the complete table of contents shall be included in each. Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

3.3 Printed Matter Submissions. For this project the Offerors shall submit the following:

3.3.1 Volume 1, Technical Proposal. Offers shall submit one original (1) and five (5) printed copies of the Technical Proposal.

Written material shall be on 8 1/2 x 11 inch paper printed in no less than a 10 pitch or 10 fonts. 11 x 17 pages will be allowed only if the written material is provided in 8 1/2 x 11 formats and the remainder of the page is used for illustrations to assist in conveying the narrative message. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, shall be considered a maximum. Pages in excess of any specified limitation shall not be evaluated. A single 8 1/2 x 11 or 11 x 17 inch sheet with written material on one side only shall constitute one page. However, if both sides of the sheet bear written material then this single sheet shall be counted as two pages.

3.3.2 Volume 2, Price Proposal. Offers shall submit one (1) printed copy of the Price Proposal.

Written material shall be on 8 1/2 x 11 inch paper printed in no less than a 10 pitch or 10 fonts. 11 x 17 pages will be allowed only if the written material is provided in 81/2 x 11 formats and the remainder of the page is used for illustrations to assist in conveying the narrative message. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, do not apply to the price proposal, Volume 2.

3.4 Electronic Submission. For this project Offerors shall submit the following:

3.4.1 Volume 1, Technical Proposal; and Volume 2, Price Proposal. Offerors shall provide one (1) CD/DVDs of the Technical Proposal and of the Price Proposal.

USACE will accept CD/DVD of the Technical Proposal and the Price Proposal with the original proposal submission. An identical CD/DVD may be submitted NLT 1400 hrs, 28 Jan 2019. In the event of discrepancies between the original submission on 24 Jan 2019 and a follow on CD/DVD, the original proposal submission will govern. Technical (Volume 1) and Price (Volume 2) submissions shall be provided on a single CD/DVD and Technical and Price must be a separate file. Written portions of the proposal should be in Adobe Acrobat (PDF) and be word searchable. The electronic version shall be either a single file tabbed or multiple files hyperlinked to a single table of contents. Each CD/DVD must be clearly labeled by solicitation number, project and installation name, copy number (i.e. 1 of 2) and Offerors name. In the event of any conflict between the electronic submission and the hard copy submission, the hard copy submission will govern and will be the material upon which the Government bases its evaluation and ultimately, its decision.

3.5 Revised Proposals (if applicable)

3.5.1 Offerors shall revise their proposals addressing each item listed on the Evaluation Notice (ENs) Form, in the list of deficiencies, weaknesses and resubmit six (6) hard copies and two (2) CDs with all proposal documents. Revisions shall be fully integrated into the original proposal document, clearly marked and cross referenced with the weakness and deficiency table discussed below. The government does not desire a complete rewrite of the proposals; retain the original structure of the proposal.

3.5.2 Replacement sheets shall be clearly identified as "Revision 1" and the new issue date.

3.5.3 Offerors shall provide a change summary table listing each weakness and deficiency, and the location of the revisions addressing these items by page, paragraph, or drawing.

3.5.4 Offerors shall provide a short paragraph describing the revisions made to address the weaknesses and deficiencies (as part of the change table).

3.5.5 Revisions shall be made as required to address each listed weakness or deficiency.

3.5.6 Narratives and drawings: Revised proposals shall strike out text that has been deleted. Newly inserted text shall be in blue.

VOLUME 1 – Technical Proposal

4.0 EVALUATION FACTORS AND WEIGHTING

4.1 Evaluation Factors are listed on below table. Weighting of Evaluation Factors is as follows: Factors 1 and 2 are considered the most important and are of equal value and are more important than Factor 3, 4, and 5. Factors 3 and 4 have equal importance, and are less importance than Factor 1 and 2. Factor 5 is the least important. All technical factors when combined are significantly more important than price.

Evaluation Factors

Location Factor Number Description Relative Importance

TAB 1A Factor 1 Past Performance Factor 1 and 2 are the most important and are of equal value and are more important than Factor 3, 4, and 5.

TAB 1B Factor 2 Prime Contractor Key Personnel Factor 1 and 2 are the most important and are of equal value and are more important than Factor 3, 4, and 5.

TAB 1C

Factor 3 Organizational, Technical, and Risk Management Approach

Factor 3 and 4 are of equal value and are less important than Factor 1 and 2 and more important than Factor 5.

TAB 1D

Factor 4

Proposed Schedule

Factor 3 and 4 are of equal value and are less important than Factor 1 and 2 and more important than Factor 5.

TAB 1E

Factor 5

Small Business Participation Less important than factors 1, 2, 3 and 4

5.0 TAB 1A – FACTOR 1 – PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.1.1 The Past Performance Information to be submitted by the prime offeror in Volume 1, Factor 1, shall consist of Projects cited on the Past Performance Information Sheet (Attachment 1) and Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) or Construction Contractor Appraisal Support System (CCASS) or Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 2). CPARS/CCASS are to be submitted for projects completed in support of the Department of Defense (DoD) projects. The Offeror shall provide a completed offeror performance evaluation, whether interim or final, and are available via the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (www.ppirs.gov). If a completed offeror performance evaluation does not exist in PPIRS (example, non-U.S.

Government projects) the Offeror shall provide a completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 2). A sample PPQ transmittal letter is provided in Attachment 3. If, at time of evaluation, a completed offeror performance evaluation exists in PPIRS that conflicts with a submitted PPQ, the completed offeror performance evaluation will govern. Additional details regarding submission requirements are identified below.

Past performance information consists of the following three aspects:

(a) RECENCY

(b) RELEVANT COMPANY EFFORT

(c) QUALITY OF PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1.1.1 RECENCY: Recency is defined as a Project that shall be no less than 50% completed within ten (10) years preceding the date of this solicitation.

5.1.1.2 RELEVANT COMPANY EFFORT: Relevancy, as it pertains to past performance information, is a measure of the extent of similarity between the service/support effort, complexity, dollar value, contract type, and subcontract/teaming or other comparable attributes of past performance examples and the solicitation requirements; and a measure of the likelihood that the past performance is an indicator of future performance. The Offeror shall provide no more than five (5) examples of “relevant” construction of a medical or healthcare facility. The Offeror shall complete and provide a Past Performance Information Sheet (Attachment 1) for a minimum of three (3) projects and a maximum of five (5) projects which meet the criteria described below. At least two (2) projects shall be fully completed (facility turned over to the customer). If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer. If the Offeror is a joint venture, each firm shall provide a minimum of one (1) project, submitting no more than five (5) projects total demonstrating experience relevant to their role on this project. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division, unit or team member submitting the offer. Where the word “relevant” appears it is understood to mean construction of a medical or healthcare facility. All work must be new construction, or significant addition; and

(a) Project construction value of at least $50,000,000; and

(b) Experience in construction of a medical or healthcare facility on an operating medical campus. An operating medical campus means that work was performed with immediate adjacencies to operational medical facilities where care and caution was required for the concerns and safety of patients and medical practitioners.

(c) The government will give more consideration to projects submitted that clearly demonstrate an Offerors' ability to construct a facility that is similar in size and scope to this project and to execute the project successfully, while containing cost and maintaining schedule.

5.1.1.3 QUALITY OF PAST PERFORMANCE:

5.1.1.3.1 The Offeror shall submit evidence of the quality of their past performance on projects submitted in paragraph 5.1.1.2. The Offeror shall provide a completed offeror performance evaluation, whether interim or final, found in the Past Performance

Information Retrieval System (www.ppirs.gov). If a completed offeror performance evaluation does not exist in PPIRS (example, non-U.S. Government projects) the Offeror shall provide a completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 2). If, at time of evaluation, a completed offeror performance evaluation exists in PPIRS that conflicts with a submitted PPQ, the completed offeror performance evaluation will govern.

5.1.1.3.2 Offerors shall not incorporate PPQs by reference that were previously submitted for other RFPs unless the questionnaire previously completed was identical in format and content to of Attachment 2. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation.

While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

5.1.1.3.3 If an Offeror has been required to take corrective action for any substandard performance, experienced other performance problems such as cost overruns, offeror caused delays, numerous warranty calls, etc., the Offeror should explain the circumstances and the corrective actions taken.

5.1.1.3.4 Joint Venture Submission Requirements. Offerors submitting proposals as a Joint Venture (JV) shall obtain a DUNS number and be registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as the offering Joint Venture. For the projects required by paragraph 5.1.1.2, the Offeror must provide projects performed by the JV that reflect the JV’s ability to perform the work required in this solicitation. If the Offeror cannot provide a sufficient number of projects as the JV to meet the requirement, the Offeror must provide those “recent”, “relevant” projects that it has performed as the JV, and then supplement the record with additional “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by each JV member in their individual capacities. In such instance, each JV member must satisfy the requirement, to include any performed as the JV. If the JV has no “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by the JV, then each member of the JV must provide a minimum of one (1) project, but submitting no more than five (5) projects total demonstrating “recent”, “relevant” projects performed by the JV member that reflect the JV member’s ability to perform the work required in this solicitation as required by the RELEVANT COMPANY EFFORT paragraph.

An offeror may use experience gained as a member of a Joint Venture (JV) agreement;

however, while relevant, this experience may be considered less favorable than a specific project completed by the Offeror. If used, the Offeror must clearly identify their role and responsibilities in competing the project including the percentage of JV agreement and specific roles in constructing the project.

5.1.1.3.5 Provide the fully executed Joint Venture Agreement under this tab.

5.1.1.3.6 Verification: The Government reserves the right to verify the past performance record of cited projects or other recent projects not submitted by reviewing the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) or other Government appraisal systems or to interview owners or references. The Government may check any or all cited references to verify supplied information. An Offeror will be afforded the opportunity to reply to or explain adverse performance information to which the Offeror has not previously had an opportunity to respond.

5.1.1.4 The Government will use the recency, relevant company effort and quality of past performance information submitted under this tab to assess the Offeror’s Past Performance to determine the Offeror’s probability of successfully performing the scope of work described in this solicitation. Where the word “recent” appears it is understood to mean construction projects which are at least 50% complete (measured by actual progress and/or earned value) as of the RFP issue date or a construction project that has been completed within ten (10) years of the RFP issue date. Where the word "project(s)" appears in this RFP Section, it is understood to mean project(s), contract(s), task order(s), or any other contract document provided for by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR 2.101). Examples of projects submitted by the Offeror shall indicate their role as Prime Contractor on a contract for the construction of a medical or healthcare facility for Government or for commercial/private sector customers.

5.1.1.5 Offerors are responsible for indicating the percentage of work that is complete (actual progress and/or earned value) if currently underway. The Offeror shall submit evidence of the quality of their past performance on submitted projects. The Offeror shall provide a completed offeror performance evaluation, whether interim or final, found in the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (www.ppirs.gov). If a completed offeror performance evaluation does not exist in PPIRS (example, non-U.S. Government projects) the Offeror shall provide a completed Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 2). If, at time of evaluation, a completed offeror performance evaluation exists in PPIRS that conflicts with a submitted PPQ, the completed offeror performance evaluation in PPIRS will govern. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into their proposal PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. This does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the burden of providing detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information rests with the Offeror.

5.2 SUPPLEMENTAL NARRATIVE. The Offeror may provide a supplemental narrative (not project lists), not to exceed three (3) pages, explaining how any corporate experience that is not directly related to the specific projects above is applicable to this project and how the Government will benefit.

5.3 PAST PERFORMANCE EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.3.1 An Offeror will receive one past performance confidence assessment rating (as defined in Paragraph 12.4.4 of this Section) that is based on the Offeror’s overall record of recency, relevancy, and quality of performance.

5.3.1.2 Past performance on the projects identified in the project forms (Attachments 1 with corresponding -evaluation from PPIRS or Attachment 2) will receive more consideration than past performance provided in the supplemental narrative. The Government will place greater value on projects performed as a prime contractor than as a subcontractor, depending upon overall role and relevancy considerations.

5.3.1.3 The past performance evaluation considers each Offeror’s demonstrated recent and relevant record of performance (as defined in Paragraph 12.4.3 of this Section) in supplying construction services that meet the contract’s requirements. The Government will evaluate the Offeror’s past performance to determine how relevant the past performance is to the project under consideration. More relevant past performance will typically be a stronger predictor of future success and have more influence on the past performance confidence assessment than past performance of lesser relevance.

5.3.1.4 The Government will review the past performance information submitted and other past performance information deemed relevant, to determine quality and usefulness as it applies to the performance confidence assessment. If any firm has multiple functions or divisions, the Government will only evaluate past performance of the division or unit submitting the offer. Owners/references may be asked to comment on items such as quality of construction, timeliness, management of the work, subcontractor management, including timely payment to subs or suppliers, safety, relations between owner and designer or contractor, level of support for such things as as-built documentation, O&M manuals, training, correcting design or construction errors, warranty work, etc. If the Government cannot establish the Offeror’s relevant past performance, it reserves the right to utilize the Past Performance Questionnaire (Attachment 2) to interview the points of contact on the information sheets. The Government will not release the information gathered to the Offeror at any time, in order for the Government to solicit candid, unbiased interview comments. The Government's evaluation of the Offeror’s past performance is not limited to information on the projects listed in Attachment 1.

5.3.1.5 The confidence rating will be established based on the past performance of the Offeror or that of its predecessor, if applicable. An entity may not establish past performance based on the past performance of its key personnel apart from that of the entity. If the Government does not obtain past performance information and cannot establish a past performance record for the Offeror through other sources, a rating of Neutral Confidence will be assigned. However, the Government may determine that an offer receiving a “Substantial Confidence” or “Satisfactory Confidence” past performance rating is worth more than a “Neutral Confidence” based on the stated solicitation evaluation criteria.

5.3.1.6 If negative information from Reference Checks or other sources is received, the Offeror will be given an opportunity to provide input as required by FAR Part 15. Any available information from PPIRS that is part of the official record will be utilized without any requirement for additional Offeror input as the Offeror has already had an opportunity to respond.

5.3.1.7 The Government will evaluate the quality of past performance based on the elements listed below:

(a) Quality of Construction and Safety Record. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the quality of the actual construction undertaken and the standards of workmanship exhibited by the Offeror. The Offeror’s safety record and overall safety program will also be evaluated.

(b) Timeliness of Performance. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the completion of projects within the scheduled completion times.

(c) Cost/Financial Management. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to the cost and financial management on past projects.

(d) Customer Satisfaction. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to customer satisfaction, cooperation with customers, and interaction on past projects.

(e) Subcontractor Management. The Government will evaluate all information available with respect to effective management of subcontractors on past projects.

6.0 TAB 1B – FACTOR 2 – PRIME CONTRACTOR KEY PERSONNEL

6.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

6.1.1 The Offeror shall complete Attachment 4 (Resume for Prime Contractor Key Personnel) which clearly indicates separate duties and responsibilities for each individual that will be assigned to this project. All personnel, including Prime Contractor Key Personnel are subject to security screening and must meet security requirements as stated in Specification Section 01-37-00. All years of experience must be chronologically documented. This section shall include data on the following personnel:

(a) Project Manager. The Project Manager is responsible for all aspects of the project. Minimum requirements for this position are ten (10) years experience as an overall project manager in the construction industry with projects similar in size, scope and complexity. A degree in architecture, engineering, or construction management is required.

Projects considered similar are as described in paragraph 5.1.1.2.

Projects presented shall be complete or substantially complete within the last ten (10) years. At least one (1) project shall be presented.

(b) Project Superintendent. The Construction Project Superintendent(s) shall meet the qualifications of Specification Section 01 00 00 paragraph 1.1.2. Minimum requirements for this position are ten (10) years experience as a project superintendent in the construction industry with at least five (5) of those years as superintendent on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity. Projects considered similar are as described in paragraph 5.1.1.2. Projects presented shall be complete or substantially complete within the last ten (10) years. At least one (1) project shall be presented. Include the following, if applicable, in your resume's project information: additional experience in the construction of hospitals or medical facilities; project experience with phasing schedules; construction of multi-story buildings;

professional registration(s), if any.

(c) Contractor Quality Control (CQC) System Manager. The CQC System Manager shall meet the qualifications of Specification Section 01 45 01, paragraph 3.4.2. Minimum requirements for this position are ten (10) years experience as a project CQC manager in the construction industry with at least five (5) years as CQC manager on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity. A degree in architecture, engineering, or construction management is required. Projects considered similar are as described in paragraph 5.1.1.2. Projects presented shall be complete or substantially complete within the last ten (10) years. At least one (1) project shall be presented. Include the following, if applicable, in your resume's project information: additional experience in the construction of hospitals or medical facilities; project experience with phasing schedules; construction of multi-story buildings; professional registration(s), if any.

(d) Site Safety and Health Officer (SSHO). The (SSHO) shall meet the qualifications of Specification Section 01 35 26, paragraph 1.6.1.1.

Minimum requirements for this position are ten (10) years experience as a project Safety Officer/SSHO in the construction industry with at least five (5) years as project Safety Officer/SSHO on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity. Projects considered similar are as described in paragraph 5.1.1.2. Projects presented shall be complete or substantially complete within the last ten (10) years. At least one (1) project shall be presented. Include the following, if applicable, in your resume's project information: additional experience in the construction of hospitals or medical facilities; project experience with phasing schedules;

construction of multi-story buildings; professional registration(s), if any.

(e) Project Scheduler. The Project Scheduler for the project shall have prepared and maintained at least two (2) previous schedules and at least seven (7) years experience on projects similar in size, scope, and complexity of this contract using Primavera or current mandated scheduling program. The Project Scheduler shall be able to perform the requirements and conditions of Specification Section 01 32 01, Project Schedule. A minimum of two projects shall be presented. Experience and qualifications as a Scheduler on projects similar in size, scope and complexity of the proposed project is favorable. Include the following, if applicable, in your resume's project information: project experience with phasing schedules; construction of multi-story buildings; and professional registration(s), if any.

6.1.2 The Offerors are required to keep the key personnel submitted in the proposal for the duration of the project. If after contract award, because of reasons beyond the control of the Offeror, the individuals named in this proposal are not able to fulfill this obligation, replacement personnel with qualifications and experience meeting or exceeding those identified in the proposal shall be presented for acceptance and approval by the Contracting Officer. Replacement individuals for this project shall be required to have qualifications and experience meeting or exceeding those identified in the proposal.

6.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

6.2.1 The Government will evaluate the credentials of each person. The Offeror’s proposal shall clearly show that each individual meets the listed requirements.

Resumes shall include examples of project experience, including what capacity the individual served on each project listed, as well as the dates employed on each project, the monetary size of each project cited as experience and the educational qualifications of the proposed personnel shall be submitted. The Government will evaluate the required information for completeness and assess how well the Offeror identifies and demonstrates that its key personnel in their proposal meet or exceed minimum experience and qualifications requirements of the RFP.

6.2.2 The government may give more consideration to prior experience on Federal government construction projects as well as experience in constructing a LEED certified project. The government may also give more consideration to satisfactory past hospital and healthcare construction experience. The CQC Manager and the Safety Manager may receive more consideration when demonstrating past experience with Corps of Engineers quality and safety plans. More consideration may be given to Key Personnel that have worked together; worked on Corps of Engineers construction projects; worked on a Federal facility; and/or on past projects cited in Factor 1.

Professional registration(s) that exceed minimum requirements may also receive additional consideration.

7.0 TAB 1C – FACTOR 3 – ORGANIZATIONAL, TECHNICAL, AND RISK

MANAGEMENT APPROACH

7.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

7.1.1 This information considers the Offeror’s intended organizational, technical, and risk management approach to construction of the type facilities specified in the RFP. The submission shall not exceed ten (10) pages to address the following:

7.1.2 Risk Management.

(a) Provide narrative describing the Offeror’s management approach to risk identification, prioritization, analysis, mitigation, and tracking.

The related roles and responsibilities, and coordination of construction management personnel should be addressed. Include in the narrative the proposed processes for handling field problems, RFI s, Government communication, and management involvement throughout the construction period.

(b) Identify the top three (3) risks associated with successful completion of this project. The narrative should identify three top risks according to the Offeror’s assessment of this project, the RFP and the potential internal and external risks in the areas of design, construction, material and equipment, labor, subcontracting, and project coordination; and the potential consequence to budget, quality, schedule, and safety.

Include specifics that demonstrate the Offeror’s understanding of this project scope, location, and complexity.

(c) The Government will evaluate responses to assess the Offeror’s ability to identify significant risks, and assess the probability for a negative impact to the project budget, quality, schedule, or safety, and develop mitigation strategies. Proposals that identify a reasonable process for early risk identification and mitigation will receive a more favorable evaluation.

7.1.3 Organizational and Technical Management. Identify and explain the roles and responsibilities of team members that will perform major or critical aspects of construction phases. Provide an organization chart identifying on-site and remote positions and staff. Show the corporate organization and reporting chain for key personnel and explain the succession plan for replacement of key personnel. Also, include a general description of the work the Offeror will self-perform to be compliant with the requirements of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) clause 52.236-1, Performance of Work by Contractor.

(a) Describe how the Offeror plans to coordinate working space(s) and site access with the Government. Describe how the Offeror plans to mitigate the risks of completing a large construction project on an active medical campus (mission impacts, utility outages, parking, noise, etc).

(b) Briefly describe the Offeror's Quality Control Program including approach to Quality Control analysis and monitoring of performance against requirements and standards, and the feasibility of the Offeror's approach to ensuring achievement of the required levels of performance. How does the Offeror integrate subcontractors into the quality control process?

(c) How will the Offeror communicate and coordinate construction issues throughout the construction period with the Government? The Offeror shall present mechanisms for managing and interfacing with key subcontractors and the Government to include discussion of its techniques for communicating with its subcontractors/consultants and its plan for ensuring that performance is at the level required to ensure timely and effective contract execution.

7.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA –FACTOR 3 ORGANIZATIONAL, TECHNICAL,

AND RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH

7.2.1 The Government will evaluate the strengths, weaknesses and any deficiencies in the submission. Based on the submission provided, the Government will evaluate the Offeror’s overall understanding of this construction project, the RFP requirements, and the Offeror’s capability to successfully execute an awarded contract based on a sound organizational, technical and risk management approach.

Additional consideration may be given to an Offeror who provides:

(a) Evidence of previous successful teaming experience between current team members.

(b) Evidence of previous successful teaming experience between the prime and key subcontractors (mechanical, electrical, plumbing, and structural).

(c) Evidence of their ability to mitigate risk while completing a large construction project on an active medical campus.

(d) Demonstration of a technically feasible and innovative approaches to meeting the Government’s requirements.

7.3 Offeror’s are cautioned that the Organizational, Technical, and Risk Management Approach shall not exceed ten (10) pages and that the Government s evaluators will review and evaluate only the information contained in the first ten (10) pages.

8.0 TAB 1D – FACTOR 4 – PROPOSED SCHEDULE

8.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

8.1.1 Proposed Contract Duration. This duration will become the contractually binding completion period. The Government will evaluate the contract duration, as proposed by the Offeror, not to exceed the maximum allowed duration of 900 calendar days from notice-to-proceed (NTP). In assessing the reasonableness of the proposed contract duration, the Government may take into account how well the Offeror’s proposed summary schedule supports the proposed duration, as well as use other information, such as but not limited to, independent judgment concerning logic, constraints, and typical construction durations. An offer which proposes contract duration significantly shorter than the maximum allowed duration may receive additional consideration provided proposed duration is realistic, deemed achievable, and is fully supported to include submission of Statement of Compliance as shown in Attachment 5.

8.1.2 Proposed Summary Schedule. Submit a Summary Construction Schedule.

The Summary Schedules or diagrams may be provided separately in a size that is easily read, but shall be bound and clearly labeled as TAB C. This summary schedule shall be considered the preliminary schedule as required by Section 01 32 01: Project Schedule. The first 90 days must be fully detailed and the remainder of the project summarized by trade and detailed by definable features of work. This schedule must be submitted on the DVD in the backup (from the developed software) format that can be imported and reviewed electronically by the Government. The Government will use either Primavera P3 or P6 for review of this schedule. The schedule shall be task oriented, indicating the number of calendar days, after notice to proceed, by which milestones are to be achieved.

Offeror shall use critical path. Schedules shall be graphically represented. Give attention to the following features:

(a) Include necessary data files required for detailed evaluation of proposed network analysis system compatible with Primavera P3 or P6.

(b) Show the overall construction phase for each facility, for the site work, and for utilities. Show sufficient detailed breakdown construction sequencing of each facility, site work and utilities.

(c) Provide a narrative of no more than two (2) pages, describing the overall construction packaging plan. Describe sequencing and time frames of all long lead item equipment that must be ordered. Show the required ordering date(s) in the schedule. Narrative should also describe tie-in points with existing buildings completed and or currently under construction and provide a summary risk assessment. The two-page limit for the schedule narrative does not include the pages required for the graphical depiction of the proposed schedule.

(d) Show that schedule has taken into account construction…