FL103_-_Hazmat_Report_-_Final.pdf

HAZARDOUS MATERIAL SURVEY

U.S. ARMY RESERVE CENTER – FL103

RATTLESNAKE POINT USARC

5201 WEST TYSON AVENUE

TAMPA FL 33611

PRIME CONTRACT # W912HP18D6000

TASK ORDER – W912HP18F1203

PROJECT NUMBER - F5Y67384

SUBCONSULTING F5Y67384-S19-0001

Prepared for:

JACOBS GOVERNMENT SERVICE COMPANY

1100 North Glebe Road, Suite 500 Arlington, VA 22201

Submitted by:

6401 Golden Triangle Drive, #304

Greenbelt, MD 20770

March 12, 2019

ARCHITECTURAL AND ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC 5201 West Tyson Avenue

Tampa FL 33611 i

Table of Contents

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................i

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

2.1 Survey Methodology

2.2 Analytical Procedures

2.3 Inaccessible and Limited-Access Spaces

2.4 Survey Limitations

2.5 Asbestos Survey Results

2.6 Asbestos Conclusions and Recommendations

3.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY REPORT

3.1 LBP Survey Methodology

3.2 LBP Survey Results

3.3 LBP Conclusions and Recommendations

4.0 OTHER POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS

5.0 DISCLAIMER

Appendices:

Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results Appendix 3 – Drawings of Sample Locations Appendix 4 – Inspector Certification(s)/License(s)

Carlk323 Text Box

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC 5201 West Tyson Avenue

Tampa, FL 33611 i

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, retained Jacobs Government Service Company (Jacobs) to provide Architect-Engineering Services for the 81st Readiness Division (RD) Reset Design Project, for the U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC), U.S.

Army Reserve Center – FL103, Rattlesnake Point USARC, 5201 West Tyson Avenue, Tampa FL 33611. Jacobs retained Global Consulting, Inc. (GCI) to perform an environmental and hazardous material survey for this project. This report documents the survey of the Facility by GCI’s certified inspector for Asbestos-Containing Material (ACM), Lead-Based Paint (LBP), other hazardous materials, and Universal Waste (UW).

The Facility is scheduled for a partial HVAC renovation (Reset), and this survey was limited to identifying the potentially hazardous materials and conditions that may be impacted by the renovation.

Asbestos:

On February 20, 2019, GCI’s EPA-accredited and licensed Asbestos Inspector assessed the existing building materials suspected to contain asbestos and likely to be impacted during renovation. GCI identified twenty-three (23) specific suspect homogenous building materials, from which a total of seventy-three (73) suspected asbestos-containing samples were collected and submitted for laboratory analysis.

Samples FL103-10.1 to 10.3 was collected from the black mastic on the fiberglass insulated ductwork and was found to contain 8% chrysotile and is classified as a Class II Non-friable ACM. This ductwork is located throughout the old office building and is above the drop ceilings. In the event this material is disturbed during the HVAC Reset this will require the development of abatement specification and drawings.

Sample FL103-20.1 to 20.3 of the black roof flashing on the roof of the old office building and was not found to have asbestos concentration above 1% by weight. FL103-20.4-QC was found to contain 2.7% chrysotile. This material is classified as a Class II Non-friable ACM and if disturbed during the renovation of the HVAC system will require the development of abatement specification and drawings.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC ii

The black vinyl vibration damper gasket located in the duct work for the HVAC system in Assembly Room 140 could not be sampled without compromising the equipment and is assumed to be ACM. While the vibration damper is considered to have a low potential to be ACM, we recommend this material be sampled and analyzed for asbestos prior to renovation to confirm the classification.

The other twenty-one (21) suspect materials identified, sampled, and analyzed were not found to be asbestos-containing. Remedial action or specification development is not indicated for these building materials.

Details of the survey are presented in Section 2.0 – Asbestos Survey Report, Analytical results are presented in Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results and ACM and LBP Sample Locations are presented in Appendix 3 – Sample Location Drawings. The development of asbestos abatement drawings and specifications is indicated for the black mastic on insulated ductwork throughout the old office building.

Lead-Based Paint:

GCI’s Industrial Hygienist (IH), an EPA and certified LBP Inspector, performed a survey of the Facility for Lead-Based Paint (LBP) and Lead-Containing Paint (LCP) painted surfaces that have an elevated potential to be impacted during renovation.

The building components that were sampled and analyzed were not found to be LBP. The following components were sampled, analyzed and did contain lead above the detection limit for the analytical method and are considered to be LCP:

• Tan Paint Exterior Office Walls

• Grey Paint on Concrete Block Walls and Stairs

The other painted building components were not found to have lead (Pb) above the detection limit for the method and are not considered to be LBP or LCP and no special requirements apply. Details of the survey are presented in Section 3.0 – Lead-Based Paint Survey Report.

Analytical results are presented in Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results. OSHA lead safe work practices should be used if the LCP painted surfaces are disturbed.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC iii

Other Potential Hazardous Materials:

The Facility was surveyed for other potentially hazardous materials that may be impacted by the HVAC renovation. The existing original lighting systems have an elevated potential to contain mercury-containing florescent light bulbs which should be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273. The original fluorescent lighting system in the building has an elevated potential to be equipped with potentially PCB-containing electrical light ballasts that require management as a PCB-containing waste unless specifically marked as non-PCB containing ballasts. Should the lighting system be impacted by the HVAC system renovation, specifications should be developed to address these materials. UW Waste storage issues were not observed.

The fire protection system has an elevated potential to contain ionization-type smoke and fire detectors that are typically constructed with an Americium-241 radioactive source. If impacted by the renovation, these detectors should be segregated and disposed of properly in accordance with Federal, state, and local regulations.

The existing heating and cooling system consists of several air-conditioning systems that contain a significant quantity of potentially regulated refrigerants that may be classified as Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS). Section 608 of the Clean Air Act prohibits the known release of refrigerants and ODS during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. The EPA requires proper refrigerant management practices by owners and operators of refrigeration and air-conditioning systems, technicians, and others. The refrigerants should be managed and disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR 82 and applicable Federal, state, and local regulations.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC iv

ACRONYMS

ACM Asbestos-Containing Material

AHERA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act

CFR Code of Federal Regulations

EPA Environmental Protection Agency

FDEP Florida Department of Environmental Protection

IH Industrial Hygienist

LBP Lead-Based Paint

LCP Lead-Containing Paint

NESHAP National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollution

NIOSH National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health

NVLAP National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program

OSHA Occupational Safety & Health Administration

ODS Ozone-Depleting Substances

PCB Polychlorinated Biphenyl

PLM Polarized Light Microscopy

PACM Presumed Asbestos-Containing Material

RACM Regulated Asbestos-Containing Material

UW Universal Waste

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

Tampa FL 33611

1.0 INTRODUCTION

The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Charleston District, retained Jacobs Government Service Company (Jacobs) to provide Architect-Engineering Services for the 81st Readiness Division (RD) Reset Design Project, for the U.S. Army Reserve Center (USARC), U.S.

Army Reserve Center – FL103, Rattlesnake Point USARC, 5201 West Tyson Avenue, Tampa FL 33611. Jacobs retained Global Consulting, Inc. (GCI) to perform the limited environmental and hazardous material survey associated with this project. This report documents the limited survey of the Facility by a certified inspector for Asbestos- Containing Material (ACM), Lead-Based Paint (LBP), other hazardous materials, and Universal Waste (UW). The Facility is scheduled for a HVAC renovation and this survey was limited to identifying the potentially hazardous materials and conditions likely to be impacted by the proposed project. The mutual goal of the contractor and the government is to safely achieve a quality product within the expected timeframe and budget.

The scope of work for this survey consisted of the following tasks:

1. Review of available records for identified and suspect ACM, LBP, and other hazardous and regulated materials that may be impacted by the scope of work;

2. Conduct a visual survey of the project area to identify potential location(s) of hazardous materials that may be affected by the scope of work.

3. Collect bulk samples of suspect ACMs and assess painted surfaces for LBP using paint chip analysis.

4. Submit the bulk samples to a certified laboratory to positively identify ACM via Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM) using EPA Method 600/R-93/116 and to identify LBP/LCP using Atomic Absorption Analysis for Lead method SW846 – 3050B/7000B.

5. Prepare a report summarizing data, collection techniques, analysis procedures, location and quantity of ACM, LBP/LCP and other hazardous and regulated materials observed and detailed recommendations for any indicated response actions.

6. Abatement specification(s) will be prepared separately, if required.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

2.0 ASBESTOS SURVEY REPORT

This section describes the site survey and sample collection of suspect ACMs. The site survey was conducted on January 17, 2019, by EPA Asbestos Hazard Emergency Response Act (AHERA) and State of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection accredited Asbestos Inspector, Mr. William Zukauskas. A copy of Mr. Zukauskas’s credentials are presented in Appendix 4.

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP), are the authorities that regulate activities related to Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACM) in Florida. The EPA regulations enforce four asbestos activities; (1) removal, repair, or encapsulation of ACM, (2) approval of asbestos training providers, (3) regulation of professionals accredited to perform asbestos-related activities, and (4) asbestos in schools. The GPED regulates the enforcement of the EPA’s National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP), and enforcement of the asbestos notification regulations.

2.1 Survey Methodology

The asbestos survey was divided into two distinct phases: pre-survey planning and field survey.

2.1.1 Pre-Survey Planning

The pre-survey planning phase included reviewing previous survey reports, drawings, management plans, and abatement reports, if available. Jacobs provided GCI with information regarding the planned HVAC Reset of the Facility. GCI planned a survey strategy and scheduled the survey work. It was determined that this survey should include all applicable and accessible areas of the Facility to ensure that intended renovation, can be conducted in an efficient and safe manner compliant with applicable Federal, state, and local regulations.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

2.1.2 Field Survey

The field survey was conducted for the areas affected by the HVAC renovation as determined in the planning phase, and suspect asbestos-containing building materials were identified. Suspect materials that were homogeneous in nature (i.e., uniform in color and texture, installation date) were identified, touched to determine friability, and sampled by removing a small amount of material. Extreme care was taken to avoid potential fiber release during the sampling process. Before sample collection, a fine mist of water was typically applied to the sampling location. Samples were collected using sharpened core samplers and/or utility knives, where necessary, and immediately placed in labeled containers and sealed. Any dust generated was wet-wiped to minimize the potential fiber release. All sampling locations were promptly patched and repaired. The location and condition of each homogeneous material were recorded.

2.2 Analytical Procedures

The samples of suspect ACMs were packaged and delivered under strict chain of custody procedures to EMSL Analytical, Inc. of Tampa, FL, a National Voluntary Laboratory Accreditation Program (NVLAP) accredited laboratory. Quality control samples were duplicated in the field and submitted to ATL International Asbestos Testing Laboratories in Mt. Laurel, NJ.

Quantification of asbestos content in bulk samples was performed via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM). This method of analysis involves the dispersion staining of a suspect material in a solution of known refractive index and then subjected to illumination by polarized light. The resulting color contrast enables fiber and mineral identification. The Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) and the State of Georgia define an ACM as any material containing greater than 1% asbestos.

A summary of field data including the sample designations, gross descriptions, and analytical results are provided in Table 2. The analytical results of all bulk samples and chain of custody documents are provided in Appendix 1.

2.3 Inaccessible and Limited-Access Spaces

Every reasonable effort was made to locate suspect ACM at elevated potential to be

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC impacted by this project. All rooms were made accessible for the survey. Other inaccessible areas might include, but are not limited to, those listed in Table 1: Description of Potential Inaccessible Locations.

Table 1: Description of Potential Inaccessible Locations

Mechanical and plumbing system above the reach of readily accessible ladders

Concealed by roofing and building waterproofing systems

Enclosed pipe/duct chases/floor penetrations Inside mechanical equipment/ductwork

Above hard plaster ceilings Inside fire doors

2.4 Survey Limitations

This survey was limited to areas and building systems scheduled for HVAC replacement, upgrade, or renovation as part of the scope of this project. Other suspect materials uncovered during renovation and/or demolition activities not identified within this report should be considered presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM) and should be treated as ACM until sampling and laboratory analysis confirm otherwise.

2.5 Asbestos Survey Results

A total of seventy-three (73) bulk samples were collected from thirteen (23) homogeneous suspect materials during the survey. The suspect ACM and asbestos laboratory analytical results are summarized in Table 2: Description of Homogeneous Areas and Sampling Results.

Table 2: Description of Homogeneous Areas and Sampling Results

HA

# Description Sample # Location Asbestos

Content Friable

(Yes/No)

1 Concrete Slab FL103-1.1 Office 108 ND

No FL103-1.2 Office 108 ND FL103-1.3 Office 108 ND

2 Exterior Tan Brick Wall

FL103-2.1 Bathroom 111 ND No

FL103-2.2 Server 103 ND

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

# Description Sample # Location Asbestos

Content Friable

(Yes/No) FL103-2.3 Office 101 ND

3 Grey Exterior Brick Mortar

FL103-3.1 Bathroom 111 ND No FL103-3.2 Server 103 ND

FL103-3.3 Office 101 ND

4 Exterior Soffit FL103-4.1 Outside Breakroom 114 ND

No FL103-4.2 Outside Server 103 ND FL103-4.3 Outside Office 101 ND

5 Concrete Block Walls

FL103-5.1 Reception 110 ND Yes FL103-5.2 Office 108 ND

FL103-5.3 Office 108 ND

6 Concrete Block Wall Mortar

FL103-6.1 Reception 110 ND No FL103-6.2 Office 108 ND

FL103-6.3 Office 108 ND

7 Drywall Board

FL103-7.1 Reception 110 ND

No FL103-7.2 Reception 110 ND

FL103-7.3 Reception 110 ND

8 White Joint Compound

FL103-8.1 Reception 110 ND

No

FL103-8.2 Reception 110 ND FL103-8.3 Office 108 ND

FL103-8.4 - QC

Office 108 – QC Sample Result Confirms Prime

Sample Results

ND

9 2’ x 2’ White Ceiling Tiles

FL103-9.1 Reception 110 ND

No FL103-9.2 Hallway Outside Office

106 ND

FL103-9.3 Hallway Outside Office

104 ND

10 Black Duct Mastic

FL103-10.1 8%

No FL103-10.2 PS

FL103-10.3 Hallway Outside Office

108 PS

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

# Description Sample # Location Asbestos

Content Friable

(Yes/No)

FL103-10.4 - QC

Hallway Outside Office 108 - QC Sample Result Confirms Prime Sample

Results

5.7%

11 Concrete Slab Main Building

FL103-11.1 High Bay 121 Near Conference Room 134 ND

No FL103-11.2 High Bay 121 Near Breakroom 114 ND

FL103-11.3 High Bay 121 – Southwest Corner ND

12 2’ x 4’ White Ceiling Tiles

FL103-12.1 Conference Room 134 ND

No FL103-12.2 Conference Room 134 ND

FL103-12.3 Administration 122 ND

13 Drywall Board Panels

FL103-13.1 Conference Room 134 ND

No FL103-13.2 Conference Room 134 ND

FL103-13.3 Administration 122 ND

Grey Duct Mastic

FL103-14.1

Conference Room 134

ND

No FL103-14.2 Administration 123 ND

FL103-14.3 Office 124 ND

15 Drywall Board

FL103-15.1 Office 200 ND

No FL103-15.2 Office 200 ND

FL103-15.3 Office 200 ND

16 White Joint Compound FL103-16.1 Office 200 ND No

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

# Description Sample # Location Asbestos

Content Friable

(Yes/No)

FL103-16.2 Office 200 ND

FL103-16.3 Office 200 ND

FL103-16.4

Office 200 - QC Sample Result Confirms Prime

Sample Results

ND

17 Grey Duct Mastic

FL103-17.1 Mechanical 201 ND

No FL103-17.2 Mechanical 201 ND

FL103-17.3 Mechanical 201 ND

18 Roof Shingle

FL103-18.1 Roof ND

No FL103-18.2 Roof ND

FL103-18.3 Roof ND

19 Black Roof Tar

FL103-19.1 Roof ND

No FL103-19.2 Roof ND

FL103-19.3 Roof ND

20 Black Flashing Material

FL103-20.1 Roof of Old Office Building ND

No

FL103-20.2 Roof of Old Office Building ND

FL103-20.3 Roof of Old Office Building ND

FL103-20.4

Roof - QC Sample Result does not Confirm Prime Sample Results and this material is classified as an

ACM

2.7%

21 FL103-21.1 Office 108 ND No

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

# Description Sample # Location Asbestos

Content Friable

(Yes/No)

Compressed Fiber Roof Boards -

Tectum

FL103-21.2 Office 108 ND

FL103-21.3 Office 108 Hallway ND

Plaster Applied directly to Concrete Block

FL103-22.1 Office 108 Hallway ND

No FL103-22.2 Office 108 ND

FL103-22.3 Office 108 ND

Black Vinyl

Vibration Damper Gasket

Samples not collected due to concerns about compromising integrity of gasket.

HVAC Ductwork in Room

Assumed ACM No

ND – Not Detected PS – Positive Stop

2.6 Asbestos Conclusions and Recommendations

Regulated asbestos-containing material (RACM) is defined as friable ACM or non-friable ACM with an asbestos fiber content greater than 1% that will be, or has been, subjected to sanding, grinding, cutting, or abrading or has crumbled, pulverized, or reduced to powder during demolition or renovation operations.

Sample FL103-10.1 to 10.3 was collected from the black mastic on the fiberglass insulated ductwork was found to contain 8% Chrysotile and is considered a Class II Non-friable ACM. This ductwork is located throughout the old office building and is above the drop ceilings. In the event this material is disturbed during the HVAC Reset this will require the development of abatement specification and drawings.

Sample FL103-20.1 to 20.3 of the black roof flashing on the roof of the old office building and was not found to have asbestos concentration above 1% by weight. FL103-20.4-QC was found to contain 2.7% chrysotile. This material is classified as a Class II Non-friable

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

ACM and if disturbed during the renovation of the HVAC system will require the development of abatement specification and drawings.

The black vinyl vibration damper gasket located in the duct work for the HVAC system in Assembly room 140 could not be sampled without compromising the equipment and is assumed to be ACM. While the vibration damper is considered to have a low potential to be ACM, we recommend this material be sampled and analyzed for asbestos prior to renovation to confirm the classification.

The other twenty-one (21) suspect materials identified, sampled, and analyzed as part of the survey were not found to be asbestos-containing. Remedial action or specification development is not indicated for these materials.

If additional suspect materials are identified during renovation/demolition and have not been tested to determine the presence of asbestos, those materials should be protected from impact until further investigated and the asbestos content is determined.

All quantities must be field-verified by a licensed asbestos abatement contractor(s) prior to demolition or renovation.

Sampling locations and positively-identified materials are identified on drawings presented in Appendix 3.

3.0 LEAD-BASED PAINT SURVEY REPORT

This section describes data collection activities including the site survey and sample collection for Lead-Based Paint (LBP) that will be affected by the HVAC renovation. The site survey was completed on February 20, 2019, by EPA-accredited and Lead-Safe State Program Inspector, Mr. William Zukauskas.

3.1 LBP Survey Methodology

Testing for LBP was conducted using paint chips sampling techniques. LBP is defined as a paint containing greater than 0.5% lead by weight according to the FDEP. Samples were delivered to EMSL of Orlando, FL for analysis using Atomic Absorption Analysis for Lead in accordance with method SW846 – 3050B/7000B.

The analytical results are presented in Appendix 2 – Lead Paint Chip Results.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

3.2 LBP Survey Results

A total of seven (7) components were assessed using paint chip sampling. These painted surfaces included the components with an elevated potential to be impacted by the planned HVAC renovation. The summary of the paint chip sampled and analyzed are presented in Table 3.

Table 3 – Paint Chip Sample Results

Sample Number Description Location LBP/LCP Classification

FL103-PS-01 Beige Paint Interior Office Walls NA

FL103-PS-02 Tan Paint Exterior Walls LCP

FL103-PS-03 White Paint High Bay NA

FL103-PS-04 Grey Paint Concrete and Stairs LCP

FL103-PS-05 Tan Paint Administration Walls NA

FL103-PS-06 Beige Paint West Office and Classrooms NA

FL103-PS-07 Grey Paint HVAC NA

LBP – Lead Based Paint, LCP – Lead Containing Paint, ND – Not Detected

The analytical results for samples FL103-PS-01, 3, 5, 6 and 7 were not found to have detectable levels of lead and no special consideration is required if these painted surfaces are disturbed. Sample FL103-PS-02 and FL103-PS-04 were found to be below the standard for LBP and above the detection limit for the analytical method and are classified as LCP.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

3.3 LBP Conclusions and Recommendations

The tan exterior walls and the grey painted surfaces inspected and sampled were found to be LCP and are classified as lead containing paint. The development of LBP abatement specifications is not indicated. Should these painted surfaces be impacted by the planned HVAC Reset we recommend that OSHA Lead Safe Construction practices be used.

4.0 OTHER POTENTIAL HAZARDOUS AND REGULATED MATERIALS

The Facility was surveyed for other potentially hazardous materials that may be impacted by the planned renovation. The existing original lighting systems have an elevated potential to contain mercury-containing florescent light bulbs and should be disposed of in accordance with the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Universal Waste (UW) Regulations 40 CFR 273. The original fluorescent lighting fixtures in the building have an elevated potential to be equipped with potentially PCB-containing electrical light ballasts.

These ballasts require management as a PCB-containing waste unless specifically marked as non-PCB containing ballasts. The development of specifications for Universal Waste (UW) and PCB light ballasts is indicated if the lighting system is impacted by the planned HVAC renovation.

The fire protection system has an elevated potential to contain ionization-type smoke and fire detectors that are constructed with an Americium-241 radioactive source. If they do, they should be segregated and disposed of properly in accordance with Federal, state and local regulations.

The existing heating and cooling system consist of several air-conditioning systems that contain a significant quantity of potentially regulated refrigerants that may be classified as Ozone Depleting Substances (ODS). Section 608 of the Clean Air Act prohibits the known release of refrigerants and ODS during the maintenance, service, repair, or disposal of air-conditioning and refrigeration equipment. The EPA requires proper refrigerant management practices by owners and operators of refrigeration and air-conditioning systems, technicians, and others. The refrigerants should be managed and disposed of in accordance with 40 CFR 82 and applicable Federal, state, and local regulations.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

5.0 DISCLAIMER

Information in this limited survey report relating to hazardous materials (i.e., asbestos and lead), although believed to be inclusive and accurate, was based on visual observations and field sampling of accessible areas at the time of survey. Global Consulting, Inc. reserves the right to revise any recommendations and conclusions based on new information that may become available and does not guarantee or accept any liability that encompasses this limited survey of hazardous or regulated materials located within this Facility. This report should not be used as a comprehensive hazardous material survey of the whole facility.

Hazardous Material Survey U.S. Army Reserve Center – FL103

Rattlesnake Point USARC

Appendix 1 – ACM Analytical Results

EMSL Analytical, Inc.

3303 PARKWAY CENTER COURT Orlando, FL 32808

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

341903353EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Attention: Phone:Bill Zukauskas (904) 636-9360

Fax:APTIM Environmental & Infrastructure (904) 636-9356

Received Date:9143 Phillips Highway 02/22/2019 9:40 AM

Analysis Date:Suite 400 02/28/2019

Collected Date:Jacksonville, FL 32256 02/21/2019

Project: FL103-Rattlesnake Point-USARC

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

FL103-1.1

341903353-0001

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Slab

FL103-1.2

341903353-0002

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Slab

FL103-1.3

341903353-0003

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Slab

FL103-2.1

341903353-0004

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Brick

FL103-2.2

341903353-0005

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Brick

FL103-2.3

341903353-0006

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Beige

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Tan Brick

FL103-3.1

341903353-0007

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Brick Mortar

FL103-3.2

341903353-0008

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Brick Mortar

FL103-3.3

341903353-0009

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Brick Mortar

FL103-4.1

341903353-0010

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

15%

65%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Stucco-Soffit

FL103-4.2

341903353-0011

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Stucco-Soffit

FL103-4.3

341903353-0012

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Exterior Stucco-Soffit

FL103-5.1

341903353-0013

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

FL103-5.2

341903353-0014

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

FL103-5.3

341903353-0015

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

FL103-6.1

341903353-0016

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

Initial report from: 03/01/2019 09:01:10

Page 1 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/1/2019 9:01 AM

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

341903353EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

FL103-6.2

341903353-0017

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

FL103-6.3

341903353-0018

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Block

Mortar

FL103-7.1

341903353-0019

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

25%

Cellulose

Glass

10%

<1%

Brown/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-7.2

341903353-0020

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

25%

Cellulose

Glass

10%

<1%

Brown/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-7.3

341903353-0021

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

25%

Cellulose

Glass

10%

<1%

Brown/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-8.1

341903353-0022

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

FL103-8.2

341903353-0023

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

FL103-8.3

341903353-0024

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

FL103-9.1

341903353-0025

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

20%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Tan/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

2x2 White Ceiling

Tiles

FL103-9.2

341903353-0026

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

20%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Tan/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

2x2 White Ceiling

Tiles

FL103-9.3

341903353-0027

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

10%

20%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Tan/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

2x2 White Ceiling

Tiles

FL103-10.1

341903353-0028

8% ChrysotileNon-fibrous (Other)92%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Blk Duct Mastic

FL103-10.2

341903353-0029

Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Blk Duct Mastic

FL103-10.3

341903353-0030

Positive Stop (Not Analyzed)Blk Duct Mastic

FL103-11.1

341903353-0031

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Slab

FL103-11.2

341903353-0032

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Slab

FL103-11.3

341903353-0033

None DetectedQuartz

Ca Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

30%

15%

55%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Concrete Slab

FL103-12.1

341903353-0034

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

2x4 White Ceiling

Tiles

FL103-12.2

341903353-0035

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2x4 White Ceiling

Tiles

Page 2 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/1/2019 9:01 AM

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

341903353EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

FL103-12.3

341903353-0036

None DetectedPerlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

20%

10%

Cellulose

Min. Wool

40%

30%

Gray/White

Fibrous

Homogeneous

2x4 White Ceiling

Tiles

FL103-13.1

341903353-0037

None DetectedGypsum

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

3%

22%

Cellulose

Glass

10%

<1%

Brown/Gray

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-13.2

341903353-0038

None DetectedGypsum

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

3%

22%

Cellulose

Glass

10%

<1%

Brown/Gray

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-13.3

341903353-0039

None DetectedGypsum

Mica

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

3%

22%

Cellulose

Glass

10%

<1%

Brown/Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-14.1-Gray Mastic

341903353-0040

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-14.1-Tan Mastic

341903353-0040A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-14.2-Gray Mastic

341903353-0041

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-14.2-Tan Mastic

341903353-0041A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-14.3-Gray Mastic

341903353-0042

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-14.3-Tan Mastic

341903353-0042A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Tan

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-15.1

341903353-0043

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

25%

Cellulose

Glass

10%

<1%

Brown/Gray

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-15.2

341903353-0044

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

25%

Cellulose

Glass

10%

<1%

Brown/Tan

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-15.3

341903353-0045

None DetectedGypsum

Non-fibrous (Other)

65%

25%

Cellulose10%Brown/Tan

Fibrous

Heterogeneous

Drywall Board

FL103-16.1

341903353-0046

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

FL103-16.2

341903353-0047

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

FL103-16.3

341903353-0048

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White Joint

Compound

FL103-17.1-Gray Mastic

341903353-0049

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-17.1-White

Mastic

341903353-0049A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

Page 3 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/1/2019 9:01 AM

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

341903353EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

FL103-17.2-Gray Mastic

341903353-0050

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-17.2-White

Mastic

341903353-0050A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-17.3-Gray Mastic

341903353-0051

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-17.3-White

Mastic

341903353-0051A

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Gray Duct Mastic

FL103-18.1

341903353-0052

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Glass10%White/Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

White/Blk Rolled

Asphalt Shingle

FL103-18.2

341903353-0053

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Glass10%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White/Blk Rolled

Asphalt Shingle

FL103-18.3

341903353-0054

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)90%Glass10%White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

White/Blk Rolled

Asphalt Shingle

FL103-19.1

341903353-0055

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Blk Roof Tar

FL103-19.2

341903353-0056

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Blk Roof Tar

FL103-19.3

341903353-0057

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)100%Black

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Blk Roof Tar

FL103-20.1

341903353-0058

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)65%Cellulose35%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Blk Flashing

FL103-20.2

341903353-0059

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)65%Cellulose35%Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Blk Flashing

FL103-20.3

341903353-0060

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)65%Cellulose

Synthetic

20%

15%

Black

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Blk Flashing

FL103-21.1

341903353-0061

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Compound Fiber Roof

Deck

FL103-21.2

341903353-0062

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Compound Fiber Roof

Deck

FL103-21.3

341903353-0063

None DetectedNon-fibrous (Other)5%Cellulose95%Tan

Fibrous

Homogeneous

Compound Fiber Roof

Deck

FL103-22.1-Skim Coat

341903353-0064

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster Wall

FL103-22.1-Base Coat

341903353-0064A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Perlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

20%

65%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster Wall

Page 4 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/1/2019 9:01 AM

Tel/Fax: (407) 599-5887 / (407) 599-9063 http://www.EMSL.com / orlandolab@emsl.com

341903353EMSL Order:

Customer ID: SHAE77

Customer PO:

Project ID:

Test Report: Asbestos Analysis of Bulk Materials via EPA 600/R-93/116 Method using Polarized

Light Microscopy

Sample Description Appearance % Fibrous % Non-Fibrous

Non-Asbestos Asbestos

% Type

FL103-22.2-Skim Coat

341903353-0065

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster Wall

FL103-22.2-Base Coat

341903353-0065A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Perlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

20%

65%

Brown

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster Wall

FL103-22.3-Skim Coat

341903353-0066

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

85%

White

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster Wall

FL103-22.3-Base Coat

341903353-0066A

None DetectedCa Carbonate

Perlite

Non-fibrous (Other)

15%

20%

65%

Gray

Non-Fibrous

Homogeneous

Plaster Wall

Analyst(s)

Jessicka Lopez (31)

Jhon Rosario (42)

Carlos Rivadeneyra, Laboratory Director or Other Approved Signatory

EMSL maintains liability limited to cost of analysis . The above analyses were performed in general compliance with Appendix E to Subpart E of 40 CFR (previously EPA 600/M4-82-020 "Interim

Method"), but augmented with procedures outlined in the 1993 ("final") version of the method. This report relates only to the samples reported above, and may not be reproduced, except in full, without written approval by EMSL. EMSL bears no responsibility for sample collection activities or analytical method limitations . Interpretation and use of test results are the responsibility of the client. All samples received in acceptable condition unless otherwise noted. This report must not be used by the client to claim product certification, approval, or endorsement by NVLAP, NIST or any agency of the federal government. EMSL recommends gravimetric reduction for all non -friable organically bound materials prior to analysis. Estimation of uncertainty is available on request.

Samples analyzed by EMSL Analytical, Inc. Orlando, FL NVLAP Lab Code 101151-0

Page 5 of 5ASB_PLM_0008_0001 - 1.78 Printed: 3/1/2019 9:01 AM

OrderID: 341903353

Lab No.: 6723731 Client No.: FL103-8.4QA

Analyst Observation: White Joint Compound Client Description: White Joint Compound

Location:

Facility:

Percent Asbestos:

None Detected

Percent Non-Asbestos Fibrous Material:

Percent Non-Fibrous Material:

Lab No.: 6723732 Client No.: FL103-10.4QA

Analyst Observation: Black Mastic Client Description: Blk Duct Mastic

PC 5.7 Chrysotile

7 Cellulose

87.3

Lab No.: 6723733 Client No.: FL103-16.4QA

Analyst Observation: White Joint Compound Client Description: White Joint Compound

Lab No.: 6723734 Client No.: FL103-20.4QA

Analyst Observation: Black Flashing Client Description: Blk Flashing

PC 2.7 Chrysotile

10 Cellulose 3 Fibrous Glass

84.3

Laboratory Director

Approved By:

Date Analyzed:

2/22/2019Date Received:

Analyst:

Please refer to the Appendix of this report for further information regarding your analysis.

Signature:

Ellen Smith

02/28/2019 Frank E. Ehrenfeld, III

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim

9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

2/28/2019Report Date:

Report No.: 584163 - PLM Project: FL103-Rattlesnake Point - USARC Project No.: 631004314

PLM BULK SAMPLE ANALYSIS SUMMARY

Client: SHA873

Dated : 3/1/2019 3:33:11 Page 1 of 4

Appendix to Analytical Report Customer Contact: Dave Mosher Method: US EPA 600, R93-116

This appendix seeks to promote greater understanding of any observations, exceptions, special instructions, or circumstances that the laboratory needs to communicate to the client concerning the above samples. The information below is used to help promote your ability to make the most informed decisions for you and your customers.

Please note the following points of contact for any questions you may have.

iATL Customer Service: customerservice@iatl.com iATL Office Manager: cdavis@iatl.com iATL Account Representative: Kelly Klippel Sample Login Notes: See Batch Sheet Attached Sample Matrix: Bulk Building Materials Exceptions Noted: See Following Pages

General Terms, Warrants, Limits, Qualifiers:

General information about iATL capabilities and client/laboratory relationships and responsibilities are spelled out in iATL policies that are listed at www.iATL.com and in our Quality Assurance Manual per ISO 17025 standard requirements. The information therein is a representation of iATL definitions and policies for turnaround times, sample submittal, collection media, blank definitions, quantification issues and limit of detection, analytical methods and procedures, sub-contracting policies, results reporting options, fees, terms, and discounts, confidentiality, sample archival and disposal, and data interpretation.

iATL warrants the test results to be of a precision normal for the type and methodology employed for each sample submitted. iATL disclaims any other warrants, expressed or implied, including warranty of fitness for a particular purpose and warranty of merchantability. iATL accepts no legal responsibility for the purpose for which the client uses test results. Any analytical work performed must be governed by our Standard Terms and Conditions. Prices, methods and detection limits may be changed without notification. Please contact your Customer Service Representative for the most current information.

This confidential report relates only to those item(s) tested and does not represent an endorsement by NIST-NVLAP, AIHA LAP LLC, or any agency of local, state or province governments nor of any agency of the U.S. government.

This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without written approval of the laboratory.

Information Pertinent to this Report:

Analysis by US EPA 600 93-116: Determination of Asbestos in Bulk Building Materials by Polarized Light Microscopy (PLM).

Certifications:

NIST-NVLAP No. 101165-0• NYSDOH-ELAP No. 11021• AIHA-LAP, LLC No. 100188•

Quantification at <0.25% by volume is possible with this method. (PC) Indicates Stratified Point Count Method performed. (PC-Trace) means that asbestos was detected but is not quantifiable under the Point Counting regimen. PC Trace represents a <0.25% amount. Analysis includes all distinct separable layers in accordance with EPA 600 Method. If not reported or otherwise noted, layer is either not present or the client has specifically requested that it not be analyzed (ex. analyze until positive instructions). Small asbestos fibers may be missed by PLM due to resolution limitations of the optical microscope. Therefore, PLM is not consistently reliable in detecting asbestos in non-friable organically bound (NOB) materials. Quantitative transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is currently the only method that can pronounce materials as non-asbestos containing.

Analytical Methodology Alternatives: Your initial request for analysis may not have accounted for recent advances in regulatory requirements or advances in technology that are routinely used in similar situations for other qualified projects. You may have the option to explore additional analysis for further information. Below are a few options, listed as the matrix followed by the appropriate methodology. Also included are links to more information on our website.

Bulk Building Materials that are Non-Friable Organically Bound (NOB) by Gravimetric Reduction techniques employing PLM and TEM: ELAP 198.6 (PLM-NOB), ELAP 198.4 (TEM-NOB)

Loose Fill Vermiculite Insulation, Attic Insulation, Zonolite (copyright), etc.: US EPA 600 R-4/004 (multi-tiered analytical process)

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim 9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

2/28/2019Report Date:

Report No.: 584163 - PLM Project: FL103-Rattlesnake Point - USARC Project No.: 631004314

Page 2 of 4Dated : 3/1/2019 3:33:11

Sprayed On Insulation/Fireproofing with Vermiculite (SOF-V): ELAP 198.8 (PLM-SOF-V)

Soil, sludge, sediment, aggregate, and like materials analyzed for asbestos or other elongated mineral particles (ex. erionite, etc.): ASTM D7521, CARB 435, and other options available

Asbestos in Surface Dust according to one of ASTM's Methods (very dependent on sampling collection technique – by TEM): ASTM D 5755, D5756, or D6480

Various other asbestos matrices (air, water, etc.) and analytical methods are available.

Disclaimers / Qualifiers:

There may be some samples in this project that have a "NOTE:" associated with a sample result. We use added disclaimers or qualifiers to inform the client about something that requires further explanation. Here is a list with highlighted disclaimers that may be pertinent to this project. For a full explanation of these and other disclaimers, please inquire at customerservice@iatl.com.

1) Note: No mastic provided for analysis.

2) Note: Insufficient mastic provided for analysis.

3) Note: Insufficient material provided for analysis.

4) Note: Insufficient sample provided for QC reanalysis.

5) Note: Different material than indicated on Sample Log / Description.

6) Note: Sample not submitted.

7) Note: Attached to asbestos containing material.

8) Note: Received wet.

9) Note: Possible surface contamination.

10) Note: Not building material. 1% threshold may not apply.

11) Note: Recommend TEM-NOB analysis as per EPA recommendations.

12) Note: Asbestos detected but not quantifiable.

13) Note: Multiple identical samples submitted, only one analyzed.

14) Note: Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116. Point Counting detection limit at 0.080%.

15) Note: Analyzed by EPA 600/R-93/116. Point Counting detection limit at 0.125%.

16) Note: This sample contains >10% vermiculite mineral. See Appendix for Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis.

Recommendations for Vermiculite Analysis:

Several analytical protocols exist for the analysis of asbestos in vermiculite. These analytical approaches vary depending upon the nature of the vermiculite mineral being tested (e.g. un-processed gange, homogeneous exfoliated books of mica, or mixed mineral composites).Please contact your client representative for pricing and turnaround time options available.

iATL recommends initial testing using the EPA 600/R-93/116 method. This method is specifically designed for the analysis of asbestos in bulk building materials. It provides an acceptable starting point for primary screening of vermiculite for possible asbestos.

Results from this testing may be inconclusive. EPA suggests proceeding to a multi-tiered analysis involving wet separation techniques in conjunction with PLM and TEM gravimetric analysis (EPA 600/R-04/004).

For New York State customers, NYSDOH requires disclaimers and qualifiers for various vermiculite containing samples that direct analysis via ELAP198.6 and ELAP198.8 for samples that contain >10% vermiculite mineral where ELAP198.6 may be used to evaluate the asbestos content of the material. However, any test result using ELAP198.6 will be reported with the following disclaimer: “ELAP198.6 method does not remove vermiculite and may underestimate the level of asbestos present in a sample containing >10% vermiculite.”

Further information on this method and other vermiculite and asbestos issues can be found at the following: Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) www.atsdr.cdc.gov, United States Geological Survey (USGS) www.minerals.usgs.gov/minerals/, US EPA www.epa.gov/asbestos. The USEPA also has an informative brochure "Current Best Practices for Vermiculite Attic Insulation" EPA 747F03001 May 2003, that may assist the health and remediation professional.

The following is a summary of the analytical process outlines in the EPA 600/R-04/004 Method:

1)Analytical Step/Method: Initial Screening by PLM, EPA 600R-93/116 Requirements/Comments: Minimum of 0.1 g of sample. ~0.25% LOQ for most samples.

2)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample. Analysis of "Sinks" only.

9000 Commerce Parkway Suite B Mt. Laurel, New Jersey 08054

Telephone: 856-231-9449 Email: customerservice@iatl.com

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS

Client: Aptim 9143 Phillips Highway, Suite 400 Jacksonville FL 32256

2/28/2019Report Date:

Report No.: 584163 - PLM Project: FL103-Rattlesnake Point - USARC Project No.: 631004314

Page 3 of 4Dated : 3/1/2019 3:33:11

3)Analytical Step/Method:Wet Separation by PLM Gravimetric Technique, EPA R-04/004 Requirements/Comments: Minimum 50g** of dry sample.