MATOCSolicitationAmendment0001.pdf
PDF 245 KB Posted
- Attached to
- MULTIPLE AWARD TASK ORDER CONTRACT (MATOC) FOR DESIGN-BUILD (DB) AND DESIGN-BID-BUILD (DBB) CONSTRUCTION
- Solicitation number
- W912PF18R0014
About this file
Amendment 0001
View the file
Other files
Show all 14
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT
Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.
15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)
30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30
APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84
STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA
FAR (48 CFR) 53.243
See continuation sheet for details.
1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES
J 1 14
16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)
16C. DATE SIGNED
BY 12-Jun-2018
16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR
(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)
8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912PF18R0014
X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)
23-May-2018
10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)
9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.
11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS
X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer is extended, X is not extended.
Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:
(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;
or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN
REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.
12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)
13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.
IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.
A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE
CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.
B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).
C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:
D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)
E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.
14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)
10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.
2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)
6. ISSUED BY
3. EFFECTIVE DATE
12-Jun-2018
CODE
414TH CSB RCO ITALY SUBOFFICE LIVORNO
VIA AURELIA, EDIFICIO 5131
ZONA DEPOSITO
56128 TIRRENIA (PISA)
W912PF 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)
4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.
CODE
See Item 6
FACILITY CODECODE
EMAIL:TEL:
W912PF18R0014
SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
SUMMARY OF CHANGES
SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE
The following have been added by full text:
AMENDMENT 0001
The purpose of this amendment is to provide the following:
1) Complete documentation for the Seed Project MS-00276-5 entitled "Repair/Convert Bldg. 5092, Supply and Maintenance Area". The following documentation has been added in section J: complete technical specifications (100%); complete design sheets (100%); safety documents. The bidders shall replace the existing technical specifications (Attachment 1) and the existing drawings (Attachment 2) with the technical specifications and drawing sheet dated May 2018. The safety documents are added as Attachment 8.
2) Revised Section L, as shown in the highlighted sections on the following pages;
3) Revised Provision 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee (Sep 1996);
4) Revised Section M, as shown in the highlighted section on the following pages;
5) Provide the bidders the responses to the Request for Information (RFI);
6) The due date for proposals in response to the solicitation remains unchanged.
SECTION A - SOLICITATION/CONTRACT FORM
The following have been added by full text:
RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR INFO
RESPONSES TO REQUESTS FOR INFORMATION (RFI)
1. Question: Can the design firm compete for this solicitation with more than one construction company as their designer of record?
Answer: No, the design firm can only sign a letter of commitment with one offeror.
2. Question: What are the parameters for joint ventures/ cooperative arrangements for this solicitation?
Answer: Offerors shall follow the instructions for submitting proposals as a “Pool of Firms (Consorzio Stabilie)” under Section L, Instructions to Offerors, Paragraph D.4. Awards can only be made to responsible offerors established as a permanent legal entity, registered in the System for Award Management (SAM) as a separate business using its own name, meeting all requirements of this solicitation. The "Documents Required for the Determination of Responsibility" in Section L shall be provided for the business entity registered in SAM.
3. Question: May the offeror present subcontractor construction experience with the proposal, contingent on an executed letter of commitment?
Answer: As per the solicitation, the experience must be as a prime contractor and experience as a subcontractor or by a subcontractor is invalid.
4. May the offeror present a combination of experience to cover the US-Italian joint building codes, including past performance from both prime and subcontractor, contingent on an executed letter of commitment?
Answer: As per the solicitation , the experience examples (two (2) for construction experience and one (1) for design experience) must show prime contractor experience integrating US and Italian building codes and regulations on the same project.
5. Are only firms that have done work for the US Government in the past considered eligible for award?
Answer: US Government contracting experience is not required as long as the experience meets the other requirements of the solicitation.
6. Is there an example of the Performance Bond and, is it possible to provide a Performance Bond released by a primary insurance company?
Answer: We do not provide an example of the Performance Bond. As per the solicitation, the Performance Bond shall be released by a bank.
7. Are all documents required to be in English and any translations notarized?
Answer: All proposal documents shall be in English with the exception of the "Documents Required for the Determination of Responsibility" in Section L. These documents may be in either English or Italian. Translations to English are not required to be notarized.
8. Per Section L, reference C. Factor I, Paragraph 5. At a minimum , two (2) of the examples shall be for work performed on a facilities which required the joint application for both US and Italian building codes and regulations. Is it acceptable if the work performed on a facilities requires a join application of US and European building codes and regulations?
Answer: As per the solicitation, the experience examples (two (2) for construction experience and one (1) for design experience) must show prime contractor experience integrating US and Italian building codes and regulations on the same project.
SECTION J - LIST OF DOCUMENTS, EXHIBITS AND OTHER ATTACHMENTS
The following have been modified:
LIST OF DOCUMENTS
Attachment #1 - Technical specification, project MS-00276-5 "Repair Building 5092 and convert to Dressing /shower Facility Supply and Maintenance area" consisting of 229 pages dated May 2018 (100% complete)
Attachment #2 - Drawing sheets, project MS-00276-5 "Repair Building 5092 and convert to Dressing/Shower Facility, Supply and Maintenance area" dated May 2018 consisting of 73 sheets (100% complete)
Attachment #3 - Construction Experience Questionnaire consisting of one sheet
Attachment #4 - Design Experience Questionnaire consisting of one sheet
Attachment #5 - Past Performance Questionnaire consisting of one sheet
Attachment #6 - Self-Certification for Antimafia Communication
Attachment #7 - Sample for Bid Guarantee
Attachment#8 - Safety Plan dated May 2018 consisting of 42 sheets and attached Elaborato Tecnico della Copertura (Italian Safety Document) consisting of 12 sheets
SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS AND NOTICES TO BIDDERS
SECTION L
A. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS AND NOTICES
1. Offerors shall strictly adhere to the requirements in this Section when preparing the proposal to be submitted in response to this Request for Proposal (RFP). Offerors are required to meet all solicitation requirements, including terms and conditions, representations and certifications, and technical requirements, in addition to those identified as evaluation factors. Proposals that fail to comply with the proposal submittal requirements addressed in this section of the solicitation may be deemed unacceptable.
2. The Government will not reimburse any Offeror any cost incurred in response to this RFP.
3. The Offeror shall submit in the proposal all requested information specified in this section of the Request for Proposal (RFP) solicitation at or before the exact date and time specified. Proposals received by the Government after the date and time set for receipt of proposals will be handled in accordance with the requirements of Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 15.208.
4. All RFP documents will be posted to the Federal Business Opportunities (FedBizOpps) website (https://www.fbo.gov) and made available for viewing. All amendments will be posted to FedBizOpps and made available for viewing. It shall be the Offeror’s responsibility to check the website for any amendments and updates to the solicitation.
5. To be awarded a government contract you MUST have DUNS (Dun & Bradstreet) (http://fedgov.dnb.com/webform ) and NCAGE (www.dlis.dla.mil/Forms/Form_AC135.asp) numbers and be registered in SAM Registration ((https://www.sam.gov).
6. The Government reserves the right to discuss aspects of proposals with Offerors, if determined to be necessary, upon completion of the evaluation. Offerors are advised that the Government may make award without discussions, clarifications, or any contact concerning the proposals received. Therefore, proposals should be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Offerors shall submit their best offer. Offerors shall not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss or revise their proposals.
B. PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
1. One electronic (CD-R or DVD-R) copy of the proposal shall be submitted by the due date and time noted in block 13 of the SF 1442 to the physical address listed in block 7 of the 1442. The CD-ROM or DVD shall be “Read only” and all documents shall be submitted in Microsoft Office (version 2007 compatible) formats or Adobe Acrobat (PDF). No e-mail submissions will be accepted. All documentation shall be in English.
2. Revised proposals will not be accepted unless specifically requested by the Contracting Officer. If the Contracting Officer decides to conduct discussions and requests revised proposals from the offerors; offerors shall ensure that all replacement pages are clearly marked “REVISED,” shall show the date of revision, shall be submitted in the appropriate number of copies (e.g., if two copies of the original page was required, then two copies of the revised page will also be required). All proposal revisions shall be submitted as page replacements with revised text readily identifiable, e.g. bold face print or underlining.
3. The submittals shall be formatted as follows:
TAB Proposal Additional notes:
1 Coversheet The SF 1442, Signed and Dated, shall serve as the coversheet 2 Pricing Each offeror shall provide a total price in EURO for the seed project on the Seed Project Proposal Schedule without the IVA tax.
3 Section K, Representations and
Certifications
4 FACTOR I PAST
EXPERIENCE, Sub-factor 1:
Construction Experience:
See requirements in Section C, below.
5 FACTOR I PAST
EXPERIENCE, Sub-factor 2:
Design Experience:
See requirements in Section C, below.
6 FACTOR II:
SOA Certification
Submit one copy of the required SOA certification in the Offer's name
7 FACTOR III:
PAST PERFORMANCE
See requirements in Section C, below.
8 Other Documentation Required by the Solicitation
Bid Guarantee, Performance Bond, Anti-Mafia Law Requirements, Pool of Firms Requirements (if applicable)
9 Documentation to Support the Determination of Responsibility
DURC, Certificate from the Chamber of Commerce, Extract of the Registration Book, Equipment List, Bank Reference, Professional Technical Capability In Accordance with DLGS NO. 81/2008 Attachment XVII (Safety Law).
Note: See the detailed sections for additional requirements concerning the areas addressed in the table, above.
C. DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THE EVALUATION OF THE FACTORS -
The solicitation provides for the following four (4) evaluation factors including the price. Offerors are required to provide information addressing all stated factors and sub-factors in a clear and understandable format. If an Offeror does not have information relating to a specific factor or sub-factor, the Offeror shall clearly state so in the proposal.
Proposals that do not clearly address all factors and sub-factors may be considered unacceptable and may not receive further consideration.
FACTOR I – PAST EXPERIENCE - SUB FACTOR 1: CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE
The offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant past construction experience which is similar in scope, complexity and price to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least five (5) projects provided by the offeror on the Construction Experience Questionnaire (Attachment#3) (in English). For purposes of evaluation of this sub-factor, recent and relevant projects are projects that meet the following minimum criteria:
1. Were construction projects “same or similar” to the scope of work for the seed project on this solicitation. At a minimum, three (3) of the projects shall include new construction or repair and/or upgrade of buildings and/or infrastructures, of residential and/or industrial and/or commercial type, consisting of reinforced concrete and /or steel and/or masonry bearing structure, complete with necessary utilities systems to include electrical, mechanical, fire protection, to include all finishing work required to deliver the project complete and ready for use. The remaining two examples may be for the type of work described above or may also be for general repair and/or maintenance of a more limited number of element/components/utilities at one or more facilities.
2. The minimum value (construction cost) of the proposed projects shall be as follows:
a) at least one (1) project equal or greater than Euro 1,000,000.00 ($1,071,926.25);
b) in addition to requirement (a), above, at least two (2) projects equal or greater than Euro 250,000.00 ($267,981.57);
c) the remaining two (2) projects shall be equal or greater than Euro 100,000.00 ($107,192.63);
3. Were at least 70% completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation, Block 3 page 1;
4. Were completed by the Offeror as the prime contractor;
5. At a minimum, two (2) of the examples shall be for work performed on a facilities which required the joint application of both US and Italian building codes and regulations.
FACTOR I – PAST EXPERIENCE - SUB FACTOR 2: DESIGN EXPERIENCE
The offeror shall demonstrate recent and relevant past design experience which is similar in scope, complexity and price to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least three
(3) projects provided by the offeror on the Design Experience Questionnaire (Attachment#4) (in English). For purposes of evaluation of this sub-factor, recent and relevant projects are projects that meet the following minimum criteria:
1. Were construction projects “same or similar” to the scope of work for the seed project on this solicitation. The projects shall cover any combination of new construction or repair and/or upgrade of buildings and/or infrastructures, of residential and/or industrial and/or commercial type, consisting of reinforced concrete and /or steel and/or masonry bearing structure, complete with necessary utilities systems to include electrical, mechanical, fire protection, to include all finishing work required to deliver the project complete and ready for use.
2. The minimum value (construction cost) of the proposed projects shall be as follows:
a) at least one (1) project equal or greater than Euro 1,000,000.00 ($1,071,926.25);
b) in addition to the requirement (a), above, the remaining two (2) projects equal or greater than Euro 250,000.00 ($267,981.57).
3. Were at least 70% completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation, Block 3 page 1;
4. At a minimum, one (1) of the examples shall be for work performed on a facilities which required the joint application of both US and Italian building codes and regulations.
Note: A letter of intent signed by an authorized agent of the Architect and Engineering firm that will be performing the design portion of this project must be included. If the design work will be performed "in-house" by the prime contractor a letter must be submitted stating this fact.
FACTOR II – SOA CERTIFICATION
Offerors will demonstrate their capabilities by providing proof of their specified Societa Organismi di Attestazione (SOA) qualification levels. Offerors shall submit certifications for current SOA categories:
OG 1: “Civil and Industrial buildings construction” Classifications IV (or higher)
Note: Sub-contracting is allowed up to 50% or if different percentage is required, it will be indicated in the task order. However, the offeror must possess the required SOA directly.
FACTOR III - PAST PERFORMANCE
The offer shall provide the information concerning at least five (5) recent and relevant projects which are similar in scope, complexity and price to the requirements of this solicitation using the Past Performance Questionnaire ( Attachment # 5 ) (in English). Offerors may submit Contract Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) generated from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) in lieu of Attachment 5 for any project. In addition to the questionnaire, the offeror is encouraged to submit supporting past performance information with evidence of customer satisfaction such as a performance evaluation, special commendation, recognition, letter of appreciation "Certificato di regoalre esecuzione" o "collaudo finale" photograph of the projects, etc. Government evaluators may contact an offeror’s points of contact/references for the projects submitted or other Government officials to verify an offeror’s past performance on these projects.
FACTOR IV: PRICE
Each offeror shall provide a total price in EURO for the seed project on the Seed Project Proposal Schedule without the IVA tax. Failure to submit a total cost for all line items in the Seed Project Proposal Schedule will cause a rejection of the proposal as not conforming to the requirement.
NOTE: DO NOT COMPLETE PRICING IN CLIN SCHEDULE FOR THE BASE YEAR AND OPTION
PERIODS OF THE MATOC.
D. OTHER DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED BY THE SOLICITATION
1. BID GUARANTEE: In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee, the bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment from a bank using the format from Section J, Attachment #7 - Sample for Bid Guarantee, certified check or cashier's check. The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees:
a. To unsuccessful offerors as soon as practicable after the award of the contract; and
b. To the successful offeror upon execution of all contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the proposal as accepted.
The Bid Guarantee will be applied for the seed project "Repair Building 5092 and convert to Dressing/Shower Facility, Supply and Maintenance Area".
Failure to submit a valid Bid Guarantee will result in an incomplete proposal which will not be evaluated.
2. PERFORMANCE BOND: The offeror shall provide the performance bond in the amount of 20% of the contract amount within 15 calendar days from the award date. The performance bond shall be released by a bank. The awardees shall submit the performance bond in the amount of 20% for each task order will be issued against MATOC Contract .
3. ANTI-MAFIA LAW REQUIREMENTS
a. Pre-Award Effect of Anti-Mafia Procedure: Inasmuch as the work of this solicitation is to be performed on land owned by the Italian State, the prospective contractor will be subject to Italian Law No. 646, of 13 September 1982, and subsequent integration and amendments. The solicitation data will be made available only to firms that meet the submittal requirements described in paragraph below. As much, in the event that prior to award any disciplinary actions or proceedings for Mafia related matters exist against the apparent low bidder, no award will be made to said low bidder.
b. Termination Under Italian Law No. 646 (Anti-Mafia): If during the life of this contract, any proceeding or disciplinary actions contemplated by Italian Law No. 646 of 13 September 1982 (and subsequent amendments and integration) is undertaken against any component of the Contractor or any Subcontractor, the Government can consider this a failure to execute the work and terminate the Contractor’s right to proceed with the work under the "DEFAULT" clause of this contract.
c. Application of Italian Law No. 646 (Anti-Mafia) To Subcontractors: In addition to the requirement in the "Subcontractors" clause if applicable to this contract, before the Contracting Officer can consent to any Subcontractors, the Contractor will be required to certify to the Contracting Officer that no disciplinary actions or proceedings for Mafia related matters exist against such Subcontractors.
d. Submittal Requirements: The offerors are required to submit the following:
1). An original copy, un-expired and not older than two months at the time of bid opening, of the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio). The Certificate must include the statement transcribed below, required by art. 9 and of the D.P.R. no. 252 dated 3 June 1998: "Nulla osta ai fini dell’articolo 10 della Legge 31 Maggio 1965 n. 575, e successive modificazioni. La presente certificazione e’ emessa dalla CCIAA utilizzando il collegamento telematico con il sistema informativo utilizzato dalla Prefettura di Roma.
2) Original copies, un-expired and not older than one month at the time of the bid opening, of the Family Status and Residency Certificates of each and every member of the firm, as listed in the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (per Decreto Legislativo no. 490 of 8 Aug. 1994, published in the Gazzetta Ufficiale no. 186 of Aug. 10 1994).
ADDENDUM to ANTI-MAFIA LAW REQUIREMENTS
1. Regarding requirement 3.d. 1), above: As it is no longer possible to include the statement “Nulla osta….” we request that you send us the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership without the statement.
Therefore, we require that you also submit an Anti-Mafia Self-Certification document including the following:
a. “Che nulla osta ai fini dell’art. 10 della Legge 575/1965 e successive modificazioni” (NULLA OSTA – in accordance with art.10, Law no. 575, 31 May 1965 and subsequent modifications).
b. Company Name and Fiscal Code
c. Name of every member of the firm, as listed in the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (per Decreto Legislativo no. 490 of 8 Aug. 1994, published in the Gazzetta Ufficiale no. 186 of Aug. 10 1994). Include:
first and last name; sex; and date & place where they were born.
d. “Che non risulta iscritta nel registro delle Imprese, per la posizione anagrafica in oggetto, alcuna dichiarazione di procedura consorsuale, ai sensi della normativa vigente in materia.”
e. “Che non risulta iscritta nel registro delle Imprese, per la posizione anagrafica in oggetto, alcuna procedura consorsuale, ai sensi della normativa vigente in materia.”
4. POOL OF FIRMS (CONSORZIO STABILE): Any Permanent Pool of Firms (Consorzio Stabile) shall provide with the proposal the here below listed required document/certificate otherwise its proposal will be rejected as not in compliance with the requirement of the solicitation, if a determination is made to award the contract based on initial proposals without discussion. A copy certified of the notarized legal document that established the Permanent Pool of Firms (Consorzio Stabile). The name and addresses of all the associated firms. The associated firms are NOT allowed to submit their individual proposals under this solicitation otherwise the proposal of the Permanent Pool of Firms (Consorzio Stabile) and the proposal of any associated firm will be rejected. The names and the addresses of the associated firms proposed to perform the work.
E. DOCUMENTATION REQUIRED FOR THE DETERMINATION OF RESPONSIBILITY
The U.S. Government requires the offeror to submit the following documentation/certification to be satisfied that a prospective contractor currently meets the applicable standards in FAR 9.104 – Standards.
1. DOCUMENTO UNICO DI REGOLARITĄ CONTRIBUTIVA (DURC)
The offeror shall provide with the proposal a copy certified and NOT older than ninety (90) days at the time set forth for the receipt of the offer of the DURC. (Documento Unico di Regolaritą Contributiva). However, if the offeror has submitted a certified DURC to the issuing office (RCO Sub Office Livorno) within 90 days from the due date of this proposal, then the offeror may submit a copy of the previously certified DURC. The document MUST include the following statement otherwise the proposal will be rejected. “Con il presente documento si dichiara che l’impresa RISULTA REGOLARE ai fini del DURC”.
2. CERTIFICATE OF THE CHAMBER OF COMMERCE (CERTIFICATO DI ISCRIZIONE ALLA CAMERA DI
COMMERCIO) (ORDINARIO)
The offeror shall provide with the proposal a copy certified and NOT older than two (2) months at the time set forth for the receipt of the offer of the Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership (Certificato di Iscrizione alla Camera di Commercio). However, if the offeror has submitted a certified Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership to the issuing office (RCO Sub Office Livorno) within 90 days from the due date of this proposal, then the offeror may submit a copy of the previously certified Chamber of Commerce Certificate of Membership. The certificate must include the following statement otherwise the proposal will be rejected. "NULLA OSTA ai fini dell’articolo 10 della Legge 31 Maggio 1965, n. 575 e successive modificazioni. La presente certificazione e’ emessa dalla C.C.I.A.A. utilizzando il collegamento telematico con il sistema informativo utilizzato dalla Prefettura di Roma."
3. EXTRACT OF THE REGISTRATION BOOK (ISTITUZIONE DEL LIBRO UNICO): The offeror shall provide with the proposal a copy or a photocopy of the Extract Registration Book (ISTITUZIONE DEL LIBRO UNICO) listing the employees presently employed by the offeror.
4. EQUIPMENT LIST: The offeror shall provide with the proposal a list of all the major equipment presently in its possession.
5. BANK REFERENCE: The offeror shall provide a bank reference that discusses whether or not the offeror has an adequate financial resource to successfully complete the resultant contract.
6. PROFESSIONAL TECHNICAL CAPABILITY IN ACCORDANCE WITH DLGS NO. 81/2008
ATTACHMENT XVII (SAFETY LAW).
In order to verify compliance with the Italian DLGS No. 81/2008, Enclosure XVII (Safety Law), the offeror shall provide the below required documentation/certification. If the offeror has submitted the below information to the issuing office (RCO Sub Office Livorno) within 90 days from the due date of this proposal, then the offeror may reference that submission instead of submitting duplicate information. In its proposal, the offeror must reference the request for proposal number for which the information was previously submitted.
a. Photocopy of the Chamber of commerce, industry or craftsmanship certificate showing the company’s business trade related to the typology of the contract;
b. Evaluation of risks document as in Art. 17, Para. 1, Sub-Para. a), or self-certification as in Art. 29, Para. 5, of the same DLGS;
c. Specific documentation showing that machinery, equipment and provisional clauses are in conformance with what required by the DLGS;
d. List/s of individual safety/protective equipment issued to employees;
e. Appointment of a safety manager responsible for the implementation of preventive and protective safety measures; of the individuals responsible for the fire prevention and fire-fighting measures, the evacuation procedures, for the management of emergencies, and qualified medical physician (doctor) when required.
f. Name/s of the employee’s safety representative/s;
g. Qualification certificates of the above mentioned individuals and employees as prescribed by the DLGS;
h. List of employees as they appear in the offeror’s Istituzione del Libro Unico and relative health records attesting they are medically fit, as required by the DLGS;
i. Photocopy of the record of social security contributions (DURC), as prescribed in D.M. 24 Oct 2007;
j. Statement that no interim orders, negative administrative provisions or suspensions exists as specified in the Art.
14 of the DLGS no. 81/2008.
52.228-1 BID GUARANTEE (SEP 1996)
(a) Failure to furnish a bid guarantee in the proper form and amount, by the time set for opening of bids, may be cause for rejection of the bid.
(b) The bidder shall furnish a bid guarantee in the form of a firm commitment from a bank using the format from Section J, Attachmnet #7 - Sample for Bid Guarantee, certified check or cashier's check. The Contracting Officer will return bid guarantees, other than bid bonds, (1) to unsuccessful bidders as soon as practicable after the opening of bids, and (2) to the successful bidder upon execution of contractual documents and bonds (including any necessary coinsurance or reinsurance agreements), as required by the bid as accepted.-
(c) The amount of the bid guarantee shall be ___10%_____ percent of the bid price or $_N/A_, whichever is less.-
(d) If the successful bidder, upon acceptance of its bid by the Government within the period specified for acceptance, fails to execute all contractual documents or furnish executed bond(s) within 10 days after receipt of the forms by the bidder, the Contracting Officer may terminate the contract for default.-
(e) In the event the contract is terminated for default, the bidder is liable for any cost of acquiring the work that exceeds the amount of its bid, and the bid guarantee is available to offset the difference.
(End of provision)
NOTE: THE AMOUNT OF THE BID GUARANTEE SHALL BE 10% OF THE BID PRICE PROPOSED FOR
THE SEED PROJECT "REPAIR BUILDING 5092 AND CONVERT TO DRESSING/SHOWER FACILITY,
SUPPLY AND MAINTENANCE AREA"
SECTION M - EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
EVALUATION FACTORS FOR AWARD
A. AWARD OF CONTRACT
1.The Government seeks to award a target of up to three (3) contracts to responsible offerors whose proposals represent the best value to the Government. Award will be made to the Lowest Priced technically acceptable pursuant to FAR 15 procedures.
2. A seed project will be used as the basis of award for MATOC award and the first task order in accordance with FAR Part 15.306. Proposals will be evaluated for technical acceptability (including past performance) but will not be ranked using the non-price Factors. In order for an Offeror to be considered for award, the proposal must receive an "Acceptable" rating in every non-price factors. A proposal receiving a rating of "Unacceptability" in any non-price Factor will not be eligible for award.
3. The Government reserves the right to discuss aspects of proposals with Offerors. Offerors are advised that the Government may make award without discussions, clarifications, or any contact concerning the proposals received.
Offerors shall submit their best offer: proposals shall be submitted initially on the most favorable terms from a price and technical standpoint. Offerors shall not assume that they will be contacted or afforded an opportunity to clarify, discuss, or revise their proposals.
4. If discussions are determined necessary upon completing the evaluation of all proposals, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range and conduct discussions only with those Offerors within the competitive range.
Upon conclusion of discussions, the Contracting Officer will request final proposal revisions from Offerors remaining in the competitive range and may, upon receipt of final proposal revisions, proceed to select the most highly qualified offerors without further discussions or notice.
B. EVALUATION PHASES
1. Phase One. The Contract Specialist will screen each proposal for completeness to ensure that all mandatory requirements for this solicitation have been addressed. This level of evaluation does not include an in-depth reading of the proposal’s content, but it is conducted solely to ensure that a complete proposal has been received and that meets the requirements of the solicitation. Failure to address all the mandatory requirements may be grounds to disqualify the proposal from further review.
2. Phase Two. In this phase, the evaluation team, comprised of experts appointed by the SSA, evaluates the technical factors.
C. EVALUATION CRITERIA
1. SUMMARY - The solicitation provides for the following (4) evaluation factors including price:
Factor I - Past Experience:
Subfactor 1: Construction Experience Subfactor 2: Design Experience Factor II - SOA Certification Factor III - Past Performance Factor IV - Price
2. FACTOR I – PAST EXPERIENCE - SUB FACTOR 1: CONSTRUCTION EXPERIENCE
The Government will evaluate and relevant past construction experience which is similar in scope, complexity and price to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least five
(5) projects provided by the offeror on the Construction Experience Questionnaire (Attachment#3) (in English).
For purposes of evaluation of this sub-factor, recent and relevant projects are projects that meet the following minimum criteria:
1. Were construction projects “same or similar” to the scope of work for the seed project on this solicitation. At a minimum, three (3) of the projects shall include new construction or repair and/or upgrade of buildings and/or infrastructures, of residential and/or industrial and/or commercial type, consisting of reinforced concrete and /or steel and/or masonry bearing structure, complete with necessary utilities systems to include electrical, mechanical, fire protection, to include all finishing work required to deliver the project complete and ready for use. The remaining two examples may be for the type of work described above or may also be for general repair and/or maintenance of a more limited number of element/components/utilities at one or more facilities.
2. The minimum value (construction cost) of the proposed projects shall be as follows:
a) at least one (1) project equal or greater than Euro 1,000,000.00 ($1,071,926.25);
b) in addition to requirement (a), above, at least two (2) projects equal or greater than Euro 250,000.00 ($267,981.57);
c) the remaining two (2) projects shall be equal or greater than Euro 100,000.00 ($107,192.63);
3. Were at least 70% completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation, Block 3 page 1;
4. Were completed by the Offeror as the prime contractor;
5. At a minimum, two (2) of the examples shall be for work performed on a facilities which required the joint application of both US and Italian building codes and regulations.
The technical factor will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the following ratings:.
Acceptable Proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements of the solicitation.
Unacceptable Proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements of the solicitation
The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements if the offeror demonstrates recent and relevant experience as described in the Factor, above. The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements in the offeror fails to demonstrate recent and relevant experience as described in the Factor, above.
3. FACTOR I – PAST EXPERIENCE - SUB FACTOR 2: DESIGN EXPERIENCE
The Government will evaluate recent and relevant past design experience which is similar in scope, complexity and price to the requirements of this solicitation. The Government will evaluate the information concerning at least three
(3) projects provided by the offeror on the Design Experience Questionnaire (Attachment#4) (in English). For purposes of evaluation of this sub-factor, recent and relevant projects are projects that meet the following minimum criteria:
1. Were construction projects “same or similar” to the scope of work for the seed project on this solicitation. The projects shall cover any combination of new construction or repair and/or upgrade of buildings and/or infrastructures, of residential and/or industrial and/or commercial type, consisting of reinforced concrete and /or steel and/or masonry bearing structure, complete with necessary utilities systems to include electrical, mechanical, fire protection, to include all finishing work required to deliver the project complete and ready for use.
2. The minimum value (construction cost) of the proposed projects shall be as follows:
a) at least one (1) project equal or greater than Euro 1,000,000.00 ($1,071,926.25);
b) in addition to the requirement (a), above, the remaining two (2) projects equal or greater than Euro 250,000.00 ($267,981.57).
3. Were at least 70% completed within five (5) years from the date of this solicitation, Block 3 page 1;
4. At a minimum, one (1) of the examples shall be for work performed on a facilities which required the joint application of both US and Italian building codes and regulations.
Note: A letter of intent signed by an authorized agent of the Architect and Engineering firm that will be performing the design portion of this project must be included. If the design work will be performed "in-house" by the prime contractor a letter must be submitted stating this fact.
The technical factor will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the following ratings:
The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements if the offeror demonstrates recent and relevant experience as described in the Factor, above. The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements in the offeror fails to demonstrate recent and relevant experience as described in the Factor, above.
3. FACTOR II – SOA CERTIFICATION
Offerors will demonstrate their capabilities by providing proof of their specified Societa Organismi di Attestazione (SOA) qualification levels. Offerors shall submit certifications for current SOA categories:
OG 1: “Civil and Industrial buildings construction” Classifications IV (or higher)
Note: Sub-contracting is allowed up to 50% or if different percentage is required, it will be indicated in the task order. However, the offeror must possess the required SOA directly.
The technical factor will be rated on an acceptable/unacceptable basis using the following ratings:
The proposal clearly meets the minimum requirements if the offeror provides copies of the required certifications as described in the Factor, above. The proposal does not clearly meet the minimum requirements in the offeror fails to provide copies of the required certifications as described in the Factor, above. The
4. FACTOR III - PAST PERFORMANCE
The offer shall provide the information concerning at least five (5) recent and relevant projects which are similar in scope, complexity and price to the requirements of this solicitation using the Past Performance Questionnaire ( Attachment # 5 ) (in English). Offerors may submit Contract Performance Assessment Report (CPAR) generated from the Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) in lieu of Attachment 5 for any project. In addition to the questionnaire, the offeror is encouraged to submit supporting past performance information with evidence of customer satisfaction such as a performance evaluation, special commendation, recognition, letter of appreciation "Certificato di regoalre esecuzione" o "collaudo finale" photograph of the projects, etc. Government evaluators may contact an offeror’s points of contact/references for the projects submitted or other Government officials to verify an offeror’s past performance on these projects.
Past Performance Evaluation Ratings - Rating Descriptions:
Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.
Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has no reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.
Note: In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably on past performance (see FAR 15.305 (a) (2) (IV).
The Government may consider the Past Performance Questionnaire information, as well as information obtained from any other sources.
5. FACTOR IV: PRICE
The Government will evaluate the pricing submitted on the Seed Project Proposal Schedule. Price will be evaluated after the completion of SSEB consensus rating for all non-price factors.
The SSA shall further evaluate price proposal for reasonableness, completeness and affordability based on comparison with the Government Estimate and price competition. If necessary, the SSA may evaluate price proposal based on any other price analysis techniques listed in FAR 15.404-1. The SSA shall also identify and document any errors or suspected errors found in each price proposal, including any evidence of materially unbalanced pricing.
(End of Summary of Changes)
File details come from the government source that posted it.