Attachment_0002_-_Past_Performance_Questionnaire.DOC

SUBJECT: Past Performance Questionnaire for Solicitation W912GY-19-R-0003, Army Contracting Command – Warren for Sierra Army Depot

1. GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS:

This information, when filled in, shall be treated as Source Selection Sensitive in accordance with FAR 3.104-3 and shall not be disclosed to anyone outside the Government Source Selection Team.

Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward it either (1) by electronic mail to: stanley.r.biernacki.civ@mail.mil or (2) return it directly to the Government at the following address:

OUTSIDE ENVELOPE:

United States Army Contracting Command – Warren

6501 East 11 Mile Road

Warren, MI 48397-5000

Exclusively for:

Stanley Biernacki

Mail Stop 330

INNER ENVELOPE:

RFP W912GY-19-R-0003

PAST PERFORMANCE SOURCE

SELECTION INFORMATION

W912GY-19-R-0003

2. DESCRIPTION OF THE CURRENT SOLICITATION:

The U.S. Army Contracting Command – Warren (ACC-WRN) proposes to release an Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ), Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) Solicitation W912GY-19-R-0003 with a 5 year ordering period for a broad range of minor construction projects to support real property sustainment, restoration, modernization, repair and minor construction of buildings, structures and other real property at Sierra Army Depot (SIAD) in Herlong, CA. These tasks are typical projects performed in a variety of trades including carpentry, road repair, roofing, excavation, interior electrical, exterior electrical, heating, ventilating, and air conditioning (HVAC), fire protection, telecommunications, steam fitting, plumbing, sheet metal, painting, demolition, concrete masonry and welding.

3. Instructions on Completing Questionnaire:

Offerors interested in proposing on this effort have been requested to send the provided Past Performance Questionnaire to the appropriate point(s) of contact on past and present contracts, which the offeror deems relevant to this effort as defined in Section L. In this regard, the United States Army is conducting a past performance assessment in anticipation of a possible contract award.

We are requesting your assistance in completing this questionnaire so that we may evaluate the offerors in the area of past performance. This questionnaire has been developed for ease of electronic completion. Please provide your comments regarding the overall assessment of the contractor’s performance on the contract identified. Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. If a question on the questionnaire is not applicable, please so indicate.

SUSPENSE: Please complete and submit the questionnaire as soon as possible, but no later than the Request for Proposal (RFP) closing date (See RFP Closing Date Narrative on page 5 of the solicitation.) Thank you in advance for your assistance in making this a Best Value Procurement.

//s//

PROCURING CONTRACTING OFFICER

Past Performance Assessment Questionnaire

Please provide your candid response to the following questions. The information that you provide will be used in the awarding of federal contracts. Therefore it is important that your information be as factual and accurate as possible. If you do not have the appropriate knowledge with the company in question, please forward this questionnaire to the person who does. Upon completion of this questionnaire, please forward by electronic email to POC at stanley.r.biernacki.civ@mail.mil by NOVEMBER 21, 2018 AT 1:00 PM EASTERN STANDARD TIME. Thank you for your assistance.

PART I - IDENTIFICATION (To be completed by the Offeror)

A. RELEVANT CONTRACT

Contractor/Company Name/Division:

Address:

Program Identification/Title:

Contract/Task Order Number:

Prime Contractor Name (if different from the contractor name cited above):

Contract Award Date:

Contract Period of Performance End Date:

Forecasted or Actual Contract Completion:

Brief Description of the Relevant Contract Scope:

B. OFFEROR’S REPRESENTATIVE

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

FAX Number:

Address:

E-mail Address:

PART II - EVALUATION (To be completed by Point of Contact – Respondent)

RATING SCALE & DEFINITIONS

Table 1 identifies the rating scale and descriptions. Please apply the rating that most closely matches your assessment for each area of consideration listed below. Please include a written narrative for each rating applied, utilizing the adjectival rating definition in Table 1.

Table 1

1. Effectiveness of Program Management (to include subcontractors):

How effective was the Offeror in managing construction projects and sub-contractors at multiple sites simultaneously. (Examples of minor construction projects could include: siding projects, asbestos abatement, concrete flatwork, exterior window installation, or rollup door installation.)

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

2. Quality in Roofing:

Assess the Contractor’s attention to detail and quality of a roofing project, 60,000 square feet of greater. For example, in the months following the completion of a roofing installation were there instances where flat roof installations were not level, resulting in low spots and improper draining, or additional issues related to the roof installation.

Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. delays by the customer/end user, changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor (e.g. unusually severe weather or default of a subcontractor beyond the control of both the Contractor and subcontractor).

3. Schedule:

a. How effective was the Contractor at reacting to unforeseen issues (for example: dry rot when removing, re-installing siding or installing floors in unheated buildings) and being able to correct the issue and staying on schedule.

Exceptional Very Good

Satisfactory Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments:

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor.

b. To what extent was the Contractor able to continue to meet construction timelines during months of inclement weather (rain / snow / high winds).

Exceptional

Very Good

Satisfactory

Marginal

Unsatisfactory

Too soon to tell

Not Applicable

Comments: FORMTEXT

For any adverse issues give your assessment of the extent to which the contractor was at fault (e.g. mostly attributable to contractor, evenly attributable to contractor and customer/end user, only some somewhat attributable to contractor) and your assessment of the extent to which customer/end user was at fault (e.g. delays by the customer/end user, changes to the specification requirements, unrealistic or ambiguous specification requirements, etc.) or other factors beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the contractor (e.g. unusually severe weather or default of a subcontractor beyond the control of both the Contractor and subcontractor).

4. General Comments.

Any additional information, which your organization deems relevant or important, will be welcome by our evaluation team. Please provide any other relevant or important performance information.

Comments:

PART III - RESPONDENT IDENTIFICATION

Please provide a point of contact who compiled or completed this questionnaire and who, if needed, may be contacted by our evaluation team regarding the information provided in this questionnaire.

Organization:

Name:

Title:

Date:

Telephone Number:

Address:

Fax Number:

E-mail Address:

DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

UNITED STATES ARMY CONTRACTING COMMAND-WARREN

6501 EAST 11 MILE ROAD

WARREN, MICHIGAN 48397-5000

Once Filled In, this document is considered

Source Selection Information – See FAR 2.101 and FAR 3.104