AL072_-_Hazmat_Report_-_Final.pdf

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY

310TH CHEMICAL COMPANY

U.S. ARMY RESERVE CENTER AL072

30 LONGHORN LANE

FORT MCCLELLAN, AL 36205-5000

PRIME CONTRACT # W912HP18D6000

TASK ORDER – W912HP18F1203

PROJECT NUMBER - F5Y67384

SUBCONSULTING F5Y67384-S19-0001

Prepared for:

JACOBS GOVERNMENT SERVICE COMPANY

1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 500 Arlington, VA 22201

Submitted by:

6401 Golden Triangle Drive, #304

Greenbelt, MD 20770

February 8, 2019

ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072 30 Longhorn Lane

Fort McClellan, AL 36205-5000 i

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. i

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

2.1 Survey Methodology

2.2 Analytical Procedures

2.3 Inaccessible and Limited-Access Spaces

2.4 Survey Limitations

2.5 Asbestos Survey Results

2.6 Asbestos Conclusions and Recommendations

3.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY REPORT

3.1 LBP Survey Methodology

3.2 LBP Survey Results

3.3 LBP Conclusions and Recommendations

4.0 OTHER POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS

5.0 DISCLAIMER

Appendices:

Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results Appendix 3 – Floor Drawings of ACM and Sample Locations Appendix 4 – Inspector Certification(s)/License(s)

Carlk323 Text Box

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072 30 Longhorn Lane

Fort McClellan, AL 36205-5000 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, retained Jacobs Government Service Company (Jacobs) to provide Architect-Engineering Services for the 81st Readiness Division (RD) Reset Design Project, located at the 310th Chemical Company, US Army Reserve Center, 30 Longhorn Lane, Fort McClellan, AL 36205-5000. Jacobs retained Global Consulting, Inc. (GCI) to perform an environmental and hazardous material survey for this project. This report documents the survey of the Facility by certified inspectors for Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM),Lead-Based Paint (LBP), and other hazardous materials and Universal Waste (UW). The Facility is scheduled for a partial renovation and reset of the HVAC System, and this survey was limited to identifying the potentially hazardous materials and conditions likely to be impacted by the proposed project.

Asbestos:

On November 7, 2018, GCI’s EPA-accredited and Alabama-licensed Asbestos Inspector assessed the existing building materials suspected to contain asbestos and likely to be impacted during renovation. GCI identified 14 specific suspect homogenous building materials, of which a total of 42 samples were submitted for laboratory analysis.

None of the samples were not found to be asbestos-containing.

Details of the survey are presented in Section 2.0 – Asbestos Survey Report. Analytical results are presented in Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results and Appendix 3 – Floor Drawings of ACM and Sample Locations. The development of hazardous material abatement drawings and specifications is not indicated.

Lead-Based Paint:

GCI’s Industrial Hygienist (IH), an EPA and Alabama-certified LBP Inspector, performed a survey of the Facility for Lead-Based Paint (LBP) and Lead-Containing Paint (LCP) painted surfaces with an elevated potential to be impacted during renovation. The following components are considered to contain LBP:

• Structural Steel (Assumed)

• Metal Air Distribution Louvers (Assumed)

The following components were found to contain LCP:

• None Identified

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072 ii

Details of the survey are presented in Section 3.0 – Lead-Based Paint Survey Report.

Analytical results are presented in Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results. The LBP assumed to be present on the structural steel will not require the development of hazardous material abatement plans as they are unlikely to be impacted during the planned renovation. In the event the louvers are disturbed, removed, or replaced, the scrap metal recycling facility should be notified, and OSHA guidelines should be followed.

Other Potential Hazardous Materials:

The Facility was surveyed for other potentially hazardous materials that may be impacted by the planned renovation. The existing original lighting systems have an elevated potential to contain mercury-containing florescent light bulbs and should be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273. The original fluorescent lighting systems in the building have an elevated potential to be equipped with potentially PCB-containing electrical light ballasts that require management as a PCB-containing waste unless specifically marked as non-PCB containing ballasts. Should the lighting system be impacted by the HVAC system renovation, specifications should be developed to address these materials.

The fire protection system has an elevated potential to contain ionization-type smoke and fire detectors that are typically constructed with an Americium-241 radioactive source. If impacted by the renovation, these detectors should be segregated and disposed of properly in accordance with Federal, state, and local regulations.

The existing heating and cooling system consist of several air-conditioning systems that contain a significant quantity of potentially regulated refrigerants that may be classified as Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS). Section 608 of the Clean Air Act prohibits the known release of refrigerants and ODS during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. The EPA requires proper refrigerant management practices by owners and operators of refrigeration and air-conditioning systems, technicians, and others. The refrigerants should be managed and disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR 82 and applicable Federal, state, and local regulations.

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072 iii

ACRONYMS

ACM Asbestos-Containing Material

ADEM Alabama Department of Environmental Management

AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

IH Industrial Hygienist

LBP Lead-Based Paint

LCP Lead-Containing Paint

NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollution

NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health

NVLAP National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

OSHA Occupational Safety & Health Administration

ODS Ozone-Depleting Substances

PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl

PLM Polarized Light Microscopy

PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material

RACM Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material

UW Universal Waste

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, retained Jacobs Government Service Company (Jacobs) to provide Architect-Engineering Services for the 81st Readiness Division (RD) Reset Design Project, located at the 310th Chemical Company, U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072, 30 Longhorn Lane, Fort McClellan, AL 36205-5000. Jacobs retained Global Consulting, Inc. (GCI) to perform the limited environmental and hazardous material survey associated with this project. This report documents the limited survey of the Facility by an Alabama-certified inspector for Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM), Lead- Based Paint (LBP), and other hazardous materials. The Facility is scheduled for a HVAC renovation and this survey was limited to identify the potentially hazardous materials and conditions likely to be impacted by the proposed project. The mutual goal of the contractor and the government is to safely achieve a quality product within the expected timeframe and budget.

The scope of work for this survey consisted of the following tasks:

1. Review of available records for identified and suspect ACM, LBP, and other hazardous and regulated materials that may be impacted by the scope of work.

2. Conduct a visual survey of the project area to identify potential location(s) of hazardous materials that may be affected by the scope of work.

3. Collect bulk samples of suspect ACMs and assess painted surfaces for LBP using paint chip analysis.

4. Submit the bulk samples to a certified laboratory to positively identify ACM via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) using EPA Method 600/R-93/116 and LBP using Atomic Absorption Analysis for Lead Method SW846-7420.

5. Prepare a report summarizing data, collection techniques, analysis procedures, locations and quantity of ACM, LBP/LCP, other observed hazardous and regulated materials, and detailed recommendations for any indicated response actions.

6. Abatement specification(s) will be prepared separately, if required.

2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

This section describes the site survey and sample collection of suspect ACMs. The site survey was conducted on November 7, 2018, by EPA-accredited Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and State of Alabama Department of Environmental Management (ADEM) accredited Asbestos Inspector, Mr. William B. Zukauskas (ADEM

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

License# AIN0118639172). A copy of Mr. Zukauskas’ licensure is presented in Appendix 4.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the ADEM are the authorities that regulate activities related to asbestos-containing materials (ACM) in Alabama. The EPA regulations enforce four asbestos activities; (1) removal, repair, or encapsulation of asbestos-containing materials (ACM), (2) approval of asbestos training providers, (3) regulation of professionals accredited to perform asbestos-related activities, and (4) asbestos in schools. The ADEM regulates the enforcement of the EPA’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), and enforcement of the asbestos notification regulations.

2.1 Survey Methodology

The asbestos survey was divided into two distinct phases: pre-survey planning and field survey.

2.1.1 Pre-Survey Planning

The pre-survey planning phase included reviewing previous survey reports, drawings, management plans, and abatement reports, if available. Jacobs provided GCI with information regarding the planned HVAC renovation of the Facility. GCI planned a survey strategy and scheduled the survey work. It was determined that this survey should include all applicable and accessible areas of the Facility to ensure that intended renovation, can be conducted in an efficient and safe manner compliant with applicable Federal, state, and local regulations.

2.1.2 Field Survey

The field survey was conducted for the areas that may be affected by the renovation as determined in the planning phase, and building materials were identified and considered to be suspect ACM. Roofing materials were specifically excluded from the scope of work.

Suspect materials that were homogeneous in nature (i.e., uniform in color and texture, installation date) were identified, touched to determine friability, and sampled by removing a small amount of material. Extreme care was taken to avoid potential fiber release during the sampling process. Before sample collection, a fine mist of water was typically applied to the sampling location. Samples were collected using sharpened core samplers and/or utility knives, where necessary, and immediately placed in labeled containers and sealed.

Any dust generated was wet-wiped to minimize the potential fiber release. All sampling locations were promptly patched and repaired. The location and condition of each homogeneous material were recorded.

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

2.2 Analytical Procedures

The samples of suspect ACMs were packaged and delivered under strict chain of custody procedures to EMSL Analytical, Inc. of Cinnaminson, NJ, a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory. Quality control samples were duplicated in the field and submitted to ATL International Asbestos Testing Laboratories in Mt. Laurel, NJ.

Quantification of asbestos content in bulk samples was performed via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). This method of analysis involves the dispersion staining of a suspect material in a solution of known refractive index and then subjected to illumination by polarized light. The resulting color contrast enables fiber and mineral identification. The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) and the State of Alabama define an ACM as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos.

A summary of field data including the sample designations, gross descriptions, and analytical results are provided in Table 2. The analytical results of all bulk samples and chain of custody documents are provided in Appendix 1.

2.3 Inaccessible and Limited-Access Spaces

Every reasonable effort was made to locate suspect ACM at elevated potential to be impacted by this project. All rooms were made accessible for the survey. Inaccessible areas might include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 1: Description of Potential Inaccessible Locations.

Table 1: Description of Potential Inaccessible Locations

Mechanical and plumbing system above the reach of readily accessible ladders

Concealed by roofing and building waterproofing systems

Enclosed pipe/duct chases/floor penetrations

Inside mechanical equipment/ductwork

Above hard plaster ceilings Inside fire doors

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

2.4 Survey Limitations

This survey was limited to areas and building systems scheduled for replacement, upgrade, or renovation of the HVAC system as part of the scope of this project. Other suspect materials uncovered during renovation and/or demolition activities not identified within this report should be considered as presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) and should be treated as ACM until sampling and laboratory analysis confirm otherwise. The installed roofing and building waterproofing systems were specifically excluded and were not sampled as part of survey.

2.5 Asbestos Survey Results

A total of forty-two (42) bulk samples were collected from fourteen (14) homogeneous suspect materials during the survey. In addition, a total of three Quality Control (QC) Samples were collected, submitted to an independent laboratory, and were analyzed. The independent analysis confirmed the primary sample results. The suspect ACM and asbestos laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 2: Description of Homogeneous Areas and Sampling Results.

Table 2: Description of Homogeneous Areas and Sampling Results

HA # Description Sample # Location Asbestos Content

Friable (Yes/No)

1 Concrete – Building Slab

AL072-1.1 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building ND

No AL072-1.2 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-1.3 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

2 Concrete Block

AL072-2.1 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

No AL072-2.2 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-2.3 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

3 Concrete Block Mortar

AL072-3.1 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND No

AL072-3.2 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-3.3 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

Content

Friable (Yes/No)

White Paper

Insulated Pipe Wrap

AL072-4.1 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND No

AL072-4.2 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-4.3 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

White Mastic/Sealant on

Insulated Pipe Wrap

AL072-5.1 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

No AL072-5.2 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-5.3 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

White

Mastic/Sealant on Insulated Duct

AL072-6.1 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

No AL072-6.2 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-6.3 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

Grey

Mastic/Sealant on Sheet Metal Duct

AL072-7.1 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building ND

No AL072-7.2 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-7.3 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

8 Light Grey Caulk/Duct Putty

AL072-8.1 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

No

AL072-8.2 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-8.3 Mechanical Room - Typical of Building

ND

AL072-8.4 - QC Mechanical Room - Typical of Building – QC Sample Confirms Original Results

ND

9 Red Brick - Walls

AL072-9.1 Exterior Walls ND

No AL072-9.2 Exterior Walls ND

AL072-9.3 Exterior Walls ND

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

Content

Friable (Yes/No)

10 White Brick Mortar - Walls

AL072-10.1 Exterior Walls ND

No AL072-10.2 Exterior Walls ND

AL072-10.3 Exterior Walls ND

11 Grey Caulk at Penetrations

AL072-11.1 Pipe Penetration – Exterior Walls

ND

No

AL072-11.2 Pipe Penetration – Exterior Walls

ND

AL072-11.3 Pipe Penetration – Exterior Walls

ND

AL072-11.4 - QC Pipe Penetration – Exterior Walls – QC Sample

Confirms Original Results

ND

12 2’ X 4’ Ceiling Tiles

AL072-12.1 Hallway ND

No AL072-12.2 Classroom 116 ND AL072-12.3 Classroom 116 ND

13 White Mastic on Flex Ducts

AL072-13.1 Above Ceiling - Classroom

ND

No AL072-13.2 Above Ceiling - Classroom

ND

AL072-13.3 Above Ceiling - Classroom

ND

Black Mastic on Paper Insulation

Backing

AL072-14.1 Above Ceiling - Classroom

ND

No

AL072-14.2 Above Ceiling - Classroom

ND

AL072-14.3 Above Ceiling - Classroom

ND

AL072-14.4 - QC Above Ceiling - Classroom 116 – QC Sample Confirms

Original Results

ND

ND – None Detected

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

2.6 Asbestos Conclusions and Recommendations

Regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) is defined as friable ACM or non-friable ACM with an asbestos fiber content greater than 1% that will be, or has been, subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading or has crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition or renovation operations.

The 14 suspect materials identified, sampled and analyzed during the survey were not found to be asbestos-containing. Remedial action or specification development is not indicated.

If additional suspect materials are identified during renovation/demolition and have not been tested to determine the presence of asbestos, those materials should be protected from impact until further investigated and the asbestos content is determined.

All quantities must be field-verified by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor(s) prior to demolition or renovation.

Sampling locations are identified on drawings presented in Appendix 3.

3.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY REPORT

This section describes data collection activities including the site survey and sample collection for Lead-Based Paint (LBP) that will be affected by HVAC renovation. The site survey was completed on November 7, 2018, by EPA-accredited and State of Alabama Lead Safe State Program Inspector, Mr. William B. Zukauskas.

3.1 LBP Survey Methodology

Testing for LBP was conducted using paint chip sampling techniques. LBP is defined as a paint containing greater than 0.5% lead by weight according to the Alabama Department of Environmental Management. One sample was delivered to EMSL of North Cinnaminson, New Jersey for analysis using Atomic Absorption Analysis for Lead in accordance with method SW846 – 3050B/7000B.

The analytical results are presented in Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results.

3.2 LBP Survey Results

The assessed painted surfaces included only those components with an elevated potential to be impacted by the planned renovation of the HVAC system scheduled for this facility A total of one painted component, light gray paint on concrete block walls and drywall, was

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072 assessed using paint chip sampling. The paint is neither lead-based nor lead-containing.

GCI’s Lead Inspector observed painted metal louvers with a factory-painted finish that are assumed to be LBP; and they should be managed accordingly.

3.3 LBP Conclusions and Recommendations

The painted surfaces (concrete wall and drywall) were not found to be LBP or LCP. The development of LBP abatement specifications is not indicated. In the event the louvers are disturbed, removed, or replaced, the scrap metal recycling facility should be notified, and OSHA Lead in Construction guidelines should be followed.

4.0 OTHER POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS

The Facility was surveyed for other potentially hazardous materials that may be impacted by the planned renovation. The existing original lighting systems have an elevated potential to contain mercury-containing florescent light bulbs and should be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273. The original fluorescent lighting fixtures in the building have an elevated potential to be equipped with potentially PCB-containing electrical light ballasts.

These ballasts require management as a PCB-containing waste unless specifically marked as non-PCB containing ballasts. The development of specifications for Universal Waste (UW) and PCB light ballasts is indicated if the lighting system is impacted by the planned HVAC renovation.

The fire protection system has an elevated potential to contain ionization-type smoke and fire detectors that are constructed with an Americium-241 radioactive source. If they do, they should be segregated and disposed of properly in accordance with Federal, state and local regulations.

The existing heating and cooling system consist of several air-conditioning systems that contain a significant quantity of potentially regulated refrigerants that may be classified as Ozone-Depleting Substances (ODS). Section 608 of the Clean Air Act prohibits the known release of refrigerants and ODS during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. The EPA requires proper refrigerant management practices by owners and operators of refrigeration and air-conditioning systems, technicians, and others. The refrigerants should be managed and disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR 82 and applicable Federal, state, and local regulations.

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

5.0 DISCLAIMER

Information in this limited survey report relating to hazardous materials (i.e., asbestos and lead), although believed to be inclusive and accurate, was based on visual observations and field sampling of accessible areas at the time of survey. Global Consulting, Inc. reserves the right to revise any recommendations and conclusions based on new information that may become available, and does not guarantee or accept any liability that encompasses this limited survey of hazardous or regulated materials located within this Facility. This report should not be used as a comprehensive hazardous material survey of the whole facility.

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North Cinnaminson, NJ 08077

Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041833627EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO: 003560

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Bill Zukauskas (904) 636-9360

Fax:APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure (904) 636-9356

Received Date:9143 Phillips Highway 11/09/2018 9:20 AM

Analysis Date:Suite 400 11/13/2018 - 11/14/2018

Collected Date:Jacksonville, FL 32256

Project: AL072-003560

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

AL072-1.1

041833627-0001

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete - Bldg Slab

AL072-1.2

041833627-0002

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Brown/Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete - Bldg Slab

AL072-1.3

041833627-0003

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete - Bldg Slab

AL072-2.1

041833627-0004

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

AL072-2.2

041833627-0005

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

AL072-2.3

041833627-0006

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

AL072-3.1

041833627-0007

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

AL072-3.2

041833627-0008

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)98%Cellulose2%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

AL072-3.3

041833627-0009

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

AL072-4.1

041833627-0010

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)92%Cellulose

Glass

5%

3%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Paper Pipe

Wrap

AL072-4.2

041833627-0011

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)94%Cellulose

Glass

3%

3%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Paper Pipe

Wrap

AL072-4.3

041833627-0012

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)85%Cellulose

Glass

5%

10%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Paper Pipe

Wrap

AL072-5.1

041833627-0013

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)92%Cellulose

Glass

2%

6%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on Pipe

Valve

AL072-5.2

041833627-0014

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)93%Cellulose

Glass

2%

5%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on Pipe

Valve

AL072-5.3

041833627-0015

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)85%Cellulose

Glass

5%

10%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on Pipe

Valve

AL072-6.1

041833627-0016

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)94%Cellulose

Glass

2%

4%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on

HVAC Duct

Fiberglass

Initial report from: 11/13/2018 20:54:36

Page 1 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/14/2018 5:42 PM

Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041833627EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO: 003560

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

AL072-6.2

041833627-0017

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)96%Cellulose

Glass

2%

2%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on

HVAC Duct

Fiberglass

AL072-6.3

041833627-0018

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)85%Cellulose

Glass

5%

10%

White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on

HVAC Duct

Fiberglass

AL072-7.1

041833627-0019

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Mastic on Sheet

Metal Duct

AL072-7.2

041833627-0020

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Mastic on Sheet

Metal Duct

AL072-7.3

041833627-0021

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Mastic on Sheet

Metal Duct

AL072-8.1

041833627-0022

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)97%Cellulose3%Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Lt. Gray Candle/Duct

Putty

AL072-8.2

041833627-0023

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)97%Cellulose3%Gray

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Lt. Gray Candle/Duct

Putty

AL072-8.3

041833627-0024

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Lt. Gray Candle/Duct

Putty

AL072-9.1

041833627-0025

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)98%Cellulose2%Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Red Brick Walls

AL072-9.2

041833627-0026

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)98%Cellulose2%Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Red Brick Walls

AL072-9.3

041833627-0027

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Red

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Red Brick Walls

AL072-10.1

041833627-0028

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Brick Mortar

Walls

AL072-10.2

041833627-0029

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Brick Mortar

Walls

AL072-10.3

041833627-0030

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Brick Mortar

Walls

AL072-11.1

041833627-0031

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Caulk at

Penetrations

AL072-11.2

041833627-0032

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Caulk at

Penetrations

AL072-11.3

041833627-0033

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Caulk at

Penetrations

AL072-12.1

041833627-0034

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

20%

Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2 x 4 Ceiling Tile

AL072-12.2

041833627-0035

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

20%

Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2 x 4 Ceiling Tile

Page 2 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/14/2018 5:42 PM

Tel/Fax: (800) 220-3675 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com / cinnasblab@EMSL.com

041833627EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO: 003560

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

AL072-12.3

041833627-0036

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)20%Cellulose

Min. Wool

60%

20%

Tan/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2 x 4 Ceiling Tile

AL072-13.1

041833627-0037

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on Flex

Ducts

AL072-13.2

041833627-0038

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on Flex

Ducts

AL072-13.3

041833627-0039

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Mastic on Flex

Ducts

AL072-14.1

041833627-0040

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)81%Cellulose

Glass

15%

4%

Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black Mastic on

Paper Backing

AL072-14.2

041833627-0041

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)80%Cellulose

Glass

15%

5%

Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black Mastic on

Paper Backing

AL072-14.3

041833627-0042

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)35%Cellulose

Glass

50%

15%

Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Black Mastic on

Paper Backing

Analyst(s)

Andrew Castellano (14)

Michael Moore (28)

Benjamin Ellis, Laboratory Manager or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NVLAP Lab Code 101048-0, AIHA-LAP, LLC-IHLAP Lab 100194, NYS ELAP 10872, NJ DEP 03036, PA ID# 68-00367

Page 3 of 3ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 11/14/2018 5:42 PM

OrderID: 041833627

Lab No.: 6647867 Client No.: AL072-8.4QA

Analyst Observation: White/Grey Caulk Client Description: Lt Gray Caulk/Duct Putty

Location:

Facility:

Percent Asbestos:

None Detected

Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material:

1 Fibrous Glass 1 Cellulose

Percent Non-Fibrous Material:

Lab No.: 6647868 Client No.: AL072-11.4QA

Analyst Observation: Grey Cementitious Client Description: Gray Caulk At Penetration

Lab No.: 6647869 Client No.: AL072-14.4QA

Analyst Observation: Black Mastic Client Description: Black Mastic On Paper Backing

1 Mineral Wool

Lab No.: 6647869(L2) Client No.: AL072-14.4QA

Analyst Observation: Brown Paper Client Description: Black Mastic On Paper Backing

60 Cellulose

Laboratory Director

Approved By:

Date Analyzed:

11/8/2018Date Received:

Analyst:

Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.

Signature:

Michael Lagarde

11/15/2018 Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim

9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

11/15/2018Report Date:

Report No.: 577061 - PLM Project: 003560 Project No.: AL072

PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Client: SHA873

Dated : 11/15/2018 2:43:00 Page 1 of 4

Appendix to Analytical Report Customer Contact: Dave Mosher Method: US EPA 600, R93-116

This appendix seeks to promote greater understanding of any observations, exceptions, special instructions, or circumstances that the laboratory needs to communicate to the client concerning the above samples. The information below is used to help promote your ability to make the most informed decisions for you and your customers.

Please note the following points of contact for any questions you may have.

iATL Customer Service: customerservice@iatl.com iATL Office Manager: cdavis@iatl.com iATL Account Representative: Pete Lesniak Sample Login Notes: See Batch Sheet Attached Sample Matrix: Bulk Building Materials Exceptions Noted: See Following Pages

General Terms, Warrants, Limits, Qualifiers:

General information about iATL capabilities and client/laboratory relationships and responsibilities are spelled out in iATL policies that are listed at www.iATL.com and in our Quality Assurance Manual per ISO 17025 standard requirements. The information therein is a representation of iATL definitions and policies for turnaround times, sample submittal, collection media, blank definitions, quantification issues and limit of detection, analytical methods and procedures, sub-contracting policies, results reporting options, fees, terms, and discounts, confidentiality, sample archival and disposal, and data interpretation.

iATL warrants the test results to be of a precision normal for the type and methodology employed for each sample submitted. iATL disclaims any other warrants, expressed or implied, including warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and warranty of merchantability. iATL accepts no legal responsibility for the purpose for which the client uses test results. Any analytical work performed must be governed by our Standard Terms and Conditions. Prices, methods and detection limits may be changed without notification. Please contact your Customer Service Representative for the most current information.

This confidential report relates only to those item(s) tested and does not represent an endorsement by NIST-NVLAP, AIHA LAP LLC, or any agency of local, state or province governments nor of any agency of the U.S. government.

This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory.

Information Pertinent to this Report:

Analysis by US EPA 600 93-116: Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

Certifications:

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0• NYSDOH-ELAP No. 11021• AIHA-LAP, LLC No. 100188•

Quantification at <0.25% by volume is possible with this method. (PC) Indicates Stratified Point Count Method performed. (PC-Trace) means that asbestos was detected but is not quantifiable under the Point Counting regimen. PC Trace represents a <0.25% amount. Analysis includes all distinct separable layers in accordance with EPA 600 Method. If not reported or otherwise noted, layer is either not present or the client has specifically requested that it not be analyzed (ex. analyze until positive instructions). Small asbestos fibers may be missed by PLM due to resolution limitations of the optical microscope. Therefore, PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing.

Analytical Methodology Alternatives: Your initial request for analysis may not have accounted for recent advances in regulatory requirements or advances in technology that are routinely used in similar situations for other qualified projects. You may have the option to explore additional analysis for further information. Below are a few options, listed as the matrix followed by the appropriate methodology. Also included are links to more information on our website.

Bulk Building Materials that are Non-Friable Organically Bound (NOB) by Gravimetric Reduction techniques employing PLM and TEM: ELAP 198.6 (PLM-NOB), ELAP 198.4 (TEM-NOB)

Loose Fill Vermiculite Insulation, Attic Insulation, Zonolite (copyright), etc.: US EPA 600 R-4/004 (multi-tiered analytical process)

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim 9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

11/15/2018Report Date:

Report No.: 577061 - PLM Project: 003560 Project No.: AL072

Page 2 of 4Dated : 11/15/2018 2:43:00

Sprayed On Insulation/Fireproofing with Vermiculite (SOF-V): ELAP 198.8 (PLM-SOF-V)

Soil, sludge, sediment, aggregate, and like materials analyzed for asbestos or other elongated mineral particles (ex. erionite, etc.): ASTM D7521, CARB 435, and other options available

Asbestos in Surface Dust according to one of ASTM's Methods (very dependent on sampling collection technique – by TEM): ASTM D 5755, D5756, or D6480

Various other asbestos matrices (air, water, etc.) and analytical methods are available.

Disclaimers / Qualifiers:

There may be some samples in this project that have a "NOTE:" associated with a sample result. We use added disclaimers or qualifiers to inform the client about something that requires further explanation. Here is a list with highlighted disclaimers that may be pertinent to this project. For a full explanation of these and other disclaimers, please inquire at customerservice@iatl.com.

1) Note: No mastic provided for analysis.

2) Note: Insufficient mastic provided for analysis.

3) Note: Insufficient material provided for analysis.

4) Note: Insufficient sample provided for QC reanalysis.

5) Note: Different material than indicated on Sample Log / Description.

6) Note: Sample not submitted.

7) Note: Attached to asbestos containing material.

8) Note: Received wet.

9) Note: Possible surface contamination.

10) Note: Not building material. 1% threshold may not apply.

11) Note: Recommend TEM-NOB analysis as per EPA recommendations.

12) Note: Asbestos detected but not quantifiable.

13) Note: Multiple identical samples submitted, only one analyzed.

14) Note: Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116. Point Counting detection limit at 0.080%.

15) Note: Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116. Point Counting detection limit at 0.125%.

16) Note: This sample contains >10% vermiculite mineral. See Appendix for Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis.

Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis:

Several analytical protocols exist for the analysis of asbestos in vermiculite. These analytical approaches vary depending upon the nature of the vermiculite mineral being tested (e.g. un-processed gange, homogeneous exfoliated books of mica, or mixed mineral composites).Please contact your client representative for pricing and turnaround time options available.

iATL recommends initial testing using the EPA 600/R-93/116 method. This method is specifically designed for the analysis of asbestos in bulk building materials. It provides an acceptable starting point for primary screening of vermiculite for possible asbestos.

Results from this testing may be inconclusive. EPA suggests proceeding to a multi-tiered analysis involving wet separation techniques in conjunction with PLM and TEM gravimetric analysis (EPA 600/R-04/004).

For New York State customers, NYSDOH requires disclaimers and qualifiers for various vermiculite containing samples that direct analysis via ELAP198.6 and ELAP198.8 for samples that contain >10% vermiculite mineral where ELAP198.6 may be used to evaluate the asbestos content of the material. However, any test result using ELAP198.6 will be reported with the following disclaimer: “ELAP198.6 method does not remove vermiculite and may underestimate the level of asbestos present in a sample containing >10% vermiculite.”

Further information on this method and other vermiculite and asbestos issues can be found at the following: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) www.atsdr.cdc.gov, United States Geological Survey (USGS) www.minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/, US EPA www.epa.gov/asbestos. The USEPA also has an informative brochure "Current Best Practices for Vermiculite Attic Insulation" EPA 747F03001 May 2003, that may assist the health and remediation professional.

The following is a summary of the analytical process outlines in the EPA 600/R-04/004 Method:

1)Analytical Step/Method: Initial Screening by PLM, EPA 600R-93/116 Requirements/Comments: Minimum of 0.1 g of sample. ~0.25% LOQ for most samples.

2)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Sinks" only.

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim 9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

11/15/2018Report Date:

Report No.: 577061 - PLM Project: 003560 Project No.: AL072

Page 3 of 4Dated : 11/15/2018 2:43:00

3)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Floats" only.

4)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by TEM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Sinks" only.

5)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by TEM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Suspension" only.

LOQ, Limit of Quantitation estimates for mass and volume analyses.

*With advance notice and confirmation by the laboratory.

**Approximately 1 Liter of sample in double-bagged container (~9x6 inch bag of sample).

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim 9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

11/15/2018Report Date:

Report No.: 577061 - PLM Project: 003560 Project No.: AL072

Page 4 of 4Dated : 11/15/2018 2:43:00

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072 30 Longhorn Lane

Fort McClellan, AL 36205-5000

Appendix 2 - Lead Paint Chip Results

Client Sample Description ConcentrationLab ID Analyzed Weight Lead

Collected

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

200 Route 130 North, Cinnaminson, NJ 08077 Phone/Fax: (856) 303-2500 / (856) 786-5974 http://www.EMSL.com cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

Attn: Bill Zukauskas APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure 9143 Phillips Highway Suite 400 Jacksonville, FL 32256

Received: 11/09/18 10:00 AM

AL 072 - 003560

Fax: (904) 636-9356 Phone: (904) 636-9360

Project:

Collected:

Test Report: Lead in Paint Chips by Flame AAS (SW 846 3050B/7000B)*

201813067 CustomerID: SHAE77 CustomerPO: 003560 ProjectID:

EMSL Order:

0.2580 Site: Lt. Gray Paint

201813067-0001AL072-P5-01 <0.0080 % wt11/16/2018 g

Phillip Worby, Lead Laboratory Manager or other approved signatory

Test Report ChmSnglePrm/nQC-7.32.3 Printed: 11/16/2018 2:02:17 PM

*Analysis following Lead in Paint by EMSL SOP/Determination of Environmental Lead by FLAA. Reporting limit is 0.008 % wt based on the minimum sample weight per our SOP. Unless noted, results in this report are not blank corrected. This report relates only to the samples reported above and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities. Samples received in good condition unless otherwise noted. "<" (less than) result signifies that the analyte was not detected at or above the reporting limit. Measurement of uncertainty is available upon request. The QC data associated with the sample results included in this report meet the recovery and precision requirements unless specifically indicated otherwise.

Definitions of modifications are available upon request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Cinnaminson, NJ NELAP Certifications: NJ 03036, NY 10872, PA 68-00367, AIHA-LAP, LLC ELLAP 100194, A2LA 2845.01

Initial report from 11/16/2018 14:02:17 http://www.EMSL.com mailto:cinnaminsonleadlab@emsl.com

OrderID: 201813067

OrderID: 201813067

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072

Appendix 3 – Floor Drawings of ACM and Sample Locations

1.2, 2.2

1.1

PS-01

7.3

5.3

4.3

8.2 5.1, 7.2

7.1

5.2

2.1, 3.1 4.1

2.2, 3.2 11.1, 11.2, 11.3

8.1

1.3

9.1, 10.1

9.2, 10.2 9.3, 10.3 8.1

6.1, 6.2, 6.3 2.3, 3.3 8.3

12.2 13.1, 13.2, 13.3

14.1

14.2

14.3

12.1

12.3

FIGURE:

ACM Sample Locations of Building HVAC AL072 310th Chemical Company, 20 Longhorn Ln Fort McClellan, AL 36205

MS NTS

02/08/19

DESIGNED EDITED SCALE

DATE REVISED FLOOR:

Prepared by: Global Consulting, Inc.

6401 Golden Triangle Dr., Suite #304, Greenbelt, MD 20770

(202)832-1433 FIRST FLOOR

LEGEND:

Prepared for:

Jacobs Government Service Company 1100 N Glebe Rd, Suite 500 Arlington VA 22201

## - Sample Number Begins w/ AL072-##

- Sample Collection Area

- Inaccessible at the Time of Inspection ## - Negative Samples (e.g. : 1.1) ## - Positive Samples (e.g. : 2.2)

- Paint Sample Locations (PS-##)

Hazardous Material Survey 310th Chemical Company

U.S. Army Reserve Center AL072 30 Longhorn Lane

Fort McClellan, AL 36205-5000

Appendix 4 – Inspector Certification(s)/License(s)