Am1_W912PL-15-R-0011.pdf
PDF 568 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912PL-15-R-0011
About this file
Amendment 1. Due date for proposals extended see SF-33. And Past Performance Questionnaire revised - see Section M pages 11 -14.
View the file
Other files
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| Am4_W912PL-15-R-0011.pdf | ||
| Am3_W912PL-15-R-0011.pdf | ||
| W912PL-15-R-0011_Am2.pdf | ||
| Site_Visit_Information.pdf | ||
| Fort_Irwin-GIS_Data-2015-02-18.zip | ZIP file | |
| W912PL-15-R-0011_FtIrwin_Munitions_Maintenance.pdf |
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICAITON NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicble)
7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE
STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)
Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
FACILITY CODE
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICIATION NO.
9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.
Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:
(a)By completing items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPIRATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER
NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc. ) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15C. DATE SIGNED
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION ( Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
PAGE OF PAGES
6. ISSUED BY CODE
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)
CODE
15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of person authorized to sign)
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
NSN 7540-01-152-8070
Previous edition unusable
1 6
0001 Feb 24, 2015
W912PL
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contracting Div, West Region Br.
915 Wilshire Blvd Los Angeles, CA 90017
SEE ITEM 6
W912PL-15-R-0011
Feb 3, 2015
FORT IRWIN RANGE MAINTENANCE, NATIONAL TRAINING CENTER, FORT IRWIN, CALIFORNIA
Amendment 0001 issued to:
1) Extend the due date for proposals to March 20, 2015, 2:00PM PST. Replace SF-33.
2) Update Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ). Replace Section M pages 11 - 14.
The following documents have been posted to FedBizOps as Information Only:
a. Fort Irwin Range Maintenance GIS data-ESRI Shape files, and past range data of UXO found for last 5 years.
b. Site visit information-presentation, site visit sign-in sheet and site visit photos.
SOLICITATION, OFFER AND AWARD 1. THIS CONTRACT IS A RATED ORDER
UNDER DPAS (15 CFR 7900)
RATING PAGE OF PAGES
2. CONTRACT NUMBER 3. SOLICITATION NUMBER 4. TYPE OF SOLICITATION 5. DATE ISSUED 6. REQUISITION/PURCHASE NUMBER
CODE7. ISSUED BY 8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If other than item 7)
NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".
SOLICITATION
9. Sealed offers in original and copies for furnishings the supplies or services in the Schedule will be received at the place specified in item 8, or if hand carried, in the depository located in until local time
CAUTION - LATE Submissions, Modifications, and Withdrawals: See Section L, Provision No. 52.214-7 or 52.215-1. All offers are subject to all terms and conditions contained in this solicitation.
10. FOR
INFORMATION
CALL:
A. NAME B. TELEPHONE (NO COLLECT CALLS)
AREA CODE NUMBER EXT.
C. E-MAIL ADDRESS
11. TABLE OF CONTENTS
(X) SEC. DESCRIPTION PAGE(S) (X) SEC. PAGE(S)DESCRIPTION
A B C D E F G H
I
J
K
L
M EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
INSTRS., CONDS., AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS
REPRESENTATIONS, CERTIFICATIONS AND OTHER
STATEMENTS OF OFFERORS
PART IV - REPRESENTATIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
LIST OF ATTACHMENTS
PART III - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACH.
CONTRACT CLAUSESSOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
SUPPLIES OR SERVICES AND PRICES/COSTS
DESCRIPTION/SPECS./WORK STATEMENT
PACKAGING AND MARKING
INSPECTION AND ACCEPTANCE
DELIVERIES OR PERFORMANCE
CONTRACT ADMINISTRATION DATA
SPECIAL CONTRACT REQUIREMENTS
NOTE: Item 12 does not apply if the solicitation includes the provisions at 52.214-16, Minimum Bid Acceptance Period.
OFFER (Must be fully completed by offeror)
12. In compliance with the above, the undersigned agrees, if this offer is accepted within calendar days (60 calendar days unless a different period is inserted by the offeror) from the date for receipt of offers specified above, to furnish any or all items upon which prices are offered at the set opposite each item, delivered at the designated point(s), within the time specified in the schedule.
13. DISCOUNT FOR PROMPT PAYMENT
(See Section I, Clause No. 52.232-8)
14. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS
(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the SOLICITATION for offerors and related documents numbered and dated):
10 CALENDAR DAYS (%) 20 CALENDAR DAYS (%) 30 CALENDAR DAYS (%) CALENDAR DAYS(%)
DATEAMENDMENT NO.AMENDMENT NO. DATE
15A. NAME AND
ADDRESS
OF OFFER-
OR
CODE FACILITY 16. NAME AND THE TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN OFFER
(Type or print)
15B. TELEPHONE NUMBER
AREA CODE NUMBER EXT.
15C. CHECK IF REMITTANCE ADDRESS IS
DIFFERENT FROM ABOVE - ENTER SUCH
ADDRESS IN SCHEDULE.
17. SIGNATURE 18. OFFER DATE
AWARD (To be completed by Government)
19. ACCEPTED AS TO ITEMS 20. AMOUNT 21. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION
22. AUTHORITY FOR USING OTHER THAN FULL OPEN COMPETITION:
10 U.S.C. 2304 (c) 41 U.S.C. 253 (c)
24. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 7)
26. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
IMPORTANT - Award will be made on this Form, or on Standard Form 26, or by other authorized official written notice.
AUTHORIZED FOR LOCAL REPRODUCTION
Previous edition is unusable
23. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN
(4 copies unless otherwise specified)
25. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY
27. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
(Signature of Contracting Officer)
28. AWARD DATE
CODE
ITEM
STANDARD FORM 33 (REV,. 9-97)
Prescribed by GSA - Far (48 CFR) 53.214 (c)
SEALED BID (IFB)
NEGOTIATED (RFP)
(Hour) (Date)
PART I - THE SCHEDULE PART II - CONTRACT CLAUSES
SEE BLOCK
USACE, LOS ANGELES DISTRICT, CONTRACTING DIVISION
915 WILSHIRE BLVD, 14TH FLOOR, LOS ANGELES, CA 90017
W912PL-15-R-0011
see Sect. M See Section L 2:00 PM
Patricia.B.Bonilla@usace.army.mil
03 / 20 / 2015
213 452 3255
02 / 03 / 2015
Amendment 0001Amendment 0001
Section M-11
Military Munitions Range Maintenance Support, W912PL-15-R-0011 National Training Center (NTC), Fort Irwin, San Bernardino County, California
NAVFAC/USACE PAST PREFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0)
Note: USACE requests that the client completes the questionnaire and submit directly back to the offeror. The offeror will submit the completed questionnaire to USACE with their proposal, and may duplicate this questionnaire for future submission on USACE solicitations. Clients are highly encouraged to submit questionnaires directly to the offeror. However, questionnaires may be submitted directly to USACE, Contracting Division, please contact the offeror for USACE POC information. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:
Address: DUNs Number: Phone Number:
Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Preformed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other(Explain) Percent of project work preformed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime?(Name/Phone#)
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please Specify): Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy) Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modification, if applicable): Explain Differences:
4. Project Description:
Complexity of Work High Medium Routine How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name: Title:
Phone Number: Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Clients Signature:
Amendment 0001
Section M-12
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many of the Government/Owner’s benefit.
The Contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective
An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner.
A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.
Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
(VG) Very Good Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some of the Government’s/Owner’s benefit.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assess was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.
A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There have been NO significant weaknesses identified.
Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assess a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements.
The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions. The contractor’s proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.
A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.
(U) Unsatisfactory Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub- element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor’s correct actions appear or were ineffective.
An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.
(N) Not Applicable No information or did not apply to your contract
Rating will be neither positive nor negative
Section M-13
1. QUALITY
a) Quality of technical data/report preparations efforts E VG S M U N
b) Ability to meet quality standards for technical performance E VG S M U N
c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problems resolution without extensive customer guidance
E VG S M U
N
d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)
E VG S M U
N
2. SCHEDULE TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE
a) Compliance with contract deliver/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones.(If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
E VG S M U
N
b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract.
E VG S M U
N
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N
b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes;
responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)
E VG S M U
N
c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interested of the customer?
E VG S M U
N
d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N
4. MANAGEMENT/PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force
E VG S M U
N
b) Ability to hire, apply, retain a qualified workforce to this effort E VG S M U N
c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N
d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N
e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N
f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines.
E VG S M U
N
g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
E VG S M U
N
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractually agreed price(s)?
E VG S M U
N
Section M-14
b) Contractor proposed innovative alternative methods/processes that reduced cost, improved maintainability or other factors that benefitted the client
E VG S M U
N
c) If this is/was a Government cost type contract, please rate the Contractor’s timeliness and accuracy in submitting monthly invoices with appropriate back-up documentation, monthly status reports/budget variance reports, compliance with established budget and avoidance of significant and/or unexplained variances (under runs or overruns)
E VG S M U
N
d) Is the Contractor’s accounting system adequate for management and tracking of costs? If not please explain in the remarks section
YES No
e) If this is/was a Government contract, has/was this contract been partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? Indicate if show cause or cure notices were issued, or any default action in comment section below
YES No
f) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
YES No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) To what extent was the contractor able to maintain an environment of safety, adhere to its approved safety plan, and respond to safety issues?
(Includes: following the uses rules, regulations, and requirements regarding housekeeping, safety, correction of noted deficiencies, etc.)
E VG S M U
N
b) Contractor complied with all security requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
E VG S M U
N
7. GENERAL
a) Ability to successfully respond to emergency and/or situations (including notifying COR,PM or Contracting Officer in a timely manner regarding urgent contractual issues)
E VG S M U
N
b) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issue) E VG S M U N
c) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below) YES No
d) In summary, provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
E VG S M U
N
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additionally remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
| SF-30 Amendment 1 |
| SF-33 Solicittion, Offer and Award |
| Section M - pages 11 - 14: Past Performance Questionnaire (Form PPQ) |
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .