GA002_-_Hazmat_Report_-_Final.pdf

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY

ROY W. MILLER JR USARC

U.S. ARMY RESERVE CENTER GA002

3311 WRIGHTSBORO ROAD

AUGUSTA, GA 30909-2898

PRIME CONTRACT # W912HP18D6000

TASK ORDER – W912HP18F1203

PROJECT NUMBER - F5Y67384

SUBCONSULTING F5Y67384-S19-0001

Prepared for:

JACOBS GOVERNMENT SERVICE COMPANY

1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 500 Arlington, VA 22201

Submitted by:

6401 Golden Triangle Drive, #304

Greenbelt, MD 20770

February 15, 2019

ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002 3311 Wrightsboro Road Augusta, GA 30909-2898 i

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. i

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

2.1 Survey Methodology

2.2 Analytical Procedures

2.3 Inaccessible and Limited-Access Spaces

2.4 Survey Limitations

2.5 Asbestos Survey Results

2.6 Asbestos Conclusions and Recommendations

3.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY REPORT

3.1 LBP Survey Methodology

3.2 LBP Survey Results

3.3 LBP Conclusions and Recommendations

4.0 OTHER POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS

5.0 DISCLAIMER

Appendices:

Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results Appendix 3 – Drawings of Sample Locations Appendix 4 – Inspector Certification(s)/License(s

Carlk323 Text Box

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002 3311 Wrightsboro Road Augusta, GA 30909-2898 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, retained Jacobs Government Service Company (Jacobs) to provide Architect-Engineering Services for the 81st Readiness Division (RD) Reset Design Project, for the Roy W. Miller Jr USARC, U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002, located at 3311 Wrightsboro Road, Augusta, GA 30909-2898. Jacobs retained Global Consulting, Inc. (GCI) to perform an environmental and hazardous material survey for this project. This report documents the survey of the Facility by GCI’s certified inspector for Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM), Lead-Based Paint (LBP), other hazardous materials, and Universal Waste (UW). The Facility is scheduled for a partial HVAC renovation, and this survey was limited to identifying the potentially hazardous materials and conditions that may be impacted by the renovation.

Asbestos:

On December 11, 2018, GCI’s EPA-accredited and licensed Asbestos Inspector assessed the existing building materials suspected to contain asbestos and likely to be impacted during renovation. GCI identified eleven (11) specific suspect homogenous building materials, from which a total of thirty (30) suspected asbestos-containing samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis.

The black vinyl vibration damper gasket located in the duct work for the HVAC system on the kitchen roof could not be sampled without compromising the equipment and is, therefore, assumed to be ACM. While the vibration damper is considered to have a low potential to be ACM, we recommend this material be sampled and analyzed for asbestos prior to renovation to confirm the classification. The white mastic/sealant used on the insulated piping throughout the building was found to be ACM and, if disturbed, should be managed as a Class II non-friable ACM. Remedial action and abatement specifications are indicated for these materials if disturbed during the HVAC Reset.

The other nine (9) suspect materials identified, sampled, and analyzed were not found to be asbestos-containing. Remedial action or specification development is not indicated for these building materials.

Details of the survey are presented in Section 2.0 – Asbestos Survey Report, Analytical results are presented in Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results and ACM and LBP Sample Locations are presented in Appendix 3 – Sample Location Drawings. The development of asbestos abatement drawings and specifications is indicated for the white mastic/sealant on insulated piping throughout the building.

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002 ii

Lead-Based Paint:

GCI’s Industrial Hygienist (IH), an EPA and certified LBP Inspector, performed a survey of the Facility for Lead-Based Paint (LBP) and Lead-Containing Paint (LCP) painted surfaces that have an elevated potential to be impacted during renovation.

The following components are considered to contain LBP:

• Structural Steel (Assumed)

The following components were sampled and are neither LBP nor LCP:

• Tan Paint on Concrete Block Walls, Doors, and Frames

• White Paint on Drywall Walls

• Olive Paint on Drywall and Concrete Walls

Details of the survey are presented in Section 3.0 – Lead-Based Paint Survey Report.

Analytical results are presented in Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results. The structural steel assumed to be LBP will not require the development of hazardous material abatement plans as it is unlikely to be impacted during the planned renovation.

Other Potential Hazardous Materials:

The Facility was surveyed for other potentially hazardous materials that may be impacted by the HVAC renovation. The existing original lighting systems have an elevated potential to contain mercury-containing florescent light bulbs which should be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273. The original fluorescent lighting system in the building has an elevated potential to be equipped with potentially PCB-containing electrical light ballasts that require management as a PCB-containing waste unless specifically marked as non-PCB containing ballasts. Should the lighting system be impacted by the HVAC system renovation, specifications should be developed to address these materials.

The fire protection system has an elevated potential to contain ionization-type smoke and fire detectors that are typically constructed with an Americium-241 radioactive source. If impacted by the renovation, these detectors should be segregated and disposed of properly in accordance with Federal, state, and local regulations.

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002 iii

The existing heating and cooling system consists of several air-conditioning systems that contain a significant quantity of potentially regulated refrigerants that may be classified as Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS). Section 608 of the Clean Air Act prohibits the known release of refrigerants and ODS during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. The EPA requires proper refrigerant management practices by owners and operators of refrigeration and air-conditioning systems, technicians, and others. The refrigerants should be managed and disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR 82 and applicable Federal, state, and local regulations.

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002 iv

ACRONYMS

ACM Asbestos-Containing Material

AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

GEPD Georgia Environmental Protection Division

IH Industrial Hygienist

LBP Lead-Based Paint

LCP Lead-Containing Paint

NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollution

NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health

NVLAP National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

OSHA Occupational Safety & Health Administration

ODS Ozone-Depleting Substances

PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl

PLM Polarized Light Microscopy

PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material

RACM Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material

UW Universal Waste

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002 i

Delete this page when PDF

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, retained Jacobs Government Service Company (Jacobs) to provide Architect-Engineering Services for the 81st Readiness Division (RD) Reset Design Project, for the Roy W. Miller Jr USARC, U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002, 3311 Wrightsboro Road, Augusta, GA 30909-2898. Jacobs retained Global Consulting, Inc. (GCI) to perform the limited environmental and hazardous material survey associated with this project. This report documents the limited survey of the Facility by a certified inspector for Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM), Lead-Based Paint (LBP), other hazardous materials, and Universal Waste (UW). The Facility is scheduled for a HVAC renovation and this survey was limited to identifying the potentially hazardous materials and conditions likely to be impacted by the proposed project. The mutual goal of the contractor and the government is to safely achieve a quality product within the expected timeframe and budget.

The scope of work for this survey consisted of the following tasks:

1. Review of available records for identified and suspect ACM, LBP, and other hazardous and regulated materials that may be impacted by the scope of work;

2. Conduct a visual survey of the project area to identify potential location(s) of hazardous materials that may be affected by the scope of work.

3. Collect bulk samples of suspect ACMs and assess painted surfaces for LBP using paint chip analysis.

4. Submit the bulk samples to a certified laboratory to positively identify ACM via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) using EPA Method 600/R-93/116 and to identify LBP/LCP using Atomic Absorption Analysis for Lead method SW846 – 3050B/7000B.

5. Prepare a report summarizing data, collection techniques, analysis procedures, location and quantity of ACM, LBP/LCP and other hazardous and regulated materials observed and detailed recommendations for any indicated response actions.

6. Abatement specification(s) will be prepared separately, if required.

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

This section describes the site survey and sample collection of suspect ACMs. The site survey was conducted on December 11, 2018, by EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) accredited Asbestos Inspector, Mr. William B. Zukauskas. A copy of Mr. Zukauskas’ credentials are presented in Appendix 4.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GEPD) are the authorities that regulate activities related to Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) in Georgia. The EPA regulations enforce four asbestos activities; (1) removal, repair, or encapsulation of ACM, (2) approval of asbestos training providers, (3) regulation of professionals accredited to perform asbestos-related activities, and (4) asbestos in schools. The GPED regulates the enforcement of the EPA’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), and enforcement of the asbestos notification regulations.

2.1 Survey Methodology

The asbestos survey was divided into two distinct phases: pre-survey planning and field survey.

2.1.1 Pre-Survey Planning

The pre-survey planning phase included reviewing previous survey reports, drawings, management plans, and abatement reports, if available. Jacobs provided GCI with information regarding the planned HVAC renovation of the Facility. GCI planned a survey strategy and scheduled the survey work. It was determined that this survey should include all applicable and accessible areas of the Facility to ensure that intended renovation, can be conducted in an efficient and safe manner compliant with applicable Federal, state, and local regulations.

2.1.2 Field Survey

The field survey was conducted for the areas affected by the HVAC renovation as determined in the planning phase, and suspect asbestos-containing building materials were identified. Roofing materials were specifically excluded from the scope of work.

Suspect materials that were homogeneous in nature (i.e., uniform in color and texture, installation date) were identified, touched to determine friability, and sampled by removing a small amount of material. Extreme care was taken to avoid potential fiber release during

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002 the sampling process. Before sample collection, a fine mist of water was typically applied to the sampling location. Samples were collected using sharpened core samplers and/or utility knives, where necessary, and immediately placed in labeled containers and sealed.

Any dust generated was wet-wiped to minimize the potential fiber release. All sampling locations were promptly patched and repaired. The location and condition of each homogeneous material were recorded.

2.2 Analytical Procedures

The samples of suspect ACMs were packaged and delivered under strict chain of custody procedures to EMSL Analytical, Inc. of Cinnaminson, NJ, a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory. Quality control samples were duplicated in the field and submitted to ATL International Asbestos Testing Laboratories in Mt. Laurel, NJ.

Quantification of asbestos content in bulk samples was performed via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). This method of analysis involves the dispersion staining of a suspect material in a solution of known refractive index and then subjected to illumination by polarized light. The resulting color contrast enables fiber and mineral identification. The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) and the State of Georgia define an ACM as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos.

A summary of field data including the sample designations, gross descriptions, and analytical results are provided in Table 2. The analytical results of all bulk samples and chain of custody documents are provided in Appendix 1.

2.3 Inaccessible and Limited-Access Spaces

Every reasonable effort was made to locate suspect ACM at elevated potential to be impacted by this project. All rooms were made accessible for the survey. Other inaccessible areas might include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 1: Description of Potential Inaccessible Locations.

Table 1: Description of Potential Inaccessible Locations

Mechanical and plumbing system above the reach of readily accessible ladders

Concealed by roofing and building waterproofing systems

Enclosed pipe/duct chases/floor penetrations Inside mechanical equipment/ductwork

Above hard plaster ceilings Inside fire doors

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

2.4 Survey Limitations

This survey was limited to areas and building systems scheduled for replacement, upgrade, or renovation as part of the scope of this project. Other suspect materials uncovered during renovation and/or demolition activities not identified within this report should be considered presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) and should be treated as ACM until sampling and laboratory analysis confirm otherwise. The installed roofing and building waterproofing systems were specifically excluded, were not sampled and if impacted by the HVAC Reset we recommend these be sampled prior to impact to determine hazardous material status.

2.5 Asbestos Survey Results

A total of thirty (30) bulk samples were collected from eleven (11) homogeneous suspect materials during the survey. The suspect ACM and asbestos laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 2: Description of Homogeneous Areas and Sampling Results.

Table 2: Description of Homogeneous Areas and Sampling Results

HA

# Description Sample # Location Asbestos

Content Friable

(Yes/No)

Black Vinyl

Vibration Damper Gasket

GA002-1.1 Samples not collected due to concerns about compromising the integrity of gasket. Main Assembly

Room

Assumed ACM No

2 2 X 4 White Ceiling Tile

GA002-2.1 Hallways, Offices & Classrooms – Typical

ND

No

GA002-2.2 Hallways, Offices & Classrooms – Typical

ND

GA002-2.3 Hallways, Offices & Classrooms – Typical

ND

GA002-2.3-QC Sample Results Confirm Primary Samples

ND

3 Concrete Block Wall

GA002-3.1 Interior Walls - Typical ND No GA002-3.2 Interior Walls - Typical ND GA002-3.3 Interior Walls - Typical ND

4 Concrete Block Wall Mortar

GA002-4.1 Interior Walls - Typical ND No GA002-4.2 Interior Walls - Typical ND GA002-4.3 Interior Walls - Typical ND

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

Table 2: Description of Homogeneous Areas and Sampling Results

HA

# Description Sample # Location Asbestos Content

Friable (Yes/No)

5 Grey Mastic/Sealant on Insulated Ducts

GA002-5.1 Typical of Building ND

No GA002-5.2 Typical of Building ND GA002-5.3 Typical of Building ND

Tan Mastic/Sealant on Insulated Ductwork

GA002-6.1 Typical of Building ND

No GA002-6.2 Typical of Building ND GA002-6.3 Typical of Building ND

White

Mastic/Sealant on Insulated Pipe

GA002-7.1 Typical of Building 3%

No GA002-7.2 Typical of Building PS

GA002-7.3 Typical of Building PS

8 Drywall Wallboard

GA002-8.1 Walls and Ceilings - Typical

ND

No GA002-8.2 Walls and Ceilings - Typical

ND

GA002-8.3 Walls and Ceilings - Typical

ND

9 White Joint Compound

GA002-9.1 Walls and Ceilings - Typical

ND

No

GA002-9.2 Walls and Ceilings - Typical

ND

GA002-9.3 Walls and Ceilings - Typical

ND

GA002-9.4-QC Sample Results Confirm Primary Samples

ND

10 Red Brick – Exterior Walls

GA002-10.1 Exterior Walls - Typical ND

No GA002-10.2 Exterior Walls - Typical ND

GA002-10.3 Exterior Walls - Typical ND

11 Tan Brick Mortar – Exterior Walls

GA002-11.1 Exterior Walls - Typical ND

No GA002-11.2 Exterior Walls - Typical ND GA002-11.3 Exterior Walls - Typical ND

ND – None Detected PS – Stop Analysis on Sample Set with Positive Result

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

2.6 Asbestos Conclusions and Recommendations

Regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) is defined as friable ACM or non-friable ACM with an asbestos fiber content greater than 1% that will be, or has been, subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading or has crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition or renovation operations.

The black vinyl vibration damper gasket located in the duct work for the HVAC system on the kitchen roof could not be sampled without compromising the equipment and is, therefore, assumed to be ACM. While the vibration damper is considered to have a low potential to be ACM, we recommend this material be sampled and analyzed for asbestos prior to renovation to confirm the classification. The white mastic/sealant used on the insulated piping throughout the building was found to be ACM and, if disturbed, should be managed as a class II non-friable ACM. Remedial action and abatement specifications are indicated for these materials if disturbed during the HVAC Reset.

The other nine (9) suspect materials identified, sampled, and analyzed as part of the survey were not found to be asbestos-containing. Remedial action or specification development is not indicated for these materials.

If additional suspect materials are identified during renovation/demolition and have not been tested to determine the presence of asbestos, those materials should be protected from impact until further investigated and the asbestos content is determined.

All quantities must be field-verified by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor(s) prior to demolition or renovation.

Sampling locations and positively-identified materials are identified on drawings presented in Appendix 3.

3.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY REPORT

This section describes data collection activities including the site survey and sample collection for Lead-Based Paint (LBP) that will be affected by the HVAC renovation. The site survey was completed on December 11, 2018, by EPA-accredited and Lead-Safe State Program Inspector, Mr. William B. Zukauskas.

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

3.1 LBP Survey Methodology

Testing for LBP was conducted using paint chips sampling techniques. LBP is defined as a paint containing greater than 0.5% lead by weight according to the GEPD. Samples were delivered to EMSL of Cinnaminson, New Jersey for analysis using Atomic Absorption Analysis for Lead in accordance with method SW846 – 3050B/7000B.

The analytical results are presented in Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results.

3.2 LBP Survey Results

A total of three (3) components were assessed using paint chip sampling. These painted surfaces included the components with an elevated potential to be impacted by the planned HVAC renovation. The painted surfaces sampled include the tan paint on concrete block walls, white paint on drywall interior partitions, olive paint on drywall partitions and doors and walls were not found to be LBP or LCP. The analytical results for the three samples detected lead below the detection limit for the method. While the structural steel for the building is assumed to be painted with LBP, it is considered to be at a low potential to be impacted by the HVAC Reset.

3.3 LBP Conclusions and Recommendations

The painted surfaces inspected and sampled were not found to be LBP or LCP and are classified non-lead containing paint. The development of LBP abatement specifications is not indicated.

4.0 OTHER POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS

The Facility was surveyed for other potentially hazardous materials that may be impacted by the planned renovation. The existing original lighting systems have an elevated potential to contain mercury-containing florescent light bulbs and should be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273. The original fluorescent lighting fixtures in the building have an elevated potential to be equipped with potentially PCB-containing electrical light ballasts.

These ballasts require management as a PCB-containing waste unless specifically marked as non-PCB containing ballasts. The development of specifications for Universal Waste (UW) and PCB light ballasts is indicated if the lighting system is impacted by the planned HVAC renovation.

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

The fire protection system has an elevated potential to contain ionization-type smoke and fire detectors that are constructed with an Americium-241 radioactive source. If they do, they should be segregated and disposed of properly in accordance with Federal, state and local regulations.

The existing heating and cooling system consist of several air-conditioning systems that contain a significant quantity of potentially regulated refrigerants that may be classified as Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS). Section 608 of the Clean Air Act prohibits the known release of refrigerants and ODS during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. The EPA requires proper refrigerant management practices by owners and operators of refrigeration and air-conditioning systems, technicians, and others. The refrigerants should be managed and disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR 82 and applicable Federal, state and local regulations.

5.0 DISCLAIMER

Information in this limited survey report relating to hazardous materials (i.e., asbestos and lead), although believed to be inclusive and accurate, was based on visual observations and field sampling of accessible areas at the time of survey. Global Consulting, Inc. reserves the right to revise any recommendations and conclusions based on new information that may become available and does not guarantee or accept any liability that encompasses this limited survey of hazardous or regulated materials located within this Facility. This report should not be used as a comprehensive hazardous material survey of the whole facility.

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077

Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041836709EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Bill Zukauskas (904) 636-9360

Fax:APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure (904) 636-9356

Received Date:9143 Phillips Highway 12/13/2018 9:30 AM

Analysis Date:Suite 400 12/18/2018 - 12/19/2018

Collected Date:Jacksonville, FL 32256

Project: GA002 - Augusta

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

GA002-2.1

041836709-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose

Min. Wool

Glass

60%

5%

15%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2x4 White Ceiling Tile

GA002-2.2

041836709-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose

Min. Wool

Glass

60%

5%

15%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2x4 White Ceiling Tile

GA002-2.3

041836709-0003

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

20%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2x4 White Ceiling Tile

GA002-3.1

041836709-0004

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

GA002-3.2

041836709-0005

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

GA002-3.3

041836709-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

GA002-4.1

041836709-0007

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

GA002-4.2

041836709-0008

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

GA002-4.3

041836709-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

GA002-5.1

041836709-0010

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

GA002-5.2

041836709-0011

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

GA002-5.3

041836709-0012

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

GA002-6.1

041836709-0013

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Duct Mastic

GA002-6.2

041836709-0014

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Duct Mastic

GA002-6.3

041836709-0015

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Duct Mastic

GA002-7.1

041836709-0016

3% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)97%White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on Pipe

Insulation

Initial report from: 12/18/2018 20:57:55

Page 1 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/20/2018 7:16 AM

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077

Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041836709EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

GA002-7.2

041836709-0017

Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)White Mastic on Pipe

Insulation

GA002-7.3

041836709-0018

Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)White Mastic on Pipe

Insulation

GA002-8.1

041836709-0019

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose

Glass

15%

5%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall Board

GA002-8.2

041836709-0020

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose

Glass

15%

5%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall Board

GA002-8.3

041836709-0021

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose

Glass

15%

5%

Brown/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall Board

GA002-9.1

041836709-0022

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

GA002-9.2

041836709-0023

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

GA002-9.3

041836709-0024

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

GA002-10.1

041836709-0025

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Red Brick

GA002-10.2

041836709-0026

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Red Brick

GA002-10.3

041836709-0027

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Red Brick

GA002-11.1

041836709-0028

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Brick Mortar

GA002-11.2

041836709-0029

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Brick Mortar

GA002-11.3

041836709-0030

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Brick Mortar

Analyst(s)

Amy Latham (19)

John Flanagan (9)

Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367

Initial report from: 12/18/2018 20:57:55

Page 2 of 2ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 12/20/2018 7:16 AM

OrderID: 041836709

Lab No.: 6671829 Client No.: GA002-2.4QA

Analyst Observation: Grey Ceiling Tile Client Description: 2x4 White Ceiling Tile

Location:

Facility:

Percent Asbestos:

None Detected

Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material:

65 Mineral Wool

Percent Non-Fibrous Material:

Lab No.: 6671830 Client No.: GA002-9.4QA

Analyst Observation: White Joint Compound Client Description: White Joint Compound

Location:

Facility:

Percent Asbestos:

Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material:

Percent Non-Fibrous Material:

Laboratory Director

Approved By:

Date Analyzed:

12/12/2018Date Received:

Analyst:

Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.

Signature:

Terrence Mulhern

12/14/2018 Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim

9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

12/14/2018Report Date:

Report No.: 579348 - PLM Project: GA002 - Augusta Project No.:

PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Client: SHA873

Dated : 12/19/2018 11:37:01 Page 1 of 4

Appendix to Analytical Report Customer Contact: Dave Mosher Method: US EPA 600, R93-116

This appendix seeks to promote greater understanding of any observations, exceptions, special instructions, or circumstances that the laboratory needs to communicate to the client concerning the above samples. The information below is used to help promote your ability to make the most informed decisions for you and your customers.

Please note the following points of contact for any questions you may have.

iATL Customer Service: customerservice@iatl.com iATL Office Manager: cdavis@iatl.com iATL Account Representative: Pete Lesniak Sample Login Notes: See Batch Sheet Attached Sample Matrix: Bulk Building Materials Exceptions Noted: See Following Pages

General Terms, Warrants, Limits, Qualifiers:

General information about iATL capabilities and client/laboratory relationships and responsibilities are spelled out in iATL policies that are listed at www.iATL.com and in our Quality Assurance Manual per ISO 17025 standard requirements. The information therein is a representation of iATL definitions and policies for turnaround times, sample submittal, collection media, blank definitions, quantification issues and limit of detection, analytical methods and procedures, sub-contracting policies, results reporting options, fees, terms, and discounts, confidentiality, sample archival and disposal, and data interpretation.

iATL warrants the test results to be of a precision normal for the type and methodology employed for each sample submitted. iATL disclaims any other warrants, expressed or implied, including warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and warranty of merchantability. iATL accepts no legal responsibility for the purpose for which the client uses test results. Any analytical work performed must be governed by our Standard Terms and Conditions. Prices, methods and detection limits may be changed without notification. Please contact your Customer Service Representative for the most current information.

This confidential report relates only to those item(s) tested and does not represent an endorsement by NIST-NVLAP, AIHA LAP LLC, or any agency of local, state or province governments nor of any agency of the U.S. government.

This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory.

Information Pertinent to this Report:

Analysis by US EPA 600 93-116: Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

Certifications:

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0• NYSDOH-ELAP No. 11021• AIHA-LAP, LLC No. 100188•

Quantification at <0.25% by volume is possible with this method. (PC) Indicates Stratified Point Count Method performed. (PC-Trace) means that asbestos was detected but is not quantifiable under the Point Counting regimen. PC Trace represents a <0.25% amount. Analysis includes all distinct separable layers in accordance with EPA 600 Method. If not reported or otherwise noted, layer is either not present or the client has specifically requested that it not be analyzed (ex. analyze until positive instructions). Small asbestos fibers may be missed by PLM due to resolution limitations of the optical microscope. Therefore, PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing.

Analytical Methodology Alternatives: Your initial request for analysis may not have accounted for recent advances in regulatory requirements or advances in technology that are routinely used in similar situations for other qualified projects. You may have the option to explore additional analysis for further information. Below are a few options, listed as the matrix followed by the appropriate methodology. Also included are links to more information on our website.

Bulk Building Materials that are Non-Friable Organically Bound (NOB) by Gravimetric Reduction techniques employing PLM and TEM: ELAP 198.6 (PLM-NOB), ELAP 198.4 (TEM-NOB)

Loose Fill Vermiculite Insulation, Attic Insulation, Zonolite (copyright), etc.: US EPA 600 R-4/004 (multi-tiered analytical process)

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim 9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

12/14/2018Report Date:

Report No.: 579348 - PLM Project: GA002 - Augusta Project No.:

Page 2 of 4Dated : 12/19/2018 11:37:02

Sprayed On Insulation/Fireproofing with Vermiculite (SOF-V): ELAP 198.8 (PLM-SOF-V)

Soil, sludge, sediment, aggregate, and like materials analyzed for asbestos or other elongated mineral particles (ex. erionite, etc.): ASTM D7521, CARB 435, and other options available

Asbestos in Surface Dust according to one of ASTM's Methods (very dependent on sampling collection technique – by TEM): ASTM D 5755, D5756, or D6480

Various other asbestos matrices (air, water, etc.) and analytical methods are available.

Disclaimers / Qualifiers:

There may be some samples in this project that have a "NOTE:" associated with a sample result. We use added disclaimers or qualifiers to inform the client about something that requires further explanation. Here is a list with highlighted disclaimers that may be pertinent to this project. For a full explanation of these and other disclaimers, please inquire at customerservice@iatl.com.

1) Note: No mastic provided for analysis.

2) Note: Insufficient mastic provided for analysis.

3) Note: Insufficient material provided for analysis.

4) Note: Insufficient sample provided for QC reanalysis.

5) Note: Different material than indicated on Sample Log / Description.

6) Note: Sample not submitted.

7) Note: Attached to asbestos containing material.

8) Note: Received wet.

9) Note: Possible surface contamination.

10) Note: Not building material. 1% threshold may not apply.

11) Note: Recommend TEM-NOB analysis as per EPA recommendations.

12) Note: Asbestos detected but not quantifiable.

13) Note: Multiple identical samples submitted, only one analyzed.

14) Note: Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116. Point Counting detection limit at 0.080%.

15) Note: Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116. Point Counting detection limit at 0.125%.

16) Note: This sample contains >10% vermiculite mineral. See Appendix for Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis.

Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis:

Several analytical protocols exist for the analysis of asbestos in vermiculite. These analytical approaches vary depending upon the nature of the vermiculite mineral being tested (e.g. un-processed gange, homogeneous exfoliated books of mica, or mixed mineral composites).Please contact your client representative for pricing and turnaround time options available.

iATL recommends initial testing using the EPA 600/R-93/116 method. This method is specifically designed for the analysis of asbestos in bulk building materials. It provides an acceptable starting point for primary screening of vermiculite for possible asbestos.

Results from this testing may be inconclusive. EPA suggests proceeding to a multi-tiered analysis involving wet separation techniques in conjunction with PLM and TEM gravimetric analysis (EPA 600/R-04/004).

For New York State customers, NYSDOH requires disclaimers and qualifiers for various vermiculite containing samples that direct analysis via ELAP198.6 and ELAP198.8 for samples that contain >10% vermiculite mineral where ELAP198.6 may be used to evaluate the asbestos content of the material. However, any test result using ELAP198.6 will be reported with the following disclaimer: “ELAP198.6 method does not remove vermiculite and may underestimate the level of asbestos present in a sample containing >10% vermiculite.”

Further information on this method and other vermiculite and asbestos issues can be found at the following: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) www.atsdr.cdc.gov, United States Geological Survey (USGS) www.minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/, US EPA www.epa.gov/asbestos. The USEPA also has an informative brochure "Current Best Practices for Vermiculite Attic Insulation" EPA 747F03001 May 2003, that may assist the health and remediation professional.

The following is a summary of the analytical process outlines in the EPA 600/R-04/004 Method:

1)Analytical Step/Method: Initial Screening by PLM, EPA 600R-93/116 Requirements/Comments: Minimum of 0.1 g of sample. ~0.25% LOQ for most samples.

2)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Sinks" only.

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim 9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

12/14/2018Report Date:

Report No.: 579348 - PLM Project: GA002 - Augusta Project No.:

Page 3 of 4Dated : 12/19/2018 11:37:02

3)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Floats" only.

4)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by TEM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Sinks" only.

5)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by TEM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Suspension" only.

LOQ, Limit of Quantitation estimates for mass and volume analyses.

*With advance notice and confirmation by the laboratory.

**Approximately 1 Liter of sample in double-bagged container (~9x6 inch bag of sample).

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim 9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

12/14/2018Report Date:

Report No.: 579348 - PLM Project: GA002 - Augusta Project No.:

Page 4 of 4Dated : 12/19/2018 11:37:02

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

Appendix 2- Lead Paint Chip Results

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Bill Zukauskas APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure 9143 Phillips Highway Suite 400 Jacksonville, FL 32256

Received: 12/13/18 9:30 AM

GA002 - Augusta

Fax: (904) 636-9356 Phone: (904) 636-9360

Project:

Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

201814218 CustomerID: SHAE77 CustomerPO:

ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.2652 Site: Tan Paint

201814218-0001GA002-PS-01 <0.0080 % wt12/18/2018 g

0.2507 Site: White Paint

201814218-0002GA002-PS-02 <0.0080 % wt12/18/2018 g

0.2608 Site: Olive Paint

201814218-0003GA002-PS-03 <0.0080 % wt12/18/2018 g

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 12/20/2018 8:28:21 AM

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 12/20/2018 08:28:21 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

OrderID: 201814218

OrderID: 201814218

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

Appendix 3 – Drawings of Sample Locations

2.3, 2.4

Ceiling mounted HVAC unit

5.2, 6.2

9.2

PS.02

2.2, 7.3

5.1

10.3, 11.3

3.2, 4.2 7.2

10.2, 11.2

10.1, 11.18.18.38.2 7.1

3.1, 4.1 2.3

2.1 6.1

1.1 9.3, 9.4

MS NTS

02/04/19

DESIGNED EDITED SCALE

DATE REVISED

FIRST FLOOR

FIGURE:

ACM Sample Locations of Building HVAC GA002 Roy W. Miller JR USARC 3311 Wrightsboro Road Augusta, GA 30909-2898

FLOOR:

LEGEND:

Prepared by: Global Consulting, Inc.

6401 Golden Triangle Dr., Suite #304, Greenbelt, MD 20770 (202)832-1433

Prepared for: Jacobs Engineering., 1100 N Glebe Rd #500, Arlington, VA 22201

## - Sample Number Begins w/ Y294-B62-##

- Sample Collected Area

- Inaccessible at the Time of Inspection ## - Negative Samples (e.g. : 4A)

## - Positive Samples (e.g.: 20A)

PS.03

5.3, 6.3

3.3, 4.3

PS.01

Ceiling mounted HVAC unit

MS NTS

02/04/19

DESIGNED EDITED SCALE

DATE REVISED

SECOND FLOOR

FIGURE:

ACM Sample Locations of Building HVAC GA002 Roy W. Miller JR USARC 3311 Wrightsboro Road Augusta, GA 30909-2898

FLOOR:

LEGEND:

Prepared by: Global Consulting, Inc.

6401 Golden Triangle Dr., Suite #304, Greenbelt, MD 20770 (202)832-1433

Prepared for: Jacobs Engineering., 1100 N Glebe Rd #500, Arlington, VA 22201

## - Sample Number Begins w/ Y294-B62-##

- Sample Collected Area

- Inaccessible at the Time of Inspection ## - Negative Samples (e.g. : 4A)

## - Positive Samples (e.g.: 20A)

Hazardous Material Survey Roy W. Miller Jr USARC

U.S. Army Reserve Center GA002

Appendix 4 – Inspector Certification(s)/License(s)