Questions and Answers Part 1.xlsx
XLSX spreadsheet 17 KB Posted
- Solicitation number
- W912DO26QA002
About this file
This is a Questions and Answers document for Solicitation W912D026QA002 regarding a prefabricated M320 Range ROCA Tower building for Fort Wainwright, Alaska. The document contains clarifications and responses to offeror inquiries submitted during the solicitation period, addressing technical requirements, specifications, delivery conditions, and compliance questions relevant to the quotation submission process.
The Q&A file serves as an official amendment to the solicitation, providing critical guidance to potential small business offerors on interpretation of the Statement of Work, technical standards, and submission requirements. These clarifications are binding and incorporated into the evaluation criteria, ensuring all bidders operate under consistent understanding of government expectations for the prefabricated tower building delivery to Fort Wainwright, Alaska 99703. Offerors are required to acknowledge receipt of all amendments, including this Q&A document, in their quotation submissions due by 27 March 2026 at 1:00 PM.
View the file
Other files
Show all 18
On GovTribe
Work with this file
- Download the original file
- Contacts named in this file
- Similar government files
- Ask GovTribe AI about this file
Text version
Sheet1
| W912D026QA002: FWA Range Tower/Buildings - Questions | |||||
| ID | SECTION | DESCRIPTION | PDF Pg. # of Pg. | Answer | |
| 1 | SOLICITATION | ||||
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, paragraph 2 | This section states: |
Provide all necessary technical data, including comprehensive and clearly labeled detailed drawings, to demonstrate a full understanding of the requirements for the Prefabricated Fire Training Tower. Offers must include complete and thorough technical specifications sufficient for the Government to evaluate and determine technical acceptability.
Any submission that is incomplete or lacks adequate technical detail may be deemed technically unacceptable and removed from further consideration.
Question:
Please explicitly state what information must be submitted to meet all criteria of the technical section. 34 of 66 Be able to provide supportive documentation on past performance that you have done some similar jobs.
| 2 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #3 | This section states: |
In accordance with the requirement of 52.212-1(b)(10) the offeror shall submit recent and relevant past performance information same or similar items and other references to include a minimum of: Program Title, Brief scope description as Prime or Subcontractor, Contracting Agency or Customer, Contract Number Contract Type (i.e. FFP), Period of Performance, Contract Value Amount, Quality of Service.
Question:
Please share the maximum number of relevant projects offerors are to submit to provide an adequate illustration of the offeror’s experience. 34 of 66 Be able to provide 2 or 3 jobs of similar past performance of similar dollar value between $1M-$5M
| 3 | SOLICITATION 52.212-2(a): | |
| Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services | Under 52.212-2 (a), the RFP states: |
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
i. Price
ii. Technical
iii. Past Performance Technical and Past Performance, when combined, are equal to Price.
Question:
Please state all documents that are to be included in the ii. Technical section. 35 of 66 This has been removed.
| 4 | SOLICITATION 52.212-2(a): | |
| Evaluation - Commercial Products and Commercial Services | Under 52.212-2 (a), the RFP states: |
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers:
i. Price
ii. Technical
iii. Past Performance Technical and Past Performance, when combined, are equal to Price.
Question:
Please state all documents that are to be included in the iii. Past Performance section. 35 of 66 See Question 2.
| 5 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1(4): Page Limitations | This section states: |
This page limitation is inclusive of indexes, photographs, foldouts, appendices, and attachments. If offer is provided on SF 1449 and any additional required fill-in provisions /clauses by the offeror, these will not be counted towards the 20-page limit. System for Award Management (SAM) shall follow provision stated in 52.212-1(k), submission of any and/or any SAM.Gov information is not required and will not be counted toward the 20-page limit. Any Amendments (if applicable) will not count towards the 20-page limit.
Question:
Please confirm that a proposal cover, cover letter, and table of contents are NOT included in the 20-page limit. 36 of 66 The 20 page limit will be removed from the solicitation
| 6 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #3 | This section states: |
In accordance with the requirement of 52.212-1(b)(10) the offeror shall submit recent and relevant past performance information same or similar items and other references to include a minimum of:
Program Title Brief scope description as Prime or Subcontractor Contracting Agency or Customer Contract Number Contract Type (i.e. FFP) Period of Performance Contract Value Amount Quality of Service.
Question:
Please confirm Quality of Service is referencing CPARS or PPQs, and we are to include a CPARS or PPQ for each project included in our proposal. 36 of 66 Not everyone will have access to a CPARS or PPQ I will leave that up to each vendor on submitting it.
| 7 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #4 | This section states: |
The quotation shall be limited to 20 pages, typed at 10 pitch or larger type, single spaced, and single sided, on sheets 8.5" x 11" with 1" margins. This page limitation is inclusive of indexes, photographs, foldouts, appendices, and attachments.
Question:
Please confirm whether drawings, sketches, or concept design sheets submitted as part of the technical proposal are included in the 20-page limit or may be submitted separately as attachments outside the page limitation. 36 of 66 The 20 page limit will be removed from the solicitation as there
| 8 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #1 | This section states: |
Provide all necessary technical data, including comprehensive and clearly labeled detailed drawings, to demonstrate a full understanding of the requirements for the Prefabricated Fire Training Tower. Offers must include complete and thorough technical specifications sufficient for the Government to evaluate and determine technical acceptability.
Any submission that is incomplete or lacks adequate technical detail may be deemed technically unacceptable and removed from further consideration.
Question:
Please clarify what level of design detail is expected within the proposal drawings (e.g., conceptual layout, 15% design, 30% design, etc.) for the ROC Tower and General Instruction Building. 36 of 66 The level of design detail should be conceptual layout details and with further details. It could be the drawing of the prefabricated building typ
| 9 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #1 | This section states: |
Provide all necessary technical data, including comprehensive and clearly labeled detailed drawings, to demonstrate a full understanding of the requirements for the Prefabricated Fire Training Tower. Offers must include complete and thorough technical specifications sufficient for the Government to evaluate and determine technical acceptability.
Any submission that is incomplete or lacks adequate technical detail may be deemed technically unacceptable and removed from further consideration.
Question:
Please confirm whether design calculations, engineering analysis, or structural sizing are required as part of the proposal submission, or if these items will only be required after award during the design phase. 36 of 66 After Award
| 10 | SOLICITATION 52.212-1 (a): | |
| Evaluation | This section states: |
The Government will award a contract resulting from this solicitation to the responsible offeror whose offer conforming to the solicitation will be most advantageous to the Government, price and other factors considered. The following factors shall be used to evaluate offers: Price, Technical, and Past Performance.
Question:
Please clarify whether the Technical evaluation factor will assess the proposed design approach and building configuration, or if the evaluation will be limited to verifying technical compliance with the Statement of Work requirements. 35 of 66 Proposed Design approach and Building Configuration
| 11 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #1 | This section states: |
Provide all necessary technical data, including comprehensive and clearly labeled detailed drawings, to demonstrate a full understanding of the requirements for the Prefabricated Fire Training Tower. Offers must include complete and thorough technical specifications sufficient for the Government to evaluate and determine technical acceptability.
Any submission that is incomplete or lacks adequate technical detail may be deemed technically unacceptable and removed from further consideration.
Question:
Please confirm whether the Government expects both the ROC Tower and the General Instruction Building to be illustrated in the proposal drawings, or if drawings are required only for the ROC Tower structure. 36 of 66 Both
| 12 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #2 | This section states: |
Provide all necessary technical data, including comprehensive and clearly labeled detailed drawings, to demonstrate a full understanding of the requirements for the Prefabricated Fire Training Tower. Offers must include complete and thorough technical specifications sufficient for the Government to evaluate and determine technical acceptability.
Any submission that is incomplete or lacks adequate technical detail may be deemed technically unacceptable and removed from further consideration.
Question:
Please clarify the level of detail expected for the price breakdown, and whether the Government expects pricing to be separated by design, construction, demolition options, and electrical connection option items. 36 of 66 Pricing can be by design, construction, demolition options, electrical connections or pricing can be by one design construction, demolition option as long as it is understandable
| 13 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #4 | This section states: |
Provide all necessary technical data, including comprehensive and clearly labeled detailed drawings, to demonstrate a full understanding of the requirements for the Prefabricated Fire Training Tower. Offers must include complete and thorough technical specifications sufficient for the Government to evaluate and determine technical acceptability.
Any submission that is incomplete or lacks adequate technical detail may be deemed technically unacceptable and removed from further consideration.
Question:
Please confirm whether past performance project descriptions must be included within the 20-page proposal limitation, or if they may be provided as a separate attachment. 36 of 66 The 20 page limit will be removed from the solicitation as there
| 14 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #1 | This section states: |
Provide all necessary technical data, including comprehensive and clearly labeled detailed drawings, to demonstrate a full understanding of the requirements for the Prefabricated Fire Training Tower. Offers must include complete and thorough technical specifications sufficient for the Government to evaluate and determine technical acceptability.
Any submission that is incomplete or lacks adequate technical detail may be deemed technically unacceptable and removed from further consideration.
Question:
Please confirm whether the proposal must include preliminary building elevations and floor plans, or if general layout sketches are sufficient to demonstrate technical compliance. 36 of 66 General Layout Sketches are sufficient
| 15 | SOLICITATION | |
| Addendum 1 to 52.212-1: Instructions to Offerors, #1 | This section states: |
Provide all necessary technical data, including comprehensive and clearly labeled detailed drawings, to demonstrate a full understanding of the requirements for the Prefabricated Fire Training Tower. Offers must include complete and thorough technical specifications sufficient for the Government to evaluate and determine technical acceptability.
Any submission that is incomplete or lacks adequate technical detail may be deemed technically unacceptable and removed from further consideration.
Question:
Please confirm whether the ROC Tower and General Instruction Building are required to be prefabricated structures, or if site-built structural systems are acceptable provided they meet the performance requirements of the Statement of Work. 36 of 66 either or as long as they meet the requirements of the PWS
| 16 | SOW (5.2) Period of Performance (POP) | Question: | |
| Current industry procurement lead times for prefabricated building systems are approximately 50+ weeks. Please clarify how these procurement durations are expected to be addressed within the contract performance period. | 4 of 5 | Include in your proposal the lead time |
| 17 | Contract Clauses; | |
| Addendum to Contract Clauses; | These sections state: |
FAR 52.222-41 Service Contract Labor Standards is incorporated by reference in the contract clauses, and Attachment 3 includes an SCA Wage Determination.
Question:
| Given that the scope of work requires construction of new facilities, please confirm whether the applicable labor standard for this procurement is Service Contract Labor Standards or Davis-Bacon Construction Wage Determinations. | 9 of 66 & | |
| 29 of 66 | correcting | |
| 30 | SOLICITATION | |
| Offeror Represnetations and Certifications - Commercial Products and Commercial Srevices | These sections state: |
Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Products and Commercial Services Question:
Within our proposal, where are we supposed to put the “Offeror Representations and Certifications - Commercial Products and Commercial Services"? 38 of 66 in the package
| 31 | Question: | ||
| Will the Government consider extending the proposal submission deadline by two weeks to allow offerors adequate time to incorporate responses to bidder questions into their proposals? | yes extended it to the 8 April 2026 |
32 SOLICITATION
Addendum to 52.212-1 (pg 34) and Addendum 1 to 52.212-1 (pg
| 26) | Question: | |||
| What is the difference between page 34 and 36, they appear to say the same thing except that page 36 is Addendum 1 to 52.212-1. | 34 & 36 of 66 | Same | ||
| Please verify if the two buildings slated for removal contain any hazardous materials and the quantity of those materials. i.e.-lead paint, pcbs, etc. | there is no hazardous materials inside buildings |
Please provide as-builts for the current GIB. If not please explain what kind of foundation the GIB is sitting on and the dimensions. there is no as-builts for the current GIB
It was mentioned during the site visit that the steel shed type structure was to be moved to the other side, of the parking area, next to the new GIB. What is the foundation of this building? Also, is it the intent to move this building across the parking area? There is no foundation under the building
| Please confirm a bid bond is not required with bid submission. | Yes |
| Please confirm payment & performance bonds are not required. | Yes |
| Per solicitation document “02 Solicitation_2”, the following DFARS Clauses are said to be incorporated by reference: | Self- Assessment will be sufficient |
| a. 252.204-7008 | |
| b. 252.204-7012 | |
| c. 252.204-7019 | |
| d. 252.204-7024 | |
| These clauses are complementary to, and partially representative of, what would be expected for a solicitation requiring CMMC Level 1, 2, or 3. However, no explicit mention of CMMC can be found in the solicitation. Please clarify if this solicitation is subject to the requirements of CMMC Level 1, 2, or 3. If it is, will a self-assessment be sufficient or will C3PAO certification be required |
| Statement of Work, paragraph 4.0 Task states the following: | |
| The paragraph does not mention “design”. It’s understood from other language in the SOW that contractors are to provide design. Should “design” be added to the above paragraph? | The word Design should not be added as this would FAR reference |
The Sam.gov solicitation titles the project “Prefabricated Build Fort Wainwright M320 Range ROCA Tower”. The SOW is silent on buildings being “prefabricated”. Is there any requirement that either structure be “prefabricated”? The tower can be prefaricated or built
On hxxps[://]sam[.]gov under the “Description of Requirement:” section it states Please clarify this requirement. Is the contractor expected to begin design prior to bidding on this solicitation? No but provide complete drawings per the PWS and if drawing are incomplete then it will be unacceeptable or if one drawing is missing then it will be unacceptable.
Existing General Instruction Building had a piece of presumably FRP on the wall where mops were stored. Is that desired for the new facility? No
The solicitation lists both FWA and JBER as inspection and acceptance locations and place of performance. Confirm that all work is being performed at Fort Wainwright. All work is done on Fort Wainwright
File details come from the government source that posted it. Updated .