12R0002-SPECS-AM5.PDF

Offers must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended, by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing items 8 and 15, and returning or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment your desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT 1. CONTRACT ID CODE

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 3. EFFECTIVE DATE 4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO. 5. PROJECT NO. (If applicable)

7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than Item 6) CODE

STANDARD FORM 30 (REV. 10-83)

Prescribed by GSA FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

FACILITY CODE

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION

NO.

9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

10A. MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offers is extended, is not extended.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required) copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

13. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO MODIFICATION OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

CHECK ONE A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE CONTRACT ORDER NO.

IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(b).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15C. DATE SIGNED

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

PAGE OF PAGES

6. ISSUED BY CODE

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., street, county, State and ZIP Code) (X)

CODE

15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of person authorized to sign)

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

(Signature of Contracting Officer)

NSN 7540-01-152-8070

Previous edition unusable

Design and Construct a C-5M Formal Training Unit Facility, Dover Air Force Base, Dover, Delaware

THIS AMENDMENT DOES NOT EXTEND THE PROPOSAL DUE DATE OF 31 JANUARY 2012 AT 4:00 PM.

The cut off date for Requests for Information (RFI) has past. If additional RFI's are received, they may not be addressed.

Continued on next page

US Army Engineer District, Philadelphia Wanamaker Building, 100 Penn Square East Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-3390

US Army Engineer District, Philadelphia Attn: Michelle Bertoline Wanamaker Building, 100 Penn Square East Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107-3390

W912BU-12-R-0002

01/24/2012

11/14/2011

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

Amendment No. 0005

RFP W912BU-12-R-0002

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT (continued)

a. SPECIFICATIONS:

(1) Section 00120 – PROPOSAL SUBMISSION REQUIREMENTS, EVALUATION CRITERIA AND BASIS OF AWARD: Please delete page 00120-3 in its entirety and substitute revised page 00120-3, annotated Amendment No. 0005, attached hereto.

b. Please indicate receipt of this amendment on Standard Form 1442 (SOLICITATION, OFFER, AND AWARD) as Amendment No. 0005. Failure to acknowledge all amendments may be cause for rejection of the offer.

This page was intentionally left blank for duplex printing.

Amendment No. 0005

Section 00120 Page 3

a. Minimum of 5 years experience as a construction superintendent with projects of similar scope and complexity.

Failure to satisfy a material requirement for any of the personnel listed above will be a basis for receiving an unacceptable rating.

All resumes shall include the following information to the extent required by the solicitation and are not to exceed three pages in length for each resume. Information presented beyond the three-page limitation for each resume will not be considered in the Government’s evaluation process.

a. Name of person

b. Proposed project assignment

c. Name of firm with which presently associated and or employed

d. Years of experience as it applies to the position that would be filled

e. Educational degree(s), year of graduation and institution

f. Active professional registration (if any), year first registered, if applicable List of projects in which the individual has worked to include name of project(s), project location(s), and work assignments performed

4.3. FACTOR 3 - PAST PERFORMANCE: Past performance pertains to how well an offeror has performed relevant past work that is an indicator of future performance. Past performance information is not the same as experience information. Experience information pertains to what types of work an offeror has performed.

Past performance pertains to how well an offeror performs project work. For the purpose of this evaluation, past performance means an offeror’s reputation for satisfying its customers by delivering:

a. quality work

b. in a timely manner

c. at a reasonable cost

d. in a safe working environment as well as its reputation for

e. reasonable and cooperative conduct

f. overall commitment to customer satisfaction

Offerors are reminded that while the Government may elect to consider past performance information obtained from other sources, the primary responsibility for providing past performance information rests with the offeror. In the case of an offeror without a record of relevant past performance, or for whom information on past performance is not available or so sparse that no meaningful past performance rating can be reasonably assigned, the offeror may not be evaluated favorably or unfavorably as concerns its past performance. Therefore, the offeror shall be determined to have unknown past performance. In the context of acceptability/unacceptability, “unknown” shall be considered “acceptable”. This includes the evaluation of Construction Contractor(s) and Subcontractor(s) Past Performance and Designer(s) Past Performance. There are two categories of Past Performance with this evaluation.

a. Construction Contractor(s) and Subcontractor(s) Past Performance:

(1) The Government will evaluate an offeror’s reputation for performing work in a manner commensurate with the six areas of interest listed above.

(2) This evaluation element is applicable to Construction contractors and subcontractors, where the total subcontracting efforts performed on site (involving management and/or construction efforts) equates to twenty percent or more of the on-site project work effort. An offeror should provide written evidence of the above described six past performance qualities (see items (a) through (f)) in the form of, but not limited to:

1. letters and certificates of commendation

Amendment No. 0003

Section 00120 Page 4

2. performance awards

3. performance evaluations

4. evidence of repeat work with the same clients or owners (particularly when noncompetitively obtained), etc.

(3) Offerors are encouraged to solicit and obtain letters of recommendation from past owners, customers and clients from which written documentation contemporaneous with project performance may not be available. These past performance documents should not reference work completed more than six years prior to the date of proposal submission for this solicitation. Past performance documents older than six years will not be considered in the evaluation and selection processes.

(4) If an offeror is a joint venture or partnership, information pertaining to the areas identified as

(a) through (f), above should be presented for each member of the joint venture or partnership (unless the information being presented is in regard to the joint venture or partnership as constituted in response to this solicitation). Although the Government prefers all members of a joint venture or partnership to have satisfied all the above indicated six performance areas, the Government will consider the complementary aspects of the separate participants in a joint venture or partnership, by evaluating the joint venture or partnership as a whole.

(5) Past performance information provided for a member of a joint venture or partnership having no involvement in the project will not be considered in the Government’s Past Performance factor evaluation. Past performance information will only be evaluated from firms proposed to be involved in an offeror’s approach for performance of the solicitation work.

(6) In addition to the evidence submitted by an offeror, the Government may consider information from other sources, including but not limited to: past and present customers and their current and former employees; federal, state and local agencies (including court records); private consumer organizations; and Government past performance databases. In gathering this additional past performance information, the Government will attempt to contact an offeror’s past customers and clients for which contact information is provided by the offeror in response to the portion of the factor.

b. Designer(s) Past Performance:

(1) The Government will evaluate a proposed Designer’s reputation for performing work in a manner commensurate with the six areas of interest listed above.

(2) An offeror should provide written evidence for its proposed Designers of the above described six past performance areas of interest (see (a) and (f above) in the form of, but not limited to:

1. letters and certificates of commendation, performance awards, performance evaluations

2. evidence of repeat work with the same clients or owners (particularly when noncompetitively obtained), etc.

(3) Offerors are encouraged to solicit and obtain letters of recommendation for its proposed

Designers, from past owners, and/or customers and clients from which contemporaneous written documentation may not be presently available. These past performance documents should not reference work completed more than six years from the date of the solicitation.

Past performance documents that are older than six years will not be considered in the evaluation and selection processes.

(4) In addition to the past performance documentation submitted by an offeror for its proposed