Enclosure_4_Past_Performance_Questionnaire_(PPQ).docx
DOCX document 22 KB Posted
- Attached to
- RENOVATE BUILDING 10 Federal contract opportunity
- Solicitation number
- W912PF18R0002
About this file
ENCLOSURE 4 - PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (PPQ)
View the file
Other files for this federal contract opportunity
| File | Type | Posted |
|---|---|---|
| W912PF18R0002-0001.pdf | ||
| W912PF18R0002-0002.pdf | ||
| Enclosure_1d_List_of_Work_Features_(4_of_4)_E8-44018-7J.xls | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Enclosure_1a_List_of_Work_Features_(1_of_4)_E8-41122-5J.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Enclosure_1b_List_of_Work_Features_(2_of_4)_E7-00021-4J,_E8-44070-7J.xlsx | XLSX spreadsheet | |
| Enclosure_6_Sample_for_Bid_Guarantee.pdf | ||
| ATT_1_SOW.pdf | ||
| Enclosure_3_Design_Project_Information_Sheet.docx | DOCX document | |
| Enclosure_1c_List_of_Work_Features_(3_of_4)_E7-00018-7J.XLS | XLS spreadsheet | |
| Enclosure_5_Self_-certification_for_Antimafia_Communication.docx | DOCX document | |
| W912PF18R0002.pdf | ||
| Enclosure_2__Construction_Project_Information_Sheet.docx | DOCX document |
Show all 12
On GovTribe
Work with this file on GovTribe
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE
CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)
| 1. Contractor Information | |
| Firm Name: | CAGE Code: |
| Address: | DUNs Number: |
Phone Number: Email Address:
Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:
2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:
If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):
3. Contract Information Contract Number:
Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):
Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify): Contract Title:
Contract Location:
Award Date (mm/dd/yy):
Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy): Explain Differences:
Original Contract Price (Award Amount):
Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable): Explain Differences:
| 4. Project Description: | |||
| Complexity of Work | High | Med | Routine |
How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)
CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)
5. Client Information Name:
Title:
Phone Number:
Email Address:
6. Describe the client’s role in the project:
7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):
8. Client’s Signature:
NOTE: Clients are highly encouraged to submit completed questionnaires directly to the Government, in which case the Government may then contact the client for confirmation of past performance. Alternatively, the client may complete this questionnaire and submit it directly back to the offeror. The offeror will then submit the completed questionnaire with their proposal. The Government reserves the right to verify any and all information on this form.
Past Performance Questionnaire
(PPQ)
ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE
RATING DEFINITION NOTE
| (VG) Very Good |
| Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were |
effective.
A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.
| (S) Satisfactory |
| Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory. |
| A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract. There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified. Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not |
performing beyond the requirements of the contract.
| (U) Unsatisfactory |
| Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective. |
| An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an |
unsatisfactory rating.
| (N) Not Applicable |
| No information or did not apply to your contract |
| Rating will be neither positive nor |
negative.
TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT
PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.
1. QUALITY:
a) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance
| VG |
| S |
U
N
b) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance
VG
S
U
N
2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:
a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)
3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:
a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project?
| VG |
| S |
U
N
b) Overall customer satisfaction
| VG |
| S |
U
N
4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR
a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?
b) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes
c) Effectiveness of overall management (including ability to effectively lead, manage and control the program)
5. COST/FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
a) Ability to meet the terms and conditions within the contractual price(s)?
b) Was this contract partially or completely terminated for default or convenience or are there any pending terminations? If yes, please explain below.
Yes
No
c) Have there been any indications that the contractor has had any financial problems? If yes, please explain below.
Yes
No
6. SAFETY/SECURITY
a) Contractor complied with all safety requirements for the project and personnel security requirements.
7. GENERAL
a) Compliance with contractual terms/provisions (explain if specific issues)
b) Would you hire or work with this firm again? (If no, please explain below)
c) Provide an overall rating for the work performed by this contractor.
Please provide responses to the questions above (if applicable) and/or additional remarks. Furthermore, please provide a brief narrative addressing specific strengths, weaknesses, deficiencies, or other comments which may assist our office in evaluating performance risk (please attach additional pages if necessary):
File details come from the government source that posted it.