Solicitation_-_W912GY-19-R-0003-0002.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

PLEASE REFER TO SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE.

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 20

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 16-Nov-2018

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street, County, State and Zip Code) X W912GY19R0003

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

22-Oct-2018

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Nov-2018

CODE

SIERRA ARMY DEPOT

CONTRACTING OFFICE

6501 E. 11 MILE

WARREN MI 48397-5000

W912GY 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W912GY19R0003

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION SF 30 - BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE (SF 30)

The following have been added by full text:

AMENDMENT 0002 NARRATIVE

The purpose of AMENDMENT 0002 is as follows:

1) To extend the Question & Answer (Q&A) period to 12:00 PM EASTERN STANDARD TIME on 30

NOVEMBER 2018.

2) To extend the RFP close date to 13 DECEMBER 2018 by 1:00 PM EASTERN STANDARD TIME.

3) To change the numbering on paragraph 2.2.4, Method of Submission for Unclassified Proposal, within Section L to “L.2.2.4”.

4) To change the reference contained within paragraph L.4.1.3 (j) from “L.4.1.1 (b)” to “L.4.1.2”.

5) To further clarify in paragraph L.4.1.2 (i) that minor construction projects for either the Government or U.S. non-residential buildings with a minimum contract value of $3000, that may include any or all of the following: Siding projects, asbestos abatement, concrete flatwork, exterior window installation, or rollup door installation.

SECTION 00 00 00 - PROCUREMENT AND CONTRACTING REQUIREMENTS

The following have been modified:

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

W912GY-19-R-0003

The U.S. Army Contracting Command (ACC) in Warren, MI proposes to release an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) Solicitation W912GY-19-R-0003 with a 5 year ordering period for a broad range of minor construction projects to support real property sustainment, restoration, modernization, repair and minor construction of buildings, structures and other real property at Sierra Army Depot (SIAD) in Herlong, CA. The Government intends to award up to 7 contracts to small businesses, as this is a 100% small business set-aside.

This is an estimate only. The Government reserves the right to vary the number of awards depending on the number of responsive quotations submitted. The Government also reserves the right to utilize On/Off Ramps approximately two-and-one-half (2.5) years into the MATOC ordering period to maintain an optimal mix of prime contractors.

These tasks are typical projects performed in a variety of trades including carpentry, road repair, roofing, excavation, interior electrical, exterior electrical, heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC), fire protection, telecommunications, steam fitting, plumbing, sheet metal, painting, demolition, concrete masonry and welding.

SOLICITATION FORMATTING: This solicitation utilizes a combination of both Construction Contract Format and the Uniform Contract Format. The Construction Contract Format references numerical sections and is used throughout this solicitation.

Please note that some sections will reference both the alphabetical Uniform Contract Format letter, as well as the equivalent Construction Contract Format number. This has been added to provide additional clarity as sections are referenced.

SITE VISIT: A site visit will be held on 29 OCTOBER 2018 at 9:30 AM local time, Herlong, CA. Participants will meet at Bldg. 60, Sierra Army Depot. Although not required, attendance is highly encouraged to afford offerors the opportunity to get familiarized with all aspects of this project. In order to gain access to the depot, site visit attendees must fill out and submit a Visitor Request Form either by fax (530-827-4675) or email (usarmy.sierra.tacom.mbx.pass-and-id@mail.mil). Visitor request forms must be submitted 48 hours prior to your arrival. Please refer to the Sierra Army Depot “Visitor Links” website at https://www.sierra.army.mil/visitors.html for complete instructions on gaining access to the depot. All site visit attendees are encouraged to provide notification, via email at stanley.r.biernacki.civ@mail.mil, that they will be attending.

FILL-INS: Please note this solicitation contains fill-ins, so please be careful to read and complete each clause and provision.

PRICING MATRIX (Attachment 0001): Submit your completed Attachment 0001 with your proposal. Complete Attachment 0001 in accordance with the instructions included within the attachment. Submit the attachment in Microsoft Excel format. Do NOT enter any proposed prices into Section B of the RFP.

PAST PERFORMANCE QUESTIONNAIRE (Attachment 0002):

For each contract submitted by the offeror, the offeror shall send a copy of the past performance questionnaire directly to the appropriate Procurement Contracting Officer (PCO) and/or Contracting Officer Representative (COR) or other appropriate technical and contracting individuals. The offeror shall request these individuals complete the questionnaire and forward it electronically, directly to the Government at stanley.r.biernacki.civ@mail.mil as soon as possible and PRIOR TO THE RFP CLOSING DATE (see page 5 “RFP Closing Date Narrative”) with the subject heading “PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FOR [Offeror name]”.

TYPE OF CONTRACT AND PAYMENT SCHEDULE: The task orders awarded against this IDIQ MATOC will be Firm-Fixed-Price (FFP). Each ordering period the task orders are awarded against will be 12 months long, totaling 60 months (5 years). The statement-of-work is included in this document in Section C.

INCONSISTENCIES: This Executive Summary has been prepared as an aid for potential offeror(s). We have made every attempt to accurately reflect the requirements and information contained in the balance of this solicitation. However, if you find any inconsistency between this executive summary and the solicitation, the solicitation takes precedence.

ON/OFF RAMPS: At any point during the MA IDIQ ordering period, ACC-WRN reserves the right to Off-Ramp a MA IDIQ prime contractor via Termination for the Convenience of the Government, mutual agreement between the Government and the contractor, based on a determination of non-responsibility or non-responsiveness. To maintain an optimal mix of prime contractors, ACC-WRN may conduct an Open Season approximately two-and one-half (2-1/2) years into the MA IDIQ performance period during which new contractors may be added, via On-Ramping.

QUESTION / ANSWERS: A question and answer period is available until 12:00 PM EASTERN STANDARD TIME on 30 NOVEMBER 2018. NO PHONE CALLS WILL BE

ACCEPTED FOR ANY REASON. ALL QUESTIONS SHALL BE IN WRITING.

Questions and answers will be posted publicly to the Construction at Sierra Army Depot (SIAD) webpage at the following website: https://www.fbo.gov. Questions that are received by this office after the deadline will be considered late and may not be answered. Questions regarding this solicitation should be directed to: Stanley Biernacki and MAJ Matthew M. Webb, in writing via e-mail, at stanley.r.biernacki.civ@mail.mil and matthew.m.webb.mil@mail.mil.

Exhibits – Contract Data Requirements List (CDRL): The Master CDRL list herein are any CDRLs that may be required with individual task orders completed after award of this 5 year contract.

Ordering Limitations: Per FAR Part 16.504(a)(2), the minimum order covered by this contract is $3,000.00 in exchange for CDRL A001: Safety Plan, listed under Exhibit A.

The maximum order for a single item is $6,000,000.00 or $10,000,000.00 for a combination of items. The overall contract maximum for this requirement is $84.71M.

RFP CLOSING DATE NARRATIVE

PROPOSALS FOR THIS RFP ARE DUE BY 13 DECEMBER 2018 BY 1:00 PM

EASTERN STANDARD TIME.

SECTION 00 20 00 - INSTRUCTIONS FOR PROCUREMENT

The following have been modified:

SECTIONS L&M

SECTION L - INSTRUCTIONS, CONDITIONS, AND NOTICES TO OFFERORS

L.1 General Proposal Information: This section contains general proposal submissions instructions as well as specific proposal requirements for the Sierra Army Depot Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) for a broad range of main minor construction.

L.1.1 The Offeror's proposal, subject to the Submission, Modification, Revision and Withdrawal paragraph of FAR 52.215-1, Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition, shall be submitted in the format and quantities as set forth below. All information necessary for the review and evaluation of a proposal is to be contained in the proposal volumes set forth below. Section M of the solicitation sets forth the evaluation criteria and delineates the Factors to be evaluated. The offeror's proposal, as required by this section, shall be evaluated as set forth in Section M of this solicitation. The Government will not assume the Offeror possesses any capability, understanding, or commitment not specified in its proposal. It is an Offeror's responsibility to submit a well-written proposal with adequately detailed information which clearly demonstrates an understanding of and the ability to comply with the RFP requirements to allow for a meaningful evaluation. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals.

L.1.2 Minimum Acceptance Period.

Acceptance Period means the number of calendar days available to the Government for awarding a contract from the date specified in this solicitation for receipt of offers.

L.1.2.1 In accordance with FAR 52.215-1, the Government specified minimum acceptance period is 180 calendar days.

L.1.2.2. The offeror shall clearly state in its proposal Administrative volume the acceptance period. Offerors may specify a longer acceptance period than the Government's minimum acceptance period stated above.

L.1.2.3. An offer allowing less than the Government's minimum acceptance period may be rejected.

L.2 Proposal Content, Format and Instructions

L.2.1 Proposal Content:

L.2.1.1 All proposals shall be in English (American Standard) and shall be in US dollars.

Proposals not in English or in US Dollars may be rejected. The proposal shall include all information specified and shall address all requirements outlined in Section L. The offeror's proposal shall be submitted in three separate volumes and in the quantities as set forth below. The offerors proposal shall consist of the following volumes:

Volume Number Title Quantity Volume 1 Past Performance 2 Volume 2 Price 2 Volume 3 Administrative 2

L.2.1.2 A Proposal Executive Summary or transmittal letter is optional. It will neither be considered as part of the volumes required, nor will it be evaluated. If a Proposal Executive Summary is submitted, it should be no more than five pages in length and be submitted in the Administrative Volume.

L.2.2 Proposal Format and Instructions

L.2.2.1 The proposal shall be submitted in electronic format, hardcopy proposals will not be accepted. Each volume listed above shall be submitted on a separate set of CD- ROMs or DVDs. The offeror shall submit two identical sets of CD-ROMs or DVDs for each volume. One set of media shall be labeled as the primary copy in the case of defective file(s) on the primary disc, the second copy will be utilized only to retrieve and review the defective file(s) in question. If the primary disc is entirely defective, the second copy will be used entirely. All other data on the primary disc will take precedence.

L.2.2.1.1 Each CD-ROM or DVD shall be labeled so it is easily identifiable for evaluation purposes (example: Volume II, Price Factor, Set 1 of X, CD 1 of X), and shall also include the offeror's name and the solicitation number. Each volume shall include a (i) title page, (ii) table of contents, and (iii) list of tables and figures. Each page of the proposal shall be numbered, and each paragraph of the proposal shall have a reference number. A list of all attachments and substantiating data shall be provided in the table of contents. The table of contents shall be organized as set forth below. The table of contents shall include the following information for each Factor, attachment, and for all substantiating data listed:

(a) Cross-reference to related Section L paragraph number

(b) Page number

(c) CD-ROM or DVD Volume and number

(d) File name

L.2.2.1.2 Acceptable File Formats. All electronic information provided in response to the solicitation must be provided in Microsoft (MS) Office 2013 compatible or Adobe Portable Document Format (PDF) format or except as noted in instructions for individual volumes. For files in PDF format, scanners should be set to 200 dots per inch. The proposal shall not contain citations for, or active links to live Internet sites or pages. All linked information shall be contained within the electronic proposal. Any linked information that is not contained in the proposal will not be accepted.

L.2.2.1.3 Electronic Files. The proposal electronic file name should not exceed 50 characters in length (not including the file extension). Ensure the file name does not contain any periods.

L.2.2.1.4 Unless otherwise specified, it is recommended that the proposal be formatted for 8.5 inch x 11 inch paper with a minimum font size of 10 pt. and with a minimum of

0.5 margins. Schedules, drawings and other documents more appropriate to larger size should be formatted for no larger than 8.5 inch x 14 inch dimensions.

L.2.2.1.5 Provide spreadsheets that include all formulas, function, macros, computations, or equations used to compute the proposed amounts. For each workbook, all Rows, Columns, Cells, and Worksheets are to be visible. Do not include Zero height and zero width rows and columns in Worksheets. Do not format Worksheet cells with the font color equal to the fill color. If Workbooks or Worksheets are password protected, then the passwords must be provided. Do not submit Print image files or pictures or files containing only values. Failure to provide fully functional excel spreadsheets in the proposal may result in the proposal being rejected (See Section M.2.1 (a)).

L.2.2.1.6 The Offeror shall make every effort to ensure that the proposal is virus-free.

Proposals (or portions thereof) submitted which indicate the presence of a virus, or which are otherwise rendered unreadable by damage in electronic transit, shall be treated as "unreadable" as described in FAR 15.207(c).

L.2.2.2 Submission Due Date The offeror must ensure its proposal, in its entirety, reaches the required destination before the date and time set for closing of the solicitation set forth in the “RFP Closing Date Narrative” on page 5 of the solicitation.

L.2.2.2.1 Lateness The lateness rules for submitted proposals are outlined in FAR 52.215-1 ", Instructions to Offerors – Competitive Acquisition," and are incorporated into this solicitation.

L.2.2.3 Proposal Submission Address Proposals shall be submitted to the address below. All proposals delivered in response to this solicitation, whether hand-carried or submitted via U.S. mail, shall be addressed as follows:

US Army Contracting Command Warren Stanley Biernacki Bid Room, Bldg 231, Mail Stop 303 Attn: W912GY-19-R-0003 SIAD MATOC

6501 East 11 Mile Road Warren, MI 48397-5000

Solicitation Number: W912GY-19-R-0003 Proposal Due Date & Time: (Refer to page 5 “RFP Closing Date Narrative”)

TO BE DELIVERED UNOPENED

(Offeror’s name)

L.2.2.4 Method of Submission for Unclassified Proposal

Proposals shall either be hand-carried or submitted via US mail. Hand-carried submissions* include proposals delivered by commercial carriers such as FedEx, UPS, or services other than the US Postal Service. Proposals must be delivered to the Detroit Arsenal (DTA) Mail Handling Facility (Building 255) between the hours of 8:00AM and 1:00PM local Warren, MI time. The package(s) will be dated and time stamped at the Mail Handling Facility and the Government will be responsible for forwarding the package(s) to the appropriate personnel. Offerors should ensure that any commercial carrier it uses has a tracking system that can provide documentation that will prove the date and time of delivery to the Government. If the proposal is hand-carried by other than a commercial carrier, the delivery person (even if an employee of the offeror) must be a US citizen, and must obtain a signed receipt, indicating date and time of delivery, from the Mail Handling Facility personnel. The delivery person must provide the receipt since the Mail Handling Facility personnel do not have them.

*Directions to DTA: From Van Dyke Avenue, travel west on East Eleven Mile road to railroad track. Immediately after crossing railroad track turn right into DTA main gate and follow security officer directions to the Mail Handling Facility (Building 255). It may be necessary for the delivery person to obtain a visitors badge prior to being allowed to enter the installation. If so, the security officer will advise the delivery person of the procedures to follow.

L.2.2.4.1 Exterior envelopes must identify the solicitation number and date specified for receipt of proposals.

L.2.2.4.2 Offerors are cautioned that approval to enter the installation must be obtained prior to the closing date and time for receipt of proposals. Due to security procedures, delays are probable at the entry point and Offerors must plan to accommodate them. It is the offerors responsibility to plan sufficient time to clear Detroit Arsenal security and ensure proposals reach the intended destination.

L.2.2.5 Proposal Modifications vs Proposal Revisions.

“Proposal modification” is a change made to a proposal before the solicitation’s closing date and time, or made in response to an amendment, or made to correct a mistake at any time before award.

“Proposal revision” is a change to a proposal made after the solicitation closing date, at the request of or as allowed by a Contracting Officer as the result of negotiations.

L.2.2.5.1 Offerors may submit proposal modifications at any time before the solicitation closing date and time, and may submit modifications in response to an amendment, or to correct a mistake at any time before award.

L.2.2.5.2 Offerors may submit proposal revisions only if requested or allowed by the Contracting Officer.

L.2.3 Single Proposal Submission: FAR 52.212-1 is tailored to remove subparagraph

(e) which does not apply to this solicitation. Offerors are limited to submitting one proposal with one approach to meeting all the requirements of this solicitation.

Proposals that contain alternative terms and conditions will be considered as taking exception to the requirements of the solicitation. See Section M.2.

L.2.4 All or None FAR 52.212-1(h) is hereby tailored for this solicitation: Offers in response to this solicitation must be submitted for all the requirements identified in the solicitation.

Offers submitted for less than all the requirements called for by this solicitation may be rejected or ineligible for award.

L.3 Organizational Conflict of Interest

L.3.1 The provisions of FAR 9.5, Organizational Conflict of Interest (OCI), apply to any award under this Request for Proposal (RFP). Potential offerors should review their current and planned participation in any other Government contracts, subcontracts, consulting, or teaming arrangements where they may be in a position of actual or perceived bias or unfair competitive advantage.

L.3.2 Offerors shall disclose any potential OCI situations to the Contracting Officer (PCO) as soon as identified including prior to proposal submission. The disclosure should include the facts and an analysis of the actual or perceived conflict and a recommended approach(s) to neutralize or mitigate the potential conflict. The preferred approach to potential conflicts is to negate/obviate the conflict. Mitigation is considered only if it is not practical to negate/obviate the conflict. The Contracting Officer will promptly respond to resolve any potential conflicts.

L.4 Evaluation Factors Offeror proposals shall address the following two Factors:

a. Past Performance

b. Price

L.4.1 Volume I – Past Performance Factor

For the Past Performance Factor, provide information for a total of up to two (2) Recent and Relevant Contracts, only one (1) contract shall be for (i) Minor construction projects, performed by the offeror as the prime contractor. These may include foreign, federal, state, local and private industry contracts. The burden of providing thorough and complete past performance information remains with the offeror. It is the offeror's responsibility to submit detailed and complete information so the Government may evaluate its Past Performance volume. The Government does not assume the duty to search for data to cure problems it finds in proposals. While the Government may elect to consider data obtained from internal and external sources other than the proposal, the burden to provide thorough and complete past performance information rests with the offeror. The below instructions are provided to advise offerors as to the information required by the Government to assess the contractor’s Recent and Relevant past performance. Since this information constitutes a basis of the Government's review, it is imperative that the offeror present its past performance in a clear and complete manner.

Failure to provide the information requested under paragraph L.4.1.3 and L.4.1.4 (if applicable) below may result in an assessment that the offeror does not possess a record of Recent and Relevant past performance.

For the purpose of this volume, a Contract shall be defined as a written instrument that meets the following conditions: i) the instrument required the offeror to perform a distinct effort, and ii) the instrument’s statement of work demonstrates only work actually performed and without the use of an additional written instrument(s) to execute the effort. By their nature, stand-alone instruments such as Indefinite Delivery (FAR 16.501-1), Basic Ordering Agreement (BOA), Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA), and Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) type agreements are considered broader instruments that demonstrate work that COULD be performed, and generally do not demonstrate any actual work performed. Therefore, these stand-alone broader instruments generally do not meet this definition of a Contract, and thus would not be considered to meet the definition of a Contract. However the Government may consider, and rely upon a broader instrument's statement of work/defined requirements in the evaluation, in the event it is needed assess the comparability of the work actually performed under an associated task or delivery order that is determined to be a Contract. Examples of a Contract may include, but are not limited to:

(i) a single task or delivery order which meets the conditions above, that was placed under a broader instrument;

(ii) a single work directive or similar instrument (e.g. technical instruction) which meets the conditions, above that was placed under a broader instrument;

(iii) a definite quantity contract (Government or private industry) which meets the conditions above.

L.4.1.1 Recent Contracts are those performed within six (6) years of the date of issuance of this RFP.

L.4.1.2 Relevant Past Performance will consider the extent to which the submitted contract efforts are relevant to the statement of work paragraph 4.1 work areas and are comparable in scope and magnitude of effort and complexity to the following statement of work requirements:

i. Minor construction projects for either the Government or U.S. non-residential buildings with a minimum contract value of $3,000, that may include any or all of the following:

Siding projects, asbestos abatement, concrete flatwork, exterior window installation, or rollup door installation; and

ii. Installation or repair flooring project for a U.S. Non-residential building of 60,000 square feet or greater; or

iii. Installation or repair roofing project for a U.S. Non-residential building of 60,000 square feet or greater.

L.4.1.3 Contract Information: For each of the recent and relevant contracts submitted under L.4.1.2 above, provide the following information:

(a) Contractor name and address who performed the contract

(b) Contract Number (and delivery/task order number if applicable);

(c) Contract Type;

(d) Total Value of the Contract (beginning & ending value);

(e) Delivery or Performance Schedule;

(f) Government or private industry contracting activity address, telephone number and e-mail;

(g) Procuring Contracting Officers (PCO) and/or Contract Specialist’s name, or point of contact for private industry entity responsible for signing or administering the contract, telephone number and e-mail;

(h) Government (DCMA) or private industry administrative contracting officer (ACO), contracting officers representative (COR), performance certifier, and/or quality assurance representative (QAR), name, telephone number and email;

(i) Specify the Government or Contractor Point of Contact(s) for which the Questionnaire sent, and provide the date(s) it was sent.

(j) A description of past contract scope of work requirements and a discussion of the similarities between the cited contract scope to each of the statement of work requirements identified above in L.4.1.2 that the offeror believes is relevant. In its description, the offeror should specify the location in the proposal (to include filename or document reference with page and paragraph of the past contract information) that substantiates the relevance;

(k) Contract period of performance;

(l) For each of the contracts listed, provide a brief self-assessment of contract performance. The self-assessment must address performance to meet Technical and Schedule requirements;

(m) Copies of the Statements of Work from each of the submitted contracts to establish the relevance of the contract to the scope of work activities listed in L.4.1.2 above. The offeror shall provide drawings and any other information that can substantiate the square footage of the project.

L.4.1.4 Associated Entity, Predecessor Company, and Joint Venture. Only Contracts performed by the named offeror will be considered unless the Contract was performed by an associated entity, a predecessor company, or if the offeror is a joint venture.

i. Associated Entity. The Government may consider the past performance of an associated entity if the offeror successfully demonstrates meaningful involvement by the associated entity in the proposed effort.

a. An associated entity may include a parent company, separate corporate division within the same parent company, subsidiary company, a legally affiliated company, etc. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains the offeror’s relationship to the associated entity. The offeror shall support the narrative with legal documentation, including but not limited to corporate papers, establishing the legal nexus between the offeror and the associated entity.

b. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains the meaningful involvement the associated entity will provide to the proposed effort. Evidence of meaningful involvement may include a description of the associated entity’s resources, such as its workforce, facilities, and/or other resources that will be provided or relied upon in the proposed effort. A Contract will not be considered unless the offeror successfully establishes meaningful involvement by the associated entity in the proposed effort.

ii. Predecessor Company. The Government may consider the past performance of a predecessor company if the offeror demonstrates the experience of the predecessor company is reasonably predictive of the offeror’s performance under the proposed effort.

a. A predecessor company may include a company which was acquired by the offeror or merged with the offeror. It may also include other instances where the predecessor company was reorganized, restructured, or otherwise altered. A predecessor company does not include an entity which remains separate and distinct from the offeror. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains the offeror’s relationship to the predecessor company. The offeror shall support the narrative with documentation evidencing the offeror’s status as the successor company.

b. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains why the predecessor’s past performance is predictive of the offeror’s performance under the proposed effort. Evidence may include, but is not limited to, continuity of operations such as the continued employment of the predecessor’s employees and the transfer of assets including buildings, furnishings, and fixtures.

iii. Individual Partners of a Joint Venture. If the offeror is a Joint Venture, the Government may consider past performance of each partner of the Joint Venture and any work performed by the Joint Venture itself previously. The offeror must successfully demonstrate meaningful involvement by the partner to the proposed effort.

a. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that discloses the individual partners of the Joint Venture and shall provide documentation evidencing the Joint Venture.

b. The offeror shall provide to the Government a narrative that explains the meaningful involvement the Joint Venture partner will provide to the proposed effort. Evidence of meaningful involvement may include a description of the partner’s resources, such as its workforce, facilities, and/or other resources that will be provided or relied upon in the proposed effort. A contract will not be considered unless the offeror successfully establishes meaningful involvement by the partner in the proposed effort.

L.4.1.3.4 Past Performance Questionnaire. A past performance questionnaire is provided in Attachment 0002. For each contract submitted by the offeror, the offeror shall send a copy of the past performance questionnaire directly to the appropriate PCO and/or COR or other appropriate technical and contracting individuals. The offeror shall request that these individuals complete the questionnaire and forward it electronically directly to the Government at stanley.r.biernacki.civ@mail.mil as soon as possible and prior to the RFP closing date (See page 5 “RFP Closing Date Narrative”) with the subject heading “PAST PERFORMANCE INFORMATION FOR [Offeror name}.

L.4.2 Volume II –Price Factor

In accordance with FAR 15.403-5(a)(1), certified cost or pricing data is not required for initial proposal submission. However, after initial proposal submission, the Government reserves the right to request certified cost or pricing data in accordance with DFARS 252.215-7008. In the event certified cost or pricing data is required, the offeror may submit a written request for exception based on the applicable clauses contained herein.

In accordance with the DFARS 252.215-7010 Alt. I, for its initial proposal submission, the offeror shall provide the data other than certified cost or pricing data outlined below to permit a determination that the proposed price is reasonable.

L.4.2.1 Proposal Structure: The Price factor volume includes data to support the reasonableness of the proposed price. Offerors may submit any other additional cost, price, and financial information it considers to be helpful in the Government's evaluation of its price proposal.

L.4.2.1.1 Proposed prices are to be stated in United States (U.S.) dollars only.

L.4.2.2 The Price factor volume includes the following:

L.4.2.2.1 Attachment 0001 – Pricing Matrix/Worksheet:

Submit your completed Attachment 0001 - Pricing Worksheet with your proposal.

Complete the attachment in accordance with the instructions included within the attachment. Submit the attachment in Microsoft Excel format. Do not enter any proposed prices into Section B of the RFP.

L.4.2.2.1.1 Labor Hours: Within Attachment 0001 – Pricing Worksheet, for evaluation purposes only the Government has provided estimated labor hours for each labor category for each period (Ordering Years 1 through 5). Assume that the estimated labor hours will be evenly spread across the months of that performance period.

L.4.2.2.1.2 Labor Rates. Within Attachment 0001 – Pricing Worksheet, propose direct labor ($ per hour), fringe ($ per hour), other indirect labor costs ($ per hour), and profit ($ per hour). Attachment 0001 – Pricing Worksheet will then use these proposed inputs to calculate the fully burdened hourly ceiling labor rate and total extended price for each labor category for each period (Ordering Years 1 through 5).

L.4.2.2.1.3 Direct Material: For evaluation purposes only, the Government has provided an estimated cost for direct material within Attachment 0001 – Pricing Worksheet. Do not alter or modify the estimated cost for direct material provided by the Government.

Within Attachment 0001 – Pricing Worksheet, the offeror shall propose a ceiling indirect rate (to include costs such as material handling, material overhead, G&A) and a ceiling profit rate. Attachment 0001 – Pricing Worksheet will then apply these proposed rates to the Government provided direct material cost to develop a total material price.

L.4.2.2.2 Provide a narrative explaining the basis for the proposed direct and indirect labor rates, specifically identifying its profit rate and any escalation factors used.

L.4.2.2.3 For labor categories subject to the Davis Bacon Act, the Government has provided the Wage Determination Number and occupational code within Attachment 0001 – Pricing Worksheet, Tabs “OP 1” through “OP 5”. For those labor categories subject to the Davis Bacon Act (that have a Wage Determination Number and occupational code identified), the offeror is required to propose direct labor rates and fringe at or above the rates contained within the prevailing wage determination for each locality. For the purpose of evaluation only, assume the DBA wages will remain constant for the Base Period and all Option Periods.

To identify the prevailing Davis Bacon Act wage determinations for each locality, go to the website https://wdol.gov/ and search for DBA WD number CA9

L.4.2.2.4 Identification of Uncompensated Overtime: If applicable, provide the information required in FAR 52.237-10 -- Identification of Uncompensated Overtime, to include a copy of its policy addressing uncompensated overtime. In accordance with FAR 37.115-2(a), the use of uncompensated overtime is not encouraged.

L.4.2.3 In addition to the above information, the Government reserves the right to request additional or more detailed price breakdown data to support its determination of price reasonableness.

L.5 VOLUME III: Administrative. In addition to the evaluation factor volumes above, provide the following information:

L.5.1 Signature Actions/offeror Fill-Ins. A scanned image of a signed copy of theSF1442, both pages 1 and 2 with a signature in block 20B on page 2, a copy of all completed fill-ins for Sections A through K, and (if applicable) a signed copy of all Amendments to the solicitation. System for Award Management (SAM) certifications need not be separately submitted; however, all offerors must be successfully registered and valid in SAM prior to award.

L.5.1.1 Where certifications and approved systems are required for an offeror, if the proposal is being submitted by a Joint Venture, certifications and approved systems for the principals (partners) of the joint venture will be considered as valid for that offeror providing the necessary documentation from all principals (partners) is provided with the proposal.

L.5.1.2 Joint Venture (JV): To be recognized as a JV and eligible for award, the membership arrangements of the JV must be identified and the company relationships fully disclosed in the offeror's proposal IAW FAR 9.603. A copy of the agreement establishing the JV must contain the signatures of all of the members comprising the

JV.

L.5.2 The offeror’s proposal acceptance period in terms of calendar days from the date for receipt of offers specified in the RFP. (See Section L.1.2)

L.5.3 Statement of Acknowledgement. A statement specifying the extent of agreement with all terms, conditions, and provisions of the RFP, and a statement of agreement to furnish and deliver the items or perform services set forth in the RFP in consideration for offeror’s proposed price(s) set opposite each item. Any exceptions taken to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents may be grounds for the Contracting Officer to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process (Reference M.2.1).

L.5.4 Assumptions. The offeror shall consolidate and identify all offeror's generated "assumptions" contained anywhere in the proposal. Also, the offeror shall include a statement that none of the "assumptions" contradict or take exception to any terms, conditions, or requirements of the solicitation. Any exceptions taken to the attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or other solicitation terms, conditions, or documents may be grounds for the Contracting Officer to reject the proposal from further consideration in the source selection process (Reference M.2.1).

M.1 BASIS FOR AWARD

M.1.1 GENERAL The Government plans to award an Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Firm Fixed Price (FFP) type contract for this Sierra Army Depot (SIAD), Multi-Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) as a result of this solicitation. The Government reserves the right to choose not to award a contract if such action is in the Government’s best interest.

M.1.1.1 There are two evaluation factors:

a. Past Performance Factor

b. Price Factor

The relative order of importance of these Factors are described in Section M.4 below.

M.1.1.2 It is the Governments intent to award up to 7 contracts. Award will be made using the Trade Off source selection process IAW FAR 15.101-1, which states award will be made to other than the lowest priced offeror or other than the highest technically rated offeror that is eligible for award. The Government will follow the source selection process set forth in Section M.3 below.

M.1.1.3 Award without Discussions: In accordance with FAR 52.215-1(f), the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without discussions with offerors (this excludes clarifications as described in FAR 15.306(a)). Therefore, the offerors initial proposal should contain the offerors best terms from a price and technical standpoint. The Government reserves the right to conduct discussions if the Contracting Officer later determines them to be necessary. If discussions are held, they will be conducted with all offerors included in the competitive range.

M.1.2 Eligibility for Award. Award will only be made to an offeror who is eligible for award. To be eligible for award:

a. The offeror must be registered in System for Award Management (SAM) (see provision 52.204-7); and

b. The offeror must be determined responsible (See Section M.3.5); and

c. The proposal must not contain a Deficiency(s) (per FAR Part 15.001)

M.1.2 Importance of Price. Award will be made to the Offeror whose proposal (1) is eligible for award under M.1.1.3, and (2) represents the best value to the Government.

This may not be the Offeror with the lowest evaluated Price Factor. However, the closer the Offeror's evaluations are to each other in those Factors other than the Price Factor, the more important the Price Factor becomes in the decision. Notwithstanding the relative order of importance of the two evaluation Factors stated herein, price may be controlling when:

(a) Proposals are otherwise considered approximately equal in non-price factors; or

(b) The advantages of a higher rated, higher priced proposal are not considered to be worth the price premium.

M.2 REJECTION OF OFFERS

M.2.1 The Government may reject any proposal if doing so is in the Government's best interest at any time after receipt of proposals. Examples include, but are not limited to, the following proposal conditions:

(a) The proposal fails to meaningfully respond to the Proposal Preparation Instructions specified in Section L of this solicitation. Examples of failure to meaningfully respond include: or

(1) When a proposal merely offers to perform work according to the RFP terms or fails to present more than a statement indicating its capability to comply with the RFP terms and does not provide support and elaboration as specified in Section L of this solicitation.

(2) A proposal fails to provide any of the data and information required in Section L.

(3) A proposal merely repeats the contract statement of work without elaboration.

b. When an offeror’s proposal offers a product or service that does not meet all stated material requirements of the solicitation; or

c. The proposal proposes exceptions to the solicitation requirements, attachments, exhibits, enclosures, or solicitation terms and conditions; or

d. The proposal contains one or more OCIs that cannot be avoided or mitigated. Refer to Section L.3 of this solicitation, "Organizational Conflict of Interest."; or

e. The proposal is unbalanced as to price. See Section M.4.2; or

f. The proposal’s acceptance period does not meet the Government’s required minimum acceptance period (Refer to Section L.1.2)

M.3 Source Selection Process.

M.3.1 Compliance Review. After receipt of proposals, but prior to the evaluation process, the Government will perform a compliance review of the offeror's proposal to determine the extent of compliance to the solicitation instructions, and whether the proposal meets any of the conditions listed in M.2, Rejection of Offerors.

M.3.2 Evaluation Process Evaluated proposals which are eligible for award will be subject to the Source Selection Trade-off process, considering both the evaluation factors and their relative order of importance as cited in Section M.4, to identify the proposal which represents the best value to the Government. The Government will weigh the evaluated proposals (other than the Price Factor) against the total evaluated price to the Government. As part of the best value determination, the relative strengths and weaknesses of each offeror's proposal shall be considered, as specified below, in addition to the other evaluation methods described below. Selection of the successful Offeror shall be made following an assessment of each proposal, based on the response to the information requested in Section L of this solicitation and against the solicitation requirements and the evaluation criteria described in Section M.

M.3.3 Source Selection Authority (SSA). The SSA is the official designated to direct the source selection process and select the Offeror for contract award.

M.3.4 Source Selection Evaluation Board (SSEB). An SSEB has been established by the Government to evaluate proposals in response to this solicitation. The SSEB is comprised of technically qualified individuals who have been selected to conduct this evaluation in accordance with the evaluation criteria for this solicitation. Careful, full and impartial consideration will be given to the evaluation of all proposals received pursuant to this solicitation.

M.3.6 Determination of Responsibility. Per FAR 9.103, the Government will place a contract only with an Offeror that the Contracting Officer determines to be responsible or refer the matter to the SBA per FAR 19.602. A prospective Offeror, in order to be eligible for award for this acquisition, must be able to demonstrate it meets the standards of responsibility set forth in FAR 9.104. As a part of this determination, the Contracting Officer may utilize the Offeror's proposed prices, as well as other information, to determine if the prospective contractor has adequate financial resources to perform the contract. The Government reserves the right to conduct a Pre-Award Survey on any or all Offeror(s) or its subcontractors to aid the Contracting Officer in the evaluation of each Offeror's proposal and ensure a selected Offeror is responsible. To verify an Offeror meets the responsibility criteria at FAR 9.104, the Government reserves the right to request additional information, to include, but not limited to the following:

(a) Arrange a visit to the Offeror(s) plant and perform a necessary Pre-Award Survey; or

(b) Request an Offeror provide financial, technical, production, or managerial background information. If an Offeror does not submit the requested information within seven working days from the date of the receipt of the request, or if an Offeror refuses to provide the Government access to its facility, the Government may determine the Offeror to be non-responsible. If the Government visits the Offeror's facility, the Offeror shall ensure current data relevant to the proposal is available for Government personnel to review.

M.4 Evaluation Factors. The Government will assess each Offeror in 2factors: (1) Past Performance; (2) Price.

a. Factor 1: Past Performance (M.4.1)

b. Factor 2: Price (M.4.2)

The relative order of importance is Past Performance is significantly more important than Price. As required to be defined by FAR 15.304(e), the non-cost/price factors, when combined, are significantly more important than cost/price.

M.4.1. Volume I Past Performance

M.4.1.1 The Government will assess the Past Performance Factor to establish a Confidence Assessment Rating for each offeror. The Confidence Assessment Rating assigned will be based on the offeror’s Recent and Relevant performance record and the expectation that the offeror will successfully perform the required effort listed in L.4.1.2. The Government assessment will give a greater weight to the past performance of minor Government construction projects than U.S. Non-residential construction projects as defined in L.4.1.2.

M.4.1.2 Contracts submitted in the Past Performance Factor volume of the offeror's proposal will not be considered if the Government determines them to be not Recent, not Relevant, or lacking any credible past performance information. Offerors without a record of Recent and Relevant past performance information upon which to base a meaningful confidence assessment will be rated as "Neutral Confidence", which is neither favorable nor unfavorable.

M.4.1.3 The Government may contact any of the references the offeror provides, may utilize internal or external sources regarding past contract performance information, and reserves the right to use any information received as part of its evaluation.

M.4.1.4 Past performance which is identified in the offeror’s Past Performance Factor volume but is not supported with the information requested in Section L may be determined not Relevant.

M.4.2 Volume II Price

M.4.2.1 The Price factor evaluation will consider the total evaluated price to the Government. The total evaluated price is calculated on the “Summary” worksheet within Attachment 0001 – Pricing Matrix. The assessment of the total evaluated price will include consideration of the reasonableness of the proposed price.

M.4.2.2 The Government will evaluate whether or not the Offeror’s proposed price is reasonable. A price is reasonable if, in its nature and amount, it does not exceed that which would be incurred by a prudent person in the conduct of competitive business.

The Government may make a determination of reasonableness…