AM 0004_RFP Phase II_W9128F25R0013.pdf

AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION/MODIFICATION OF CONTRACT

Except as provided herein, all terms and conditions of the document referenced in Item 9A or 10A, as heretofore changed, remains unchanged and in full force and effect.

15A. NAME AND TITLE OF SIGNER (Type or print)

30-105-04EXCEPTION TO SF 30

APPROVED BY OIRM 11-84

STANDARD FORM 30 (Rev. 10-83) Prescribed by GSA

FAR (48 CFR) 53.243

The purpose of this Amendment is to request proposals from the 6 firms that have moved on to the Phase II Selection Process.

1. ProjNet for Phase II is: XMTEDX-HNEFBY

2. Proposals are due no later than 15 Sep 2025 by 2:00PM CST

3. Phase II Instructions are in Section: 00 22 16

1. CONTRACT ID CODE PAGE OF PAGES

J 1 5

16A. NAME AND TITLE OF CONTRACTING OFFICER (Type or print)

16C. DATE SIGNED

BY 15-Aug-2025

16B. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA15C. DATE SIGNED15B. CONTRACTOR/OFFEROR

(Signature of Contracting Officer)(Signature of person authorized to sign)

8. NAME AND ADDRESS OF CONTRACTOR (No., Street , County, State and Zip Code) X W9128F25R0013

X 9B. DATED (SEE ITEM 11)

27-Nov-2024

10B. DATED (SEE ITEM 13)

9A. AMENDMENT OF SOLICITATION NO.

11. THIS ITEM ONLY APPLIES TO AMENDMENTS OF SOLICITATIONS

X The above numbered solicitation is amended as set forth in Item 14. The hour and date specified for receipt of Offer X is extended, is not extended.

Offer must acknowledge receipt of this amendment prior to the hour and date specified in the solicitation or as amended by one of the following methods:

(a) By completing Items 8 and 15, and returning 1 copies of the amendment; (b) By acknowledging receipt of this amendment on each copy of the offer submitted;

or (c) By separate letter or telegram which includes a reference to the solicitation and amendment numbers. FAILURE OF YOUR ACKNOWLEDGMENT TO BE RECEIVED AT THE PLACE DESIGNATED FOR THE RECEIPT OF OFFERS PRIOR TO THE HOUR AND DATE SPECIFIED MAY RESULT IN

REJECTION OF YOUR OFFER. If by virtue of this amendment you desire to change an offer already submitted, such change may be made by telegram or letter, provided each telegram or letter makes reference to the solicitation and this amendment, and is received prior to the opening hour and date specified.

12. ACCOUNTING AND APPROPRIATION DATA (If required)

13. THIS ITEM APPLIES ONLY TO MODIFICATIONS OF CONTRACTS/ORDERS.

IT MODIFIES THE CONTRACT/ORDER NO. AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 14.

A. THIS CHANGE ORDER IS ISSUED PURSUANT TO: (Specify authority) THE CHANGES SET FORTH IN ITEM 14 ARE MADE IN THE

CONTRACT ORDER NO. IN ITEM 10A.

B. THE ABOVE NUMBERED CONTRACT/ORDER IS MODIFIED TO REFLECT THE ADMINISTRATIVE CHANGES (such as changes in paying office, appropriation date, etc.) SET FORTH IN ITEM 14, PURSUANT TO THE AUTHORITY OF FAR 43.103(B).

C. THIS SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT IS ENTERED INTO PURSUANT TO AUTHORITY OF:

D. OTHER (Specify type of modification and authority)

E. IMPORTANT: Contractor is not, is required to sign this document and return copies to the issuing office.

14. DESCRIPTION OF AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION (Organized by UCF section headings, including solicitation/contract subject matter where feasible.)

10A. MOD. OF CONTRACT/ORDER NO.

2. AMENDMENT/MODIFICATION NO. 5. PROJECT NO.(If applicable)

6. ISSUED BY

3. EFFECTIVE DATE

15-Aug-2025

CODE

ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

1616 CAPITOL AVENUE

OMAHA NE 68102-4901

W9128F 7. ADMINISTERED BY (If other than item 6)

4. REQUISITION/PURCHASE REQ. NO.

CODE

See Item 6

FACILITY CODECODE

EMAIL:TEL:

W9128F25R0013

SECTION SF 30 BLOCK 14 CONTINUATION PAGE

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

SECTION 00 10 00 - SOLICITATION, CONTRACT LINE ITEM NUMBER (CLIN) SCHEDULE

The required response date/time has changed from 13-Jan-2025 02:00 PM to 15-Sep-2025 02:00 PM.

SECTION 00 22 16 - SUPPLEMENTARY INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS

The following have been modified:

PHASE 2/2 SELECTION PROCEDURE

SECTION 00 22 16

PHASE 2 OF 2 PHASE SELECTION PROCEDURES

INDEX

1. BASIS FOR AWARD

2. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATION FACTORS

3. SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS

4. DEBRIEFING OFFERORS

5. EVALUATION FACTORS

5.1. VOLUME I, FACTOR 3 – RESUMES OF CORPORATE PERSONNEL

5.1.1. Evaluation Criteria

5.1.2. Technical Rating

5.2. VOLUME II, FACTOR 4 –PRICE FOR THE SAMPLE PROJECT

5.2.1. Evaluation Criteria

SECTION 00 22 16

PHASE 2 OF 2 PHASE SELECTION PROCEDURES

1. BASIS FOR AWARD

The agency will use Two-phase Design-Build Selection Procedures authorized by FAR

36.301.

In Phase 2, the Government intends to evaluate proposals and award a contract without conducting discussions with Offerors. However, in the event the Source Selection Authority

(SSA)/Procuring Contracting Officer (PCO) concludes conducting discussions is in the best interest of the Government, the Contracting Officer will establish a competitive range. If the

Contracting Officer determines that the number of proposals that would otherwise be in the competitive range exceeds the number at which an efficient competition can be conducted, the Contracting Officer may limit the number of proposals in the competitive range to the greatest number that will permit an efficient competition among the most highly rated proposals. Discussions will include issuance of evaluation notices. An Offeror initially included in the competitive range may be eliminated from consideration for award during discussions. Therefore, the Offerors initial proposal should contain the Offeror’s best terms from a price and technical standpoint.

A sample project will be used to meet price competition requirements for this SDVOSB

Multiple Award Task Order Contract (MATOC) in Phase 2.

2. RELATIVE IMPORTANCE OF EVALUATION FACTORS

Evaluation Factors are listed below in descending order of importance:

Factor 3: Resumes of Corporate Personnel (Phase 2)

Factor 4: Cost/Price for the Sample Project (Phase 2)

All Evaluation Factors other than cost or price, when combined, are significantly more important than cost or price.

3. SOURCE SELECTION PROCESS

Refer to Paragraph 1 of Section 00 21 16 PHASE 2 OF 2 SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS, Proposal Format and Submission Requirements.

4. DEBRIEFING OFFERORS

Offerors may request a debriefing in accordance with FAR 15.506 and DFARS 215.506

Postaward Debriefing of Offerors provided the Offeror has not already received a debriefing for this solicitation.

5. EVALUATION FACTORS

5.1. VOLUME I, FACTOR 3 – RESUMES OF CORPORATE PERSONNEL

5.1.1. Evaluation Criteria

The resumes for the proposed corporate personnel will be reviewed to verify that they meet the requirements specified in Section 00 21 16 Paragraph 1.4.1.

5.1.2. Technical Rating

The SSEB will use a technical acceptable/unacceptable rating system to evaluate Phase 2

– Factor 3 of the offeror’s proposal against the stated submission requirements of paragraphs 1.4.1 and 1.4.2 to determine whether the proposal is acceptable or unacceptable. The technical acceptable/unacceptable rating method will utilize the technical acceptable/unacceptable rating method listed in Table 3 below.

Table 3: Technical Acceptable/Unacceptable Rating Method

Adjectival Rating Description

Acceptable Proposal meets the requirements of the solicitation

Unacceptable Proposal does not meet the requirements of the solicitation.

5.2. VOLUME II, FACTOR 4 –PRICE FOR THE SAMPLE PROJECT

5.2.1. Evaluation Criteria

a. The total evaluated price will be the firm-fixed price proposed by the Offeror for the

Sample Project (refer to Section 00 21 16, Attachment 1).

b. The total evaluated price will not be scored or rated. Evaluation of price and analysis of the maximum binding rates will be performed using one or more of the price analysis techniques described in FAR 15.404-1(b). Cost analysis techniques described in FAR

15.404-1(c) may also be used to evaluate data other than certified cost or pricing data to determine cost reasonableness when a fair and reasonable price cannot be determined through price analysis alone. Through these techniques, the Government will determine whether the price and rates proposed by the Offeror are reasonable.

c. Award will not be made to Offerors who do not provide reasonable fully burdened rates for each the labor disciplines listed in Section 00 10 00 Table 1 (NOTE: The unburdened labor rates are for informational purposes only and are only used to assess the overall reasonableness of the fully burdened labor rates), Binding Maximum Indirect Rates listed in Section 00 10 00 Table 4, and/or a reasonable price for the Sample Project.

Because the evaluation of the price proposal will represent a portion of the total evaluation, it is possible that an Offeror may not be selected because of an unreasonable price proposal.

(End of Summary of Changes)