18R3002vol1.PDF

Fort Gordon, Georgia

Solicitation Number

W912HN-18-R-3002

Access Control Point Volume 1 of 3: Procurement and Contracting Requirements and Specification Divisions 01 - 06

PN 70677

February 2018

U.S. ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SAVANNAH

CORPS OF ENGINEERS

100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVENUE

SAVANNAH, GEORGIA 31401-3640

US Army Corps of Engineers Savannah District

Access Cont r ol Poi nt 18R3002 Ft . Gor don, GA

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS

DI VI SI ON 01 - GENERAL REQUI REMENTS

01 11 00 SUMMARY OF WORK

01 14 00 WORK RESTRI CTI ONS

01 20 00. 00 20 PRI CE AND PAYMENT PROCEDURES

01 30 00 ADMI NI STRATI VE REQUI REMENTS

01 32 01. 00 10 PROJECT SCHEDULE

01 32 17. 00 20 COST- LOADED NETWORK ANALYSI S SCHEDULES ( NAS)

01 33 00 SUBMI TTAL PROCEDURES

01 33 29 SUSTAI NABI LI TY REPORTI NG

01 35 26 GOVERNMENTAL SAFETY REQUI REMENTS

01 42 00 SOURCES FOR REFERENCE PUBLI CATI ONS

01 45 00. 00 10 QUALI TY CONTROL

01 45 35 SPECI AL I NSPECTI ONS

01 50 00 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTI ON FACI LI TI ES AND CONTROLS

01 57 19 TEMPORARY ENVI RONMENTAL CONTROLS

01 74 19 CONSTRUCTI ON AND DEMOLI TI ON WASTE MANAGEMENT

01 75 00. 00 40 STARTI NG AND ADJUSTI NG

01 78 00 CLOSEOUT SUBMI TTALS

01 78 23 OPERATI ON AND MAI NTENANCE DATA

01 91 00. 15 TOTAL BUI LDI NG COMMI SSI ONI NG

DI VI SI ON 03 - CONCRETE

03 30 00 CAST- I N- PLACE CONCRETE

03 45 34 PRECAST REI NFORCED CONCRETE THREE SI DED CULVERT

DI VI SI ON 04 - MASONRY

04 20 00 UNI T MASONRY

DI VI SI ON 05 - METALS

05 12 00 STRUCTURAL STEEL

05 21 00 STEEL JOI ST FRAMI NG

05 30 00 STEEL DECKS

05 40 00 COLD- FORMED METAL FRAMI NG

05 50 13 MI SCELLANEOUS METAL FABRI CATI ONS

DI VI SI ON 06 - WOOD, PLASTI CS, AND COMPOSI TES

06 06 60 TRANSLUCENT RESI N PANEL SYSTEM

06 10 00 ROUGH CARPENTRY

06 20 00 FI NI SH CARPENTRY

06 41 16. 00 10 PLASTI C- LAMI NATE- CLAD ARCHI TECTURAL CABI NETS

06 61 16 SOLI D SURFACI NG FABRI CATI ONS

DI VI SI ON 07 - THERMAL AND MOI STURE PROTECTI ON

07 21 13 BOARD AND BLOCK I NSULATI ON

07 21 16 MI NERAL FI BER BLANKET I NSULATI ON

07 27 10. 00 10 BUI LDI NG AI R BARRI ER SYSTEM

07 27 26 FLUI D- APPLI ED MEMBRANE AI R BARRI ERS

07 61 14. 00 20 STEEL STANDI NG SEAM ROOFI NG

07 84 00 FIRESTOPPING

07 92 00 JOI NT SEALANTS

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 1

DI VI SI ON 08 - OPENI NGS

08 11 13 STEEL DOORS AND FRAMES

08 11 16 ALUMI NUM DOORS AND FRAMES

08 34 02 BULLET- RESI STANT COMPONENTS

08 44 00 CURTAI N WALL AND GLAZED ASSEMBLI ES

08 71 00 DOOR HARDWARE

08 81 00 GLAZING

08 91 00 METAL WALL LOUVERS

DI VI SI ON 09 - FI NI SHES

09 22 00 SUPPORTS FOR GYPSUM BOARD

09 26 00 VENEER PLASTER

09 29 00 GYPSUM BOARD

09 30 10 CERAMI C, QUARRY, AND GLASS TI LI NG

09 51 00 ACOUSTI CAL CEI LI NGS

09 65 00 RESI LI ENT FLOORI NG

09 68 00 CARPETING

09 90 00 PAI NTS AND COATI NGS

DI VI SI ON 10 - SPECI ALTI ES

10 14 00. 10 EXTERI OR SI GNAGE

10 14 00. 20 I NTERI OR SI GNAGE

10 14 53 TRAFFI C SI GNAGE

10 26 00 WALL AND DOOR PROTECTI ON

10 28 13 TOI LET ACCESSORI ES

10 44 16 FI RE EXTI NGUI SHERS

DI VI SI ON 12 - FURNI SHI NGS

12 21 00 WI NDOW BLI NDS

12 36 00 COUNTERTOPS

12 48 13 ENTRANCE FLOOR MATS AND FRAMES

DI VI SI ON 13 - SPECI AL CONSTRUCTI ON

13 34 23. 16 PREFABRI CATED CONTROL BOOTHS

13 34 23. 17 PREFABRI CATED METAL SHELTERS

DI VI SI ON 21 - FI RE SUPPRESSI ON

21 22 00. 00 40 CLEAN AGENT FI RE EXTI NGUI SHI NG SYSTEMS

DI VI SI ON 22 - PLUMBI NG

22 00 00 PLUMBI NG, GENERAL PURPOSE

22 07 19. 00 40 PLUMBI NG PI PI NG I NSULATI ON

DI VI SI ON 23 - HEATI NG, VENTI LATI NG, AND AI R CONDI TI ONI NG ( HVAC)

23 00 00 AI R SUPPLY, DI STRI BUTI ON, VENTI LATI ON, AND EXHAUST SYSTEMS

23 05 93 TESTI NG, ADJUSTI NG, AND BALANCI NG FOR HVAC

23 07 00 THERMAL I NSULATI ON FOR MECHANI CAL SYSTEMS

23 09 23. 13 20 BACnet DI RECT DI GI TAL CONTROL SYSTEMS FOR HVAC

23 23 00 REFRI GERANT PI PI NG

23 82 02. 00 10 UNI TARY HEATI NG AND COOLI NG EQUI PMENT

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 2

DI VI SI ON 25 - I NTEGRATED AUTOMATI ON

25 05 11 CYBERSECURI TY FOR FACI LI TY- RELATED CONTROL SYSTEMS

DI VI SI ON 26 - ELECTRI CAL

26 00 00. 00 20 BASI C ELECTRI CAL MATERI ALS AND METHODS

26 05 00. 00 40 COMMON WORK RESULTS FOR ELECTRI CAL

26 05 19. 10 10 I NSULATED WI RE AND CABLE

26 05 71. 00 40 LOW VOLTAGE OVERCURRENT PROTECTI VE DEVI CES

26 08 00 APPARATUS I NSPECTI ON AND TESTI NG

26 09 23. 00 40 LI GHTI NG CONTROL DEVI CES

26 20 00 I NTERI OR DI STRI BUTI ON SYSTEM

26 28 21. 00 40 AUTOMATI C TRANSFER SWI TCHES

26 32 15. 00 10 DI ESEL- GENERATOR SET STATI ONARY 100- 2500 KW, WI TH

AUXILIARIES

26 33 53. 00 20 UNI NTERRUPTI BLE POWER SUPPLY ( UPS)

26 41 00 LI GHTNI NG PROTECTI ON SYSTEM

26 51 00 I NTERI OR LI GHTI NG

26 56 00 EXTERI OR LI GHTI NG

DI VI SI ON 27 - COMMUNI CATI ONS

27 10 00 BUI LDI NG TELECOMMUNI CATI ONS CABLI NG SYSTEM

27 51 16 RADI O AND PUBLI C ADDRESS SYSTEMS

DI VI SI ON 28 - ELECTRONI C SAFETY AND SECURI TY

28 31 76 I NTERI OR FI RE ALARM AND MASS NOTI FI CATI ON SYSTEM

DI VI SI ON 31 - EARTHWORK

31 00 00 EARTHWORK

31 11 00 CLEARI NG AND GRUBBI NG

31 32 11 SOI L SURFACE EROSI ON CONTROL

31 62 16. 16 STEEL H- PI LES

DI VI SI ON 32 - EXTERI OR I MPROVEMENTS

32 01 19 FI ELD MOLDED SEALANTS FOR SEALI NG JOI NTS I N RI GI D

PAVEMENTS

32 05 33 LANDSCAPE ESTABLI SHMENT

32 11 16 BASE COURSE FOR RI GI D PAVI NG

32 11 23 AGGREGATE BASE COURSE

32 12 10 BI TUMI NOUS TACK AND PRI ME COATS

32 12 16 HOT- MI X ASPHALT ( HMA) FOR ROADS

32 13 13. 06 PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT FOR ROADS AND SI TE

FACILITIES

32 17 23 PAVEMENT MARKI NGS

32 31 10 BI ORETENTI ON FACI LI TI ES

32 31 13. 53 HI GH- SECURI TY CHAI N LI NK FENCES AND GATES

32 92 19 SEEDING

32 92 23 SODDING

32 93 00 EXTERI OR PLANTS

DI VI SI ON 33 - UTI LI TI ES

33 05 23 TRENCHLESS UTI LI TY I NSTALLATI ON

33 11 00 WATER UTI LI TY DI STRI BUTI ON PI PI NG

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 3

33 30 00 SANI TARY SEWERS

33 40 00 STORM DRAI NAGE UTI LI TI ES

33 82 00 TELECOMMUNI CATI ONS OUTSI DE PLANT ( OSP)

DI VI SI ON 34 - TRANSPORTATI ON

34 00 00 PASSI VE VEHI CLE BARRI ERS

34 71 13. 16 VEHI CLE CRASH BARRI ERS

34 71 13. 19 CRASH RATED ACTI VE VEHI CLE BARRI ERS AND CONTROLS

34 72 00. 00 CABLE- BASED PASSI VE VEHI CLE BARRI ERS

33 82 00 TELECOMMUNI CATI ONS OUTSI DE PLANT ( OSP)

APPENDICES

Appendi x A SOI L SURVEY Appendi x B GEOTECHNI CAL REPORT

- - End of Pr oj ect Tabl e of Cont ent s - -

PROJECT TABLE OF CONTENTS Page 4

Access Control Point (ACP), Richmond County, Ft. Gordon, GA. PN 70677

Contractual POC: Julie M. Oliver 912/652-5899, or julie.m.oliver@usace.army.mil .

Technical POC: Steven A. Hill 912/652-5163, or steven.a.hill@usace.army.mil .

A. This acquisition w ill be aw arded utilizing a Low est Priced Technically Acceptable (LPTA) Source Selection Process in accordance w ith

FAR 15.101-2.

B. This solicitation is being solicited on an Unrestricted basis as full and open competition, but contains a HUBZone Price Evaluation Preference.

C. The North American Industry Classif ication Code (NAICS) is 236220.

D.The proposal of the successful Offeror shall be incorporated by reference upon aw ard of the contract.

E. IAW DFARS 236.204 Disclosure of Magnitude of Construction Projects, the disclosure of magnitude is betw een $25M and $100M.

JULIE M OLIVER (912) 652-5899

NOTE: In sealed bid solicitations "offer" and "offeror" mean "bid" and "bidder".

10. THE GOVERNMENT REQUIRES PERFORMANCE OF THE WORK DESCRIBED IN THESE DOCUMENTS

NEGOTIATED

26-Feb-2018

(RFP)

(IFB)

X

CALL:

B. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code) (NO COLLECT CALLS)

2. TYPE OF SOLICITATION

SEALED BID

3. DATE ISSUED

9. FOR INFORMATION A. NAME

SOLICITATION

NSN 7540-01-155-3212 1442-101 STANDARD FORM 1442 (REV. 4-85)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.236-1(e)

11. The Contractor shall begin performance w ithin _______10 calendar days and complete it w ithin ________730 calendar days after receiving aw ard, X notice to proceed. This performance period is X mandatory, negotiable. (See _________________________

12 A. THE CONTRACTOR MUST FURNISH ANY REQUIRED PERFORMANCE AND PAYMENT BONDS?

(If "YES," indicate within how many calendar days after award in Item 12B.)

X YES NO

13. ADDITIONAL SOLICITATION REQUIREMENTS:

A. Sealed offers in original and __________0 copies to perform the w ork required are due at the place specified in Item 8 by ___________ local time ______________11 Jun 2018 (date). If this is a sealed bid solicitation, offers must be publicly opened at that time.

shall be marked to show the offeror's name and address, the solicitation number, and the date and time offers are due.

B. An offer guarantee X is, is not required.

C. All offers are subject to the (1) w ork requirements, and (2) other provisions and clauses incorporated in the solicitation in full text or by reference.

D. Offers providing less than _______120 calendar days for Government acceptance after the date offers are due w ill not be considered and w ill be rejected.

SOLICITATION, OFFER,

AND AWARD

(Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

1. SOLICITATION NO.

IMPORTANT - The "offer" section on the reverse must be fully completed by offeror.

4. CONTRACT NO.

7. ISSUED BY CODE

USACE - SAVANNAH DISTRICT

100 W. OGLETHORPE AVE

SAVANNAH GA 31401

W912HN

PAGE OF PAGES

1 OF

CODE W912HN

(Title, identifying no., date):

12B. CALENDAR DAYS

02:00 PM (hour) Sealed envelopes containing offers

US ARMY ENGINEER DISTRICT, SAVANNAH

100 WEST OGLETHORPE AVE.

SAVANNAH GA 31401-3640

5. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQUEST NO. 6. PROJECT NO.

8. ADDRESS OFFER TO (If Other Than Item 7)

FAX:TEL: TEL: FAX:

W912HN18R3002 66

20B. SIGNATURE

(REV. 4-85)STANDARD FORM 1442 BACK

TO SIGN

NSN 7540-01-155-3212

SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD (Continued) (Construction, Alteration, or Repair)

CODE FACILITY CODE

17. The offeror agrees to perform the w ork required at the prices specif ied below in strict accordance w ith the terms of this solicitation, if this offer is accepted by the Government in w riting w ithin ________ calendar days after the date offers are due.

the minimum requirements stated in Item 13D. Failure to insert any number means the offeror accepts the minimum in Item 13D.)

AMOUNTS SEE SCHEDULE OF PRICES

18. The offeror agrees to furnish any required performance and payment bonds.

19. ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF AMENDMENTS

(The offeror acknowledges receipt of amendments to the solicitation -- give number and date of each)

AMENDMENT NO.

DATE

20A. NAME AND TITLE OF PERSON AUTHORIZED TO SIGN

OFFER (Type or print)

AWARD (To be completed by Government)

21. ITEMS ACCEPTED:

22. AMOUNT 23. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA

24. SUBMIT INVOICES TO ADDRESS SHOWN IN ITEM

(4 copies unless otherwise specified)

CODE

(Insert any number equal to or greater than

20C. OFFER DATE

25. OTHER THAN FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION PURSUANT TO

10 U.S.C. 2304(c) 41 U.S.C. 253(c)

CODE27. PAYMENT WILL BE MADE BY:26. ADMINISTERED BY

(Include ZIP Code)14. NAME AND ADDRESS OF OFFEROR 15. TELEPHONE NO. (Include area code)

See Item 14

(Include only if different than Item 14)16. REMITTANCE ADDRESS

30B. SIGNATURE

29. AWARD (Contractor is not required to sign this document.)

document and return _______ copies to issuing office.) Contractor agrees Your of f er on this solicitation, is hereby accepted as to the items listed. This award con-to f urnish and deliv er all items or perf orm all work, requisitions identif ied summates the contract, which consists of (a) the Gov ernment solicitation and on this f orm and any continuation sheets f or the consideration stated in this y our of f er, and (b) this contract award. No f urther contractual document is contract. The rights and obligations of the parties to this contract shall be necessary .

gov erned by (a) this contract award, (b) the solicitation, and (c) the clauses, representations, certif ications, and specif ications or incorporated by ref er-ence in or attached to this contract.

30A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTOR OR PERSON AUTHORIZED 31A. NAME OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

30C. DATE

(Type or print)

TEL: EMAIL:

31B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 31C. AWARD DATE

BY

CONTRACTING OFFICER WILL COMPLETE ITEM 28 OR 29 AS APPLICABLE

(Contractor is required to sign this28. NEGOTIATED AGREEMENT

(M ust be fully completed by offeror)OFFER

W912HN18R3002

Section 00 01 15 - List of Drawing Sheets

WAGE DETERMINATION

Applies to CLIN 0001:

General Decision Number: GA180287 01/05/2018 GA287 Superseded General Decision Number: GA20170287 State: Georgia Construction Type: Highway County: Richmond County in Georgia.

http://www.wdol.gov/dba.aspx

Applies to CLINs 0002-0005:

General Decision Number: GA180165 05/04/2018 GA165 Superseded General Decision Number: GA20170165 State: Georgia Construction Type: Building County: Richmond County in Georgia.

http://www.wdol.gov/dba.aspx

TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION CHANGES: The revised Sections listed below (revised by Amendment No. 0006) are hereby added to and made a part of the solicitation. Revised or added information is underlined and deleted information is struck out. Revisions can be located in the appropriate volume of specifications by searching for an asterisk and amendment number (i.e., *1).

Revised Sections 31 00 00

CONTRACT DRAWINGS – File No. 141-13-01:

Volume 1:

Sheets G-005 and G-005A with Revision 1 dated 23 May 2018 are hereby added to and made a part of the Contract Drawings. Sheet CT3000 with Revision 2 dated 23 May 2018 is hereby added to and made a part of the Contract Drawings.

Volume 2:

Sheets G-005, G-005A, CU101, CU115, CU122, CU123, CU124, CU126, CU127, CE001, CE004, CE100A, CE100B, CE100C, LP101, LP102, LP103, and LP501 with Revision 1 dated 23 May 2018 are hereby added to and made a part of the Contract Drawings. Sheet C-531 with Revision 2 dated 23 May 2018 is hereby added to and made a part of the Contract Drawings. Sheets CE100D, CE100E, LP101-OP3, LP102-OP3, AND LP103-OP3 dated 23 May 2018 are hereby added to and made a part of the Contract Drawings.

Volume 3:

Sheet G-005 and G-005A with Revision 1 dated 23 May 2018 are hereby added to and made a part of the Contract Drawings.

Section 00 10 00 - Solicitation

ITEM NO SUPPLIES/SERVICES QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT

0001 1 Job Base Bid - Construction of Access Control Point. Complete from Gordon Highway to 15th Street.

FOB: Destination

NET AMT

0002 1 Job Base Bid - Construction of Access Control Point area within 5 foot line of buildings to include Visitor Control Center, Search Area Office, Gatehouse, ID Check Area Canopy, POV Search Canopy, Search Area Shelter, Guardbooths, and Overwatch Guard Booth, Complete.

0003 1 Job OPTION Option 1 - Construction ofCommunications Shelter & Backup Power, Complete.

0004 1 Job OPTION Option 2 - Construction of Truck VehicleUndercarriage Camera Unit, Complete.

0005 1 Job OPTION Option 3 - Landscaping, Complete.FOB: Destination

Total Base Bid (CLINS 0001 & 0002) ________________________________________

Total Options 1-3 (CLINS 0003-0005) ________________________________________

Total Base Bid and Options 1-3 (CLINS 0001-0005) _____________________________

Section 00 20 00 - Instructions for Procurement

SECTION 00 20 00

ADDITIONAL NOTES TO OFFERORS

1. Technical inquiries are to be submitted via Bidder Inquiry in ProjNet at:

www.projnet.org\projnet Bidder Inquiry Key: 23CR68-3HA8HQ

All questions regarding this solicitation must be submitted in writing through ProjNet no later than 10 calendar days prior to the date established for receipt of proposals as shown in this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to not respond to questions/inquiries received after this date. To submit and review bid inquiry items, offerors will need to be a current registered user or self-register in the system. To self-register, go to the web page, click bid tab, select bidder inquiry, select agency USACE, enter the key for this solicitation below, and your email address, then click login. Fill in all required information and click create user. Verify that information on next screen is correct and click continue. Offerors will receive an acknowledgement of their question(s) via email, followed by an answer to their question after it has been processed by our technical team.

2. If an Offeror believes the requirements in this solicitation contain an error, omission, or are otherwise unsound, the Offeror shall immediately notify the Contracting Officer in writing, to include supporting rationale. Such communication may be submitted to the Contracting Officer through the contracting POC identified in this solicitation.

3. Supplemental Price Breakdown. If deemed necessary to evaluate the price proposals in response to the RFP, the Government will request a price breakdown of the Contract Line items. The Government will provide details on where and how to send the breakdown. This information will not be needed sooner than three working days after the proposal submission due date. This information is not an opportunity for a firm to revise its non-price or price proposal. Price will not be rated or scored, but will be evaluated for fairness and reasonableness through the use of a price analysis. Firms are cautioned to distribute direct costs, such as material, labor equipment, subcontracts, etc., and to evenly distribute indirect costs, such as job overhead, home office overhead, bond, etc., to the appropriate contract line items. Both parties shall presume that field overhead costs through the proposed contract duration are inclusive in the offered price for the contract. If deemed necessary, the supplemental price breakdown information will be used to assist the Government in performing the price evaluations described above.

4. Quality Control System: Any contract award resulting from this solicitation will require the mandatory use of the automated Quality Control System.

5. Security Requirements: Increased security at military installations may require vehicle and personnel registration, al well as 100% ID checks and random vehicle searches.

Section 00 21 00 - Instructions

SECTION 00 21 00

PROPOSAL & BID BOND SUBMISSION:

ELECTRONIC PROPOSAL SUBMISSION IS REQUIRED THROUGH THE WEBSITE

LISTED BELOW. ELECTRONIC SUBMISSION SENT VIA EMAIL OR FACSIMILE WILL

NOT BE ACCEPTED. HAND CARRIED PROPOSAL SUBMISSION IS NOT

AUTHORIZED.

DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING PROPOSALS:

In an effort to reduce paperwork and reduce cost, all proposals shall be submitted electronically.

All submissions shall be in Adobe PDF format.

Offerors may use compressions utility software such as WinZip or PKZip to reduce file size and facilitate transmission.

Title the file(s) in the following format:

W912HN18R3002_COMPANY NAME_ VOLUME I

W912HN18R3002_COMPANY NAME_ VOLUME II

Submit proposals electronically via the AMRDEC SAFE website at:

https://safe.amrdec.army.mil/SAFE/Welcome.aspx. At the AMRDEC SAFE website select the link: I do not have a CAC or this machine is not configured to read my CAC and I would like to access SAFE as a Guest User, to register, access the site and submit your proposal(s). [Note: It has been reported that documents are more quickly uploaded into the AMRDEC SAFE website when using a Firefox web browser. The Government cannot verify that this is true and offers no guarantee that Offerors will have more success utilizing any particular browser. When your proposal is submitted via the AMRDEC SAFE website, the website will provide notification of the submittal to the Government recipients. When completing the information for transmittal at the AMRDEC SAFE website, you will be required to enter e-mail addresses for the recipients.

For this solicitation, the recipients will be the PCO and Contract Specialist. The Contract Specialist for this project is Ms. Julie M. Oliver, whose e-mail address is julie.m.oliver@usace.army.mil. The PCO for this project is Mr. Andrew K. Page, whose e-mail address is andrew.k.page@usace.army.mil. These e-mail addresses are the ones you will enter as recipients.

In addition, after uploading your documents, you will be required to verify your email address before AMRDEC will send notification to the Government recipients. This is a very important step – even if you successfully upload your proposal to AMRDEC SAFE, notification will not be sent to the Government until you verify your email address, which may result in the rejection of your proposal for lateness. Follow the instructions on the AMRDEC website and the confirmation emails you receive from AMRDEC.

Proposal Due Date and Time: See Block 13 of the SF1442

Request For Proposal No: W912HN18R3002 Title of Project: Access Control Point (ACP), Ft. Gordon, GA

The date and time of delivery will be established by the time of receipt of the e-mail notification to the Contract Specialist and PCO by the AMRDEC SAFE website, not by the date and time of uploading of the proposal into the AMRDEC SAFE website. Do not assume that electronic communication is instantaneous – in fact, it can take several minutes or even hours in some cases. Please make allowances for delays in transmittal. If an electronic submission is uploaded minutes before the deadline but notification is not actually received in the recipients’ e-mail inboxes until after the deadline, the submission will be considered late.

DIRECTIONS FOR SUBMITTING BID BOND:

In accordance with FAR Clause 52.228-1, Bid Guarantee in the solicitation, Offerors are required to submit an original bid bond in accordance with these instructions and by the time and date established for the receipt of proposals. The Bid Guarantee shall be 20% of the bid price or $3 Million, whichever is less. Bid bonds must be submitted in original form and contain original signatures. Photocopied, facsimile, scanned or otherwise mechanically reproduced bid bonds will not be accepted. Failure to submit a proper bid bond shall be cause for rejection of an Offeror’s proposal. Bid Bonds must be delivered by U.S. Mail, including U.S. Express Mail, Federal Express or United Parcel Service. All Bid Bonds must be clearly identified with the contractor’s name and address. To ensure timely and proper handling, the lower left corner of the outermost wrapper should indicate the following:

Request For Proposal No: W912HN18R3002 Title of Project: Access Control Point (ACP), Ft. Gordon, GA

Bid Bonds must be addressed to:

U.S, Army Engineer District, Savannah ATTN: CECT-SAS-E (Julie M. Oliver) 100 West Oglethorpe Avenue Savannah, Georgia 31401-3640

The date and time of delivery established by commercial carriers is not the official time of receipt by the Government. Security Guards posted at the loading dock and main entry for the building do not receive bid bonds and will contact Mailroom personnel. Once Mailroom Personnel are available, the bid bonds will be processed by the Security Guards using established security procedures and subsequently picked up by Mailroom personnel. After receipt by the Mailroom personnel, a record will be made of the receipt of the bid bonds. Completion of these actions will constitute delivery of the bid bonds by the date and time designated for receipt.

Offerors that use U.S. Mail or U.S. Express Mail must allow sufficient time for the bid bonds to be received by Mailroom personnel by the time specified. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the bid bonds to be processed for receipt and are cautioned that sufficient time may be as much as 24 hours prior to the date and time designated. The Government will not be responsible for bid bonds delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated.

Offerors are responsible for ensuring that bid bonds are submitted so as to reach the office designated for receipt. Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the bid bonds to be physically received and processed by Mailroom personnel in accordance with the information provided.

The Government will not be responsible for proposals delivered to any location or to anyone other than those designated to receive proposals on its behalf. Offerors are responsible for ensuring that proposals are submitted so as to reach the designated recipient of proposals.

Offerors are responsible for allowing sufficient time for the proposal to be received in accordance with the instructions provided.

SECTION 00 21 00

SECTION V

PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS AND INSTRUCTIONS

1. OVERVIEW.

1.1 This Request for Proposal (RFP) solicits for the construction of an Access Control Point (ACP) at Fort Gordon, GA. This will be a Firm-Fixed Price (FFP) contract.

1.2 The purpose of the Source Selection Plan is to establish a uniform evaluation procedure for the technical evaluation of proposals by the Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB) and the development of the Best Value Decision by the Contracting Officer (KO) using the Lowest Price Technically Acceptable Source Selection Process (See Federal Acquisition Regulation 15.101- 2.)

2. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS

2.1 Who May Submit a Proposal. The requirement will be advertised for full and open competition; any legally organized firm may submit a proposal. Offerors submitting as a joint venture must provide the agreement forming the joint venture.

2.2 Notwithstanding the specific requirements of any other area of the RFP, information submitted about any company other than the Offeror, whether a predecessor company, affiliated company, subsidiary (including wholly owned subsidiaries), or subcontractors WILL NOT be evaluated for any factor. Information about firms that are part of a joint venture will be considered when the joint venture is the Offeror.

2.3 Offerors shall submit their proposal to the address shown Proposal and Bid Bond

Submission Instructions in Section 00 21 00.

3. GENERAL PROPOSAL FORMAT:

3.1 Title Page. Include the title of the solicitation, solicitation number, Offeror name, and date of the submittal.

3.2 Table of Contents. Each volume of the proposal shall contain a detailed table of contents.

Any materials submitted but not required by this solicitation (such as company brochures) shall be relegated to appendices.

3.3 Electronic Submissions.

3.3.1 Written material shall be on 8 ½ x 11 inch paper size, using no smaller than a 10 pitch or 10 font. Page limitations, where specified in the RFP, shall be considered a maximum. Pages in excess of any specified limitation shall not be evaluated.

3.3.2 Offerors SHALL submit an electronic version (PDF Format) of the original Volume I and Volume II. Offerors SHALL submit only two files in PDF format (i.e. Volume I and Volume II). These two files should be named in a specific format: Solicitation Number, Offeror’s Company name and the volume (i.e. W912HN-18-R-3002 USACE_Volume_I.pdf). Given the limited time and resources of the evaluation board, failure to provide proposal in the correct format may hinder the board's ability to evaluate the Offeror's proposal.

3.4 Tabs. Proposal shall be organized and tabbed as follows:

VOLUME I Price/Representations/Certifications TAB A – Standard Form 1442, completed and signed by authorized individual(s) of the Offeror.

Offers submitted in the name of a Joint Venture must be signed in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the joint venture agreement as evidenced in the proposal.

TAB B – Section 00 10 00 – Proposal Pricing Schedule

TAB C - Section 00 45 00– Representations and Certifications

TAB D – Proposal Data Sheet – See Attachment 1 provided at the end of this section.

Offerors should ensure telephone number; fax number, e-mail address and DUNS number are all included. The DUNS number provided will be used to access Past Performance Information Retrieval System (PPIRS) data. Offerors should also provide any other assigned number that identifies them in the PPIRS database. If a separate DUNS has been created for a joint venture, it must be submitted. The Offeror should also submit its Tax ID number on the proposal data sheet.

TAB E – Bid Bond – See Clause 52.228-13 and any other notes, for required bond information.

The Offeror is required to submit a bid bond. Photocopied or electronically scanned bid bonds are not acceptable and may lead to the rejection of the proposal as non-responsive. Bidders shall use the most recent form.

TAB F – Financial Information (the last three years financial statements, Annual Reports, Dun and Bradstreet ratings and/or number, etc.) Provide a list of all current contracts held, total dollar value, award date, anticipated completion, performance and payment bond amount. The Offeror shall also provide a Subcontracting Plan in accordance with FAR Clause 52.219-9, Small Business Subcontracting Plan.

TAB G – Joint Venture Agreement, if applicable. See paragraph 2.1

VOLUME II Technical Submittal TAB H – Past Performance Questionnaires Summary Sheet (Attachment 2) and Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 3). These forms will be used for both FACTOR 1 Corporate Relevant Specialized Experience and FACTOR 2 Past Performance.

4. FACTOR 1 – CORPORATE RELEVANT SPECIALIZED EXPERIENCE

4.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS:

4.1.1 Using the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet (Attachment 2) and the Past Performance Questionnaires (PPQ) (Attachment 3), the Offeror shall demonstrate experience on projects meeting the requirements described in paragraphs below. If the Offeror is a joint venture, the projects did not have to have been performed by the joint venture submitting the offer. These project could have been performed by either company in the joint venture. Offerors are advised to submit projects wherein the Offeror, or proposed joint venture members, were the prime contractor and played a significant role and to clearly define those roles. If any Offeror has multiple functions or divisions, limit the project examples to those performed by the division or unit submitting the offer. Ensure that the PPQs and continuation sheet, if used, submitted for this Factor clearly describe the relevant characteristics of the project.

4.1.2 Offerors shall submit a minimum of three (3) projects and a maximum of five (5) recent, relevant projects. If an Offeror submits more than five (5) total project examples, only the first five (5) will be evaluated. The projects submitted for consideration in Factor 1 shall be the same projects submitted for evaluation in Factor 2.

4.1.3 Recent, relevant projects:

4.1.3.1 New vertical construction of any of the following facilities: barracks, headquarters/ operational facilities, warehouses, maintenance facilities, company operations facilities, hangars, administrative/office buildings, training/classroom buildings, dining facilities, hospitals, churches, daycare centers or schools. New horizontal construction of any of the following facilities: Access Control Points, roadways, airfields, airstrips or airfield aprons. A minimum contract value of $10 million and successfully completed, or fully designed and at least 50%construction progress completed within six (6) years preceding the date of this solicitation. The Government will not consider multiple projects, such as individual task orders, combined to meet the minimum contract value.

4.1.4 The project description on the PPQ shall clearly describe the projects. The Government will not assume any project characteristics that are not specifically identified and described.

The Offeror may attach a continuation sheet to the PPQ if needed consisting of one (1) page to describe how the project contained the elements described above and meets the requirements of this factor. The submission must contain sufficient information for the government to determine whether the project meets the requirements of 4.1.3.1.

4.1.5 The PPQ must provide a Point of Contact for the Client. If the Government is unable to verify the information provided on the PPQs with the client Point of Contact, or by other sources available (e.g. CPARS), the Government reserves the right to disregard that project when evaluating the Offeror’s experience.

4.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

4.2.1 The Offeror’s submission will be evaluated to determine whether the Offeror has experience performing recent, relevant projects. To meet the minimum requirements for this Factor:

A minimum of three (3) projects must meet the requirements of paragraph 4.1.3.1.

4.2.2 Rating Methodology for Factor 1. Factor 1 will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions:

ACCEPTABLE - Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation.

UNACCEPTABLE – Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

5. FACTOR 2 – PAST PERFORMANCE

5.1 SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS

5.1.1 The Offeror shall demonstrate a record of performance on each project submitted for Factor 1. The information submitted through the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet (Attachment 2) and the Past Performance Questionnaire (PPQ) (Attachment 3) for Factor 1 will be evaluated for this factor. The PPQ is provided for the Offeror to submit to the client (Point of Contact) for each project the Offeror includes in its proposal. Offeror must ensure correct phone numbers and email addresses are provided for the client Point of Contact.

If the Government is unable to verify the information provided on the PPQs with the client Point of Contact, or by other sources available (e.g. CPARS), the Government reserves the right to disregard that project when evaluating the Offeror’s past performance and experience.

Completed PPQs must be submitted with your proposal by the specified closing date and time. Offerors should follow-up with clients/references to ensure timely submittal of questionnaires. While it is important to submit a PPQ signed by the client, if the Offeror is unable to obtain a completed PPQ from a point of contact for a project(s) before proposal closing date, the Offeror shall complete blocks 1 – 5 of the PPQ which will contain contract and client information and submit it with the proposal. The Government will call and confirm information provided by the Offeror on the PPQs with the points of contact, to the extent necessary to verify the information in the PPQ or to obtain additional information. The Government reserves the right to interview other individuals if the point of contact is not available. If the Government is unable to verify the information in the PPQ, it may be disregarded. Offerors are cautioned that the PPQ must contain sufficient information for the government to determine whether the project contains the elements of work similar to this requirement as described in Factor 1. One

(1) additional page may be used for each PPQ if needed to include this information as stated in Factor 1.

Project Information submitted in a format other than or in lieu of the PPQ (to include CCASS or CPARS) will not be considered. CCASS or CPARS will be obtained by the Government for the projects submitted. Offerors shall not incorporate by reference into the proposal, PPQs previously submitted for other RFPs. However, this does not preclude the Government from utilizing previously submitted PPQ information in the past performance evaluation. The Government will consider any available CCASS or CPARS information on the relevant projects submitted. In addition, the Government may consider available past performance information on projects not submitted by Offerors’ in response to this solicitation.

5.1.2 Using PPQs as described above, Offerors shall demonstrate the quality of performance information on projects determined by the government to be recent and relevant from Factor 1.

5.1.3 While the Government may elect to consider data from other sources, the offeror must provide detailed, current, accurate and complete past performance information for evaluation by the Government.

5.2 EVALUATION CRITERIA

5.2.1 Past Performance Evaluation. The past performance evaluation results in an assessment of the probability that the Offeror will meet the solicitation requirements. The past performance evaluation considers each Offeror’s demonstrated record of performance on recent and relevant projects that involve a similar scope and magnitude of effort and complexities as this solicitation requires. The projects submitted for Factor 1 will be evaluated to assess the Government’s confidence in the ability of the Offeror to meet the solicitation requirements.

5.2.2 Performance Evaluation. The Government will evaluate the quality of the Offeror’s past performance using the sources available to it including but not limited to the projects identified by the Offeror and submitted on the PPQs and any additional information about those projects received from references and CPARS. The Government will consider any available CCASS or CPARS information on the relevant projects submitted by the Offeror under this factor. The Government reserves the right to determine an Offeror’s past performance to be Unacceptable if negative past performance information on relevant projects performed by the Offeror but not submitted in response to this solicitation is discovered.

5.2.3 The Government will consider past performance of the offeror and the past performance information submitted on members of a joint venture.

5.2.4 Rating Methodology for Factor 2. The Government will consider the recent and relevant past performance information to assign a past performance evaluation rating. To be rated “Acceptable” in this factor, Offerors must receive ratings of Satisfactory or better in each *Section of all recent, relevant PPQs submitted by the Offeror and on recent, relevant CPARs reviewed by the government. Section in a CPARS evaluation are Quality, Schedule, Cost Control (if applicable), Management, Utilization of Small Business, Regulatory Compliance, and Other Areas such as but not limited to Safety. The elements within each Section are not considered in determining whether an offeror is Acceptable for this factor. Projects for which an evaluation was performed under the older CCASS system, only the Overall Rating will be considered. Sections in a PPQ is the individual element within each Section. For example Quality Section is not rated however each question/statement such as a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts; b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance; c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance; d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance) is rated and will be considered individually in the evaluation of this factor. This factor will be rated using the following adjectival descriptions:

Past Performance Ratings

Rating Description

Acceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government has a reasonable expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort, or the offeror’s performance record is unknown.

Unacceptable Based on the offeror’s performance record, the Government does not have a reasonable expectation that the offeror will be able to successfully perform the required effort.

5.2.5 If no recent and relevant performance record is available or information is so sparse that no meaningful rating can be reasonably assigned, this factor will be assigned a rating of “Unknown” (FAR 15.305 (a)(2)(iv)). In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “Acceptable”.

6. EVALUATION FACTORS

6.1 NON-COST FACTORS:

FACTOR 1 Corporate Relevant Specialized Experience FACTOR 2 Past Performance

6.2 PRICE. Price analysis will be performed in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b), to determine fairness and reasonableness. Reasonableness will be established using available pricing tools such as historical price information, price competition information, or the Independent Government Estimate. Proposals will be reviewed to determine price submission errors or omissions and areas requiring clarification.

7. OVERALL PROPOSAL EVALUATION

7.1 The evaluation will be based on the content of the proposal, and any information obtained from other sources, e.g. past performance information. The SSEB will not consider any documents incorporated by reference, except as expressly allowed by this solicitation.

7.2 Each member of the SSEB will independently consider all information provided in the proposal. Once these individual analyses are completed, the SSEB will assign a consensus rating for each evaluation factor. It is the responsibility of each member of the SSEB to provide and document whether the Offeror meets or does not meet the minimum requirements in order to support the assigned rating for each factor. Comments are required for all ratings.

7.3 The Government will evaluate the proposals beginning with the lowest price to the highest price until it reaches the first responsive and responsible Offeror who achieves Acceptable ratings in both factors. That Offeror will be selected for award and the remainder of the proposals will not be evaluated.

8. EXCEPTIONS. Exceptions to the contractual terms and conditions of the solicitation (e.g., standard company terms and conditions) may result in a determination to reject a proposal.

9. RESTRICTIONS. Failure to submit all the data in the format indicated in this section may be cause for determining a proposal incomplete and, therefore, not considered for evaluation, and for subsequent award.

10. BASIS FOR AWARD

10.1 Proposals must meet the criteria stated in the RFP in order to be eligible for award, to include responsiveness, responsibility and technical acceptability. A responsibility determination will be made in accordance with Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 9.1.

10.2 In order to determine which proposal(s) represent the best value, proposals will be evaluated against all source selection criteria in this RFP.

10.3 Award will be made on the basis of the lowest evaluated price of proposals meeting or exceeding the acceptability standards for non-cost factors. In order for a proposal to be considered awardable, there must be an “acceptable” rating in all non-price factors. The Government will make award to the lowest priced Offeror who is deemed responsive and responsible and whose price has been determined fair and reasonable. Reasonableness will be established by using price analysis in accordance with FAR 15.404-1(b), to determine fairness and reasonableness. Pricing tools such as historical price information, price competition information, or the Independent Government Estimate will be used to determine reasonableness.

10.4 The Government reserves the right to reject any and all offers.

10.5 Offerors are reminded to include their best technical and price terms in their initial offer.

ATTACHMENT 1

PROPOSAL DATA SHEET

PROJECT TITLE: Access Control Point

PROJECT LOCATION: Fort Gordon, GA

1. Name of Firm:

Address:

Phone:

Fax:

E-mail:

DUNS # (used for accessing CCASS, PIPRS)

2. AUTHORIZED NEGOTIATORS. FAR 52.215-11

The Offeror represents that the following persons are authorized to negotiate on its behalf with the Government in connection with this Request for Proposals (RFP).

Name of Person Authorized to Negotiate:

Negotiator’s Address:

Negotiator’s Telephone:

Negotiator’s E-mail:

ATTACHMENT 2

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE SUMMARY SHEET

Access Control Point, Fort Gordon, GA

The Offeror’s proposal shall include the Past Performance Questionnaire Summary Sheet to provide a summary of the PPQs included in this proposal. The summary sheet shall include information for all columns.

No.

Project Name

Contractor

Contract #

Construction % Complete @ Time of Solicitation

Scheduled

Completion Date

ATTACHMENT 3

NAVFAC/USACE PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Form PPQ-0) CONTRACT INFORMATION (Contractor to complete Blocks 1-4)

1. Contractor Information Firm Name: CAGE Code:

Address: DUNs Number:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

Point of Contact: Contact Phone Number:

2. Work Performed as: Prime Contractor Sub Contractor Joint Venture

Other (Explain) Percent of project work performed:

If subcontractor, who was the prime (Name/Phone #):

3. Contract Information Contract Number:

Delivery/Task Order Number (if applicable):

Contract Type: Firm Fixed Price Cost Reimbursement Other (Please specify):

Contract Title:

Contract Location:

Award Date (mm/dd/yy):

Contract Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Actual Completion Date (mm/dd/yy):

Explain Differences:

Original Contract Price (Award Amount):

Final Contract Price (to include all modifications, if applicable):

Explain Differences:

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and 3.104

4. Project Description:

Complexity of Work: High Med _ Routine

How is this project relevant to project of submission? (Please provide details such as similar equipment, requirements, conditions, etc.)

CLIENT INFORMATION (Client to complete Blocks 5-8)

5. Client Information Name:

Title:

Organization:

Phone Number:

Email Address:

6. Describe the client’s role in the project:

7. Date Questionnaire was completed (mm/dd/yy):

8. Client’s Signature:

NOTE: USACE REQUESTS THAT THE CLIENT COMPLETES THIS

QUESTIONNAIRE AND SUBMITS DIRECTLY BACK TO THE OFFEROR. THE

OFFEROR WILL SUBMIT THE COMPLETED QUESTIONNAIRE TO USACE WITH

THEIR PROPOSAL, AND MAY DUPLICATE THIS QUESTIONNAIRE FOR FUTURE

SUBMISSION ON USACE SOLICITATIONS. CLIENTS ARE HIGHLY

ENCOURAGED TO SUBMIT QUESTIONNAIRES DIRECTLY TO THE OFFEROR.

HOWEVER, QUESTIONNAIRES MAY BE SUBMITTED DIRECTLY TO USACE.

PLEASE CONTACT THE OFFEROR FOR USACE POC INFORMATION. THE

GOVERNMENT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO VERIFY ANY AND ALL

INFORMATION ON THIS FORM.

RATING DEFINITION NOTE

(E) Exceptional Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds many to the Government/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with few minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor was highly effective.

An Exceptional rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed multiple significant events that were of benefit to the Government/Owner.

A singular benefit, however, could be of such magnitude that it alone constitutes an Exceptional rating.

Also, there should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

(VG) Very Good

Performance meets contractual requirements and exceeds some to the Government’s/Owner’s benefit. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed was accomplished with some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor were effective.

A Very Good rating is appropriate when the Contractor successfully performed a significant event that was a benefit to the Government/Owner. There should have been no significant weaknesses identified.

(S) Satisfactory Performance meets minimum contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains some minor problems for which corrective actions taken by the contractor appear or were satisfactory.

A Satisfactory rating is appropriate when there were only minor problems, or major problems that the contractor recovered from without impact to the contract.

There should have been NO significant weaknesses identified.

Per DOD policy, a fundamental principle of assigning ratings is that contractors will not be assessed a rating lower than Satisfactory solely for not performing beyond the requirements of the contract.

ADJECTIVE RATINGS AND DEFINITIONS TO BE USED TO BEST REFLECT

YOUR EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE

(M) Marginal Performance does not meet some contractual requirements. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element being assessed reflects a serious problem for which the contractor has not yet identified corrective actions.

The contractor's proposed actions appear only marginally effective or were not fully implemented.

A Marginal is appropriate when a significant event occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming which impacted the Government/Owner.

(U) Unsatisfactory

Performance does not meet most contractual requirements and recovery is not likely in a timely manner. The contractual performance of the element or sub-element contains serious problem(s) for which the contractor's corrective actions appear or were ineffective.

An Unsatisfactory rating is appropriate when multiple significant events occurred that the contractor had trouble overcoming and which impacted the Government/Owner. A singular problem, however, could be of such serious magnitude that it alone constitutes an unsatisfactory rating.

(N) Not Applicable

No information or did not apply to your contract

Rating will be neither positive nor negative.

TO BE COMPLETED BY CLIENT

PLEASE CIRCLE THE ADJECTIVE RATING WHICH BEST REFLECTS YOUR

EVALUATION OF THE CONTRACTOR’S PERFORMANCE.

1. QUALITY:

a) Quality of technical data/report preparation efforts E VG S M U N

b) Ability to meet quality standards specified for technical performance

E VG S M U N

c) Timeliness/effectiveness of contract problem resolution without extensive customer guidance

d) Adequacy/effectiveness of quality control program and adherence to contract quality assurance requirements (without adverse effect on performance)

2. SCHEDULE/TIMELINESS OF PERFORMANCE:

a) Compliance with contract delivery/completion schedules including any significant intermediate milestones. (If liquidated damages were assessed or the schedule was not met, please address below)

b) Rate the contractor’s use of available resources to accomplish tasks identified in the contract

3. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION:

a) To what extent were the end users satisfied with the project? E VG S M U N

b) Contractor was reasonable and cooperative in dealing with your staff (including the ability to successfully resolve disagreements/disputes; responsiveness to administrative reports, businesslike and communication)

c) To what extent was the contractor cooperative, businesslike, and concerned with the interests of the customer?

d) Overall customer satisfaction E VG S M U N

4. MANAGEMENT/ PERSONNEL/LABOR

a) Effectiveness of on-site management, including management of subcontractors, suppliers, materials, and/or labor force?

b) Ability to hire, apply, and retain a qualified workforce to this effort

c) Government Property Control E VG S M U N

d) Knowledge/expertise demonstrated by contractor personnel E VG S M U N

e) Utilization of Small Business concerns E VG S M U N

f) Ability to simultaneously manage multiple projects with multiple disciplines

E

VG

S

M

U

N

g) Ability to assimilate and incorporate changes in requirements and/or priority, including planning, execution and response to Government changes

h) Effectiveness of overall management…